Foreverconservative said:
You crack me up.
You post this Tweet from Miller's lawyer, and apparently believe the lawyer's bullcrap.
Miller won nothing.
The judge ruled that the lawsuit by the State of Pennsylvania can continue. Loss for Miller
He did remove the restriction on selling across state lines. That's only fair, because the lawsuit is by the State of PA and is in regard to PA laws.
But I don't see how you can call it a win for Miller. The Feds still require milk products in Interstate commerce to be Pasteurized. Miller doesn't Pasteurize, and is under a detaining order from the USDA that he can't sell Interstate.
For anyone interested in the actual ruling, not the lawyer's fantasy:
https://lancasteronline.com/news/local/judge-refuses-to-throw-out-pa-ag-departments-suit-against-amos-miller/article_bb2888a0-e63a-11ee-8c12-2f6b66044c88.htmlQuote:
A Lancaster County judge won't dismiss the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture's lawsuit against Upper Leacock farmer Amos Miller over his raw milk sales.
Lancaster County Judge Thomas Sponaugle's two brief orders issued Tuesday also modified an earlier order that had prevented all sales so that it specifically applies to sales in Pennsylvania.
That would seem to allow Miller to sell raw milk and its products to customers in other states, although federal law requires that milk shipped between states be pasteurized. Miller's ability to fulfill out-of-state orders could be limited given the detaining order placed on his products earlier this year by the agriculture department.
Miller has been the subject of federal and state efforts to compel him to follow food safety rules.
In January, state agriculture inspectors raided his farm, prompted by two illnesses late last year in New York and in Michigan traced to his raw eggnog. The department then sued him Jan. 23 because he doesn't have a permit to sell raw milk and hasn't registered his business with the state, among other alleged violations.
Sponaugle's orders pave the way for the suit to continue.
Sponaugle gave Miller 20 days to respond to the issues the agriculture department raised in its Jan. 23 suit.
Miller's attorney, Robert E. Barnes, said in an emailed statement Tuesday night, "The judge's order is a major relief to Amos Miller & all of his members. As hundreds of out of state members testified to the court, they need access to Amos Miller's milk products for their health & their loved ones."
Ahead of a February 29 court hearing on a request by the agriculture department to prevent Miller from selling goods while its lawsuit plays out, more than 350 people wrote declarations to the court saying how important Miller's products are to them or their family members. And at the hearing, several people testified to that point.
In asking Sponaugle to modify his order to allow sales in other states earlier this month, Miller's attorneys wrote that Miller faced "substantial irreparable injury" if he couldn't sell to out-of-state customers and those customers "will suffer substantial harm if not afforded access to these products."
As for the federal government's pasteurization requirement for interstate sales, Barnes previously told LNP that the federal Food and Drug Administration has agreed not to enforce the rule because it's being challenged in the courts.
In the orders issued Tuesday, Sponaugle also granted a request from Miller's attorneys to order the owner of the website millersorganicfarm.com to stop marketing Miller's products.
Though attorneys for the agriculture department had contended earlier this year that Miller was responsible for the site, Miller's attorney said Miller doesn't have anything to do with it. Barnes said the woman who owns the website has been told for more than a year to stop marketing under Miller's name.