Quote:

---

Just a water break at the facility

---

If that wasn't completely faked, then it was the most convenient "coincidence" in the history of modern elections.

GeorgiAg said:

---

JamesE4 said:

---

The Dems controlled the key counties and had the stacks of fake ballots ready to go if needed. Ruby doesn't need to be a genius to know to pull out suitcases and scan them several times.

After the results are to the conspirators satisfaction, they have months to adjust and/or delete the evidence of who voted to get close to the number of ballots they processed.

Not difficult, Occam's razor not required.

---

Explain how "stacks of fake ballots" work. Are these names of real people or made up names?

---

Answer - depends on who's doing the counting.

ermcdonald said:

---

HarryJ33tamu said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

So, let's break down this eureka moment. We are talking about alleged fraudulent absentee votes. So the genius scamster dems knew well over 11,000 people who were

REGISTERED TO VOTE

NOT GOING TO VOTE IN PERSON EARLY OR ON ELECTION DAY AND THEY KNEW IT EARLY ENOUGH TO SOMEHOW FRAUDULENTLY REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT IN THAT PERSON'S NAME WITHOUT THAT PERSON FINDING OUT ABOUT IT AND GET THE BALLOT OUT OF THEIR MAILBOX OR OTHERWISE INTERCEPT IT.

THEY PERFECTLY PICKED OVER 11,000 SUCH BALLOTS OF REGISTERED VOTERS WHERE THE PERSON DIDN'T ALSO REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT OR OTHERWISE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN MULTIPLE ABSENTEE BALLOTS FOR THE SAME PERSON DETECTED.

This scheme requires 11,000+ registered voters who didn't vote. And they nailed it with such precision that no fraud was detected by existing safeguards.

Amazing.

---

Biden supporter showing his a** again. Why do you think the Dems are so against cleansing voter rolls? Of course they cheat - dead voters, nursing home residents, etc.

Surely you aren't this clueless.

---

And don't forget the Dems using ballot harvesting to get thousands of ballots in at 3:00 am
in the morning with no change of custody and when those ballots were legally challenged
they disappeared right before the court date....coincidence ????

The Dems plans for 2024 is pretty obvious get millions of illegals into the country check
Give them driver licenses and automatically register them to vote check
use ballot harvesting to get votes for the dems

---

I take it that you have no understanding of what ballot harvesting is.

GeorgiAg said:

---

Rockdoc said:

---

So I take it you're proud of the job your boy is doing for the country and would vote for him again?

---

Donated to DeSantis. I don't think I can vote for either but voting Trump would be better for me personally. I'm still hoping there is an alternative to Trump.

---

Quit making it some stupid personal crusade and consider the bigger picture. My Lord some of you are so f'n dramatic about what your vote "means." It's so narcissistic.

PA24 said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

So, let's break down this eureka moment. We are talking about alleged fraudulent absentee votes. So the genius scamster dems knew well over 11,000 people who were

REGISTERED TO VOTE

NOT GOING TO VOTE IN PERSON EARLY OR ON ELECTION DAY AND THEY KNEW IT EARLY ENOUGH TO SOMEHOW FRAUDULENTLY REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT IN THAT PERSON'S NAME WITHOUT THAT PERSON FINDING OUT ABOUT IT AND GET THE BALLOT OUT OF THEIR MAILBOX OR OTHERWISE INTERCEPT IT.

THEY PERFECTLY PICKED OVER 11,000 SUCH BALLOTS OF REGISTERED VOTERS WHERE THE PERSON DIDN'T ALSO REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT OR OTHERWISE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN MULTIPLE ABSENTEE BALLOTS FOR THE SAME PERSON DETECTED.

This scheme requires 11,000+ registered voters who didn't vote. And they nailed it with such precision that no fraud was detected by existing safeguards.

Amazing.

---

Data mining in 2020 really not that difficult especially in urban areas where folks seldom to never vote.

