Fulton County GA allowed ACLU to process absentee ballots w/o County Supervision

7,667 Views | 77 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by richardag
jt2hunt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How many absentee ballots were cast in this election?
LoudestWHOOP!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

Things that make you go hmmm.....

Quote:

BREAKING: New FOIA records reveal Fulton election officials in 2020 deputized 100s of anti-Trump Dems from ACLU, gave them power to process absentee ballot apps rec'd thru online portals & then equipped ACLU poll workers w/ iPads to cancel absentee ballots w/o county supervision

Sounds Illegal
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oysterbayAG said:

If a real forensic audit was done in all the swing states, examining each Ballot for authenticity, based on election laws, it would have shown TRUMP WON !
it's a system intentionally designed to not be able to show it. Intentionally non-transparent. Intentionally no audit trails or reliable chains of custody. Envelopes that would have had a signature that should match a registered voter on file are destroyed. They fight so hard for no IDs, no sig verification, many many insecure and unsurveilled drop-boxes, etc. because you can't prove the fraud, courts won't hear it, and then they can push lies that it was the most secure election ever and arrest people who question it.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

oysterbayAG said:

If a real forensic audit was done in all the swing states, examining each Ballot for authenticity, based on election laws, it would have shown TRUMP WON !
it's a system intentionally designed to not be able to show it. Intentionally non-transparent. Intentionally no audit trails or reliable chains of custody. Envelopes that would have had a signature that should match a registered voter on file are destroyed. They fight so hard for no IDs, no sig verification, many many insecure and unsurveilled drop-boxes, etc. because you can't prove the fraud, courts won't hear it, and then they can push lies that it was the most secure election ever and arrest people who question it.
After watching the Kari Lake mini trials and then listening to that whole one plus video with Gabe Sterling, it is just amazing to me how overly complicated the procedures ave become. Election officials are creating their own headaches and incompetence for what should be a pretty straightforward and simple process.

All supposedly in the name of making voting "more convenient" for voters, whether they are interested in voting or not.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

oh no said:

oysterbayAG said:

If a real forensic audit was done in all the swing states, examining each Ballot for authenticity, based on election laws, it would have shown TRUMP WON !
it's a system intentionally designed to not be able to show it. Intentionally non-transparent. Intentionally no audit trails or reliable chains of custody. Envelopes that would have had a signature that should match a registered voter on file are destroyed. They fight so hard for no IDs, no sig verification, many many insecure and unsurveilled drop-boxes, etc. because you can't prove the fraud, courts won't hear it, and then they can push lies that it was the most secure election ever and arrest people who question it.
After watching the Kari Lake mini trials and then listening to that whole one plus video with Gabe Sterling, it is just amazing to me how overly complicated the procedures ave become. Election officials are creating their own headaches and incompetence for what should be a pretty straightforward and simple process.

All supposedly in the name of making voting "more convenient" for voters, whether they are interested in voting or not.
all the efforts to make voting "more convenient" were really just to transform voting so they don't have to convince the impoverished free handout government dependent socialist voter base to make an effort and go vote anymore. Don't need inspiring candidates. Don't need motivating "get out the vote" concerts. Don't need to campaign. Can sit in a basement with a lid on from the media and just wait until enough mass-mailed ballots can get counted until the predetermined outcome is achieved. Registering is done for millions. Filling out ballots is done for millions. Dropping off ballots is done for millions. This is how our slow creep towards socialism over decades just got fast-tracked to a breakneck pace and they can now lie about it being the most secure ever.
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

oh no said:

oysterbayAG said:

If a real forensic audit was done in all the swing states, examining each Ballot for authenticity, based on election laws, it would have shown TRUMP WON !
it's a system intentionally designed to not be able to show it. Intentionally non-transparent. Intentionally no audit trails or reliable chains of custody. Envelopes that would have had a signature that should match a registered voter on file are destroyed. They fight so hard for no IDs, no sig verification, many many insecure and unsurveilled drop-boxes, etc. because you can't prove the fraud, courts won't hear it, and then they can push lies that it was the most secure election ever and arrest people who question it.
After watching the Kari Lake mini trials and then listening to that whole one plus video with Gabe Sterling, it is just amazing to me how overly complicated the procedures ave become. Election officials are creating their own headaches and incompetence for what should be a pretty straightforward and simple process.

