Muh Polls

785,793 Views | 5734 Replies | Last: 17 hrs ago by ts5641
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
66 this am.





Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Weird, maybe some profit taking or hedging? Look at the steep movement


nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah pretty odd last night, maybe someone thought there'd be some truth to some of the lies/CNN poll. Profit taking if some folks bought Trump to win back around the DNC makes sense too, I dunno. Didn't have a long term impact obviously.



That as well makes sense.
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What does Mark Mitchell mean "to the right of us"?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He works for Rasmussen (the company, not RMG). He's snarking about how they are accused of having a GOP bias regularly but they may actually be putting out public numbers that are to the left of reality right now.
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Left meaning his numbers favoring Trump might be lower than reality?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Correct. The internal polling he is aware of is apparently better for Trump in the battlegrounds than the Rasmussen Reports figures.
Highway6
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FireAg said:

What does Mark Mitchell mean "to the right of us"?
I believe it means the numbers should favor the Rs even more than it shows. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong
OverSeas AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Even worse, the democrats that "won" were even more epically stupid and repugnant than the worst republican running and fools still allowed their disgusting ilk to get elected.

You reap what you sow.
I am not friends with people that want to tare down the Republic.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


(GOP pollster, but still good).



TexAgsSean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FireAg said:

What does Mark Mitchell mean "to the right of us"?


Mark Mitchell is the head pollster of Rasmussen. They put out their final poll yesterday with Trump +2 nationally. He's saying that the candidates internal polling (i would assume Trump's internal polling?) is showing it is actually more than +2.
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexAgsSean said:

FireAg said:

What does Mark Mitchell mean "to the right of us"?


Mark Mitchell is the head pollster of Rasmussen. They put out their final poll yesterday with Trump +2 nationally. He's saying that the candidates internal polling (i would assume Trump's internal polling?) is showing it is actually more than +2.
Baris and Gallup have the electorate at R+3 for this election right now. Atlas Intel (most accurate pollster of 2020) has it at R+2. Then you have a slew of historically inaccurate public pollsters with Harris up which is really bringing the popular vote polling to about even.
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SwigAg11 said:

TexAgsSean said:

FireAg said:

What does Mark Mitchell mean "to the right of us"?


Mark Mitchell is the head pollster of Rasmussen. They put out their final poll yesterday with Trump +2 nationally. He's saying that the candidates internal polling (i would assume Trump's internal polling?) is showing it is actually more than +2.
Baris and Gallup have the electorate at R+3 for this election right now. Atlas Intel (most accurate pollster of 2020) has it at R+2. Then you have a slew of historically inaccurate public pollsters with Harris up which is really bringing the popular vote polling to about even.

Are these R+ electorate assumptions being influenced by early voting numbers?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Baris and Gallup have the electorate at R+3 for this election right now. Atlas Intel (most accurate pollster of 2020) has it at R+2. Then you have a slew of historically inaccurate public pollsters with Harris up which is really bringing the popular vote polling to about even.
One other data point that figures into why public polling may be off by an influential margin in a few of the states, the 2020 Census. In states such as North Carolina, the Census takers missed people particularly in western NC. That was a known problem from back in 2022. So if the public polls start from the Census results and don't do a deeper dive, they are underpolling right out of the gate.

The Census problem also occurred in Texas and Florida from what I understand. We'll see if the Census comes up during the post mortem on the polling this cycle.
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FireAg said:

SwigAg11 said:

TexAgsSean said:

FireAg said:

What does Mark Mitchell mean "to the right of us"?


Mark Mitchell is the head pollster of Rasmussen. They put out their final poll yesterday with Trump +2 nationally. He's saying that the candidates internal polling (i would assume Trump's internal polling?) is showing it is actually more than +2.
Baris and Gallup have the electorate at R+3 for this election right now. Atlas Intel (most accurate pollster of 2020) has it at R+2. Then you have a slew of historically inaccurate public pollsters with Harris up which is really bringing the popular vote polling to about even.

