Trump Wins Again

9,065 Views | 134 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by annie88
Dimebag Darrell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No Spin Ag said:

Brittmoore Car Club said:

Charpie said:

No Spin Ag said:

LegalDrugPusher said:





Any American woman can still get an abortion in America, she'll just need to take a vacation destination state to do it.

Universities will still bring in the same number of minorities, they'll just use different ways of doing it that are legal.

Facts
SHHHHH...let him take the lap
Where did anyone say women can't get abortions in certain states? Overturning Roe and leaving it up to states was the win.

Also, universities better be VERY careful how they creatively craft new ways to discriminate against Asians based on race. There is no legal way for them to do it. And if the number of Asians doesn't go up, while number of blacks go down, at least to some degree, it will be a big tell. They better tread lightly....now the focus is on them and i can't imagine the class action lawsuits from deserving Asians who sacrificed and busted their asses their entire lives to go to the best schools in America now that this has been ruled upon.

You and No Spin seem pretty "triggered" by that meme, which I find to be pretty accurate. Not sure why it bothers you. Which one are you against? Leaving abortion up to states, or not being able to discriminate against Asians.


Triggered? Please. I'm just stating the obvious.

I'm glad the court didn't make abortions illegal across the country and said that states that want to, can still provide abortions to women who want them. It was as even a decision as possible. Good court.

I'm glad Asians will have a better chance at getting into universities. But, again, that'll be up to the universities and their own policies. And seeing as how universities aren't exactly conservative bastions, I'm sure they'll pay out the nose to hire the best lawyers possible to make sure they'll be fine in running their schools how they feel is best.

But it is good to see the concern for the minority Asian population. Now to see if that same concern for one's higher education hope goes to those that aren't considered "white adjacent" like Hispanics and African Americans.
I would be equally as pissed about discriminating against blacks and hispanics as I would Asians...even though my daughter is half asian/half white, making her very likely to be racially discriminated against. Racial discrimination is wrong, period. You know how many parents of Asians came over here dirt poor or working class? LOTS. But they sacrificed and worked their tails off and focused on academics over other things to increase their likelihood of EARNING a spot based on merit and achievements.

Discriminating against qualified Asians to admit unqualified or less qualified blacks and hispanics is wrong. I think some of you just don't see it that way because you are black are hispanic...which, if we're all playing by the same rules here, actually makes YOU the racist, whether knowingly or not.

Also, the universities can hire all the lawyers they want...there are equally capable lawyers waiting on the sidelines just salivating, hoping they can catch them using discriminatory practice and assemble a ma$$ive class action lawsuit. A very close eye will be kept on these schools after this.
Ags77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good decisions coming out of SC. I give Trump some credit there.

Now I'm still going to do what I can to make sure he stays fired, lol.

DeSantis 2024
LegalDrugPusher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No Spin Ag said:

LegalDrugPusher said:





Any American woman can still get an abortion in America, she'll just need to take a vacation destination state to do it.

Universities will still bring in the same number of minorities, they'll just use different ways of doing it that are legal.

Facts


True, but we made it harder for them. What do you want us to do just sit back and make it easy as hell for them to do ? That's what laws are in place for , with your logic then we should not have a law against DWI and murder, but we do.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LegalDrugPusher said:

No Spin Ag said:

LegalDrugPusher said:





Any American woman can still get an abortion in America, she'll just need to take a vacation destination state to do it.

Universities will still bring in the same number of minorities, they'll just use different ways of doing it that are legal.

Facts


True, but we made it harder for them. What do you want us to do just sit back and make it easy as hell for them to do ? That's what laws are in place for , with your logic then we should not have a law against DWI and murder, but we do.


I'm just saying balls were being spiked as of somehow our society and it's culture were significantly changed by those decisions. They weren't and I'm sure the justices knew that when they voted the way they did.

Now, had these rulings happened fifty years ago, then things would've been affected in a way that would've hampered the people in these rulings. Today, not so much.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Dimebag Darrell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No Spin Ag said:

LegalDrugPusher said:

No Spin Ag said:

LegalDrugPusher said:





Any American woman can still get an abortion in America, she'll just need to take a vacation destination state to do it.

Universities will still bring in the same number of minorities, they'll just use different ways of doing it that are legal.

Facts


True, but we made it harder for them. What do you want us to do just sit back and make it easy as hell for them to do ? That's what laws are in place for , with your logic then we should not have a law against DWI and murder, but we do.


I'm just saying balls were being spiked as of somehow our society and it's culture were significantly changed by those decisions. They weren't and I'm sure the justices knew that when they voted the way they did.

Now, had these rulings happened fifty years ago, then things would've been affected in a way that would've hampered the people in these rulings. Today, not so much.
Pretty sure several states immediately and heavily restricted abortions.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brittmoore Car Club said:

No Spin Ag said:

Brittmoore Car Club said:

Charpie said:

No Spin Ag said:

LegalDrugPusher said:





Any American woman can still get an abortion in America, she'll just need to take a vacation destination state to do it.

