Kate Middleton conspiracy?

42,386 Views | 275 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by Im Gipper
City Dumme
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes they were. That's why every news outlet in the world pulled them. And today we got 100% proof, she looks absolutely nothing like that fake ass pic they put out. You are rubes and you're mad at me for telling you that
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

This chick either getting phased out for a new princess or she is dead I challenge anyone to prove otherwise.


"I was wrong. Sorry".


Own it.

I'm Gipper
City Dumme
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Congratulations, instead of dead she is merely fighting a terminal disease. Alone. Completely normal.

Nevermind that you guys were wrong about everything else. Great work man, you got me
Stonegateag85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just take the L.

You seem to be really angry about this. Go touch some grass.
City Dumme
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not angry at all. There was a blatant cover up of the real story. Everyone was openly lied to repeatedly, that is not in question. And because of people like you, there will be no consequences and nothing will change. Really happy for you guys though
redcrayon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
City Dumme said:

I'm not angry at all. There was a blatant cover up of the real story. Everyone was openly lied to repeatedly, that is not in question. And because of people like you, there will be no consequences and nothing will change. Really happy for you guys though
Maybe they just wanted some privacy to process the diagnosis. Is that too much to ask?

And where did you hear that she's terminal? I haven't heard that.

Choose your battles, man. This is just not worth your angst.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Privacy? Sure, that's makes sense to the moral mind.

Not the unapologetic conspiracy theorist!

I'm Gipper
Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
City Dumme said:

I'm not angry at all. There was a blatant cover up of the real story. Everyone was openly lied to repeatedly, that is not in question. And because of people like you, there will be no consequences and nothing will change. Really happy for you guys though
Wow. Sorry uhhhh... where were you guaranteed the right not to be lied to... by the royal family or press or whoever you blame... in some other country???? And why exactly are you owed that?

I'm not aware of any covenant, contract, obligation or magna carta on your rights to KNOW everything and be told on your timetable.

Just a really weird thing to tee you off... like seriously. Who cares? they wanted privacy they didn't want to tell YOU....AND.... so what?!?!?!??!

I 100% believe they have every right to LIE and cover up the real story. If thats what they want to do. Why would they not????
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zombie Jon Snow said:

City Dumme said:

I'm not angry at all. There was a blatant cover up of the real story. Everyone was openly lied to repeatedly, that is not in question. And because of people like you, there will be no consequences and nothing will change. Really happy for you guys though
Wow. Sorry uhhhh... where were you guaranteed the right not to be lied to... by the royal family or press or whoever you blame... in some other country???? And why exactly are you owed that?

I'm not aware of any covenant, contract, obligation or magna carta on your rights to KNOW everything and be told on your timetable.

Just a really weird thing to tee you off... like seriously. Who cares? they wanted privacy they didn't want to tell YOU....AND.... so what?!?!?!??!

I 100% believe they have every right to LIE and cover up the real story. If thats what they want to do. Why would they not????

that's easy for you to say ZOMBIE Jon Snow.

you already came back to life.

We are still waiting for our princess, but she is being held in another castle.

IN HELL!!!!!!!!!!!!
DrEvazanPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
C@LAg said:

Zombie Jon Snow said:

City Dumme said:

I'm not angry at all. There was a blatant cover up of the real story. Everyone was openly lied to repeatedly, that is not in question. And because of people like you, there will be no consequences and nothing will change. Really happy for you guys though
Wow. Sorry uhhhh... where were you guaranteed the right not to be lied to... by the royal family or press or whoever you blame... in some other country???? And why exactly are you owed that?

I'm not aware of any covenant, contract, obligation or magna carta on your rights to KNOW everything and be told on your timetable.

Just a really weird thing to tee you off... like seriously. Who cares? they wanted privacy they didn't want to tell YOU....AND.... so what?!?!?!??!

I 100% believe they have every right to LIE and cover up the real story. If thats what they want to do. Why would they not????

that's easy for you to say ZOMBIE Jon Snow.

you already came back to life.

We are still waiting for our princess, but she is being held in another castle.

IN HELL!!!!!!!!!!!!


Yeah. Kings landing castle. Where zombie John snow KILLED THE QUEEN!

But that's ok. Bran had the most interesting story.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
City Dumme said:

rgag12 said:

I bet some of the conspiracy theory folks feel dumb, or at least they should.


They have been lying to you for weeks, putting out obvious AI photos that you said were real and not telling the truth about what is going on at all.

Then she makes a video explaining she has cancer and her piece of **** husband can't even bother to sit beside her for it? She has to sit there alone explaining why they've been lying about everything.

LOL at us being the ones who feel dumb. I hope you feel very vindicated. Everything is fine!!

Hmm you are right... he does seem like a dbag for not being visibly next to her. She seemed alone which is sad.
There were stories that he was having an affair with her friend, I hope they are not true...
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
infinity ag said:

City Dumme said:

rgag12 said:

I bet some of the conspiracy theory folks feel dumb, or at least they should.


They have been lying to you for weeks, putting out obvious AI photos that you said were real and not telling the truth about what is going on at all.

Then she makes a video explaining she has cancer and her piece of **** husband can't even bother to sit beside her for it? She has to sit there alone explaining why they've been lying about everything.

LOL at us being the ones who feel dumb. I hope you feel very vindicated. Everything is fine!!

Hmm you are right... he does seem like a dbag for not being visibly next to her. She seemed alone which is sad.
There were stories that he was having an affair with her friend, I hope they are not true...