Register them early and high probability if they did vote it would be democrat so no harm done.

COVID made it easy.

Why didn't it work in TEXAS?

Abbott only allowed 3 voter box drops in all of Harris county.

Your state is like a third world country.

---

Data mining everybody. Ridiculous accuracy to get what is wanted. Election was stolen.

TRADUCTOR said:

---

PA24 said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

So, let's break down this eureka moment. We are talking about alleged fraudulent absentee votes. So the genius scamster dems knew well over 11,000 people who were

REGISTERED TO VOTE

NOT GOING TO VOTE IN PERSON EARLY OR ON ELECTION DAY AND THEY KNEW IT EARLY ENOUGH TO SOMEHOW FRAUDULENTLY REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT IN THAT PERSON'S NAME WITHOUT THAT PERSON FINDING OUT ABOUT IT AND GET THE BALLOT OUT OF THEIR MAILBOX OR OTHERWISE INTERCEPT IT.

THEY PERFECTLY PICKED OVER 11,000 SUCH BALLOTS OF REGISTERED VOTERS WHERE THE PERSON DIDN'T ALSO REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT OR OTHERWISE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN MULTIPLE ABSENTEE BALLOTS FOR THE SAME PERSON DETECTED.

This scheme requires 11,000+ registered voters who didn't vote. And they nailed it with such precision that no fraud was detected by existing safeguards.

Amazing.

---

Data mining in 2020 really not that difficult especially in urban areas where folks seldom to never vote.

Register them early and high probability if they did vote it would be democrat so no harm done.

COVID made it easy.

Why didn't it work in TEXAS?

Abbott only allowed 3 voter box drops in all of Harris county.

Your state is like a third world country.

---

Data mining everybody. Ridiculous accuracy to get what is wanted. Election was stolen.

---

The technology is in place.
The target areas are poor, mostly government housing. One square mile would harvesting 1000's of votes.
Atlanta had drop boxes on every corner, with no monitoring.
Dead people voting was just a red herring to throw the dogs off track.


Rudy knew that Sidney Powell was a diversion tactic or else just not in the know, he distanced the President from her almost immediately. He stayed away from Kraken.

will25u said:

---

Wow... Hawg has been all over this for a while now.
….,,,, removed to save space

---

There are people involved with this that deserve jail time.

Seamaster said:

---

It's what everyone already knows yet absolutely nothing will come of it.

---

I hope you are wrong and people will be held accountable.

GeorgiAg said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

So, let's break down this eureka moment. We are talking about alleged fraudulent absentee votes. So the genius scamster dems knew well over 11,000 people who were

REGISTERED TO VOTE

NOT GOING TO VOTE IN PERSON EARLY OR ON ELECTION DAY AND THEY KNEW IT EARLY ENOUGH TO SOMEHOW FRAUDULENTLY REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT IN THAT PERSON'S NAME WITHOUT THAT PERSON FINDING OUT ABOUT IT AND GET THE BALLOT OUT OF THEIR MAILBOX OR OTHERWISE INTERCEPT IT.

THEY PERFECTLY PICKED OVER 11,000 SUCH BALLOTS OF REGISTERED VOTERS WHERE THE PERSON DIDN'T ALSO REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT OR OTHERWISE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN MULTIPLE ABSENTEE BALLOTS FOR THE SAME PERSON DETECTED.

This scheme requires 11,000+ registered voters who didn't vote. And they nailed it with such precision that no fraud was detected by existing safeguards.

Amazing.

---

You mean like if the voter rolls in GA were hacked and stolen prior to the election so that yeah they knew exactly who they could match Mail in ballots to people who never vote or moved?

Oh wait. That's EXACTLY what happened!


If you were as passionate about truth as you are playing goalie for democrats you'd make some progress

---

Voter rolls are public. How do you know who isn't going to vote in person on Election Day? You think the incompetent morons in Fulton county are going to pull all that off during a water leak? Have you been to Fulton county government? This is more unbelievable than the scheme in the Ocean's 11 movies.

