HaroldShipmanAg said:
Rossticus said:
HaroldShipmanAg said:
Rossticus said:
HaroldShipmanAg said:
Rossticus said:
Seeing as the Taints haven't made it to trial yet, that's not particularly relevant. But they sure seem terrified of the prospect of allowing a court the opportunity to prove their guilt. Looking forward to the show.
weird because reading this thread in the internet they have been found guilty already......
When people tell me who they are, I believe them. So, assuming they're guilty of the things they've claimed to have done I find that perfectly reasonable. They brought it on themselves. Couldn't have happened to a more deserving example of human debris.
cool that's not how it works though.....going off of feeelz
Women have never falsely accused men before...ever....
Yep. All a setup that they have dozens of counts in 2 court cases in 2 separate counties plus an active investigation in the US. Also a setup that they've publicly admitted to much of what they're being charged with. They're stupid degenerates but it's everyone else's fault. lol. Bless your heart. You're one of their little true believers.
LOL in corrupt Romania and the UK which allows Pakistani rapists to go free...lmao that's your proof.....oh you are funny.
Uh huh. So all you have is logical fallacy. You have no comment on the actual charges or evidence. Ok. How specifically do Pakistani rapists impact the validity of the charges or evidence in the UK? What aspects of your alleged Romanian corruption threaten the integrity of their specific cases. Explain how you feel that this led to their specific charges and impacts the evidence?
If you want all charges dismissed out of hand then you're going to have to demonstrate some critical thought and detailed explanation as to why it's legally appropriate. And you accuse me of running on feelz? C'mon now.