New Mexico Gov Suspends Second Amendment

19,614 Views | 193 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by torrid
Catag94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Every person in NM who is licensed to carry, should go to this area and show the Governor she is out of line. This would be a great protest.
Catag94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Couldn't agree more.
Goodnight Irene
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Actual Talking Thermos said:

Rapier108 said:

beanbean said:

New Mexico has went the way of Australia and Canada. Places that used to seem kind of cool whose politicians are ruining them.
Much of New Mexico votes Republican. The problem is the two big population centers, Santa Fe and Albuquerque, are so heavily Democrat that they overwhelm the rest of the state which is rather sparsely populated.
Sand can't vote. People can. The people who live in New Mexico, by your account, do not in fact lean Republican. One voter inhabiting their own 100 acre cactus kingdom still counts 1/100 as much as 100 voters all living in a 2-acre apartment complex.


Why do you progressives want to give power hungry elected officials the ability to tell you what you can and can't do? Is thinking for yourself too hard?
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agree about emergency powers. If that's all it takes to violate our rights, then the Constitution is meaningless. Everything in it should be protected 24/7/365 no matter what. Always.
UTExan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I saw the KRQE presser. Apparently only the state police are enforcing this. Sheriffs and ABQ city police declined so far.
“If you’re going to have crime it should at least be organized crime”
-Havelock Vetinari
agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If the police try to enforce it I hope there is bloodshed.
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Damn. When camera Hog and one of the most left wing Congress critters says you're wrong, you're extra wrong
fixer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Catag94 said:

Every person in NM who is licensed to carry, should go to this area and show the Governor she is out of line. This would be a great protest.


And have the county sheriffs with them.
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Boy who is gonna tell Ted about 2020?
APHIS AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Goodnight Irene said:

Actual Talking Thermos said:

Rapier108 said:

beanbean said:

New Mexico has went the way of Australia and Canada. Places that used to seem kind of cool whose politicians are ruining them.
Much of New Mexico votes Republican. The problem is the two big population centers, Santa Fe and Albuquerque, are so heavily Democrat that they overwhelm the rest of the state which is rather sparsely populated.
Sand can't vote. People can. The people who live in New Mexico, by your account, do not in fact lean Republican. One voter inhabiting their own 100 acre cactus kingdom still counts 1/100 as much as 100 voters all living in a 2-acre apartment complex.


Why do you progressives want to give power hungry elected officials the ability to tell you what you can and can't do? Is thinking for yourself too hard?
Because for some odd reason, they think that the Democrats have the people's safety in mind.

Nothing can be farther from the truth for it is all about power and control.

Trajan88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"New Mexico Governor Faces Call for Impeachment After Banning Concealed Carry"

https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2023/09/09/new-mexico-governor-faces-call-impeachment-banning-concealed-carry/
Catag94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The NM governor's actions here cause me to wonder if George Soros is adding Governors to his list of activists officials.
agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If we were serious about truly defending the constitution she would be successfully impeached with near universal support. And it would be done within a week.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agsalaska said:

If we were serious about truly defending the constitution she would be successfully impeached with near universal support. And it would be done within a week.


100% this

The reaction can NOT be strong enough against her because this was a trial test balloon to see how far Dems could push with their "health emergency" nonsense. If this goes unchallenged they would try to bring it nationally and we'd never ever get out of the endless "health and climate emergency" ever again
texsn95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Unreal. And to think, some of our resident liberals approve of this type of behavior. It's filthy.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trajan88 said:

"New Mexico Governor Faces Call for Impeachment After Banning Concealed Carry"

https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2023/09/09/new-mexico-governor-faces-call-impeachment-banning-concealed-carry/
I think the leftists know this is a bridge too far to get away with, at least at the moment.
AggieUSMC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Albuquerque police Chief Harold Medina said he won't enforce it, and Bernalillo County Sheriff John Allen said he's uneasy about it because it raises too many questions about constitutional rights.
This right here is why this is nothing but a political stunt. No one will actually be charged for concealed carry. There's a reason why they call it LAW enforcement and not Executive Order enforcement.
AggieUSMC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dan Scott said:




When you've lost David Hogg on a gun control measure....
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah. One thing you have to respect about the left is they are good at propaganda/law fare. This one tho…is going to evaporate.

C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"No constitutional right, in my view, including my oath, is intended to be absolute."
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agthatbuilds said:


Sep 10 INSURRECTIONISTS!!!!!!!!!!

