Okay, let's start with conventional wisdom that defense attorneys are always looking the needle in the haystack that they hear on direct and seize upon during cross.
Base upon the reported testimony from this morning thus far, sticking their hand into Cohen's verbal haystack, withdrawing would look as if it were a pin cushion there would be so many.
Now I'm his personal attorney, now I'm not, now I'm in contact wih him and advising him but not as his lawyer, except when I was, my constant contacts with other lawyers and participation in the joint defense team were not legal services, just his loyalty to and protection of Trump but no, not acting as his lawyer because he wasn't actively billing him?
That's on Cohen if he is not billing. Lawyers are not being paid everyday but they still have to represent their clients. Being paid alone does not render it legal services and hence legal expenses.
Too many holes in his testimony to keep count of. And the introduction of the February 2018 letter from Cohen's counsel to the FEC is a problem. Cohen testified he was very involved in drafting that letter and intentionally made it "misleading." And just like the glory hound he is, went back to Trump to tell him what he did and get an Atta boy! But now the jury knows about the FEC investigation into all of this.
If the jury was wondering why so many people did not like having to work with nor deal with Cohen, they know now. He's damn near certifiable in his various rationales for what he did, which keep changing.
And for the two lawyers on the jury, listening to how Cohen lied to everybody, including his clients, was sloppy and lackadaisical about billing practices, etc. have to be appalled at what they are hearing.
One last thing that I heard Jeanine Pirro say earlier after she had been in the courtroom in days past. She watched the jury coming and going from the courtroom. This jury has been together for four weeks now. They have down time. They usually develop some friendships, exchange courtesies and smile and look at each other.
But not this jury. No cohesion among members at all that she could see. No cliques, no groupings, barely even look at one another walking in and out of the courtroom. Does that mean anything momentous? Maybe not but if they are not that comfortable with each other after four weeks, the possibility of a hung jury increases exponentiality, in my view.