Why are these Trump people going after Taylor Swift? She's popular with white, suburban women and their daughters. Attacking her is just going to turn them off.
ImSoDumb said:
Why are these Trump people going after Taylor Swift? She's popular with white, suburban women and their daughters. Attacking her is just going to turn them off.
ImSoDumb said:
Then why waste time on them and maybe try to actually reach someone who will vote for you?
Because 30-45 seconds of air time showing a celebrity per game is some really scary psy-op job. It has a lot more to do with her being a woman and anti-Trump. I've never seen a single Trumper do the same when they show clips of Matthew McConaughy, Spike Lee, or any of the other celebs getting seconds of air time.ImSoDumb said:
Why are these Trump people going after Taylor Swift? She's popular with white, suburban women and their daughters. Attacking her is just going to turn them off.
liar. post proof.Old Army Metal said:
They don't even think women should be allowed to vote, let alone meaningfully influence elections.
https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3441381/replies/66882309C@LAg said:liar. post proof.Old Army Metal said:
They don't even think women should be allowed to vote, let alone meaningfully influence elections.
you asserted it.
you defend it.
they are not wrong.Old Army Ghost said:https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3441381/replies/66882309C@LAg said:liar. post proof.Old Army Metal said:
They don't even think women should be allowed to vote, let alone meaningfully influence elections.
you asserted it.
you defend it.
Vince_McMahon said:they are not wrong.Old Army Ghost said:https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3441381/replies/66882309C@LAg said:liar. post proof.Old Army Metal said:
They don't even think women should be allowed to vote, let alone meaningfully influence elections.
you asserted it.
you defend it.
Old Army Metal said:
It's because a woman has the audacity to be prominent but not do it expressly for them.
They don't even think women should be allowed to vote, let alone meaningfully influence elections.
And tend to appoint to or vote for them for important positions regardless of actual competence.No Spin Ag said:Old Army Metal said:
It's because a woman has the audacity to be prominent but not do it expressly for them.
They don't even think women should be allowed to vote, let alone meaningfully influence elections.
Maybe, but if they look like they could have an Only Fans account, they'll be more than happy to at least"appreciate" them for what they are.
as opposed to the left with AOC, Pelosi, Omar, who are not ugly in appearance but in their politics.Old Army Metal said:And tend to appoint to or vote for them for important positions regardless of actual competence.No Spin Ag said:Old Army Metal said:
It's because a woman has the audacity to be prominent but not do it expressly for them.
They don't even think women should be allowed to vote, let alone meaningfully influence elections.
Maybe, but if they look like they could have an Only Fans account, they'll be more than happy to at least"appreciate" them for what they are.
See: Habba, Boebert, etc.
"Doesn't matter if we go down in flames as long as I can do it while having a boner!"
I'm not sure how to simplify my point any further to the point that you would understand it.Vince_McMahon said:as opposed to the left with AOC, Pelosi, Omar, who are not ugly in appearance but in their politics.Old Army Metal said:And tend to appoint to or vote for them for important positions regardless of actual competence.No Spin Ag said:Old Army Metal said:
It's because a woman has the audacity to be prominent but not do it expressly for them.
They don't even think women should be allowed to vote, let alone meaningfully influence elections.
Maybe, but if they look like they could have an Only Fans account, they'll be more than happy to at least"appreciate" them for what they are.
See: Habba, Boebert, etc.
"Doesn't matter if we go down in flames as long as I can do it while having a boner!"
Whats your point?
You did a poll all conservatives think that...laughable. Also, the makeup industry is a billion dollar business women attach their worth to their looks, any other crazy left wing theories from daily kos?Old Army Metal said:I'm not sure how to simplify my point any further to the point that you would understand it.Vince_McMahon said:as opposed to the left with AOC, Pelosi, Omar, who are not ugly in appearance but in their politics.Old Army Metal said:And tend to appoint to or vote for them for important positions regardless of actual competence.No Spin Ag said:Old Army Metal said:
It's because a woman has the audacity to be prominent but not do it expressly for them.
They don't even think women should be allowed to vote, let alone meaningfully influence elections.
Maybe, but if they look like they could have an Only Fans account, they'll be more than happy to at least"appreciate" them for what they are.
See: Habba, Boebert, etc.
"Doesn't matter if we go down in flames as long as I can do it while having a boner!"
Whats your point?
Conservatives think women have worth only if they are attractive and/or can be unobtrusive as possible while making babies and cooking.
Old Army Metal said:I'm not sure how to simplify my point any further to the point that you would understand it.Vince_McMahon said:as opposed to the left with AOC, Pelosi, Omar, who are not ugly in appearance but in their politics.Old Army Metal said:And tend to appoint to or vote for them for important positions regardless of actual competence.No Spin Ag said:Old Army Metal said:
It's because a woman has the audacity to be prominent but not do it expressly for them.
They don't even think women should be allowed to vote, let alone meaningfully influence elections.
Maybe, but if they look like they could have an Only Fans account, they'll be more than happy to at least"appreciate" them for what they are.
See: Habba, Boebert, etc.
"Doesn't matter if we go down in flames as long as I can do it while having a boner!"
Whats your point?
Conservatives think women have worth only if they are attractive and/or can be unobtrusive as possible while making babies and cooking.
Now dont hit ole Red Army with historical facts. The mentioning of the name, Thatcher, triggered his ilk back in the day.Sarge 91 said:Old Army Metal said:I'm not sure how to simplify my point any further to the point that you would understand it.Vince_McMahon said:as opposed to the left with AOC, Pelosi, Omar, who are not ugly in appearance but in their politics.Old Army Metal said:And tend to appoint to or vote for them for important positions regardless of actual competence.No Spin Ag said:Old Army Metal said:
It's because a woman has the audacity to be prominent but not do it expressly for them.
They don't even think women should be allowed to vote, let alone meaningfully influence elections.
Maybe, but if they look like they could have an Only Fans account, they'll be more than happy to at least"appreciate" them for what they are.
See: Habba, Boebert, etc.
"Doesn't matter if we go down in flames as long as I can do it while having a boner!"
Whats your point?
Conservatives think women have worth only if they are attractive and/or can be unobtrusive as possible while making babies and cooking.
Right. That's why Margaret Thatcher is a conservative legend.
funny women didnt even want the right to vote when it was being discussedOld Army Metal said:
It's because a woman has the audacity to be prominent but not do it expressly for them.
They don't even think women should be allowed to vote, let alone meaningfully influence elections.