The affidavit has been released and is all over social media. It looks very credible and was created a day before the last presidential debate.

Bill Ackman makes a great point that if you have a presidential candidate that is willing to get the questions ahead of time and cheat in order to win the debate, why in the world would you want someone of this characterin charge of the country?

If indeed this turns out to be true, which is looking increasingly likely, consider the character of the presidential candidate that would cheat in a debate, allowing her staff to negotiate the questions in advance, the camera angles, the required fact checking of her opponent,… https://t.co/RrmYoy151N

— Bill Ackman (@BillAckman) September 15, 2024

Mailed a certified copy to self to be unopened pending investigation, and one to the speaker of Congress. Ready to testify and has recordings of the information (audible).

Heels required agreement she wouldn't be fact checked, and abc was ready for all possible Trump statements. Disgusting stuff, but par for Dems.

Let's see if anyone actually does anything, or if they get the the Clinton treatment and shoot themselves on the back.

BREAKING: ABC News Whistleblower Affidavit alleging that Kamala Harris was given an unfair advantage in her debate with Donald Trump has been released

H/T @DocNetyoutube pic.twitter.com/wleWeXSKWG

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) September 15, 2024

But does she hate Taylor Swift?

This is nothing. This is the same party that stuffed ballot box last election. You don't need to worry about anything if you ensure you get more votes.

Just as an FYI, the democrat party does not view this as cheating because the ends justify the means. They are literally trying to kill their opponent. The train isn't off the track with the democrat party it is burning in the ditch.

While extremely concerning that she got to pick what questions would not be asked (though MSM wouid never ask about Biden health or shady business dealings), this is different than the "she was given the questions" everyone assumed.


Time for Speaker Johnson to meet with this person. This needs to be dug into!



EDIT: page 3 did not pop up when I first read the tweet. It says she was provided sample questions. If the same was not done for Trump this can not be allowed to stand! It's bad enough the agreements on what not to ask, but giving questions as "samples" to just one makes it unconscionable!

Thing is...it was so unbelievably obvious, you'd have to be blind and deaf not to believe it.

Yet...it's deemed conspiracy theory by those with their heads in the sand.

Yet...it's deemed conspiracy theory by those with their heads in the sand.

So, liberals and Democrats.

Im Gipper said:

---

While extremely concerning that she got to pick what questions would not be asked (though MSM wouid never ask about Biden health or shady business dealings), this is different than the "she was given the questions" everyone assumed.


Time for Speaker Johnson to meet with this person. This needs to be dug into!

---

She didn't need the questions in advance….

They were basically as follows:

President Trump, why are you such a bad person…

Trump answers seemingly defensive… because he should be….

And then, Madame Vice-President, give us your thoughts on why Trump is such a bad person…

And she KNEW they wouldn't fact check her so she could just lie like all dem politicians do….

So she had the questions ahead of time and THOSE were the best answers that she could come up with? Wow.

How have I not heard about her brother in law accused of embezzling billions?

So she can go around claiming she's a prosecutor and I think even bring it up in the debate but is forbidding ABC to ask her about it?

The Trump shooting may push this out of the news.

If you are a journalist, your reputation is all you have. So when someone releases an affidavit which claims that you were a major player in defrauding the American people in a presidential debate, if you are not guilty as alleged, you have no choice but to immediately issue a… https://t.co/B2CjoeXAlu

— Bill Ackman (@BillAckman) September 15, 2024

In hindsight that's pretty obvious what happened

84AGEC said:

---

In hindsight that's pretty obvious what happened

---

It was obvious in real time.

jt2hunt said:

---

84AGEC said:

---

In hindsight that's pretty obvious what happened

---

It was obvious in real time.

---

This

When you know ahead of time that the moderators are not allowed to question your answers but will attack Trump for you then you can do exactly what she did: refuse to answer any questions and instead use some debunked talking points attack against Trump instead

And that's why she ultimately was considered the loser in the debate by the people of this country. People are finally seeing the biased in the mainstream media. Their credibility is shot at least for this election

Quote:

---

But does she hate Taylor Swift?

---

Retired FBI Agent said:

---

What does "the affidavit has been released" mean?

I have trouble believing it was "released" to a Twitter-user "Black Insurrectionist" alone. If someone like that has access, surely others would.

---

You have trouble believing anything negative about the Dems or positive about Trump.

Huh. I seem to remember a big argument on this forum prior to the debate that ABC was going to feed her the questions. Wonder if those that were claiming there was no evidence of collusion between ABC and the DNC will show up to this thread.

It was so obvious but I did have to rewatch to truly pick up on all of it.

Even avowed Democrats such as Mark Halperin, was immediately appalled at ABC stooping that low and said so the moment to debate ended.

And that is the reason Kamala has not had any type of bump from the debate. Too lopsided by the moderators to be able to objectively judge what happened. And that has pissed and frustrated most indy undecideds who don't know that much about Kamala.