Responses below reflect better on the statement of the IDF>
No, they did not claim they were not involved, they claim the Church hadn't mentioned anything about the shooting when they spoke earlier about an explosion.jt2hunt said:
I read where the IDF was in talks with the church and confirmed they were not involved. This is one side of the event.
May I ask if you have a dog in this fight?LMCane said:
and EXACTLY how would the Patriarch of JERUSALEM, a city located 70 miles away from Gaza
know that it was two IDF snipers that "killed" the "innocent" parishioners?!
what EXACT evidence do you have of this?
other than being on the side of Hamas.
I don't think that is exactly right. The IDF has admitted they have been operating in the area. You might be talking about this quote from the below linked article:jt2hunt said:
I read where the IDF was in talks with the church and confirmed they were not involved. This is one side of the event.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-refutes-claim-it-targeted-sole-catholic-church-in-gaza-after-2-women-said-killed/Quote:
Stressing that the IDF "does not target civilians, no matter their religion," the army told AFP that it had on Saturday been contacted by church representatives about an incident in the Holy Family Parish, but "no reports of a hit on the church, nor civilians being injured or killed, were raised."
This bit is so tired...LMCane said:
other than being on the side of Hamas.
shack009 said:I don't think that is exactly right. The IDF has admitted they have been operating in the area. You might be talking about this quote from the below linked article:jt2hunt said:
I read where the IDF was in talks with the church and confirmed they were not involved. This is one side of the event.https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-refutes-claim-it-targeted-sole-catholic-church-in-gaza-after-2-women-said-killed/Quote:
Stressing that the IDF "does not target civilians, no matter their religion," the army told AFP that it had on Saturday been contacted by church representatives about an incident in the Holy Family Parish, but "no reports of a hit on the church, nor civilians being injured or killed, were raised."
The bolded wording is so strange. They talked to people there about something that happened at the church but it wasn't about people being harmed? What the heck was being discussed?
And, again, their "denial" of the incident uses the word "target," which is not a denial that it happened.
Well, you may recall a few years ago they shot a Palestian journalist. They were adamant that they didn't do it for weeks, or maybe months. Then finally admitted it was them.shack009 said:We still don't have confirmation yet, as far as I am aware. IDF says they were operating in the area but denies "targeting" the Catholic church, which isn't a denial that it was them that did it.jt2hunt said:
Not reading 236 posts but who was the sniper? IDF or Hamas?
Why do you put "innocent" in quotes? What EXACT evidence do you have that the 83 year old woman and the other woman were not innocent?LMCane said:
and EXACTLY how would the Patriarch of JERUSALEM, a city located 70 miles away from Gaza
know that it was two IDF snipers that "killed" the "innocent" parishioners?!
what EXACT evidence do you have of this?
other than being on the side of Hamas.
He dared to criticize Israel and doesn't want Palestinian civilians to die. Also probably fails to call for the hostage release any chance he can get, and fails to constantly be telling everyone how bad Hamas is. That's like automatically proven to be pro-Hamas. Get with the program dude.zoneag said:Why do you put "innocent" in quotes? What EXACT evidence do you have that the 83 year old woman and the other woman were not innocent?LMCane said:
and EXACTLY how would the Patriarch of JERUSALEM, a city located 70 miles away from Gaza
know that it was two IDF snipers that "killed" the "innocent" parishioners?!
what EXACT evidence do you have of this?
other than being on the side of Hamas.
And what EXACT evidence do you have of the Cardinal being "on the side of Hamas"?
May I ask what your username was before October 13th, when this username was created?Terminus Est said:May I ask if you have a dog in this fight?LMCane said:
and EXACTLY how would the Patriarch of JERUSALEM, a city located 70 miles away from Gaza
know that it was two IDF snipers that "killed" the "innocent" parishioners?!
what EXACT evidence do you have of this?
other than being on the side of Hamas.
HamasJihadAgjrdaustin said:May I ask what your username was before October 13th, when this username was created?Terminus Est said:May I ask if you have a dog in this fight?LMCane said:
and EXACTLY how would the Patriarch of JERUSALEM, a city located 70 miles away from Gaza
know that it was two IDF snipers that "killed" the "innocent" parishioners?!
what EXACT evidence do you have of this?
other than being on the side of Hamas.
