Not understanding. Frontal head shot means massive exit wound in the back of the skull. Blood follows gravity and would run down from that wound, no?

But agree there is something wrong with the lack of blood spatter, brain matter, skull fragments normally found with head shots from a high powered rifle. Also the body may have been moved or repositioned in some way. Is that what you are getting at?

Wish I could find better pictures of the shooter's body that are not blurred out.

The shot looks like it went in on left side of his mouth and blew out the back right side of his neck. It is not Yearick. The eyebrows are different and there are no gauges/holes/gauge scars on the dead guys earlobes.

This is the first I've heard of Yearick, are there any links to information on him?

The System said:

---

The shot looks like it went in on left side of his mouth and blew out the back right side of his neck. It is not Yearick. The eyebrows are different and there are no gauges/holes/gauge scars on the dead guys earlobes.

---

Not following. Sorry for being a dummy but really have no context on Yearick versus Crooks.

100 percent on those options. Frankly, the 'incompetence' one is more unbelievable for various reasons but I don't want to list all 20 etc. again. And they keep now layering on fresh excuses daily like 'well, the nato conference took a lot of our manpower.'

Crooks was just an uber genius apparently. What other assassination attempt in modern history had such a lengthy window from anywhere near so close? When were local cops blamed? Where's the aerial surveillance plan? Who has been relieved (no one)?

Oh, but the secret service is appalled by the 'rhetoric,' just so you know:

We don’t want to hear this ridiculous obfuscation from Secret Service right now. We want to understand what went wrong. Full investigation now. https://t.co/ZxlRn1Anrr

— David Sacks (@DavidSacks) July 18, 2024

Just saw on Fox that the rangefinder was a simple golf rangefinder.

if there's a second shooter we wouldn't have a name.

If the stand down is the biggest evidence of conspiracy, and you believe there was one, it means that the conspirators so powerful and capable of arranging the stand down, entrusted the kill shot to a greasy mixed up kid (or two greasy mixed up kids).

Texas velvet maestro said:

---

if there's a second shooter we wouldn't have a name.

If the stand down is the biggest evidence of conspiracy, and you believe there was one, it means that the conspirators so powerful and capable of arranging the stand down, entrusted the kill shot to a greasy mixed up kid (or two greasy mixed up kids).

---

Lack of evidence is proof of the conspiracy.

Larger picture of Crooks' corpse at this LINK Warning it is graphic.

Ooo we now have a second shooter named Yearick…

Gig em G said:

---

Ooo we now have a second shooter named Yearick…

---

Alas, I knew him well.

Texas velvet maestro said:

---

if there's a second shooter we wouldn't have a name.

If the stand down is the biggest evidence of conspiracy, and you believe there was one, it means that the conspirators so powerful and capable of arranging the stand down, entrusted the kill shot to a greasy mixed up kid (or two greasy mixed up kids).

---

The stand down was to allow the distraction to get into place, get videoed, draw tons of suspicion, and eventually get taken out so he could be blamed…

That allowed the real shooter to get into place and take the shots that missed…

Most people in the stands were shooting video. One of them has to have captured video with Trump in the foreground and shots being fired by Crooks, right??? If not, the cover-up is in full swing and we may never know the truth.

My hope is that people who were in the stands to President Trump's left have video that they sent to friends. My question is why has not one of those videos surfaced by now?

TyHolden said:

---

Bring the Q back!!! They predicted Trump would win 2024 after an attempt at his life! I believe again!!!

---

I think with the way this is playing out that Texags jumped the shark with banning Q content.

the reenactment

PatriotAg02 said:

---

TyHolden said:

---

Bring the Q back!!! They predicted Trump would win 2024 after an attempt at his life! I believe again!!!

---

I think with the way this is playing out that Texags jumped the shark with banning Q content.

---

I agree...there many drops in 2018 that match to events in 2024...called a 6 year projection, which was called out in one of the drops...1 yr, 2 yr and 6 yr.

Really weird how text and events match...including references to J D Vance.

6 min mark. Pretty remarkable how stupid these libs are:

NEW: Footage shows rallygoers behind Donald Trump in PA noticing people jumping into action behind the rally just moments before the first shot rang out.

The footage adds to the big question: How did everyone seem to know something was going on except for USSS?

"Uh oh,… pic.twitter.com/si65O5XqIk

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 18, 2024

Gonna go on record here, fwiw (nothing, of course): the Crooks guy was trans/cross dressing. No, I won't post a source yet, so feel free to blast me later, if wrong.

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/misinformation-narratives-fact-checked-wake-trump-assassination-attempt-2024-07-15/

nortex97 said:

---

Gonna go on record here, fwiw (nothing, of course): the Crooks guy was trans/cross dressing. No, I won't post a source yet, so feel free to blast me later, if wrong.

---

Soccer fan too. I'm my own source.

aggiehawg said:

---

NEW: Footage shows rallygoers behind Donald Trump in PA noticing people jumping into action behind the rally just moments before the first shot rang out.

The footage adds to the big question: How did everyone seem to know something was going on except for USSS?

"Uh oh,… pic.twitter.com/si65O5XqIk

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 18, 2024

---

The second video we've seen documenting people scurrying around immediately before the first shot.

First was a video early on of a guy in a red shirt and another guy in the background that start running before the shots fired.

In any event, it looks like people on the ground were like a heard of wild animals that sensed something was going down and got spooked by collective consciousness. .

