How many absentee ballots were cast in this election?
Sounds Illegalwill25u said:
Things that make you go hmmm.....Quote:
BREAKING: New FOIA records reveal Fulton election officials in 2020 deputized 100s of anti-Trump Dems from ACLU, gave them power to process absentee ballot apps rec'd thru online portals & then equipped ACLU poll workers w/ iPads to cancel absentee ballots w/o county supervision
it's a system intentionally designed to not be able to show it. Intentionally non-transparent. Intentionally no audit trails or reliable chains of custody. Envelopes that would have had a signature that should match a registered voter on file are destroyed. They fight so hard for no IDs, no sig verification, many many insecure and unsurveilled drop-boxes, etc. because you can't prove the fraud, courts won't hear it, and then they can push lies that it was the most secure election ever and arrest people who question it.oysterbayAG said:
If a real forensic audit was done in all the swing states, examining each Ballot for authenticity, based on election laws, it would have shown TRUMP WON !
After watching the Kari Lake mini trials and then listening to that whole one plus video with Gabe Sterling, it is just amazing to me how overly complicated the procedures ave become. Election officials are creating their own headaches and incompetence for what should be a pretty straightforward and simple process.oh no said:it's a system intentionally designed to not be able to show it. Intentionally non-transparent. Intentionally no audit trails or reliable chains of custody. Envelopes that would have had a signature that should match a registered voter on file are destroyed. They fight so hard for no IDs, no sig verification, many many insecure and unsurveilled drop-boxes, etc. because you can't prove the fraud, courts won't hear it, and then they can push lies that it was the most secure election ever and arrest people who question it.oysterbayAG said:
If a real forensic audit was done in all the swing states, examining each Ballot for authenticity, based on election laws, it would have shown TRUMP WON !
all the efforts to make voting "more convenient" were really just to transform voting so they don't have to convince the impoverished free handout government dependent socialist voter base to make an effort and go vote anymore. Don't need inspiring candidates. Don't need motivating "get out the vote" concerts. Don't need to campaign. Can sit in a basement with a lid on from the media and just wait until enough mass-mailed ballots can get counted until the predetermined outcome is achieved. Registering is done for millions. Filling out ballots is done for millions. Dropping off ballots is done for millions. This is how our slow creep towards socialism over decades just got fast-tracked to a breakneck pace and they can now lie about it being the most secure ever.aggiehawg said:After watching the Kari Lake mini trials and then listening to that whole one plus video with Gabe Sterling, it is just amazing to me how overly complicated the procedures ave become. Election officials are creating their own headaches and incompetence for what should be a pretty straightforward and simple process.oh no said:it's a system intentionally designed to not be able to show it. Intentionally non-transparent. Intentionally no audit trails or reliable chains of custody. Envelopes that would have had a signature that should match a registered voter on file are destroyed. They fight so hard for no IDs, no sig verification, many many insecure and unsurveilled drop-boxes, etc. because you can't prove the fraud, courts won't hear it, and then they can push lies that it was the most secure election ever and arrest people who question it.oysterbayAG said:
If a real forensic audit was done in all the swing states, examining each Ballot for authenticity, based on election laws, it would have shown TRUMP WON !
All supposedly in the name of making voting "more convenient" for voters, whether they are interested in voting or not.
Making things complicated is how you create opportunity for extracting value for yourself (or party). This is true in energy, insurance, loans, etc. It also provides cover and makes it harder to present a case in public against it.aggiehawg said:After watching the Kari Lake mini trials and then listening to that whole one plus video with Gabe Sterling, it is just amazing to me how overly complicated the procedures ave become. Election officials are creating their own headaches and incompetence for what should be a pretty straightforward and simple process.oh no said:it's a system intentionally designed to not be able to show it. Intentionally non-transparent. Intentionally no audit trails or reliable chains of custody. Envelopes that would have had a signature that should match a registered voter on file are destroyed. They fight so hard for no IDs, no sig verification, many many insecure and unsurveilled drop-boxes, etc. because you can't prove the fraud, courts won't hear it, and then they can push lies that it was the most secure election ever and arrest people who question it.oysterbayAG said:
If a real forensic audit was done in all the swing states, examining each Ballot for authenticity, based on election laws, it would have shown TRUMP WON !
