RNC agreement pays Trump's legal bills first

1,641 Views | 27 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by Rapier108
rgvag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Donate directly to Republican candidates' campaigns if you want your donations to get to where you want.
Pookers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rgvag11 said:


Donate directly to Republican candidates' campaigns if you want your donations to get to where you want.
This should had ALWAYS been the approach. The RNC is dumb as is the GOPe at large.
PA24
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No issue with that and most likely the only ones complaining about helping Trump fight these bonus lawsuits are Democrats and Never Trumpers who have never given and never will.

Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People not blinded by loyalty to Trump said this was going to happen, and were of course met with "TDS, CM, Biden Voter, etc. etc. etc."

Turns out we were right yet again.

The Trump grift continues unabated.

MAGA wants to spend every penny on Trump's legal bills, and don't care if it means a 1932 style wipe out.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

People not blinded by loyalty to Trump said this was going to happen, and were of course met with "TDS, CM, Biden Voter, etc. etc. etc."

Turns out we were right yet again.

The Trump grift continues unabated.

MAGA wants to spend every penny on Trump's legal bills, and don't care if it means a 1932 style wipe out.
since when is it better to give donations to Republican Congressional candidates than to lawyers representing Trump?

ONWARD TO VICTORY
TA-OP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

People not blinded by loyalty to Trump said this was going to happen, and were of course met with "TDS, CM, Biden Voter, etc. etc. etc."

Turns out we were right yet again.

The Trump grift continues unabated.
Yeah, those of us that are real mentally ill liberals were throwing out these warnings several years before this new crop of conservatives who don't want a second Trump term.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gee, did people flip the f*** out when Hillary did the same thing with the DNC in 2016? Who was paying the legal bills for Perkins, Coie? The DNC.
Anonymous Source
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
PA24 said:

No issue with that and most likely the only ones complaining about helping Trump fight these bonus lawsuits are Democrats and Never Trumpers who have never given and never will.


And R candidates down the ballot who will never see a dime of that money that was given for the benefit of the entire party.

Turns out "the entire party" is just one guy who appoints his in-laws to make sure he gets what's not really his.
Gig 'Em
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Gee, did people flip the f*** out when Hillary did the same thing with the DNC in 2016? Who was paying the legal bills for Perkins, Coie? The DNC.


Not surprising, Hillary and the Clintons have a long storied history for being grifters.
PA24
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anonymous Source said:

PA24 said:

No issue with that and most likely the only ones complaining about helping Trump fight these bonus lawsuits are Democrats and Never Trumpers who have never given and never will.


And R candidates down the ballot who will never see a dime of that money that was given for the benefit of the entire party.

Turns out "the entire party" is just one guy who appoints his in-laws to make sure he gets what's not really his.
Give directly to your candidate but also contribute to fighting the hacks that continue to try and trip our candidate, Donald John Trump.

Kvetch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We're supposed to be mad that the RNC is providing funds to support their nominee against political prosecutions?

What a waste of money!!! Those funds could be better used throwing lavish donor parties and running TV ads that nobody cares about!!!

Y'all really will choose to get your panties in a wad about anything.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kvetch said:

We're supposed to be mad that the RNC is providing funds to support their nominee against political prosecutions?

What a waste of money!!! Those funds could be better used throwing lavish donor parties and running TV ads that nobody cares about!!!

Y'all really will choose to get your panties in a wad about anything.
The money should be spent on electing as many Republicans to Congress as possible.

And it was Trump's girl Ronna that was blowing money on parties and flowers.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
CSTXAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

People not blinded by loyalty to Trump said this was going to happen, and were of course met with "TDS, CM, Biden Voter, etc. etc. etc."

Turns out we were right yet again.

The Trump grift continues unabated.

MAGA wants to spend every penny on Trump's legal bills, and don't care if it means a 1932 style wipe out.
Dude, how can you deny all this LAWFARE from the left is anything but a POLITICAL witch hunt??? The RNC should *ABSOLUTELY* defend their candidates against this sort of egregious malfeasance.
Desert Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So Trump is being politically persecuted to prevent his election and contributions to his party's political organization shouldn't be used to fight the persecution. Love the logic.
CSTXAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

Kvetch said:

We're supposed to be mad that the RNC is providing funds to support their nominee against political prosecutions?

What a waste of money!!! Those funds could be better used throwing lavish donor parties and running TV ads that nobody cares about!!!

Y'all really will choose to get your panties in a wad about anything.
The money should be spent on electing as many Republicans to Congress as possible.

And it was Trump's girl Ronna that was blowing money on parties and flowers.
Missing the forrest for the trees.

Let the left get away with what they're doing to Trump, and the only candidates we'll get to 'elect' will be the ones the left allows us to.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why not both?

In reality, the RNC has been ineffective for many years now, except for spamming inboxes with solicitations.

They don't really do all that much there. They have little leverage to corral in party members with political backing. The individual campaigns are where it is at.
Ozzy Osbourne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now that lawfare is fair game, the RNC will have to offer protection to any and all candidates, or else no one will run for office.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CSTXAg92 said:

Rapier108 said:

Kvetch said:

We're supposed to be mad that the RNC is providing funds to support their nominee against political prosecutions?

What a waste of money!!! Those funds could be better used throwing lavish donor parties and running TV ads that nobody cares about!!!

