Candace Owens decline continues…

38,804 Views | 439 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by MelvinUdall
GAC06
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to J. Walter Weatherman • 3:38p, 2/25/26
AG
J. Walter Weatherman said:
GAC06 said:
J. Walter Weatherman said:
Farmer_J said:
Rapier108 said:
Farmer_J said:
Kashchei said:
Farmer_J said:
CDUB98 said:
Every time I see this thread bumped, I looked forward to seeing what today's looney tune version of Candace is saying.


Every time I see the thread bumped, I checked to see if someone is going to make a compelling case against what Candace is saying. Or if it's just going to be ranting, raving, or posting a clip of someone else ranting and raving.


Two fallacies in one: Shifting the Burden of Proof and Appeal to Ignorance. Impressive.



No, it's just I've heard Candace's side of the story. Some of it sounds crazy. Some of it sounds plausible. What I don't hear is someone making a sound argument against it. Just ranting and raving.

Your reply is insinuating I made an accusation which I did not. Then, you argued against that. Technically, that's called a straw man.

What of her rantings is "plausible"?

The bee cult?
The Jews"
The Egyptians?
TPUSA?
Erika Kirk?
Trump?
The X-Men?
Charlie was in love with her?

The only person she hasn't blamed is the person who pulled the trigger.


I don't know pick one, and lets discuss and see where it leads



You said some of the claims "sound plausible." Which claims are you referring to?


Stand by for "hey what's wrong with asking questions"


Update, looks like we just got the "make absurd statement and then disappear when you're asked to back it up" version of Candace supporters.


I guess that's better than TVM's "She's making some good points" and when asked for examples responds with "hey I don't have time to spell it all out for you"
Reply Quote
2
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:40p, 2/25/26


Is it a "smear" when it's based in fact?

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
3
ATX_AG_08
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AGHouston11 • 4:50p, 2/25/26
AG
AGHouston11 said:
astros4545 said:
AGHouston11 said:
johnnyblaze36 said:
Bongino teeing off on her as well:



Dan Bongino- the new propaganda machine
He has zero credibility for making himself a moron over the JE events. Anytime you forget just play a collection of all his blow hard rants about about what needs to be done and what he would do about lots of things- then just watch what the guy has become. It's sad.


So he's wrong about Candace? Got it


Bongino ranted and raved about what is wrong with the FBI, Secret Service, the DOJ, the JE files, etc etc. Yet after much time was spent getting him into a position to do things he became no different than the exact BS he himself ranted about.

Now he's going to rant about another podcaster ? Yet all the stuff he used to rant about and did nothing for is fine with him - but his rage is over this ?

He is a blowhard that does what most republicans do best - rant about all the problems but then when given a chance to make a difference……. Well they become what they ranted about.

So he's looking for low hanging fruit to boost his ratings and this fits.


Yet in many places in America crime is at a 100 year low.

You ppl will always find something to b*tch about. Always be contrarian. Always be critical no matter what. Sad way to live.
Reply Quote
2
2 edits
johnnyblaze36
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:13a, 2/26/26
AG
Who would have thought Candace has already now teased a possible season 2 and a season 3 to make money off of.

If I didn't know better I'd think she's such a psycho that she is dying to be the next martyr. The only problem is nobody with a functioning brain would give a **** about her death in the way they did about Charlie Kirk's. Sad.

Reply Quote
3
johnnyblaze36
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:19a, 2/26/26
AG
Only reason for that post above is for the 4 minute heinous clip embedded of Candace talking today.

Here she is reposting later about how wonderful the Streisand Effect has been for her.

Sick and twisted BSC *****. She craves attention and she's definitely good at getting it because here I am past bedtime even posting about her but my God she makes my blood boil.

Reply Quote
Texas velvet maestro
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:14a, 2/26/26
At a nexus point of political influence, whale donors, religion, multi-millions of untaxed cash, Israel and assassination and succession, the safest bet is to accept the narrative handed to you by msm. and just nod your head. don't want to be shamed for doubting the grieving widow. never doubt a grieving widow. ever.
Follow the science.

and gee, don't want to be bat-s4!t crazy, bat-s4!t crazy, say it again. BSC.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
AgLiving06
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to johnnyblaze36 • 6:29a, 2/26/26
johnnyblaze36 said:
Who would have thought Candace has already now teased a possible season 2 and a season 3 to make money off of.

