Teslag said:
BadMoonRisin said:
Some of the same people on this thread for years fell for "Russian disinformation" Mueller hoax perpetrated by our own government and reported on by the same whiney losers with zero self-awareness complaining about Tucker going over there. We all now know that the entire thing was a hoax perpetrated by Hillary Clinton and the DNC to allow the FBI to spy on her political opponent. It was obvious from the jump to those with any critical thinking or reasoning skills immediately, of course, but we all now know the entire thing was a scam.
Some of the same people fell for the "51 intelligence agencies say that Hunter's laptop is Russian Information" hook, line, sinker -- "tHaTs A cOnSpIrAcY tHeOrY". We now know that Hunter's laptop was 100% true the entire time, the emails are real, and he's a crackhead degenerate selling access to his father from to nation's enemies for personal profit.
And their response, after being so epically wrong for more than 5 years (let's ignore COVID and the "safe, free, and effective" meme one poster is known for) now is to....listen to and trust the government.
"dOn"t lIsTeN tO tUcKeR, hE's a RuSsIaN pUpPeT" -- gtfo here with that ***** Some of the biggest bull**** "misinformation" ive ever read on the internet happened in the last 8 years, propagated by the same delusional Uke stans in this very thread.
So your solution is to listen to and trust…
the Russian government?
You can trust the scorpion to do scorpion things, The truest information we got about the DNC activities leading up to 2016 was wikileaks and the Russians. Our own media would not report on it because they were complicit in the election influencing. They were loading Hillary with questions in advance and giving her articles for pre-approval.
The Russians, scorpions that they are, are going to give accurate intelligence so long as it is disruptive. If it isn't accurate, it loses its punch. If it is unifying, they won't bother sharing it. In that way, they are just like our own government and media in bias in what they report, but actually probably a little more accurate when they do because they will at least be held accountable and scrutinized.