Occam's razor

Did democrats pull off the most unbelievable complicated election stunt in history or did Trump just lose the election?

---

You are leaving off the fact that once the ballot and the envelope are separated it doesn't matter if the ballot was fraudulent with no signature verification.

pagerman @ work said:

---

So when is Trump's inauguration?

---

Not the point. Point relates to the manufacturing of crimes to indict President Trump.

380,000 absentee ballots were not verified for signature by Fulton County. Those were 380,000 ballots that should have been thrown out.

Meanwhile, the Republicans in Georgia would rather look for a place to hide than actually go after these Fulton County fascists for perpetrating a fraud on an election.

GeorgiAg said:

---

JamesE4 said:

---

The Dems controlled the key counties and had the stacks of fake ballots ready to go if needed. Ruby doesn't need to be a genius to know to pull out suitcases and scan them several times.

After the results are to the conspirators satisfaction, they have months to adjust and/or delete the evidence of who voted to get close to the number of ballots they processed.

Not difficult, Occam's razor not required.

---

Explain how "stacks of fake ballots" work. Are these names of real people or made up names?

---

There are no names on the ballots, only on the envelopes that mysteriously can not be found.

PA24 said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

So, let's break down this eureka moment. We are talking about alleged fraudulent absentee votes. So the genius scamster dems knew well over 11,000 people who were

REGISTERED TO VOTE

NOT GOING TO VOTE IN PERSON EARLY OR ON ELECTION DAY AND THEY KNEW IT EARLY ENOUGH TO SOMEHOW FRAUDULENTLY REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT IN THAT PERSON'S NAME WITHOUT THAT PERSON FINDING OUT ABOUT IT AND GET THE BALLOT OUT OF THEIR MAILBOX OR OTHERWISE INTERCEPT IT.

THEY PERFECTLY PICKED OVER 11,000 SUCH BALLOTS OF REGISTERED VOTERS WHERE THE PERSON DIDN'T ALSO REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT OR OTHERWISE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN MULTIPLE ABSENTEE BALLOTS FOR THE SAME PERSON DETECTED.

This scheme requires 11,000+ registered voters who didn't vote. And they nailed it with such precision that no fraud was detected by existing safeguards.

Amazing.

---

Data mining in 2020 really not that difficult especially in urban areas where folks seldom to never vote.

Register them early and high probability if they did vote it would be democrat so no harm done.

COVID made it easy.

Why didn't it work in TEXAS?

Abbott only allowed 3 voter box drops in all of Harris county.

Your state is like a third world country.

---

Was there cheating in GA. Sure was. Is there cheating in Harris Co. Sure is. The DemWits dont have to cheat every where. All they have to hit are big states like Georgia that are control by one or two large metros. OR hit big metros in red states. Personally believe that voter fraud should bring as minimum of 10 years with no parole.

As usual you wrong due to over simplification. You need to leave the farm and take a look around. Your posting is embarrassing

will25u said:

---

How is it India can count all the votes in their country, which is more than the entire population of the US in a few hours?

But here it takes weeks?

---

The answer is they don't.

Do we know how the 380K votes went? Assuming Dem because they are mail-in

The ratio in this thread.

Here is the other report unsealed by Judge Totenberg which points out that Halderman's claims can be done with time and access no one has.

If a "researcher" was given unfettered access to the President's nuclear football for 12 weeks, I wonder what he could come up with.

https://sos.ga.gov/sites/default/files/2023-06/MITRE%20Report.pdf

Quote:

---

Conclusion:

In this report, MITRE NESL performed an independent expert technical review of claims made by a researcher concerning the security of specific devices used in the conduct of elections in the State of Georgia. MITRE NESL assessed the feasibility of the researcher's proposed attacks changing the outcome of a Georgia election. Without access to Georgia voting equipment or the researcher's proof-of-concept capabilities as part of this effort, MITRE NESL assumed validity of the researcher's technical capabilities and focused on the difficulty, time-required, level of physical access required, scalability, and detectability aspects of each proposed attack given existing compensating controls. MITRE NESL has no evidence that any of the researcher's proposed attacks, in whole or in part, have been attempted by any party in an election.