Universities will still bring in the same number of minorities, they'll just use different ways of doing it that are legal.

Facts
SHHHHH...let him take the lap
Where did anyone say women can't get abortions in certain states? Overturning Roe and leaving it up to states was the win.

Also, universities better be VERY careful how they creatively craft new ways to discriminate against Asians based on race. There is no legal way for them to do it. And if the number of Asians doesn't go up, while number of blacks go down, at least to some degree, it will be a big tell. They better tread lightly....now the focus is on them and i can't imagine the class action lawsuits from deserving Asians who sacrificed and busted their asses their entire lives to go to the best schools in America now that this has been ruled upon.

You and No Spin seem pretty "triggered" by that meme, which I find to be pretty accurate. Not sure why it bothers you. Which one are you against? Leaving abortion up to states, or not being able to discriminate against Asians.


Triggered? Please. I'm just stating the obvious.

I'm glad the court didn't make abortions illegal across the country and said that states that want to, can still provide abortions to women who want them. It was as even a decision as possible. Good court.

I'm glad Asians will have a better chance at getting into universities. But, again, that'll be up to the universities and their own policies. And seeing as how universities aren't exactly conservative bastions, I'm sure they'll pay out the nose to hire the best lawyers possible to make sure they'll be fine in running their schools how they feel is best.

But it is good to see the concern for the minority Asian population. Now to see if that same concern for one's higher education hope goes to those that aren't considered "white adjacent" like Hispanics and African Americans.
I would be equally as pissed about discriminating against blacks and hispanics as I would Asians...even though my daughter is half asian/half white, making her very likely to be racially discriminated against. Racial discrimination is wrong, period. You know how many parents of Asians came over here dirt poor or working class? LOTS. But they sacrificed and worked their tails off and focused on academics over other things to increase their likelihood of EARNING a spot based on merit and achievements.

Discriminating against qualified Asians to admit unqualified or less qualified blacks and hispanics is wrong. I think some of you just don't see it that way because you are black are hispanic...which, if we're all playing by the same rules here, actually makes YOU the racist, whether knowingly or not.

Also, the universities can hire all the lawyers they want...there are equally capable lawyers waiting on the sidelines just salivating, hoping they can catch them using discriminatory practice and assemble a ma$$ive class action lawsuit. A very close eye will be kept on these schools after this.


A close eye should be kept, and I want only those who deserve it to get in. That would also mean that a lot of suburban wonderbread legacies would never be allowed one foot in the door to those universities either.

But, still, this is a good step. Because there's too many kids that get in that really shouldn't.

I'd also add athletes that are let in when they're dumb as a bad of rocks but play so well the school turns a blind eye to how they get in.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brittmoore Car Club said:

No Spin Ag said:

LegalDrugPusher said:

No Spin Ag said:

LegalDrugPusher said:





Any American woman can still get an abortion in America, she'll just need to take a vacation destination state to do it.

Universities will still bring in the same number of minorities, they'll just use different ways of doing it that are legal.

Facts


True, but we made it harder for them. What do you want us to do just sit back and make it easy as hell for them to do ? That's what laws are in place for , with your logic then we should not have a law against DWI and murder, but we do.


I'm just saying balls were being spiked as of somehow our society and it's culture were significantly changed by those decisions. They weren't and I'm sure the justices knew that when they voted the way they did.

Now, had these rulings happened fifty years ago, then things would've been affected in a way that would've hampered the people in these rulings. Today, not so much.
Pretty sure several states immediately and heavily restricted abortions.


Which is why I said those women would have to make their abortion an overnight trip to one of the many that allow them. They're still getting them, just somewhere else.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Franklin Comes Alive!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ags77 said:

Good decisions coming out of SC. I give Trump some credit there.

Now I'm still going to do what I can to make sure he stays fired, lol.

DeSantis 2024


So you'd still vote cornpop if Trump is the nominee?

Pathetic
Dimebag Darrell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No Spin Ag said:

Brittmoore Car Club said:

No Spin Ag said:

Brittmoore Car Club said:

Charpie said:

No Spin Ag said:

LegalDrugPusher said:





Any American woman can still get an abortion in America, she'll just need to take a vacation destination state to do it.

Universities will still bring in the same number of minorities, they'll just use different ways of doing it that are legal.

Facts
SHHHHH...let him take the lap
Where did anyone say women can't get abortions in certain states? Overturning Roe and leaving it up to states was the win.

