TX_COWDOC said:
Elections have consequences.
For some.
TX_COWDOC said:
Elections have consequences.
TX_COWDOC said:
Elections have consequences.
highvelocity said:
does anyone have any hope that interest rates will come back down next year with an election coming in? hoping to refinance a couple of my properties to increase cash flow to increase other investments
Agthatbuilds said:
https://www.marke****ch.com/story/housing-affordability-hits-a-39-year-low-its-fair-to-expect-prices-to-weaken-expert-says-2e7963adQuote:
It's an unwelcome blast from the past home buyers are facing the most unaffordable housing market since the 1980s, according to a new report.
With mortgage rates at 23-year highs, the monthly principal and interest payment on a median-priced home hit a record high in October. That puts the U.S. housing market at its least affordable since 1984, according to a report by Intercontinental Exchange, or ICE ICE, -0.11%.Quote:
The last time affordability was this bad in the 80s, rates were in the double digits and the average home was about 3.5 times median income, in stark contrast to today's price-to-income ratio of nearly 6-to-1."Quote:
Returning the housing market to more affordable levels would require one of three things, ICE said: Either the 30-year mortgage rate needs to fall by 4.4 percentage points, the median household income needs to rise by 62%, or home prices need to fall by 38%.
But "none of which are likely to fully solve today's challenges alone, and none of which tend to move independently of one another," the report stated.
One might say it's twice as hard to own a home than it was 40 years ago
whytho987654 said:
And yet gen Z/young millenials will just be called lazy for this, as if we created the policies that led to this mess
Win At Life said:txaggie_08 said:
Seeing any price decreases? We've been passively watching the housing market around Lake Buchanan for the last year or so, and prices have been decreasing over that time but not a ton. Not enough to make us bite.
Definitely for ours. We heard the constant "multiple offers 30% over list price" back in 2021 and decided to prove them wrong by listing ours at an FU price, so it didn't sell. Problem solved. But, we've since found a waterfront elsewhere that we bought so got serious about selling it in 22, but that's exactly when all the buying stopped. We dropped ours another $100K and still didn't get an offer. We were the lowest $/SF around the whole lake. Even our realtor said WTF? We took it off the market and made $20K of upgrades. Just waiting for a week to get back up there and re-stage. Not sure what, or when, the next move is.
Actually, what is says is that 40 years ago housing affordability was even LOWER than it is today, or in your words HARDER to own a home in 1983 v 2023.Agthatbuilds said:
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/housing-affordability-hits-a-39-year-low-its-fair-to-expect-prices-to-weaken-expert-says-2e7963adQuote:
It's an unwelcome blast from the past home buyers are facing the most unaffordable housing market since the 1980s, according to a new report.
With mortgage rates at 23-year highs, the monthly principal and interest payment on a median-priced home hit a record high in October. That puts the U.S. housing market at its least affordable since 1984, according to a report by Intercontinental Exchange, or ICE ICE, -0.11%.Quote:
The last time affordability was this bad in the 80s, rates were in the double digits and the average home was about 3.5 times median income, in stark contrast to today's price-to-income ratio of nearly 6-to-1."Quote:
Returning the housing market to more affordable levels would require one of three things, ICE said: Either the 30-year mortgage rate needs to fall by 4.4 percentage points, the median household income needs to rise by 62%, or home prices need to fall by 38%.
But "none of which are likely to fully solve today's challenges alone, and none of which tend to move independently of one another," the report stated.
One might say it's twice as hard to own a home than it was 40 years ago
Not only smaller, but substantially crappier as well.Quote:
homes were substantially smaller
This.fka ftc said:Even if you got the lot for free your numbers are not workable. Well, maybe in Colony Ridge.UTExan said:
One way to drive down home prices is by zoning for smaller homes (800-1000 sq ft) in areas that have space to build them. It would allow singles and young couples to purchase at 80-150k, get the tax advantages and start building a wealth base. Putting people in small crappy apartments with no ability to generate equity is stupid and hopefully, some smart town or city on the outskirts of a major metro area will figure this out.
Fun fact, VDLs exist in many older communities located within commuting distance, particularly in places like Houston.
I have spent copious amounts of times looking at the situation you describe. Even when the numbers work from an affordability, the market is simply not there (even entry level home buyers demand the best schools, newest features, short commute).
Resetting expectations is the biggest challenge.
The builders were building houses that reflected the artificially depressed interest rate that allowed the average consumer to afford homes that would otherwise put them in the formica countertop world. (And builders were making more profit).SockStilkings said:
You can blame the builders for building it, the communities for allowing and supporting those solutions but the overall blame is really on the consumer for demanding it.
Question for our homebuilders. Why is homebuilding slowing down? If there is a supply issue, isn't there a market to build new homes?Quote:
Yep. It's wild, I haven't seen this in 10 or more years.