MITRE NESL observed six total attack scenarios hypothesized by the researcher and assessed each one to be operationally infeasible given two parameters: the normal operating procedures of a voting precinct and associated officials, and scale considerations. Five of the proposed attacks were detectable through RLAs, as they only modified a printed ballot's QR codea non-authoritative component of a ballotand the sixth proposed attack was detectable during normal post-election result tabulation procedures. Five of six attacks were deemed non-scalable, impacting a statistically insignificant number of votes on a single device at a time. One attack was technically scalable but also was assessed to be infeasible due to access controls in place in operational election environments, access required to Dominion election software, and access required to Dominion election hardware.

Each of the proposed attacks requires access and/or opportunity that remains unavailable in the operational environment: all six proposed attacks require an attacker to place hands on a device, tamper with hardware and/or software, or otherwise perform actions under operating conditions and security protocols developed to prevent this form of contact with the equipment.

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

So, let's break down this eureka moment. We are talking about alleged fraudulent absentee votes. So the genius scamster dems knew well over 11,000 people who were

REGISTERED TO VOTE

NOT GOING TO VOTE IN PERSON EARLY OR ON ELECTION DAY AND THEY KNEW IT EARLY ENOUGH TO SOMEHOW FRAUDULENTLY REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT IN THAT PERSON'S NAME WITHOUT THAT PERSON FINDING OUT ABOUT IT AND GET THE BALLOT OUT OF THEIR MAILBOX OR OTHERWISE INTERCEPT IT.

THEY PERFECTLY PICKED OVER 11,000 SUCH BALLOTS OF REGISTERED VOTERS WHERE THE PERSON DIDN'T ALSO REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT OR OTHERWISE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN MULTIPLE ABSENTEE BALLOTS FOR THE SAME PERSON DETECTED.

This scheme requires 11,000+ registered voters who didn't vote. And they nailed it with such precision that no fraud was detected by existing safeguards.

Amazing.

---

According to the Alzheimer's Association, there are currently more than 150,000 seniors in Georgia living with Alzheimer's and other types of dementia, and this figure is expected to increase by 26.7% by 2025. The CDC estimates that the number of seniors affected by Alzheimer's and other memory-related diseases will double by 2060.

Well, heres 10x the number of potential candidates right off the bat.

GeorgiAg said:

---

Here is the other report unsealed by Judge Totenberg which points out that Halderman's claims can be done with time and access no one has.

If a "researcher" was given unfettered access to the President's nuclear football for 12 weeks, I wonder what he could come up with.

https://sos.ga.gov/sites/default/files/2023-06/MITRE%20Report.pdf

Quote:

---

Conclusion:

In this report, MITRE NESL performed an independent expert technical review of claims made by a researcher concerning the security of specific devices used in the conduct of elections in the State of Georgia. MITRE NESL assessed the feasibility of the researcher's proposed attacks changing the outcome of a Georgia election. Without access to Georgia voting equipment or the researcher's proof-of-concept capabilities as part of this effort, MITRE NESL assumed validity of the researcher's technical capabilities and focused on the difficulty, time-required, level of physical access required, scalability, and detectability aspects of each proposed attack given existing compensating controls. MITRE NESL has no evidence that any of the researcher's proposed attacks, in whole or in part, have been attempted by any party in an election.