Also, universities better be VERY careful how they creatively craft new ways to discriminate against Asians based on race. There is no legal way for them to do it. And if the number of Asians doesn't go up, while number of blacks go down, at least to some degree, it will be a big tell. They better tread lightly....now the focus is on them and i can't imagine the class action lawsuits from deserving Asians who sacrificed and busted their asses their entire lives to go to the best schools in America now that this has been ruled upon.

You and No Spin seem pretty "triggered" by that meme, which I find to be pretty accurate. Not sure why it bothers you. Which one are you against? Leaving abortion up to states, or not being able to discriminate against Asians.


Triggered? Please. I'm just stating the obvious.

I'm glad the court didn't make abortions illegal across the country and said that states that want to, can still provide abortions to women who want them. It was as even a decision as possible. Good court.

I'm glad Asians will have a better chance at getting into universities. But, again, that'll be up to the universities and their own policies. And seeing as how universities aren't exactly conservative bastions, I'm sure they'll pay out the nose to hire the best lawyers possible to make sure they'll be fine in running their schools how they feel is best.

But it is good to see the concern for the minority Asian population. Now to see if that same concern for one's higher education hope goes to those that aren't considered "white adjacent" like Hispanics and African Americans.
I would be equally as pissed about discriminating against blacks and hispanics as I would Asians...even though my daughter is half asian/half white, making her very likely to be racially discriminated against. Racial discrimination is wrong, period. You know how many parents of Asians came over here dirt poor or working class? LOTS. But they sacrificed and worked their tails off and focused on academics over other things to increase their likelihood of EARNING a spot based on merit and achievements.

Discriminating against qualified Asians to admit unqualified or less qualified blacks and hispanics is wrong. I think some of you just don't see it that way because you are black are hispanic...which, if we're all playing by the same rules here, actually makes YOU the racist, whether knowingly or not.

Also, the universities can hire all the lawyers they want...there are equally capable lawyers waiting on the sidelines just salivating, hoping they can catch them using discriminatory practice and assemble a ma$$ive class action lawsuit. A very close eye will be kept on these schools after this.


A close eye should be kept, and I want only those who deserve it to get in. That would also mean that a lot of suburban wonderbread legacies would never be allowed one foot in the door to those universities either.

But, still, this is a good step. Because there's too many kids that get in that really shouldn't.

I'd also add athletes that are let in when they're dumb as a bad of rocks but play so well the school turns a blind eye to how they get in.
I agree with you. And nice racism. Oh wait, it's impossible to be racist against whites.

With regards to your bolded portion, this is a good step, because it bans racial discrimination.
Dimebag Darrell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No Spin Ag said:

Brittmoore Car Club said:

No Spin Ag said:

LegalDrugPusher said:

No Spin Ag said:

LegalDrugPusher said:





Any American woman can still get an abortion in America, she'll just need to take a vacation destination state to do it.

Universities will still bring in the same number of minorities, they'll just use different ways of doing it that are legal.

Facts


True, but we made it harder for them. What do you want us to do just sit back and make it easy as hell for them to do ? That's what laws are in place for , with your logic then we should not have a law against DWI and murder, but we do.


I'm just saying balls were being spiked as of somehow our society and it's culture were significantly changed by those decisions. They weren't and I'm sure the justices knew that when they voted the way they did.

Now, had these rulings happened fifty years ago, then things would've been affected in a way that would've hampered the people in these rulings. Today, not so much.
Pretty sure several states immediately and heavily restricted abortions.


Which is why I said those women would have to make their abortion an overnight trip to one of the many that allow them. They're still getting them, just somewhere else.
Data I saw showed an increase. But you are right, at least to a large extent. Again, the victory was states rights. No one with an above 80 IQ thought this would ban abortion across the board...a lot of liberals did.
LegalDrugPusher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No Spin Ag said:

LegalDrugPusher said:

No Spin Ag said:

LegalDrugPusher said:





Any American woman can still get an abortion in America, she'll just need to take a vacation destination state to do it.

Universities will still bring in the same number of minorities, they'll just use different ways of doing it that are legal.

Facts


True, but we made it harder for them. What do you want us to do just sit back and make it easy as hell for them to do ? That's what laws are in place for , with your logic then we should not have a law against DWI and murder, but we do.


I'm just saying balls were being spiked as of somehow our society and it's culture were significantly changed by those decisions. They weren't and I'm sure the justices knew that when they voted the way they did.

Now, had these rulings happened fifty years ago, then things would've been affected in a way that would've hampered the people in these rulings. Today, not so much.


It's never too late to do the right thing
Ags77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Franklin Comes Alive! said:

Ags77 said:

Good decisions coming out of SC. I give Trump some credit there.

Now I'm still going to do what I can to make sure he stays fired, lol.

DeSantis 2024


So you'd still vote cornpop if Trump is the nominee?

Pathetic


No. I couldn't do that again. If it's Trump Biden, I vote 3rd party or write in.