Agree. Seems odd considering who they are but my wife said she didn't think it was odd at all. So maybe not a big deal. Dunno.
Counterpoint
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rgag12 said:

I bet some of the conspiracy theory folks feel dumb
Have you ever been on Texags before?
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
City Dumme said:

I'm not angry at all. There was a blatant cover up of the real story. Everyone was openly lied to repeatedly, that is not in question. And because of people like you, there will be no consequences and nothing will change. Really happy for you guys though



houag80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just like his daddy...and she is rather homely just like his step mum.
The "Royals" are anything but.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now there's allegations that this most recent video was AI generated.
Guy on a Buffalo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG




-----------------------
Truth without love is brutality. Love without truth is compromise.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Could be a green screen because she is really frail so they just set it up in the room she is receiving care in.
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
there is no reason whatsoever to suspect foul play.

she is the wife of the future king. Not the king.

and the king has 3 direct successors.

She is irrelevant to the monarchy or the throne.

if she was dead... it would have zero impact on the monarchy.

No reason to keep her (supposed) death quiet.
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some said "gee I bet all the conspiracy nuts feel bad about their speculation now that we know she has cancer".

Apparently not.
redcrayon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The ring doesn't disappear. Watch the video in 4K.
MAROON
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fc2112 said:

Some said "gee I bet all the conspiracy nuts feel bad about their speculation now that we know she has cancer".

Apparently not.
before the internet the village idiot stayed in his village and was ignored by all the residents.

Between this, the Angela Chao deal, and the Baltimore bridge I'm amazed by the number (of what I assume are people with college degrees from A&M) that could be this crazy.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What is the consensus on whether this latest video was AI generated?
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

What is the consensus on whether this latest video was AI generated?



totally faked.

the new world order is putting in overtime to keep the public guessing while the lizard people install their duplicates at all levels of government.

once they crash the economy and start sucking up our resources to take back to their home planet. you will realize you were wasting your time looking in the wrong directions.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

What is the consensus on whether this latest video was AI generated?
I'm now even beginning to have my doubts about Pippa's rear end.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hypothetically,

If the video was all or part AI rendered,

Are we looking at the absolute state of the art so far as AI generated video is concerned?

The royal family would presumably have access to the very latest technology, no?

Are we looking at it then?
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They just went through this with the edited still photo that kicked off the controversy.

Why would you release a AI video if it would be this easily detectable?

What purpose would that serve?

If this was in fact AI rendered or edited video, you've got to assume it was done because she isn't in a health condition where she would be comfortable making a video for public release. If that's the case, why not come out and say that?

'yes the video was edited using AI. This was because she's not in physical health where she felt comfortable doing doing a video for public release'

What would conceivably cause more public outrage, the actual state of her health / physical appearance or that the video was computer generated?

It's not so much whether it was, or wasn't computer generated, but the overarching issue of whether we've crossed a rubicon on this use of AI by public figures at the highest level.

Is this the new normal?
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

They just went through this with the edited still photo that kicked off the controversy.

Why would you release a AI video if it would be this easily detectable?

What purpose would that serve?

If this was in fact AI rendered or edited video, you've got to assume it was done because she isn't in a health condition where she would be comfortable making a video for public release. If that's the case, why not come out and say that?

'yes the video was edited using AI. This was because she's not in physical health where she felty comfortable doing doing a video for public release'

What would conceivably cause more public outrage, the actual state of her health / physical appearance or that the video was computer generated?

It's not so much whether it was, or wasn't computer generated, but the overarching issue of whether we've crossed a rubicon on this use of AI by public figures at the highest level.

Is this the new normal?


I could see them doing it on a green screen inside a studio just to control the surroundings and dropping the background on there in production, but a grand conspiracy where the whole thing is AI doesn't really make sense. Seems pointless to release anything if you're going to do it in a way that people would easily figure out is AI.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

Hypothetically,

If the video was all or part AI rendered,

Are we looking at the absolute state of the art so far as AI generated video is concerned?

The royal family would presumably have access to the very latest technology, no?

Are we looking at it then?


Counterpoint: not necessarily. I present to you as an example the inclusion of de-aged CGI Luke Skywalker in the season finale of The Mandalorian. One of the worst representations of de-aging CGI ever put on screen and that was done by ILM.

Almost immediately, a YouTube guy produced a much better quality version on his own using deep fake tech on the internet and got hired by ILM because of it.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Stat Monitor Repairman said:

Hypothetically,

If the video was all or part AI rendered,

Are we looking at the absolute state of the art so far as AI generated video is concerned?

The royal family would presumably have access to the very latest technology, no?

Are we looking at it then?


Counterpoint: not necessarily. I present to you as an example the inclusion of de-aged CGI Luke Skywalker in the season finale of The Mandalorian. One of the worst representations of de-aging CGI ever put on screen and that was done by ILM.

Almost immediately, a YouTube guy produced a much better quality version on his own using deep fake tech on the internet and got hired by ILM because of it.


The FBO birth certificate released was photoshopped by Scooby Doo. When they think we are easily fooled...
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
City Dumme said:

This chick either getting phased out for a new princess or she is dead I challenge anyone to prove otherwise. She either had an affair that was found out or she figured out the dorky balding husband was having an affair or both!!! They could clear this all up with a 10 second video of Kate. Royals are sick there is no loyalty among any of them. Where is Kate and why are they photoshopping pics of her??????
The Palace is now creating AI stories and deep fakes hat Kate Middleton is done with cancer treatment!

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/royals/kate-middleton-cancer-news-update-33628807


Quote:


In the deeply moving clip, mum of three Kate, 42, described the last nine months since discovering she had cancer as 'scary' and "incredibly tough" but says "out of darkness, can come light". The future Queen said despite "feeling well" she was now on a long road to recovery, but plans to start a light programme of engagements.

I'm Gipper
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.