MITRE NESL observed six total attack scenarios hypothesized by the researcher and assessed each one to be operationally infeasible given two parameters: the normal operating procedures of a voting precinct and associated officials, and scale considerations. Five of the proposed attacks were detectable through RLAs, as they only modified a printed ballot's QR codea non-authoritative component of a ballotand the sixth proposed attack was detectable during normal post-election result tabulation procedures. Five of six attacks were deemed non-scalable, impacting a statistically insignificant number of votes on a single device at a time. One attack was technically scalable but also was assessed to be infeasible due to access controls in place in operational election environments, access required to Dominion election software, and access required to Dominion election hardware.

Each of the proposed attacks requires access and/or opportunity that remains unavailable in the operational environment: all six proposed attacks require an attacker to place hands on a device, tamper with hardware and/or software, or otherwise perform actions under operating conditions and security protocols developed to prevent this form of contact with the equipment.

---

---

Can you say Technical Consultant? I guess by definition a county consultant must be unbiased and only have pure motives, right?

Having been around elections, that statement is an outright falsehood. You can have consultants working with the equipment while opposition observers are "watching" from 100 feet away behind glass. A team of two or three would easily have the access and opportunity in the operational environment.

Here's what I want to know: Who's actually taking action based on this supposed smoking gun? Anyone? Buehler?

It's comical how easily some of y'all fall for confirmation bias. Someone sends an inflammatory tweet, no follow up with comments from anyone in a position to act on this info, and y'all take it as gospel.

I would like nothing more than for the dem political machine to be wholly exposed and smashed to bits, but if we learned anything from the Sidney Powell debacle, it's that people will say anything to get some attention.

I'm glad you're attempting to rebut evidence as we put it up. It's important, as the docs and comments you have will be used in any kind of a court/trial situation.

The reason I made up my mind to support election fraud were two main items. First, ANY politician who obtained 12 million more votes than Barack Obama should have the entire process investigated. There wasn't a third party candidate running, and Obama was a lot more popular than Biden. Secondly, regarding that process, so many at the federal level and the state level have directly and actively engaged in blocking access to the necessary information to verify election authenticity. Plus, hatred is a corps value for Democrats and Trump is quite good at making it worse.

Even when identified,

Quote:

---

https://fox11online.com/news/state/michael-gableman-releases-report-on-wisconsin-2020-election

---

I'm never sure if the powers that be choose to rectify the problem. AnD yes, that's a voters problem, but I guarantee you plenty of voters asked for these items to be addressed and corrected.

The bottom line is there's such an astounding amount of either verified, and quite a bit more circumstantial evidence, that any rational person would ask questions. But no one answers those questions unless they're political answers, which means the question is never answered.

This is about the nicest way I can post. I'm 100% certain massive (more than 10 million in ballots nationwide, at least) cheating happened due to mail-in voting and ballot harvesting. Was there machine malfeasance? Probably, but it has never been proved and Dominion would never release their access passwords. I doubt it's proprietary.

If you want us to shut the hell up, then cooperate and release everything nationwide that's been requested hundreds of times since November of 2020.

Stmichael said:

---

Here's what I want to know: Who's actually taking action based on this supposed smoking gun? Anyone? Buehler?

It's comical how easily some of y'all fall for confirmation bias. Someone sends an inflammatory tweet, no follow up with comments from anyone in a position to act on this info, and y'all take it as gospel.

I would like nothing more than for the dem political machine to be wholly exposed and smashed to bits, but if we learned anything from the Sidney Powell debacle, it's that people will say anything to get some attention.

---

These findings are about something happening in court. So the parties and their attorneys are trying to do something. There's another side in the suit that is trying to prevent anything from happening (notated by a "D" in voting preference usually). Hopefully there's a A judge that isn't wildly biased, but the legal system is overwhelmingly biased to the political left, so not likely.

ermcdonald said:

---

HarryJ33tamu said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

So, let's break down this eureka moment. We are talking about alleged fraudulent absentee votes. So the genius scamster dems knew well over 11,000 people who were

REGISTERED TO VOTE

NOT GOING TO VOTE IN PERSON EARLY OR ON ELECTION DAY AND THEY KNEW IT EARLY ENOUGH TO SOMEHOW FRAUDULENTLY REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT IN THAT PERSON'S NAME WITHOUT THAT PERSON FINDING OUT ABOUT IT AND GET THE BALLOT OUT OF THEIR MAILBOX OR OTHERWISE INTERCEPT IT.

