There was a reason Tom Clancy was blocked from publishing his book The Hunt for Red October originally.

C@LAg said:

---

Bunk Moreland said:

---

Carry on sycophants. It's just so pathetic at this point. But keep carrying the old egotistical moron's water. I hope yall are only internet heroes and not financial donors to his family's lifestyle while he keeps trolling you.

---

you are the one that came here crying like a titty baby, posting your troll OP as if this was a proven fact.

It is not. your own link starts with ALLEGEDLY.

And now you are all butthurt that you have been exposed for accepting uncorroborated, unproven information as fact, and have now decided that throwing a temper tantrum is the correct course of action.

---

.
I'm not the OP buddy. Cry cry again.

Bunk Moreland said:

---

Carry on sycophants. It's just so pathetic at this point. But keep carrying the old egotistical moron's water. I hope yall are only internet heroes and not financial donors to his family's lifestyle while he keeps trolling you.

---

Wow, good one there. You sure showed 16!

texsn95 said:

---

Bunk Moreland said:

---

Carry on sycophants. It's just so pathetic at this point. But keep carrying the old egotistical moron's water. I hope yall are only internet heroes and not financial donors to his family's lifestyle while he keeps trolling you.

---

Wow, good one there. You sure showed 16!

---

Ehh. It's just a bunch of insecure people who still can't admit the checks they're cutting to Trump are just for him to fleece them. I'm not worried.

Ok. I will play.

Name any time and specific information Trump has said publicly that was factually correct.

He speaks in hyperbole and platitudes

I await your detailing anything on any subject Trump has spoken publicly about that had accurate details as the "story" alleged. Off the top of my head I can't think of a time that ever happened

C@LAg said:

---

Bunk Moreland said:

---

C@LAg said:

---

Bunk Moreland said:

---

Carry on sycophants. It's just so pathetic at this point. But keep carrying the old egotistical moron's water. I hope yall are only internet heroes and not financial donors to his family's lifestyle while he keeps trolling you.

---

you are the one that came here crying like a titty baby, posting your troll OP as if this was a proven fact.

It is not. your own link starts with ALLEGEDLY.

And now you are all butthurt that you have been exposed for accepting uncorroborated, unproven information as fact, and have now decided that throwing a temper tantrum is the correct course of action.

---

.
I'm not the OP buddy. Cry cry again.

---

point still stands. you ran with it, and you are the one throwing the temper tantrum.

I can admit when I am wrong. Mea culpa. Maybe you should try the same.

---

What temper tantrum am I throwing? I'm laughing at how quickly the F16 team came to move goalposts on a damning story just because Trump was the subject.

Even if Trump was blustering and bragging it shows how stupid he is and how clearly he should not be POTUS.

But again please keep supporting him and sending checks. Kimberly and Don Jr appreciate it.

aggiehawg said:

---

There was a reason Tom Clancy was blocked from publishing his book The Hunt for Red October originally.

---

People are dumb if they think the various nation states of the world dont already know all there is to know about 100 year old tech. The clintons were passing it out like candy in the 90s.

Boozer92 said:

---

Ok. I will play.

Name any time and specific information Trump has said publicly that was factually correct.

He speaks in hyperbole and platitudes

I await your detailing anything on any subject Trump has spoken publicly about that had accurate details as the "story" alleged. Off the top of my head I can't think of a time that ever happened

---

Is your defense now that "trump discussing nuclear information to an Australian paying for access to stay at his residence and meet him is just hyperbole and should only be treated is such" as if that's somehow OK for a guy trying to convince us be should be president again?

Seriously?

No. I am saying Trump doesn't even know the information he supposedly said. He doesn't know how anything actually works. I doubt this story is true in any way because Trump would never bother knowing such information. But possible he would brag in broad strokes about something he has no clue what he is talking about.

I don't support Trump and his empty words but I don't believe this either.

Waiting for you to tell us even one time he ever spoke on details of anything correctly

Bunk Moreland said:

---

C@LAg said:

---

Bunk Moreland said:

---

C@LAg said:

---

Bunk Moreland said:

---

Carry on sycophants. It's just so pathetic at this point. But keep carrying the old egotistical moron's water. I hope yall are only internet heroes and not financial donors to his family's lifestyle while he keeps trolling you.

---

you are the one that came here crying like a titty baby, posting your troll OP as if this was a proven fact.

It is not. your own link starts with ALLEGEDLY.