All supposedly in the name of making voting "more convenient" for voters, whether they are interested in voting or not.
Here is a teaser. What does 250 missing Fulton absentee ballots in June 2020 have to do w a car accident in Nov and the ACLU?
— Eric CIAramella’s Dirty Whistle (@TheAndersPaul) June 29, 2023
Hint 1/2: Why is #1 GA ACLU lawyer on an email w Fulton head of elections describing the accident. The police found ballots, election equipment and more pic.twitter.com/mr9UWbRKMm
TheEternalPessimist said:If the chicanery around elections is not stopped...... it will all go up in smoke.An L of an Ag said:
Burn it all down!
Grant ? was up in Virginia at the time. You mean that **** head Sherman ?Ciboag96 said:
Someone dig up Grant. Time to lay waste
Has this been fixed?aggiehawg said:
Just want to point out that Raffensperger agreed to a consent settlement with one the Abrams outfits that severely limited signature verification procedures and that settlement occurred in 2019. State legislature was kept in the dark at the time to the effective change in election laws as a consequence of that settlement.
All of that was by design.
No. Raffensperger refused.TAMU1990 said:Has this been fixed?aggiehawg said:
Just want to point out that Raffensperger agreed to a consent settlement with one the Abrams outfits that severely limited signature verification procedures and that settlement occurred in 2019. State legislature was kept in the dark at the time to the effective change in election laws as a consequence of that settlement.
All of that was by design.
Yes. And legislature tried to fix it. But none of the election officials care about the law anymore, since they don't have to.BadMoonRisin said:
Was this the "consent decree"?
How many people do you think now about this bull*****
They were all in on it. Disgraceful.aggiehawg said:Yes. And legislature tried to fix it. But none of the election officials care about the law anymore, since they don't have to.BadMoonRisin said:
Was this the "consent decree"?
How many people do you think now about this bull*****
Please post a link - the quotes I saw have him saying the oppositeLarryElder said:
But didn't' DeeSantes say the 2020 election was fair and no cheating happened.
It's a feature, not a bugaggiehawg said:After watching the Kari Lake mini trials and then listening to that whole one plus video with Gabe Sterling, it is just amazing to me how overly complicated the procedures ave become. Election officials are creating their own headaches and incompetence for what should be a pretty straightforward and simple process.oh no said:it's a system intentionally designed to not be able to show it. Intentionally non-transparent. Intentionally no audit trails or reliable chains of custody. Envelopes that would have had a signature that should match a registered voter on file are destroyed. They fight so hard for no IDs, no sig verification, many many insecure and unsurveilled drop-boxes, etc. because you can't prove the fraud, courts won't hear it, and then they can push lies that it was the most secure election ever and arrest people who question it.oysterbayAG said:
If a real forensic audit was done in all the swing states, examining each Ballot for authenticity, based on election laws, it would have shown TRUMP WON !
All supposedly in the name of making voting "more convenient" for voters, whether they are interested in voting or not.
My grandfather would say... "That is letting the foxes count the chickens"will25u said:
Things that make you go hmmm.....Quote:
BREAKING: New FOIA records reveal Fulton election officials in 2020 deputized 100s of anti-Trump Dems from ACLU, gave them power to process absentee ballot apps rec'd thru online portals & then equipped ACLU poll workers w/ iPads to cancel absentee ballots w/o county supervision
TexAgs91 said:TheEternalPessimist said:If the chicanery around elections is not stopped...... it will all go up in smoke.An L of an Ag said:
Burn it all down!