I keep telling everyone to squirrel away their checks and not buy any new tools they don't need. I gave an electrician a check Friday and he said he hasn't set a tpole in 3 months. Got a plumber with 8 roughs going right now. A framer that has 2 frames dropping in the next few weeks.
I think the bottoms going to drop out for a bit. I feel bad for these guys but I know that unless the decision makers in the big production companies get impacted personally then we are going to keep going with high prices and low inventory. It may be better in the long haul but it's probably going to suck soon.
Jabin said:
If folks can hang on for a while, something's got to break. Right now no one wants to sell their house because they don't want to lose their low interest rate loan and/or they don't want to finance a new house with mortgages hovering around 8%.
But houses will start hitting the market one way or another. People die, move to nursing homes, get transferred, etc. Assuming that mortgage rates don't drop significantly, home prices will have to start coming down, although it may take awhile.
For the bolded, are you saying builders are not building now because they purchased lots at a high price, and they can't build on it for fear of the overall cost being too much for the market to afford?fka ftc said:
Count me as biased being in the business, or count me as knowing the business, but builders build to the market vs establishing it at a certain margin as you are suggesting.
I don't expect Texas to slowdown much. Still way underhoused but some of the slowdown is from builders having expensive lots to get through. Some builders may have to abandon those lots and they will be repriced and resold.
Then you will see the end price of house drop and demand, pace of building pick right back up.
Some markets outside of Texas and Florida may see a 2008 type market drop.
But I would not count on the Texas market dropping substantially in price.
Are you saying that once the expensive lots work through the system, building will pick back up?Quote:
Then you will see the end price of house drop and demand, pace of building pick right back up.
Can you run these numbers for 1984? I'm curious about how much the housing market improved during Reagan's first term.hph6203 said:You have to save 2.5x as long to purchase a home that costs 3x as much monthly. Interest rates are a portion of the equation, but they matter WAY less than price relative to income. Even at 0% interest rates it's more expensive/difficult to buy a home than it was in the early 80's.techno-ag said:
What did we ever do back when the interest rates were near 18%?
Oh yeah, I remember. We saved up for 20% down, didn't buy more than we could afford, and refinanced when rates went down.
1980
Median House Price: 47,200
Median Household Income: 21,000
20% Down: 9,440
Interest Rate: 17%
Tax: 864/yr (72.00/mo)
HOI: 250/yr (20.80/mo)
P&I: 539.00
Total Payment: 631.80
Down payment percent gross income: 45%
Total payment percent of gross income: 16%
2023
Median House Price: 416,000
Median Household Income: 81,500
20% Down: 83,200
Interest Rate: 7.5%
Tax: 7615 (634.59/mo)
Insurance: 2204 (183.67/mo)
P&I: 2327.00
Total Payment: 3145.26
Down payment percent gross income: 102%
Total payment percent of gross income: 46.3%
Tex117 said:The builders were building houses that reflected the artificially depressed interest rate that allowed the average consumer to afford homes that would otherwise put them in the formica countertop world. (And builders were making more profit).SockStilkings said:
You can blame the builders for building it, the communities for allowing and supporting those solutions but the overall blame is really on the consumer for demanding it.
This is not unlike when colleges up their tuition when they know that students can get higher loans.
Consumers clearly are going to seek the best they can get with their money. They could get more when the interest rates were low. And that is what is reflected. Should expectations change to reflect the current market? Yes, but those expectations should also be reflected by homebuilders (and their margins) and sellers. The market will ultimately settle all this out. But its going to take awhile. Real Estate always seems to lag behind the rest of the economy.Question for our homebuilders. Why is homebuilding slowing down? If there is a supply issue, isn't there a market to build new homes?Quote:
Yep. It's wild, I haven't seen this in 10 or more years.
I keep telling everyone to squirrel away their checks and not buy any new tools they don't need. I gave an electrician a check Friday and he said he hasn't set a tpole in 3 months. Got a plumber with 8 roughs going right now. A framer that has 2 frames dropping in the next few weeks.
I think the bottoms going to drop out for a bit. I feel bad for these guys but I know that unless the decision makers in the big production companies get impacted personally then we are going to keep going with high prices and low inventory. It may be better in the long haul but it's probably going to suck soon.
Or is it that with the interest rate being so high, the builders margins and risk or just too low?
Jabin said:Not only smaller, but substantially crappier as well.Quote:
homes were substantially smaller
Go look at a house built in the early 80s that has not been updated. Formica countertops, shag carpet that was bottom-of-the-line builder grade even then, cheap paneling on walls, low popcorn ceilings, one bathroom for 3 or 4 bedrooms, vinyl floor in the kitchen, minimum insulation in the walls and attic, and so forth.
What is considered basic entry level today would have been high-end luxury in the early 80s.