Are these R+ electorate assumptions being influenced by early voting numbers?
Speaking of Baris, since I've listened to a couple of his shows now, he took large samples of the electorate - including those who have voted, not voted, and will not vote. His polling results for those who have already voted appear to line up nearly exactly with what is being observed in early voting for the states who give out some details.

Edit: Short answer: his polling appears to be almost perfectly aligned with the early vote as of the last 1-2 days, and he has not been using the early vote as weighting.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Granmar is important.

"Uh oh"

"Was worse [for Republicans] in 2020"

"Worse for Republicans" [in 2020]
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The recent polls have been showing this enthusiasm gap in favor of Dems. The nazi/racist/fascist stuff was 100% a ploy to get Dem base excited. Not sure why R base has gotten less enthusiastic over the past few months.

Gallup is one of the few I trust.

rgag12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captn_Ag05 said:

The recent polls have been showing this enthusiasm gap in favor of Dems. The nazi/racist/fascist stuff was 100% a ploy to get Dem base excited. Not sure why R base has gotten less enthusiastic over the past few months.

Gallup is one of the few I trust.




How does one poll enthusiasm?
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Highway6 said:

FireAg said:

What does Mark Mitchell mean "to the right of us"?
I believe it means the numbers should favor the Rs even more than it shows. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong
He and Baris are claiming the real numbers may be favoring Trump more than their own reported metrics.

I am highly skeptical as they were more pro-Trump in 2020 and we see how that worked out
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rgag12 said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

The recent polls have been showing this enthusiasm gap in favor of Dems. The nazi/racist/fascist stuff was 100% a ploy to get Dem base excited. Not sure why R base has gotten less enthusiastic over the past few months.

Gallup is one of the few I trust.




How does one poll enthusiasm?
Asking voters how excited they are to vote for their candidate is typically the most common way. A more excited a voter is, the more likely they will turn out and wait in line.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Harris (CCP) probably has something like a 5 or even 8 point lead among independent RV's in NC, but if I had to guess, it's smaller than that after the hurricane. I've seen no polling evidence she will close the gap via the Indie vote. Pro Democrat October poll:



Even Emerson and Redfield have put Trump ahead:
Quote:

For example, a Redfield and Wilton Strategies poll conducted between Oct. 25 and 27 found the former president leading Harris 48% to 46%. The poll sampled 916 likely voters and has a margin of error of 3.24 percentage points. Similarly, a SurveyUSA poll conducted a few days earlier with a sample of 1,050 adults found the candidates were tied at 47%.

Trump led Harris by two points 50% to 48% in an Emerson College poll conducted between Oct. 21 and 22. The survey sampled 950 likely voters and has a margin of error of 3.1 percentage points, putting Trump's lead within that margin.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captn_Ag05 said:

rgag12 said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

The recent polls have been showing this enthusiasm gap in favor of Dems. The nazi/racist/fascist stuff was 100% a ploy to get Dem base excited. Not sure why R base has gotten less enthusiastic over the past few months.

Gallup is one of the few I trust.




How does one poll enthusiasm?
Asking voters how excited they are to vote for their candidate is typically the most common way. A more excited a voter is, the more likely they will turn out and wait in line.


Could dramatically underestimate enthusiasm by people who are holding their nose to vote for Trump. They are enthusiastic to vote against Kamala, but would rather it be somebody besides Trump to vote for.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Captn_Ag05 said:

The recent polls have been showing this enthusiasm gap in favor of Dems. The nazi/racist/fascist stuff was 100% a ploy to get Dem base excited. Not sure why R base has gotten less enthusiastic over the past few months.

Gallup is one of the few I trust.



Eh this doesn't surprise nor bother me. Trump is not someone a good chunk of Republicans "want" to vote for but that doesn't mean he isn't one they will go to great lengths to vote for.

Further rallying up the base dem vs republican runs the risk of alienating the independents.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JB99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captn_Ag05 said:

The recent polls have been showing this enthusiasm gap in favor of Dems. The nazi/racist/fascist stuff was 100% a ploy to get Dem base excited. Not sure why R base has gotten less enthusiastic over the past few months.

Gallup is one of the few I trust.