THEY PERFECTLY PICKED OVER 11,000 SUCH BALLOTS OF REGISTERED VOTERS WHERE THE PERSON DIDN'T ALSO REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT OR OTHERWISE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN MULTIPLE ABSENTEE BALLOTS FOR THE SAME PERSON DETECTED.

This scheme requires 11,000+ registered voters who didn't vote. And they nailed it with such precision that no fraud was detected by existing safeguards.

Amazing.

---

Biden supporter showing his a** again. Why do you think the Dems are so against cleansing voter rolls? Of course they cheat - dead voters, nursing home residents, etc.

Surely you aren't this clueless.

---

And don't forget the Dems using ballot harvesting to get thousands of ballots in at 3:00 am
in the morning with no chain of custody and when those ballots were legally challenged
they disappeared right before the court date....coincidence ????

The Dems plans for 2024 :
is pretty obvious get millions of illegals into the country check
Give them driver licenses and automatically register them to vote check
Print up thousands of ballots for illegal aliens and dead people and deliver them to ballot
boxes in the middle of night hoping to avoid scrutiny

Pretty peculiar how illegal aliens and dead people ONLY vote for democrats

---

sock

jrdaustin said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

Here is the other report unsealed by Judge Totenberg which points out that Halderman's claims can be done with time and access no one has.

If a "researcher" was given unfettered access to the President's nuclear football for 12 weeks, I wonder what he could come up with.

https://sos.ga.gov/sites/default/files/2023-06/MITRE%20Report.pdf

Quote:

---

Conclusion:

In this report, MITRE NESL performed an independent expert technical review of claims made by a researcher concerning the security of specific devices used in the conduct of elections in the State of Georgia. MITRE NESL assessed the feasibility of the researcher's proposed attacks changing the outcome of a Georgia election. Without access to Georgia voting equipment or the researcher's proof-of-concept capabilities as part of this effort, MITRE NESL assumed validity of the researcher's technical capabilities and focused on the difficulty, time-required, level of physical access required, scalability, and detectability aspects of each proposed attack given existing compensating controls. MITRE NESL has no evidence that any of the researcher's proposed attacks, in whole or in part, have been attempted by any party in an election.


MITRE NESL observed six total attack scenarios hypothesized by the researcher and assessed each one to be operationally infeasible given two parameters: the normal operating procedures of a voting precinct and associated officials, and scale considerations. Five of the proposed attacks were detectable through RLAs, as they only modified a printed ballot's QR codea non-authoritative component of a ballotand the sixth proposed attack was detectable during normal post-election result tabulation procedures. Five of six attacks were deemed non-scalable, impacting a statistically insignificant number of votes on a single device at a time. One attack was technically scalable but also was assessed to be infeasible due to access controls in place in operational election environments, access required to Dominion election software, and access required to Dominion election hardware.

Each of the proposed attacks requires access and/or opportunity that remains unavailable in the operational environment: all six proposed attacks require an attacker to place hands on a device, tamper with hardware and/or software, or otherwise perform actions under operating conditions and security protocols developed to prevent this form of contact with the equipment.

---

---

Can you say Technical Consultant? I guess by definition a county consultant must be unbiased and only have pure motives, right?

Having been around elections, that statement is an outright falsehood. You can have consultants working with the equipment while opposition observers are "watching" from 100 feet away behind glass. A team of two or three would easily have the access and opportunity in the operational environment.