You know, one week after the Hamas attack....
Based on your posts on this thread - and yes, I read the whole thread - that doesn't seem too unrealistic.Terminus Est said:HamasJihadAgjrdaustin said:May I ask what your username was before October 13th, when this username was created?Terminus Est said:May I ask if you have a dog in this fight?LMCane said:
and EXACTLY how would the Patriarch of JERUSALEM, a city located 70 miles away from Gaza
know that it was two IDF snipers that "killed" the "innocent" parishioners?!
what EXACT evidence do you have of this?
other than being on the side of Hamas.
You know, one week after the Hamas attack....
Pseudoreligions and cults are indeed worse.ttu_85 said:Yeah Atheistic 'Religions' such as Nazism and Communism killed millions not thousands. And those that murdered people violated their religions. Imagine the body counts in an Atheistic world. Oh wait we have bloody examples that drawf anything seen in the religious world-- not even close$240 Worth of Pudding said:
Ain't religion grand?
Rapier is right. It not religion its humanity.
You may want to educate yourself a little. Things are more complicated than you think.
Dies Irae, Silian Rail, nuclear scramjet, etc. etc. etc. and originally Bustup.jrdaustin said:May I ask what your username was before October 13th, when this username was created?Terminus Est said:May I ask if you have a dog in this fight?LMCane said:
and EXACTLY how would the Patriarch of JERUSALEM, a city located 70 miles away from Gaza
know that it was two IDF snipers that "killed" the "innocent" parishioners?!
what EXACT evidence do you have of this?
other than being on the side of Hamas.
You know, one week after the Hamas attack....
See about 15 posts up. Seems to still be "he said-he said."akm91 said:
Was it ever confirmed the two women were actually killed by IDF snipers? Have not seen this anywhere else.
Which leads me to wonder:Quote:
Stressing that the IDF "does not target civilians, no matter their religion," the army told AFP that it had on Saturday been contacted by church representatives about an incident in the Holy Family Parish, but "no reports of a hit on the church, nor civilians being injured or killed, were raised."
I think there have been a few incidents there. First was their generator got hit, supposedly by a tank, earlier in the day.akm91 said:
Actually I find IDF's statement very interesting:Which leads me to wonder:Quote:
Stressing that the IDF "does not target civilians, no matter their religion," the army told AFP that it had on Saturday been contacted by church representatives about an incident in the Holy Family Parish, but "no reports of a hit on the church, nor civilians being injured or killed, were raised."
1. Were people even killed in the church?
2. If so, were they Hamas terrorists posing as Christians hiding out in a church?
Hey LM Cane since you're so concerned about EXACT evidence,zoneag said:Why do you put "innocent" in quotes? What EXACT evidence do you have that the 83 year old woman and the other woman were not innocent?LMCane said:
and EXACTLY how would the Patriarch of JERUSALEM, a city located 70 miles away from Gaza
know that it was two IDF snipers that "killed" the "innocent" parishioners?!
what EXACT evidence do you have of this?
other than being on the side of Hamas.
And what EXACT evidence do you have of the Cardinal being "on the side of Hamas"?
Terminus Est said:HamasJihadAgjrdaustin said:May I ask what your username was before October 13th, when this username was created?Terminus Est said:May I ask if you have a dog in this fight?LMCane said:
and EXACTLY how would the Patriarch of JERUSALEM, a city located 70 miles away from Gaza
know that it was two IDF snipers that "killed" the "innocent" parishioners?!
what EXACT evidence do you have of this?
other than being on the side of Hamas.
You know, one week after the Hamas attack....
Quote:
Speaking to Crux, Raphael Schutz, Israel's ambassador to the Holy See said, "it might be true that the women were shot by IDF forces, although this has not been 100 percent established, but even if this is true, this has not been done by malice, or intentionally, it was a mistake like others during the war."
"In this context, I find it very annoying that the Latin Patriarchate in Jerusalem very fast, a few hours after the incident, without an inquiry, lashed into publishing a text naming Israel as a country of murder, the IDF as murderers in 'cold blood,' which is basically a blood libel. Nobody in Israel does that intentionally," he said.