LOCK THEM ALL UP AND RUIN THEIR LIVES!!!!!!!!!!!!

Remember, remember, the 10th of September....
Catag94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Finally an actually worthy protest! Good for them.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agthatbuilds said:


They should wear masks like ANTIFA, be smart people and project yourself for the future conflicts.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kceovaisnt- said:

I am very opposed to this move. But perhaps it could work as a case study of how much it doesn't affect criminal acts involving firearms. It could even result in an increase in violence committed by gun wielding criminals.

You think Tuco's crew cares about laws like this?
You dream if you think this is a possibility.

The goalposts would simply change when it's proven that criminals still commit violence. And we have plenty of real world, real time data sets showing that criminals do criminal things regardless of the laws.

None of that matters to the left. They are wholly incapable of logic, critical thought, independent thought or reason.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Actual Talking Thermos said:

Rapier108 said:

beanbean said:

New Mexico has went the way of Australia and Canada. Places that used to seem kind of cool whose politicians are ruining them.
Much of New Mexico votes Republican. The problem is the two big population centers, Santa Fe and Albuquerque, are so heavily Democrat that they overwhelm the rest of the state which is rather sparsely populated.
Sand can't vote. People can. The people who live in New Mexico, by your account, do not in fact lean Republican. One voter inhabiting their own 100 acre cactus kingdom still counts 1/100 as much as 100 voters all living in a 2-acre apartment complex.
.....which is why the framers specifically set it up that landowners were the only ones allowed to vote.

Because they knew that setting it up the way we have it now would lead to exactly what you are talking about - a scenario where only numbers count, and that has always been a case of ignorant population centers voting something for themselves.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Catag94 said:

Every person in NM who is licensed to carry, should go to this area and show the Governor she is out of line. This would be a great protest.
NM is an Open Carry state - no license required to openly carry.
sleepybeagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Coming to a country near you.
Dimebag Darrell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How insanely stupid do you have to be to think violent murderous criminals will decide to cease fire since you can no longer lawfully carry a gun on your person now. I would wager that 90+% of liberals just blindly support this type of action in every state.

Liberals are unfathomably stupid. Basic logic is their kryptonite.
RebelE Infantry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dimebag Darrell said:

How insanely stupid do you have to be to think violent murderous criminals will decide to cease fire since you can no longer lawfully carry a gun on your person now. I would wager that 90+% of liberals just blindly support this type of action in every state.

Liberals are unfathomably stupid. Basic logic is their kryptonite.


This may come as a a shock to you, but many of these people- especially those in power- don't actually believe this.
The flames of the Imperium burn brightly in the hearts of men repulsed by degenerate modernity. Souls aflame with love of goodness, truth, beauty, justice, and order.
InfantryAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agthatbuilds said:


There should be way more people than that protesting.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The new mask mandate.
zoneag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RebelE Infantry said:

Dimebag Darrell said:

How insanely stupid do you have to be to think violent murderous criminals will decide to cease fire since you can no longer lawfully carry a gun on your person now. I would wager that 90+% of liberals just blindly support this type of action in every state.

Liberals are unfathomably stupid. Basic logic is their kryptonite.


This may come as a a shock to you, but many of these people- especially those in power- don't actually believe this.


Conservatives always make the mistake of laughing at how "stupid" those in power on the left are. They're just evil and don't care if all conservatives do is laugh at their stupidity and hypocrisy because while we're laughing they're winning. Lujan will backpedal from this, but we should make no mistake that this is a trial balloon.
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
zoneag said:

RebelE Infantry said:

Dimebag Darrell said:

How insanely stupid do you have to be to think violent murderous criminals will decide to cease fire since you can no longer lawfully carry a gun on your person now. I would wager that 90+% of liberals just blindly support this type of action in every state.

Liberals are unfathomably stupid. Basic logic is their kryptonite.


This may come as a a shock to you, but many of these people- especially those in power- don't actually believe this.


Conservatives always make the mistake of laughing at how "stupid" those in power on the left are. They're just evil and don't care if all conservatives do is laugh at their stupidity and hypocrisy because while we're laughing they're winning. Lujan will backpedal from this, but we should make no mistake that this is a trial balloon.
The moment they try this nationally...... it will be FAR worse for the left. And they know it.

MLG should still be removed from office, criminally tried for violating constitutional rights, and imprisoned in a federal prison for at least 22 years. But don't hold your breath....... We know how justice goes with this sorry administration in power.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.