Stat Monitor Repairman said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

NEW: Footage shows rallygoers behind Donald Trump in PA noticing people jumping into action behind the rally just moments before the first shot rang out.

The footage adds to the big question: How did everyone seem to know something was going on except for USSS?

"Uh oh,… pic.twitter.com/si65O5XqIk

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 18, 2024

---

The second video we've seen documenting people scurrying around immediately before the first shot.

First was a video early on of a guy in a red shirt and another guy in the background that start running before the shots fired.

In any event, it looks like people on the ground were like a heard of wild animals that sensed something was going down and got spooked by collective consciousness. .

---

The guy near the building running just before the shots likely saw Crooks aiming the gun and decided to put some distance between himself and the threat.

Long take on it being an inside job;

Quote:

---

So on the basis of the most basic operational standards it is simply NOT possible this mere incompetence. A child given the problem would do a better job of securing the area.

Then there are the things we now know thanks to multiple video evidence that has now been timelined. Police and SS were alerted to the guy on the roof about 30 minutes before he started shooting. Once again, assuming they did nothing due to mere incompetence is unlikely, although, having dealt with security "professionals" at all levels for a number of years, I can tell you I do NOT exclude this possibility entirely. People are scared, most cops are cowardly bullies, and many if not perhaps most "hard men" in "security" related fields are SWAT team types (Sit, Wait, Act, Tough). There is a report of ONE cop being shunted up by another to see what was going on on the rooftop and the shooter apparently pointed the rifle at him, which made him retreat and shortly thereafter he fired at Trump. Still a few minutes passed. And the cop did not immediately sound the alarm, find a way to shoot the guy after initially retreating and so on. I believe this was probably a "good" cop, but as you can see, his reaction was far from adequate for his position.

---

A 'two shooter' theory which I frankly strongly disagree with. His economic analysis is much better though, fwiw.

The more info I get - the more I believe this was 100% a setup and allowed to happen.

— Ryan Fournier (@RyanAFournier) July 19, 2024

?

Why would the wonderful FBI put this woman there? An "insider threat specialist?" Yeah, umm…

🚨🇺🇸 REMEMBER THIS LADY CALMLY FILMING THE RALLY AS SH0TS WENT OFF?

Her name is Janeen DiGuiseppi and she works for the FBI as the “Insider threat specialist”

What’s going on here?

If this truly is her, why didn’t she spring into action? It’s almost like she knew it was about… pic.twitter.com/lTTQSujPEe

— The News You Dont See (@Crazynews4real) July 19, 2024

nortex97 said:

---

The more info I get - the more I believe this was 100% a setup and allowed to happen.

— Ryan Fournier (@RyanAFournier) July 19, 2024

?

Why would the wonderful FBI put this woman there? An "insider threat specialist?" Yeah, umm…

🚨🇺🇸 REMEMBER THIS LADY CALMLY FILMING THE RALLY AS SH0TS WENT OFF?

Her name is Janeen DiGuiseppi and she works for the FBI as the “Insider threat specialist”

What’s going on here?

If this truly is her, why didn’t she spring into action? It’s almost like she knew it was about… pic.twitter.com/lTTQSujPEe

— The News You Dont See (@Crazynews4real) July 19, 2024

---

That is facking wild!

fixer said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

The more info I get - the more I believe this was 100% a setup and allowed to happen.

— Ryan Fournier (@RyanAFournier) July 19, 2024

?

Why would the wonderful FBI put this woman there? An "insider threat specialist?" Yeah, umm…

🚨🇺🇸 REMEMBER THIS LADY CALMLY FILMING THE RALLY AS SH0TS WENT OFF?

Her name is Janeen DiGuiseppi and she works for the FBI as the “Insider threat specialist”

What’s going on here?

If this truly is her, why didn’t she spring into action? It’s almost like she knew it was about… pic.twitter.com/lTTQSujPEe

— The News You Dont See (@Crazynews4real) July 19, 2024

---

That is facking wild!

---

Lmao that is absolutely not her. Come on people, use a slight bit of common sense and don't believe everything you see online.

I don't think it's her pic.twitter.com/Xerd90LhCA

— Hegel Borg™️ (@xxclusionary) July 19, 2024

It's a wild claim. Other issue is that she is so quick to whip out her phone (after sort of grinning at the first shot) to film when purportedly SS had banned phones in that area for others.

Nothing to go off of or persuade me.
But might as well look into it.

She seemed anxious in the bleachers.
As if she’s waiting for something.

No shock or reflex to the sound of gunfire or the fact that the President just dropped to the ground.

She just tries to blend in with… pic.twitter.com/uioslXL1t0

— ZNO 🇺🇸 (@therealZNO) July 19, 2024

Associate director of insider threats; "You were supposed to stop the Sith, Anakin, not join him!"

Of course, if any of us trusted that the FBI isn't involved in this, we'd expect them to quickly declare they did obtain this woman's phone/footage as part of their investigation already, and disclose it wasn't their gal, and demonstrate she wasn't in Butler PA.

But that's…not gonna happen.

It's not her….people are reaching! (Lady in cap has small moles on left cheek and lower left chin….FBI lady doesn't have those.)

There is nothing of value that a conspiracy would get from placing anyone that close to a target In this situation

Whether she is fbi or not, the reaction is waaaayyyyy off.

no way it's her. 48 hour rule this one.

fixer said:

---

Whether she is fbi or not, the reaction is waaaayyyyy off.

---

As you can see from this this thread, you can possibly attribute this to "people are just strange."

Including myself