And now you are all butthurt that you have been exposed for accepting uncorroborated, unproven information as fact, and have now decided that throwing a temper tantrum is the correct course of action.

---

.
I'm not the OP buddy. Cry cry again.

---

point still stands. you ran with it, and you are the one throwing the temper tantrum.

I can admit when I am wrong. Mea culpa. Maybe you should try the same.

---

What temper tantrum am I throwing? I'm laughing at how quickly the F16 team came to move goalposts on a damning story just because Trump was the subject.

Even if Trump was blustering and bragging it shows how stupid he is and how clearly he should not be POTUS.

But again please keep supporting him and sending checks. Kimberly and Don Jr appreciate it.

---

. Please tell us how it changes anything if Trump stated to some guy or in s speech that we have 2,856 nukes on 18 subs.

Trump is also working on cold fusion.

TDS is strong with this one, Obi Wan

Bunk Moreland said:

---

Burnsey said:

---

Bunk Moreland said:

---

The defending of this is so on brand for this board and at the same time so pathetic. Trump sycophants just can't quit him.

This is a very damning story.

---

There's no secret about how many nukes are on our subs. It's on wiki ffs! What am I missing?

---

Giving locations and proximities of capabilities of our subs to random people, foreign or not, is a major issue. It's insanely stupid.

What am I missing!?

---

If I told you what you were missing, you'd flag me and I'd get banned.

I support Desantis, btw

Trump has plenty of faults and makes plenty of mistakes.


You don't have to lie about him.

The timing of this story is intriguing, I wonder what could have driven it.

🚨 #BREAKING: TRUMP WILLING TO ACCEPT HOUSE SPEAKERSHIP

Trump has now said he would serve as Speaker of the House to serve as a unifier for the Republican Party until a permanent replacement can be found, according to Fox News

This development comes after it was reported today… pic.twitter.com/uf36Qold0X

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) October 5, 2023

Bunk Moreland said:

---

Carry on sycophants. It's just so pathetic at this point. But keep carrying the old egotistical moron's water. I hope yall are only internet heroes and not financial donors to his family's lifestyle while he keeps trolling you.

---

Calling everyone else sycophants when you believe this "alleged" story from "anonymous sources." The same level of factual basis as the peeing in Russian hookers story that was completely false. It's a bit hard for any of us to give a flying f when you people bite at every false story out there.

Dare to dream

Is that true?

If so, LOL

Heads would explode.

boboguitar said:

---

Quote:

---

Months after leaving the White House, former President Donald Trump allegedly discussed potentially sensitive information about U.S. nuclear submarines with a member of his Mar-a-Lago Club -- an Australian billionaire who then allegedly shared the information with scores of others, including more than a dozen foreign officials, several of his own employees, and a handful of journalists, according to sources familiar with the matter.

---

https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=103760456

Trump is a traitor to this nation.

---

Yeah, every idiot knows you monetize that type of info and use your crackhead sob to deliver it and collect payment and then nobody will investigate you, let alone call you a traitor.

The wording of the allegation is intentional and precise. The article states "potentially sensitive" and did not say "classified" because Smith knows that is isn't classified state secrets. The purpose of the story, as Smith and his mouthpiece ABC News know, is to keep the word of "another investigation" circulating and distract from the concrete facts of felonious conduct by Biden Inc that drip every day from gaining the attention of the NPCs.

Pookers said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

There was a reason Tom Clancy was blocked from publishing his book The Hunt for Red October originally.

---

People are dumb if they think the various nation states of the world dont already know all there is to know about 100 year old tech. The clintons were passing it out like candy in the 90s.

---

People are really dumb if they can't understand the difference between 100 year old tech and bleeding edge tech and also of the current plans and capabilities of using that tech.

I heard trump tried to grab the subs steering wheel and crash it into Australia

boboguitar said:

---

Quote:

---

Months after leaving the White House, former President Donald Trump allegedly discussed potentially sensitive information about U.S. nuclear submarines with a member of his Mar-a-Lago Club -- an Australian billionaire who then allegedly shared the information with scores of others, including more than a dozen foreign officials, several of his own employees, and a handful of journalists, according to sources familiar with the matter.

---

You know what "allegedly" means, right?

https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=103760456

Trump is a traitor to this nation.