If I didn't know better I'd think she's such a psycho that she is dying to be the next martyr. The only problem is nobody with a functioning brain would give a **** about her death in the way they did about Charlie Kirk's. Sad.




Is she really going back to well after being sued by Macron?

And let's play the hypothetical out. So Charlie is now gay? And part of the conspiracy with lab kids?

Why anybody listens to her I'll never know
Reply Quote
5
Texas velvet maestro
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to johnnyblaze36 • 7:43a, 2/26/26
johnnyblaze36 said:


If I didn't know better I'd think she's such a psycho that she is dying to be the next martyr. The only problem is nobody with a functioning brain would give a **** about her death in the way they did about Charlie Kirk's. Sad.


a very balanced and level-headed opinion.
Reply Quote
1 edit
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AgLiving06 • 7:45a, 2/26/26
AgLiving06 said:

Is she really going back to well after being sued by Macron?

And let's play the hypothetical out. So Charlie is now gay? And part of the conspiracy with lab kids?

Why anybody listens to her I'll never know
She makes Alex Jones seem completely sane.
Reply Quote
6
Texas velvet maestro
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AgLiving06 • 8:13a, 2/26/26
AgLiving06 said:

Is she really going back to well after being sued by Macron?

And let's play the hypothetical out. So Charlie is now gay? And part of the conspiracy with lab kids?

Why anybody listens to her I'll never know

are you appealing to the authority of Macron?'
Why are you playing-out a hypothetical?
Should posters here, not look at the "evidence" CO is producing, and have their own opinions?

just asking questions
Reply Quote
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Texas velvet maestro • 8:13a, 2/26/26
Texas velvet maestro said:
AgLiving06 said:

Is she really going back to well after being sued by Macron?

And let's play the hypothetical out. So Charlie is now gay? And part of the conspiracy with lab kids?

Why anybody listens to her I'll never know

are you appealing to the authority of Macron?'
Why are you playing-out a hypothetical?
Should posters here, not look at the "evidence" CO is producing, and have their own opinions?

just asking questions

Simping for Owens is really a bad look.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
9
Farmer_J
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AgLiving06 • 8:20a, 2/26/26
AgLiving06 said:
johnnyblaze36 said:
Who would have thought Candace has already now teased a possible season 2 and a season 3 to make money off of.

If I didn't know better I'd think she's such a psycho that she is dying to be the next martyr. The only problem is nobody with a functioning brain would give a **** about her death in the way they did about Charlie Kirk's. Sad.




Is she really going back to well after being sued by Macron?


Why don't you give us an update on that lawsuit?

lol.
Reply Quote
2
Texas velvet maestro
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 8:21a, 2/26/26
Rapier108 said:
Texas velvet maestro said:
AgLiving06 said:

Is she really going back to well after being sued by Macron?

And let's play the hypothetical out. So Charlie is now gay? And part of the conspiracy with lab kids?

Why anybody listens to her I'll never know

are you appealing to the authority of Macron?'
Why are you playing-out a hypothetical?
Should posters here, not look at the "evidence" CO is producing, and have their own opinions?

just asking questions

Simping for Owens is really a bad look.

name-calling is a bad look also. thought-stopping and intimidation by way of name-calling is a weak strategy.
Reply Quote
1 edit
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Texas velvet maestro • 8:21a, 2/26/26
Texas velvet maestro said:
AgLiving06 said:

Is she really going back to well after being sued by Macron?

And let's play the hypothetical out. So Charlie is now gay? And part of the conspiracy with lab kids?

Why anybody listens to her I'll never know

are you appealing to the authority of Macron?'
Why are you playing-out a hypothetical?
Should posters here, not look at the "evidence" CO is producing, and have their own opinions?

just asking questions

I'd recommend not giving her any views or clicks. Her entire influence needs to go away until she gets help.
If you say you hate the state of politics in this nation and you don't get involved in it, you obviously don't hate the state of politics in this nation.
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
Zachary Klement
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:24a, 2/26/26
AG
"Anyone I don't like politically is trans" is a bold new strategy.
Reply Quote
3
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:25a, 2/26/26
AG
That's some pretty impressive surgery then to go from male child to popping out a couple of kids later in life. Must have gotten that technology from those aliens that Tucker is shilling for. He's right, that's some really dark stuff. I think I saw that on the National Enquirer while checking out at the HEBs.

Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
Reply Quote
4
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Tony Franklins Other Shoe • 8:27a, 2/26/26
Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:
That's some pretty impressive surgery then to go from male child to popping out a couple of kids later in life. Must have gotten that technology from those aliens that Tucker is shilling for. He's right, that's some really dark stuff. I think I saw that on the National Enquirer while checking out at the HEBs.

Don't insult The National Enquirer.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
4
AgLiving06
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Texas velvet maestro • 8:32a, 2/26/26
Texas velvet maestro said:
AgLiving06 said:

Is she really going back to well after being sued by Macron?

And let's play the hypothetical out. So Charlie is now gay? And part of the conspiracy with lab kids?

Why anybody listens to her I'll never know

are you appealing to the authority of Macron?'
Why are you playing-out a hypothetical?
Should posters here, not look at the "evidence" CO is producing, and have their own opinions?

just asking questions


I mean...that's all I'm doing...just asking questions as well.

Reply Quote
5
AgLiving06
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Farmer_J • 8:35a, 2/26/26
Farmer_J said:
AgLiving06 said:
johnnyblaze36 said:
Who would have thought Candace has already now teased a possible season 2 and a season 3 to make money off of.

If I didn't know better I'd think she's such a psycho that she is dying to be the next martyr. The only problem is nobody with a functioning brain would give a **** about her death in the way they did about Charlie Kirk's. Sad.




Is she really going back to well after being sued by Macron?


Why don't you give us an update on that lawsuit?

lol.


Sure

Seems like Owen's is trying to find any legal loophole to avoid being sued.

For someone who was so adamant that she was right, she sure seems to want to avoid taking this to court. Almost like she's afraid of being proven for the fraud she is.

Just some questions.

Why would a honest person try and get a lawsuit thrown out?
Why have other people been found guilty when making the same claims?
What is Candace afraid of?

You know...just asking questions.
Reply Quote
5
Farmer_J
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AgLiving06 • 8:37a, 2/26/26

Sounds like a slam dunk for Macron. Keep a close eye on it.
Reply Quote
Kvetch
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Farmer_J • 8:40a, 2/26/26
AG
Farmer_J said:

Sounds like a slam dunk for Macron. Keep a close eye on it.


You're going to defend Candace on the basis that it's extremely difficult for a public figure to win a defamation case? Bold strategy.
Reply Quote
5
AgLiving06
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Farmer_J • 8:41a, 2/26/26
Seems you don't like questions.

Why is candace trying to get the case dismissed? What's she afraid of?

Is she concerned 10 people have been found guilty of fraudulently making the claims she is?

Candace seems very afraid now.


But..yeah...just asking questions.
Reply Quote
4
Farmer_J
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AgLiving06 • 8:43a, 2/26/26
Sounds like they really got candace this time.
Reply Quote
Farmer_J
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Kvetch • 8:43a, 2/26/26
Kvetch said:
Farmer_J said:

Sounds like a slam dunk for Macron. Keep a close eye on it.


You're going to defend Candace on the basis that it's extremely difficult for a public figure to win a defamation case? Bold strategy.


Do you get all your news from texags?
Reply Quote
Texas velvet maestro
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:44a, 2/26/26
... it's a weak strategy. "don't do your own research" is a weak strategy. trust the narrative...is weak. calling somebody "toxic" " crazy" trusting non-profits.

We've been seeing this for 20 years now.
Reply Quote
Kvetch
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Farmer_J • 8:45a, 2/26/26
AG
Farmer_J said:
Kvetch said:
Farmer_J said:

Sounds like a slam dunk for Macron. Keep a close eye on it.


You're going to defend Candace on the basis that it's extremely difficult for a public figure to win a defamation case? Bold strategy.


Do you get all your news from texags?


Do you get all your news from Candace, Tucker, and Nick Fuentes?
Reply Quote
7
Farmer_J
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Kvetch • 8:49a, 2/26/26
Kvetch said:
Farmer_J said:
Kvetch said:
Farmer_J said:

Sounds like a slam dunk for Macron. Keep a close eye on it.


You're going to defend Candace on the basis that it's extremely difficult for a public figure to win a defamation case? Bold strategy.


Do you get all your news from texags?


Do you get all your news from Candace, Tucker, and Nick Fuentes?


Don't let your hate for Candice, make you do mental gymnastics and defend European pettos. Good grief go look at the actual allegations about brigette.
Reply Quote
AgLiving06
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Farmer_J • 8:55a, 2/26/26
Farmer_J said:
Sounds like they really got candace this time.


She's certainly scared enough she's trying to duck the lawsuit.