All supposedly in the name of making voting "more convenient" for voters, whether they are interested in voting or not.
Making things complicated is how you create opportunity for extracting value for yourself (or party). This is true in energy, insurance, loans, etc. It also provides cover and makes it harder to present a case in public against it.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How is this on page 2?
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TheEternalPessimist said:

An L of an Ag said:

Burn it all down!
If the chicanery around elections is not stopped...... it will all go up in smoke.


Real Americans wouldn't wait around for a second time.

"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ciboag96 said:

Someone dig up Grant. Time to lay waste
Grant ? was up in Virginia at the time. You mean that **** head Sherman ?
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Just want to point out that Raffensperger agreed to a consent settlement with one the Abrams outfits that severely limited signature verification procedures and that settlement occurred in 2019. State legislature was kept in the dark at the time to the effective change in election laws as a consequence of that settlement.

All of that was by design.
Has this been fixed?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TAMU1990 said:

aggiehawg said:

Just want to point out that Raffensperger agreed to a consent settlement with one the Abrams outfits that severely limited signature verification procedures and that settlement occurred in 2019. State legislature was kept in the dark at the time to the effective change in election laws as a consequence of that settlement.

All of that was by design.
Has this been fixed?
No. Raffensperger refused.

Take that for what you will.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Was this the "consent decree"?

How many people do you think now about this bull*****
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin said:

Was this the "consent decree"?

How many people do you think now about this bull*****
Yes. And legislature tried to fix it. But none of the election officials care about the law anymore, since they don't have to.
Reno Hightower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ballot Harvesters are gonna harvest and establishment R's condone and champion it all.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

BadMoonRisin said:

Was this the "consent decree"?

How many people do you think now about this bull*****
Yes. And legislature tried to fix it. But none of the election officials care about the law anymore, since they don't have to.
They were all in on it. Disgraceful.
mjschiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OP - that method is used in marxist countries. Satan minions
JamesE4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LarryElder said:

But didn't' DeeSantes say the 2020 election was fair and no cheating happened.
Please post a link - the quotes I saw have him saying the opposite
Al Bula
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Remember, Democrats ALWAYS accuse the opposition of doing the crimes they themselves are committing.
JamesE4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

oh no said:

oysterbayAG said:

If a real forensic audit was done in all the swing states, examining each Ballot for authenticity, based on election laws, it would have shown TRUMP WON !
it's a system intentionally designed to not be able to show it. Intentionally non-transparent. Intentionally no audit trails or reliable chains of custody. Envelopes that would have had a signature that should match a registered voter on file are destroyed. They fight so hard for no IDs, no sig verification, many many insecure and unsurveilled drop-boxes, etc. because you can't prove the fraud, courts won't hear it, and then they can push lies that it was the most secure election ever and arrest people who question it.
After watching the Kari Lake mini trials and then listening to that whole one plus video with Gabe Sterling, it is just amazing to me how overly complicated the procedures ave become. Election officials are creating their own headaches and incompetence for what should be a pretty straightforward and simple process.

All supposedly in the name of making voting "more convenient" for voters, whether they are interested in voting or not.
It's a feature, not a bug
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

Things that make you go hmmm.....

Quote:

BREAKING: New FOIA records reveal Fulton election officials in 2020 deputized 100s of anti-Trump Dems from ACLU, gave them power to process absentee ballot apps rec'd thru online portals & then equipped ACLU poll workers w/ iPads to cancel absentee ballots w/o county supervision

My grandfather would say... "That is letting the foxes count the chickens"
JWinTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexAgs91 said:

TheEternalPessimist said:

An L of an Ag said:

Burn it all down!
If the chicanery around elections is not stopped...... it will all go up in smoke.


Real Americans wouldn't wait around for a second time.




If we had enough real Americans still, this would've already happened again. It ain't happening…
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheEternalPessimist said:

An L of an Ag said:

Burn it all down!
If the chicanery around elections is not stopped...... it will all go up in smoke.



Sure, blame it on us browns!
geoag58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fka ftc said:

Wait, I was laughed at in another thread about whether FOIA's produce anything of substance…

Anyone with a brain cell count above one knows the election was engineered to favor Biden and hurt trump, both legal and illegal engineering.


Anyone who defends the election integrity is a liar or an idiot!
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well, this is alarming.

Charpie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BigRobSA said:

TheEternalPessimist said:

An L of an Ag said:

Burn it all down!
If the chicanery around elections is not stopped...... it will all go up in smoke.



Sure, blame it on us browns!


I am more olive skinned
geoag58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JWinTX said:

TexAgs91 said:

TheEternalPessimist said:

An L of an Ag said:

Burn it all down!
If the chicanery around elections is not stopped...... it will all go up in smoke.