This seems counterintuitive. Dem early voting is down, R is up. Repubs are outpacing Dems in voter registrations as well
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JB99 said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

The recent polls have been showing this enthusiasm gap in favor of Dems. The nazi/racist/fascist stuff was 100% a ploy to get Dem base excited. Not sure why R base has gotten less enthusiastic over the past few months.

Gallup is one of the few I trust.




This seems counterintuitive. Dem early voting is down, R is up. Repubs are outpacing Dems in voter registrations as well
Yeah, the early voting data does not support the poll result, which probably means there is a gap between R motivation and R enthusiasm. A significant portion of the R electorate is not "enthusiastic" about voting for Trump, but they are extremely "motivated" to vote based on how the last 4 years have gone and what 4-8 years under Kamala would look like.
JB99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txags92 said:

JB99 said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

The recent polls have been showing this enthusiasm gap in favor of Dems. The nazi/racist/fascist stuff was 100% a ploy to get Dem base excited. Not sure why R base has gotten less enthusiastic over the past few months.

Gallup is one of the few I trust.




This seems counterintuitive. Dem early voting is down, R is up. Repubs are outpacing Dems in voter registrations as well
Yeah, the early voting data does not support the poll result, which probably means there is a gap between R motivation and R enthusiasm. A significant portion of the R electorate is not "enthusiastic" about voting for Trump, but they are extremely "motivated" to vote based on how the last 4 years have gone and what 4-8 years under Kamala would look like.


Seems like semantics. They should have just asked how likely are you to go vote.
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think it all depends on how they phrased the question. Since I am an engineer who does nothing but technical writing at this point, I am very pedantic in my understanding of what I read and will always use a literal interpretation on first read.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JB99 said:

txags92 said:

JB99 said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

The recent polls have been showing this enthusiasm gap in favor of Dems. The nazi/racist/fascist stuff was 100% a ploy to get Dem base excited. Not sure why R base has gotten less enthusiastic over the past few months.

Gallup is one of the few I trust.




This seems counterintuitive. Dem early voting is down, R is up. Repubs are outpacing Dems in voter registrations as well
Yeah, the early voting data does not support the poll result, which probably means there is a gap between R motivation and R enthusiasm. A significant portion of the R electorate is not "enthusiastic" about voting for Trump, but they are extremely "motivated" to vote based on how the last 4 years have gone and what 4-8 years under Kamala would look like.


Seems like semantics. They should have just asked how likely are you to go vote.
Some of them do ask that, but if they asked me how enthusiastic I am about voting for Trump, I would probably not say "very" because I would rather be voting for DeSantis, but I am extremely motivated to vote against the Ds, so there was never a question of whether I would turn out and vote R.
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This lines up nearly spot on with Baris's numbers.

LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Captn_Ag05 said:

rgag12 said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

The recent polls have been showing this enthusiasm gap in favor of Dems. The nazi/racist/fascist stuff was 100% a ploy to get Dem base excited. Not sure why R base has gotten less enthusiastic over the past few months.

Gallup is one of the few I trust.




How does one poll enthusiasm?
Asking voters how excited they are to vote for their candidate is typically the most common way. A more excited a voter is, the more likely they will turn out and wait in line.
so the fact that in nearly every state the GOP registrations have been surging and early voting has increased dramatically from Republicans compared to past elections...

but they are less excited than normal??!

does not compute
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

rgag12 said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

The recent polls have been showing this enthusiasm gap in favor of Dems. The nazi/racist/fascist stuff was 100% a ploy to get Dem base excited. Not sure why R base has gotten less enthusiastic over the past few months.

Gallup is one of the few I trust.




How does one poll enthusiasm?
Asking voters how excited they are to vote for their candidate is typically the most common way. A more excited a voter is, the more likely they will turn out and wait in line.
so the fact that in nearly every state the GOP registrations have been surging and early voting has increased dramatically from Republicans compared to past elections...

but they are less excited than normal??!

does not compute

What would the numbers have to look like for them to be excited?
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First Page Last Page
Page 141 of 164
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.