---

Rapier108 said:

---

boboguitar said:

---

pacecar02 said:

---

boboguitar said:

---

pacecar02 said:

---

then told Pratt two pieces of information about U.S. submarines: the supposed exact number of nuclear warheads they routinely carry, and exactly how close they supposedly can get to a Russian submarine without being detected.






That's the sekrat info?

---

Are you really defending that?

---

It's known info

---

Then post the source of that information that predates Trump leaving office.

---

It is not a secret how many Trident II SLBMs the Ohio class carries. Hell, you can count the number of silo doors on the sub if you can spot on one Google Earth when in port.

It is also not a secret how many warheads a Trident II can carry. The number can vary, but the max number is known and has been long before Trump.

Try again bobo.

Edit: Grammar

---

If Rapier is calling you out on stuff that reflects poorly on Trump, you can bet your info is probably misguided.

As many have already said, zero chance Trump knows anything significant or technical about our subs even if it was briefed to him in excruciating detail.

eric76 said:

---

Pookers said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

There was a reason Tom Clancy was blocked from publishing his book The Hunt for Red October originally.

---

People are dumb if they think the various nation states of the world dont already know all there is to know about 100 year old tech. The clintons were passing it out like candy in the 90s.

---

People are really dumb if they can't understand the difference between 100 year old tech and bleeding edge tech and also of the current plans and capabilities of using that tech.

---

Nukes are ****** fear porn. But of course a boomer like yourself thinks they are still cutting edge.

Pookers said:

---

eric76 said:

---

Pookers said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

There was a reason Tom Clancy was blocked from publishing his book The Hunt for Red October originally.

---

People are dumb if they think the various nation states of the world dont already know all there is to know about 100 year old tech. The clintons were passing it out like candy in the 90s.

---

People are really dumb if they can't understand the difference between 100 year old tech and bleeding edge tech and also of the current plans and capabilities of using that tech.

---

Nukes are ****** fear porn. But of course a boomer like yourself thinks they are still cutting edge.

---

The idea that it is unimportant says more about today's idiocracy that we have devolved into.

eric76 said:

---

Pookers said:

---

eric76 said:

---

Pookers said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

There was a reason Tom Clancy was blocked from publishing his book The Hunt for Red October originally.

---

People are dumb if they think the various nation states of the world dont already know all there is to know about 100 year old tech. The clintons were passing it out like candy in the 90s.

---

People are really dumb if they can't understand the difference between 100 year old tech and bleeding edge tech and also of the current plans and capabilities of using that tech.

---

Nukes are ****** fear porn. But of course a boomer like yourself thinks they are still cutting edge.

---

The idea that it is unimportant says more about today's idiocracy that we have devolved into.

---

The idea that this story is legit says even more about said idiocracy.

GAC06 said:

---

As many have already said, zero chance Trump knows anything significant or technical about our subs even if it was briefed to him in excruciating detail.

---

Agreed, at this point I'm not sure Trump knows his left shoe from his right one so I have serious doubts he knows any relevant details about nuclear subs. I can easily see him bragging about this stuff but out of all the dumb things he says/does this one is pretty low on the list.

At some point, they'll have Trump allegedly being a 9/11 pilot.

Absolutely delusional. Same folks who believed Steele's dossier was infallible.

Logos Stick said:

---

Is that true?

If so, LOL

Heads would explode.

---

There was another report that he will support Jim Jordan, so probably won't happen, but it would be glorious.

I'm probably the most Never Trumper on here and I can't see Trump knowing enough about a submarine to possibly pass on to anyone.

Someone find the clip from 2016 where he was asked his thoughts on the nuclear triad. That dunce just rambled about the importance of "the nuclear".

As far as preparing readers for a real doozy, "Trump allegedly..." ranks right up there with Biden's "Here's the thing..."

After all this time you never Trumpers still fall for it.

Every
Single
Time

Bunk Moreland said:

---

Boozer92 said:

---

Ok. I will play.

Name any time and specific information Trump has said publicly that was factually correct.

He speaks in hyperbole and platitudes

I await your detailing anything on any subject Trump has spoken publicly about that had accurate details as the "story" alleged. Off the top of my head I can't think of a time that ever happened

---

Is your defense now that "trump discussing nuclear information to an Australian paying for access to stay at his residence and meet him is just hyperbole and should only be treated is such" as if that's somehow OK for a guy trying to convince us be should be president again?

Seriously?

---

From the experience of the last 7 years, I'm saying it didn't happen and you're full of *****