Real Americans wouldn't wait around for a second time.




If we had enough real Americans still, this would've already happened again. It ain't happening…


If anyone doesn't think we are headed there you better think again. This country is a powder keg waiting on a spark. As long as the left pushes anything that will bring election results into question we are headed to a very bad place. If they try the same crap about covid and the need to stay home and mail in ballots it will be obvious the election fraud is happening again and an appropriate response was mapped out in 1946.

RoadkillBBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Philip J Fry said:

How is this on page 2?
Because Orange Man Bad.
Election integrity be damned.
2024 is going to be………interesting.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So they allow electronic absentees ballots to be submitted by voters? Or are these physical ballots that were scanned into a system?

Why do we need humans doing signature validation? The computer can do that and the rejects can be done by humans.

MIBs should not be allowed in the first place. Thats the real answer.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

oysterbayAG said:

If a real forensic audit was done in all the swing states, examining each Ballot for authenticity, based on election laws, it would have shown TRUMP WON !
it's a system intentionally designed to not be able to show it. Intentionally non-transparent. Intentionally no audit trails or reliable chains of custody. Envelopes that would have had a signature that should match a registered voter on file are destroyed. They fight so hard for no IDs, no sig verification, many many insecure and unsurveilled drop-boxes, etc. because you can't prove the fraud, courts won't hear it, and then they can push lies that it was the most secure election ever and arrest people who question it.
it's pretty clear that they started with the presumption that Biden needed to be president and then worked backwards to figure out how to do it, using multiple avenues of BS.

They just told Biden to sit in his basement and said "let us figure it out"

And once they did, he accidentally got the most votes in history. Ah but its cool, we will smooth it over by calling anyone that wonders why there were weird things like toilet leaks and several weeks of counting for the first time ever "conspiracy theorists" or "election deniers" and ruin them.

They really think we are that stupid.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

it's pretty clear that they started with the presumption that Biden needed to be president and then worked backwards to figure out how to do it, using multiple avenues of BS.

They just told Biden to sit in his basement and said "let us figure it out"

And once they did, he accidentally got the most votes in history. Ah but its cool, we will smooth it over by calling anyone that wonders why there were weird things like toilet leaks and several weeks of counting for the first time ever "conspiracy theorists" or "election deniers" and ruin them.

They really think we are that stupid.
David Plouffe was the mastermind. He also happens to be from Wilmington DE. What a coinkdink, huh? He was also close enough to Joe to be able to convince him not to run against Hillary in 2016. That's a sign they were pretty tight.

Plouffe also went to work for Mark Zuckerberg's Chan Zuckerberg Initative in January 2017. In very early 2020 he published A Citizen's Guide to Beating Donald Trump.

Quote:

In A Citizen's Guide to Beating Donald Trump, Plouffe's message is simple: the only way change happens, especially on scale, is one human being talking to another. It won't happen magically, it won't happen because of debates and conventions, it won't happen because of ads. It will happen because citizens take action. And Plouffe is here to help, with specific strategies and tailored talking points to make sure your time and energy aren't wasted. He lays out why different activities the average citizen can take can make a difference to getting to 270 electoral votes, how people can go about doing them and examples of where it's worked in the past.

There are at least 65 million Americans who are likely committed to voting against Trump. It is entirely in our control to grow that number and make sure the support materializes in actual votes. Plouffe arms us with advice on how to defend against misinformation online, how to create and spread content, how to register and get out the vote early, how to make a difference in the battlegrounds and how to stay involved after the big election. Filled with stories from the last sixteen years, both successes and failures, as well as political strategies that have evolved in the wake of the breakthrough campaign that Plouffe masterminded, A Citizen's Guide to Beating Donald Trump is a pragmatic, specific, and very motivational guide for the path forward.

LINK

And he took his ideas to Zuckerberg to form the CTCL and CEIR "grants" a/k/a Zuckbucks to target those counties Ploufee knew would have the most impact. He had that granular knowledge from his time with the Obama campaign.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tammany Hall on a national level. Thanks Dems.
RGLAG85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sorry guys, I'm going to have to wait on eric76 and the DeSantis fanboys to tell me if this is true. I need to hear from the number 1 TDS'er that there's no way they could manufacture millions of votes (only 200k needed) and that we shouldn't focus on the election fraud of 2020-22, we should whistle thru the graveyard, because if DeSantis is the nominee, the left and rinos will be on the up and up this time. They won't cheat against him.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
eric's got meatings.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.