Y'all really will choose to get your panties in a wad about anything.
The money should be spent on electing as many Republicans to Congress as possible.

And it was Trump's girl Ronna that was blowing money on parties and flowers.
Missing the forrest for the trees.

Let the left get away with what they're doing to Trump, and the only candidates we'll get to 'elect' will be the ones the left allows us to.
Why should donors have to pay Trump's legal bills? (Obvious answer is because he's Trump and his followers say so.)

The guy is worth billions. If he cannot pay his bill, then he shouldn't be running for office and focus on dealing with that instead.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Gee, did people flip the f*** out when Hillary did the same thing with the DNC in 2016? Who was paying the legal bills for Perkins, Coie? The DNC.


Who cares about the DNC? They're **** incarnate.

Most of this board claims a conservative slant. "But the DNC..." means nothing. This is a dumbass move by the RNC and will hamper down ballot candidates, just like what was said when Trump was trying to get nepotism enacted. And....here we are.
IronFist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who cares? None of yall are donating to the RNC yet you come on here and whine and cry about to point out orange man bad.

lol. lmao
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
$500 million in legal bills?
Scotty Appleton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigRobSA said:

aggiehawg said:

Gee, did people flip the f*** out when Hillary did the same thing with the DNC in 2016? Who was paying the legal bills for Perkins, Coie? The DNC.


Who cares about the DNC? They're **** incarnate.

Most of this board claims a conservative slant. "But the DNC..." means nothing. This is a dumbass move by the RNC and will hamper down ballot candidates, just like what was said when Trump was trying to get nepotism enacted. And....here we are.


Yep, and how did that workout for Hillary and the commies '16?
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good thing Trump knows the best way to throw all that money at the problems. Top people and all.

CSTXAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

CSTXAg92 said:

Rapier108 said:

Kvetch said:

We're supposed to be mad that the RNC is providing funds to support their nominee against political prosecutions?

What a waste of money!!! Those funds could be better used throwing lavish donor parties and running TV ads that nobody cares about!!!

Y'all really will choose to get your panties in a wad about anything.
The money should be spent on electing as many Republicans to Congress as possible.

And it was Trump's girl Ronna that was blowing money on parties and flowers.
Missing the forrest for the trees.

Let the left get away with what they're doing to Trump, and the only candidates we'll get to 'elect' will be the ones the left allows us to.
Why should donors have to pay Trump's legal bills? (Obvious answer is because he's Trump and his followers say so.)

The guy is worth billions. If he cannot pay his bill, then he shouldn't be running for office and focus on dealing with that instead.
I don't even know where to start with that response Rapier108, but surely you're smart enough to think your line of logic through... If you only want candidates who can afford to weather the Lawfare the left is waging, you have DRAMATICALLY reduced your candidate pool to only the uber wealthy. Does that really sound like a rational solution you Rapier108?
Anonymous Source
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Rapier108 said:

CSTXAg92 said:

Rapier108 said:

Kvetch said:

We're supposed to be mad that the RNC is providing funds to support their nominee against political prosecutions?

What a waste of money!!! Those funds could be better used throwing lavish donor parties and running TV ads that nobody cares about!!!

Y'all really will choose to get your panties in a wad about anything.
The money should be spent on electing as many Republicans to Congress as possible.

And it was Trump's girl Ronna that was blowing money on parties and flowers.
Missing the forrest for the trees.

Let the left get away with what they're doing to Trump, and the only candidates we'll get to 'elect' will be the ones the left allows us to.
Why should donors have to pay Trump's legal bills? (Obvious answer is because he's Trump and his followers say so.)

The guy is worth billions. If he cannot pay his bill, then he shouldn't be running for office and focus on dealing with that instead.
Gig 'Em
sharpdressedman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kvetch said:

We're supposed to be mad that the RNC is providing funds to support their nominee against political prosecutions?

What a waste of money!!! Those funds could be better used throwing lavish donor parties and running TV ads that nobody cares about!!!

Y'all really will choose to get your panties in a wad about anything.
The cohort of "Never Trumpers" and TDS impaired frequent posters on all threads involving Trump will be greatly saddened should he continue to dominate the polls and will reelection.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

Kvetch said:

We're supposed to be mad that the RNC is providing funds to support their nominee against political prosecutions?

What a waste of money!!! Those funds could be better used throwing lavish donor parties and running TV ads that nobody cares about!!!

Y'all really will choose to get your panties in a wad about anything.
The money should be spent on electing as many Republicans to Congress as possible.
In theory, yes. But even prior to Trump, the Republican Party didn't exactly have a good track record of doing what it took to get more Republicans elected. Lots of wasted money on Romney/Ryan-like candidates with weak messaging.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gigem314 said:

Rapier108 said:

Kvetch said:

We're supposed to be mad that the RNC is providing funds to support their nominee against political prosecutions?

What a waste of money!!! Those funds could be better used throwing lavish donor parties and running TV ads that nobody cares about!!!

Y'all really will choose to get your panties in a wad about anything.
The money should be spent on electing as many Republicans to Congress as possible.
In theory, yes. But even prior to Trump, the Republican Party didn't exactly have a good track record of doing what it took to get more Republicans elected. Lots of wasted money on Romney/Ryan-like candidates with weak messaging.
I don't disagree with that at all, but spending $0 on House and Senate races is basically conceding the election before it ever happens.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.