Real Americans wouldn't wait around for a second time.
TheEternalPessimist said:If the chicanery around elections is not stopped...... it will all go up in smoke.An L of an Ag said:
Burn it all down!
fka ftc said:
Wait, I was laughed at in another thread about whether FOIA's produce anything of substance…
Anyone with a brain cell count above one knows the election was engineered to favor Biden and hurt trump, both legal and illegal engineering.
🚨GEORGIA BREAKING🚨Gov. Brian Kemp admits to a Republican voter:
— Carolyn Ryan (@CarolynRyanTV) August 26, 2023
"If you give anybody a voting machine, they can hack it".
The exchange took place today at the 8th district GOP fish fry in Perry, GA. @GOP @realDonaldTrump @GaHouseHub @GaHouseGOP @NEWSMAX @RealAmVoice #gapol pic.twitter.com/nZ27KxtqlU
BigRobSA said:TheEternalPessimist said:If the chicanery around elections is not stopped...... it will all go up in smoke.An L of an Ag said:
Burn it all down!
Sure, blame it on us browns!
JWinTX said:TexAgs91 said:TheEternalPessimist said:If the chicanery around elections is not stopped...... it will all go up in smoke.An L of an Ag said:
Burn it all down!
Real Americans wouldn't wait around for a second time.
If we had enough real Americans still, this would've already happened again. It ain't happening…
Because Orange Man Bad.Philip J Fry said:
How is this on page 2?
it's pretty clear that they started with the presumption that Biden needed to be president and then worked backwards to figure out how to do it, using multiple avenues of BS.oh no said:it's a system intentionally designed to not be able to show it. Intentionally non-transparent. Intentionally no audit trails or reliable chains of custody. Envelopes that would have had a signature that should match a registered voter on file are destroyed. They fight so hard for no IDs, no sig verification, many many insecure and unsurveilled drop-boxes, etc. because you can't prove the fraud, courts won't hear it, and then they can push lies that it was the most secure election ever and arrest people who question it.oysterbayAG said:
If a real forensic audit was done in all the swing states, examining each Ballot for authenticity, based on election laws, it would have shown TRUMP WON !
David Plouffe was the mastermind. He also happens to be from Wilmington DE. What a coinkdink, huh? He was also close enough to Joe to be able to convince him not to run against Hillary in 2016. That's a sign they were pretty tight.Quote:
it's pretty clear that they started with the presumption that Biden needed to be president and then worked backwards to figure out how to do it, using multiple avenues of BS.
They just told Biden to sit in his basement and said "let us figure it out"
And once they did, he accidentally got the most votes in history. Ah but its cool, we will smooth it over by calling anyone that wonders why there were weird things like toilet leaks and several weeks of counting for the first time ever "conspiracy theorists" or "election deniers" and ruin them.
They really think we are that stupid.
LINKQuote:
In A Citizen's Guide to Beating Donald Trump, Plouffe's message is simple: the only way change happens, especially on scale, is one human being talking to another. It won't happen magically, it won't happen because of debates and conventions, it won't happen because of ads. It will happen because citizens take action. And Plouffe is here to help, with specific strategies and tailored talking points to make sure your time and energy aren't wasted. He lays out why different activities the average citizen can take can make a difference to getting to 270 electoral votes, how people can go about doing them and examples of where it's worked in the past.
There are at least 65 million Americans who are likely committed to voting against Trump. It is entirely in our control to grow that number and make sure the support materializes in actual votes. Plouffe arms us with advice on how to defend against misinformation online, how to create and spread content, how to register and get out the vote early, how to make a difference in the battlegrounds and how to stay involved after the big election. Filled with stories from the last sixteen years, both successes and failures, as well as political strategies that have evolved in the wake of the breakthrough campaign that Plouffe masterminded, A Citizen's Guide to Beating Donald Trump is a pragmatic, specific, and very motivational guide for the path forward.