What's she afraid of?
Reply Quote
2
Farmer_J
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AgLiving06 • 8:56a, 2/26/26
hahahahaha
Reply Quote
Farmer_J
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to johnnyblaze36 • 9:01a, 2/26/26
johnnyblaze36 said:
Who would have thought Candace has already now teased a possible season 2 and a season 3 to make money off of.

If I didn't know better I'd think she's such a psycho that she is dying to be the next martyr. The only problem is nobody with a functioning brain would give a **** about her death in the way they did about Charlie Kirk's. Sad.



Lol. There are posters here that see that tweet and think candace really said that. I'm convinced most of the candace haters here form their opinions seeing posts like that on texags. Smh

If candace is crazy, why not just print what she actually said, why have to exaggerate?
Reply Quote
1 edit
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AgLiving06 • 9:02a, 2/26/26
Avoiding court isn't an awful idea, "guilty" or "innocent".
If you say you hate the state of politics in this nation and you don't get involved in it, you obviously don't hate the state of politics in this nation.
Reply Quote
2
Ervin Burrell
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ghost of Andrew Eaton • 9:07a, 2/26/26
AG
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
Texas velvet maestro said:
AgLiving06 said:

Is she really going back to well after being sued by Macron?

And let's play the hypothetical out. So Charlie is now gay? And part of the conspiracy with lab kids?

Why anybody listens to her I'll never know

are you appealing to the authority of Macron?'
Why are you playing-out a hypothetical?
Should posters here, not look at the "evidence" CO is producing, and have their own opinions?

just asking questions

I'd recommend not giving her any views or clicks. Her entire influence needs to go away until she gets help.

As others have said, she knows exactly what she's doing. Spewing complete BS, but millions lap it up. $$$. Which is weird, because I thought only the left peddled in conspiracies and fell for fake news...super strange.
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ervin Burrell • 9:09a, 2/26/26
Ervin Burrell said:
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
Texas velvet maestro said:
AgLiving06 said:

Is she really going back to well after being sued by Macron?

And let's play the hypothetical out. So Charlie is now gay? And part of the conspiracy with lab kids?

Why anybody listens to her I'll never know

are you appealing to the authority of Macron?'
Why are you playing-out a hypothetical?
Should posters here, not look at the "evidence" CO is producing, and have their own opinions?

just asking questions

I'd recommend not giving her any views or clicks. Her entire influence needs to go away until she gets help.

As others have said, she knows exactly what she's doing. Spewing complete BS, but millions lap it up. $$$. Which is weird, because I thought only the left peddled in conspiracies and fell for fake news...super strange.

It is far more pervasive on your side of the political aisle, and it often repeated by the MSM and the leaders of your party on a daily basis.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
J. Walter Weatherman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to J. Walter Weatherman • 9:14a, 2/26/26
J. Walter Weatherman said:
GAC06 said:
J. Walter Weatherman said:
Farmer_J said:
Rapier108 said:
Farmer_J said:
Kashchei said:
Farmer_J said:
CDUB98 said:
Every time I see this thread bumped, I looked forward to seeing what today's looney tune version of Candace is saying.


Every time I see the thread bumped, I checked to see if someone is going to make a compelling case against what Candace is saying. Or if it's just going to be ranting, raving, or posting a clip of someone else ranting and raving.


Two fallacies in one: Shifting the Burden of Proof and Appeal to Ignorance. Impressive.



No, it's just I've heard Candace's side of the story. Some of it sounds crazy. Some of it sounds plausible. What I don't hear is someone making a sound argument against it. Just ranting and raving.

Your reply is insinuating I made an accusation which I did not. Then, you argued against that. Technically, that's called a straw man.

What of her rantings is "plausible"?

The bee cult?
The Jews"
The Egyptians?
TPUSA?
Erika Kirk?
Trump?
The X-Men?
Charlie was in love with her?

The only person she hasn't blamed is the person who pulled the trigger.


I don't know pick one, and lets discuss and see where it leads



You said some of the claims "sound plausible." Which claims are you referring to?


Stand by for "hey what's wrong with asking questions"


Update, looks like we just got the "make absurd statement and then disappear when you're asked to back it up" version of Candace supporters.


Oh hey Farmer is back. Can you let us know which one of her claims about Erika Kirk's involvement in Charlie's murder you find "plausible?"
Reply Quote
1
Farmer_J
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to J. Walter Weatherman • 9:27a, 2/26/26
What quote are you referring to?
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.