Jabin said:
If folks can hang on for a while, something's got to break. Right now no one wants to sell their house because they don't want to lose their low interest rate loan and/or they don't want to finance a new house with mortgages hovering around 8%.
But houses will start hitting the market one way or another. People die, move to nursing homes, get transferred, etc. Assuming that mortgage rates don't drop significantly, home prices will have to start coming down, although it may take awhile.
I live in sort of an intersecting area of homebuilding. I work with builders who construct under long-term contracts at a mostly fixed price and scattered site, high-end single-family customs, and other guys who ran large public builders.Agthatbuilds said:Jabin said:Not only smaller, but substantially crappier as well.Quote:
homes were substantially smaller
Go look at a house built in the early 80s that has not been updated. Formica countertops, shag carpet that was bottom-of-the-line builder grade even then, cheap paneling on walls, low popcorn ceilings, one bathroom for 3 or 4 bedrooms, vinyl floor in the kitchen, minimum insulation in the walls and attic, and so forth.
What is considered basic entry level today would have been high-end luxury in the early 80s.
I disagree. The production homes built today are mostly crap. It's lipstick on the pig. I went into a recently finished "high end" production or semi-custom in college station recently Imani was floored by how low end it was. This was a 750k home on a pretty small lot south of town
I was hoping you would respond. So, to summarize. At least with your end of the market, its a matter of increased costs to build (labor, materials, etc.) that if you completed the project, would put you in too high of a price?Agthatbuilds said:Tex117 said:The builders were building houses that reflected the artificially depressed interest rate that allowed the average consumer to afford homes that would otherwise put them in the formica countertop world. (And builders were making more profit).SockStilkings said:
You can blame the builders for building it, the communities for allowing and supporting those solutions but the overall blame is really on the consumer for demanding it.
This is not unlike when colleges up their tuition when they know that students can get higher loans.
Consumers clearly are going to seek the best they can get with their money. They could get more when the interest rates were low. And that is what is reflected. Should expectations change to reflect the current market? Yes, but those expectations should also be reflected by homebuilders (and their margins) and sellers. The market will ultimately settle all this out. But its going to take awhile. Real Estate always seems to lag behind the rest of the economy.Question for our homebuilders. Why is homebuilding slowing down? If there is a supply issue, isn't there a market to build new homes?Quote:
Yep. It's wild, I haven't seen this in 10 or more years.
I keep telling everyone to squirrel away their checks and not buy any new tools they don't need. I gave an electrician a check Friday and he said he hasn't set a tpole in 3 months. Got a plumber with 8 roughs going right now. A framer that has 2 frames dropping in the next few weeks.
I think the bottoms going to drop out for a bit. I feel bad for these guys but I know that unless the decision makers in the big production companies get impacted personally then we are going to keep going with high prices and low inventory. It may be better in the long haul but it's probably going to suck soon.
Or is it that with the interest rate being so high, the builders margins and risk or just too low?
There are not enough people who can afford to buy the home.
I dont build production homes. I build purely high end custom homes, so I cannot say why or what those production builders do or don't do. I know they've canceled many a homes because of market conditions.
I can tell you on the custom side, it's a cost problem. Inflation in the materials, and especially the labor, have eaten up margins. There's not a lot of ability to raise prices without pricing oneself out, in my experience. That 1.5 million home from 2019 is now 2.25 million or more.
Materials, save lumber, have either leveled out or continue to increase in cost, not come down. And labor remains extremely high. We build on the 500/sqft low end to 800/sqft high end sort of pricing and that market has shrunk considerably and turned into more remodels.
Tex117 said:For the bolded, are you saying builders are not building now because they purchased lots at a high price, and they can't build on it for fear of the overall cost being too much for the market to afford?fka ftc said:
Still way underhoused but some of the slowdown is from builders having expensive lots to get through. Some builders may have to abandon those lots and they will be repriced and resold.
I, very much admittedly, don't know about the homebuilding market. But aren't we really talking about the chicken or the egg? The market could demand more house because interest rates were so low and builders could build those houses as the market could support it. Wouldn't builders be happy to oblige that as that would increase their profit and margins? Just curious. I have no idea how it works on a nuts and bolts level other than "money is cheap, can buy more and can build more. Money expensive, can buy less can build less."Are you saying that once the expensive lots work through the system, building will pick back up?Quote:
Then you will see the end price of house drop and demand, pace of building pick right back up.
Absolutely. Happens in every downturn. Not unlike forward-purchase commodities like oil, electricity, etc, builders buy lots from developers (or buy land to develop) and those are priced by the seller at that point in time (roughly). The builders / developers are left to hedge whether they can turn that dirt into a completed home to close to a buyer at a price the market will enjoy.Quote:
For the bolded, are you saying builders are not building now because they purchased lots at a high price, and they can't build on it for fear of the overall cost being too much for the market to afford?