---

Well, here is Dominion actually TEACHING how to change votes

2040huck said:

---

ermcdonald said:

---

HarryJ33tamu said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

So, let's break down this eureka moment. We are talking about alleged fraudulent absentee votes. So the genius scamster dems knew well over 11,000 people who were

REGISTERED TO VOTE

NOT GOING TO VOTE IN PERSON EARLY OR ON ELECTION DAY AND THEY KNEW IT EARLY ENOUGH TO SOMEHOW FRAUDULENTLY REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT IN THAT PERSON'S NAME WITHOUT THAT PERSON FINDING OUT ABOUT IT AND GET THE BALLOT OUT OF THEIR MAILBOX OR OTHERWISE INTERCEPT IT.

THEY PERFECTLY PICKED OVER 11,000 SUCH BALLOTS OF REGISTERED VOTERS WHERE THE PERSON DIDN'T ALSO REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT OR OTHERWISE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN MULTIPLE ABSENTEE BALLOTS FOR THE SAME PERSON DETECTED.

This scheme requires 11,000+ registered voters who didn't vote. And they nailed it with such precision that no fraud was detected by existing safeguards.

Amazing.

---

Biden supporter showing his a** again. Why do you think the Dems are so against cleansing voter rolls? Of course they cheat - dead voters, nursing home residents, etc.

Surely you aren't this clueless.

---

And don't forget the Dems using ballot harvesting to get thousands of ballots in at 3:00 am
in the morning with no chain of custody and when those ballots were legally challenged
they disappeared right before the court date....coincidence ????

The Dems plans for 2024 :
is pretty obvious get millions of illegals into the country check
Give them driver licenses and automatically register them to vote check
Print up thousands of ballots for illegal aliens and dead people and deliver them to ballot
boxes in the middle of night hoping to avoid scrutiny

Pretty peculiar how illegal aliens and dead people ONLY vote for democrats

---

sock

---

High level retort.

fasthorse05 said:

---

I'm glad you're attempting to rebut evidence as we put it up. It's important, as the docs and comments you have will be used in any kind of a court/trial situation.

The reason I made up my mind to support election fraud were two main items. First, ANY politician who obtained 12 million more votes than Barack Obama should have the entire process investigated. There wasn't a third party candidate running, and Obama was a lot more popular than Biden. Secondly, regarding that process, so many at the federal level and the state level have directly and actively engaged in blocking access to the necessary information to verify election authenticity. Plus, hatred is a corps value for Democrats and Trump is quite good at making it worse.

Even when identified,

Quote:

---

https://fox11online.com/news/state/michael-gableman-releases-report-on-wisconsin-2020-election

---

I'm never sure if the powers that be choose to rectify the problem. AnD yes, that's a voters problem, but I guarantee you plenty of voters asked for these items to be addressed and corrected.

The bottom line is there's such an astounding amount of either verified, and quite a bit more circumstantial evidence, that any rational person would ask questions. But no one answers those questions unless they're political answers, which means the question is never answered.

This is about the nicest way I can post. I'm 100% certain massive (more than 10 million in ballots nationwide, at least) cheating happened due to mail-in voting and ballot harvesting. Was their machine malfeasance? Probably, but it has never been proved and Dominion would never release their access passwords. I doubt it's proprietary.

If you want us to shut the hell up, then cooperate and release everything nationwide that's been requested hundreds of times since November of 2020.

---

Appreciate the tone and spirit of your post. It's good not to be the spawn of Satan, liberal commie for once. I don't have first hand information. No one here does. We are here to debate politics.

The flip side of your argument about Obama is that while Obama was liked by Dems, McCain/Romney were not HATED anywhere to the level Trump reached. I think a good number of "Biden" votes were really "not Trump" votes.

ermcdonald said:

---

HarryJ33tamu said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

So, let's break down this eureka moment. We are talking about alleged fraudulent absentee votes. So the genius scamster dems knew well over 11,000 people who were

REGISTERED TO VOTE

NOT GOING TO VOTE IN PERSON EARLY OR ON ELECTION DAY AND THEY KNEW IT EARLY ENOUGH TO SOMEHOW FRAUDULENTLY REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT IN THAT PERSON'S NAME WITHOUT THAT PERSON FINDING OUT ABOUT IT AND GET THE BALLOT OUT OF THEIR MAILBOX OR OTHERWISE INTERCEPT IT.

