I guess we can look forward to Trump signing the assault weapons ban he promised he would.

If I may add to it, the leading sheeps force the entire herd to pull teeth but keep theirs and hire sheep dogs to protect them.

Ag_of_08 said:

---

I guess we can look forward to Trump signing the assault weapons ban he promised he would.

---

I'm not sure an assault weapons ban that included the AR15 would pass constitutional muster since Heller. Even the liberal justices have admitted that an AR15 is a firearm in common use now. I think it now would require a constitutional amendment.

Ag_of_08 said:

---

I guess we can look forward to Trump signing the assault weapons ban he promised he would.

---

Yes... I'm proud we have such stalwart that's all about the most important pillars and cornerstones of conservatism to support this year... especially with regards to gun control.

Tom Fox said:

---

Ag_of_08 said:

---

I guess we can look forward to Trump signing the assault weapons ban he promised he would.

---

I'm not sure an assault weapons ban that included the AR15 would pass constitutional muster since Heller. Even the liberal justices have admitted that an AR15 is a firearm in common use now. I think it now would require a constitutional amendment.

---

IDK...if it was passed by US congress I doubt SCOTUS would have the stones to overturn it. They seem to give way too much leeway to unconstitutional actions of congress because of "the will of the people" and whatnot. I think that is absolutely wrong and they should only judge constitutionality, but that is where we are.

aggieforester05 said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Ag_of_08 said:

---

I guess we can look forward to Trump signing the assault weapons ban he promised he would.

---

I'm not sure an assault weapons ban that included the AR15 would pass constitutional muster since Heller. Even the liberal justices have admitted that an AR15 is a firearm in common use now. I think it now would require a constitutional amendment.

---

IDK...if it was passed by US congress I doubt SCOTUS would have the stones to overturn it. They seem to give way too much leeway to unconstitutional actions of congress because of "the will of the people" and whatnot. I think that is absolutely wrong and they should only judge constitutionality, but that is where we are.

---

Yep, SCOTUS cannot be trusted to uphold the 2nd Amendment. Heck, they won't even protect the 1st anymore.

Kelsey Odair 09 said:

---

We don't need ANY fully automatic weapons on our streets. There are now fully automatic glock clips available that people can buy. Just google it.

---

Why do people keep saying "need"? It doesn't even have anything to do with need. 95% of what American's consume on a daily basis is not based on need. We don't need alcohol, but it kills more people than automatic guns could ever dream of. We don't need 85" TVs. Heck, we don't need sports or television at all. But people who can afford them, want them.

If I want to shoot an AR in a field and am a law abiding citizen, you're damn right I should be able to own one.

Edit: And yes, everything else said about your ignorance. But even ignoring that, it still isn't solely about need.

Not about gun violence, it's about control