Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
Bryanisbest said:
Weird girl with pink bandana on head. I can't tell what her real emotion is. She is half laughing half crying all the way through the interview.
Those teeth…LeonardSkinner said:
When did she get suspended from practicing basic hygiene?
BTHOB-98 said:
Breanna Brocker should've been focusing on studying for finals and graduating. Yet, Brocker wasted her time being destructive and supporting terrorist by breaking and entering and trespassing (allegedly per police reports.).
Now she is suspended and is unsure about her future. I am so glad that I was tough on my kids!!WATCH: We spoke with ASU senior Breanna Brocker outside the courthouse, who said she will not be able to graduate because the suspension will cause her to miss her final exam pic.twitter.com/FKGaMuzOt7
— Ben Brown (@bdbrown473) May 4, 2024
Ryan the Temp said:
Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequence.
This.Ryan the Temp said:
Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequence.
Ryan the Temp said:
Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequence.
AggieVictor10 said:
Schadenfreude aside, it's better to learn those hard lessons in your 20s, than your 30s.
Speaking from experience.
They apparently hit goats. Not sure they would know the difference.Ag for Life said:
Not even hamas would hit that, yikes!
Ok, maybe with a Toyota Hilux
She'll eat it before it gets to its destination.bobbranco said:
She'll be delivering Amazon Fresh in a minute.
JG88 said:
Based on what she said it sounds like she is still getting her degree, just not able to attend graduation and walk the stage. Basically a slap on the wrist?
Ryan the Temp said:
Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequence.
If only. Therein lies the rub.Quote:
Breaking laws, regardless of the reason for it, is still breaking laws, and consequences will happen. No one is immune to legal consequences.
Dumb as F AI.jickyjack1 said:Ryan the Temp said:
Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequence.
This sentiment, imo, requires inspection.
Other than in situations such as those represented by the well-known "fire in the theater" analogy, incitement to riot or to cause serious mayhem and/or in other fixed, known situations capable of specification by observers more knowledgeable than your humble servant, Freedom of Speech means exactly "freedom from consequence". While one abhors the nefarious usages to which the First Amendment has for years been turned and utilized by elements subversive to established American tradition, extreme care must be taken in the application of consequences for it's use. This is one of many fine lines these divisive and subversive forces continue to force traditional institutions to walk, with the goal that, through the choreographed convergence of disparate but serious -- many, such as the one under discussion, crucial -- questions, confusion and chaos may be promulgated with more disruptive, followed in ordered succession by destructive, steps to follow. Deft navigation of these intentionally and continually placed obstacles requires sober, concentrated attention in gauging the effect of and directing the response (so long as defensive measures are effective) to these elements. The goal, which is not a consideration to these forces so far as THEIR actions are concerned, is to stay within the Constitution. Difficult days are ahead.