THEY PERFECTLY PICKED OVER 11,000 SUCH BALLOTS OF REGISTERED VOTERS WHERE THE PERSON DIDN'T ALSO REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT OR OTHERWISE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN MULTIPLE ABSENTEE BALLOTS FOR THE SAME PERSON DETECTED.

This scheme requires 11,000+ registered voters who didn't vote. And they nailed it with such precision that no fraud was detected by existing safeguards.

Amazing.

---

Biden supporter showing his a** again. Why do you think the Dems are so against cleansing voter rolls? Of course they cheat - dead voters, nursing home residents, etc.

Surely you aren't this clueless.

---

And don't forget the Dems using ballot harvesting to get thousands of ballots in at 3:00 am
in the morning with no chain of custody and when those ballots were legally challenged
they disappeared right before the court date....coincidence ????

The Dems plans for 2024 :
is pretty obvious get millions of illegals into the country check
Give them driver licenses and automatically register them to vote check
Print up thousands of ballots for illegal aliens and dead people and deliver them to ballot
boxes in the middle of night hoping to avoid scrutiny

Pretty peculiar how illegal aliens and dead people ONLY vote for democrats

---

Wow.

GeorgiAg said:

---

ermcdonald said:

---

HarryJ33tamu said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

So, let's break down this eureka moment. We are talking about alleged fraudulent absentee votes. So the genius scamster dems knew well over 11,000 people who were

REGISTERED TO VOTE

NOT GOING TO VOTE IN PERSON EARLY OR ON ELECTION DAY AND THEY KNEW IT EARLY ENOUGH TO SOMEHOW FRAUDULENTLY REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT IN THAT PERSON'S NAME WITHOUT THAT PERSON FINDING OUT ABOUT IT AND GET THE BALLOT OUT OF THEIR MAILBOX OR OTHERWISE INTERCEPT IT.

THEY PERFECTLY PICKED OVER 11,000 SUCH BALLOTS OF REGISTERED VOTERS WHERE THE PERSON DIDN'T ALSO REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT OR OTHERWISE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN MULTIPLE ABSENTEE BALLOTS FOR THE SAME PERSON DETECTED.

This scheme requires 11,000+ registered voters who didn't vote. And they nailed it with such precision that no fraud was detected by existing safeguards.

Amazing.

---

Biden supporter showing his a** again. Why do you think the Dems are so against cleansing voter rolls? Of course they cheat - dead voters, nursing home residents, etc.

Surely you aren't this clueless.

---

And don't forget the Dems using ballot harvesting to get thousands of ballots in at 3:00 am
in the morning with no chain of custody and when those ballots were legally challenged
they disappeared right before the court date....coincidence ????

The Dems plans for 2024 :
is pretty obvious get millions of illegals into the country check
Give them driver licenses and automatically register them to vote check
Print up thousands of ballots for illegal aliens and dead people and deliver them to ballot
boxes in the middle of night hoping to avoid scrutiny

Pretty peculiar how illegal aliens and dead people ONLY vote for democrats

---

Wow.

---

Wow as is never will happen? Or wow good point?

ermcdonald said:

---

The Dems plans for 2024 :
is pretty obvious get millions of illegals into the country check
Give them driver licenses and automatically register them to vote check
Print up thousands of ballots for illegal aliens and dead people and deliver them to ballot
boxes in the middle of night hoping to avoid scrutiny

Pretty peculiar how illegal aliens and dead people ONLY vote for democrats

---

Is there a constitutional amendment I'm not aware of allowing non citizens to vote?