DeSantis 2024
LegalDrugPusher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You're part of the problem not a solution
Franklin Comes Alive!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ags77 said:

Franklin Comes Alive! said:

Ags77 said:

Good decisions coming out of SC. I give Trump some credit there.

Now I'm still going to do what I can to make sure he stays fired, lol.

DeSantis 2024


So you'd still vote cornpop if Trump is the nominee?

Pathetic


No. I couldn't do that again. If it's Trump Biden, I vote 3rd party or write in.

DeSantis 2024


So you'd vote cornpop by default....

Smart
Ags77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Franklin Comes Alive! said:

Ags77 said:

Franklin Comes Alive! said:

Ags77 said:

Good decisions coming out of SC. I give Trump some credit there.

Now I'm still going to do what I can to make sure he stays fired, lol.

DeSantis 2024


So you'd still vote cornpop if Trump is the nominee?

Pathetic


No. I couldn't do that again. If it's Trump Biden, I vote 3rd party or write in.

DeSantis 2024


So you'd vote cornpop by default....

Smart


No... if those are our two choices, Lord help us. I can't vote for either. For different reasons. A medium diaper wearer vs 3x diaper wearer. A 78 yr old vs 82 yr old.

For me its.....Write in, 3rd party, don't vote for president

DeSantis 2024
LarryElder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ags77 said:

Franklin Comes Alive! said:

Ags77 said:

Good decisions coming out of SC. I give Trump some credit there.

Now I'm still going to do what I can to make sure he stays fired, lol.

DeSantis 2024


So you'd still vote cornpop if Trump is the nominee?

Pathetic


No. I couldn't do that again. If it's Trump Biden, I vote 3rd party or write in.

DeSantis 2024
so basically a vote for Biden cool man
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

TexasAggie73 said:

Don't hold your breath. When the court turns liberal again, and it will at some point, this ruling will be overturned. The courts have gotten too political.
January 2025, the Democrats will pack the Court with at least 6 die hard Marxist justices.
I hope you are wrong for the sake of our Republic.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
XXXVII said:

C@LAg said:

1. yes it is his only and lasting legacy (the court).

2. he still sucks and should not be president again. we all deserve better.

but do not get ahead of yourself, dear consultant since you ran in here with your inflammatory OP and chest thumping vs those you imply are anti-Trump. there are many easy work-arounds universities can implement to achieve the same outcome witout being overt about it. The MSM is already lining those up and breaking them down for everyone to see.
Aren't those universities opening themselves up for lawsuits?
Probably, but considering the current state of the judicial system and leftist federal judges, will any lawsuits have to make it to the Supreme Court for Justice to prevail?
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funky Winkerbean said:

People that voted for Gary Johnson and Joe Biden trying to lecture republicans on who to vote for. Don't stop.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Ags77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LarryElder said:

Ags77 said:

Franklin Comes Alive! said:

Ags77 said:

Good decisions coming out of SC. I give Trump some credit there.

Now I'm still going to do what I can to make sure he stays fired, lol.

DeSantis 2024


So you'd still vote cornpop if Trump is the nominee?

Pathetic


No. I couldn't do that again. If it's Trump Biden, I vote 3rd party or write in.

DeSantis 2024
so basically a vote for Biden cool man


Huh, not a vote for Biden. Why is a write in a vote for Biden? Or a 3rd party ?
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

PA24 said:

…..And a high probability, Donald will win the Republican nomination for the 2024 Presidential election.

Should be a fun election year.
And will be promptly slaughtered in the general; while dragging down every Republican candidate with him.

The only good thing that will come out of it will be the chance to ram a lot of "told you so" right down the throat of every only and forever Trumper.
Not sure there are many, if any, "forever Trumper" posters on this board.

There is a difference between
  • Posters that defend President Trump who has been wrongly accused on numerous occasions
  • Posters that are for President Trump's nomination but will vote Republican regardless.
  • Posters that will only vote for President Trump and sit out the election or protest vote for a Democrat or third party candidate.
Seems every time someone on this board is accused of being a "forever Trumper" they say they will vote for the Republican candidate. On the other hand there seems to be quite a few posters that if President Trump is the nominee they will indeed sit out the election or vote third party. I haven't seen any posters yet that say they will protest vote for the Democratic candidate.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
StandUpforAmerica said:

Urban Ag said:

Good Trump was how tenacious he was in fighting for the campaign promises he made. He absolutely did that. Getting conservative justices seated on the USSC was one of those promises and he came through.

That said, we really lucked out on timing for a one term president getting the opportunity to nominate three. Anyone know if that has happened before?
The Dems paid a high price for RBG wanting Hillary to pick her replacement.
Another example of RBG's political activist attitude. She proclaimed the Constitution out of date and would not recommend a country(Egypt) base their government on our Constitution.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

No. I couldn't do that again.


Even if it's DeSantis you will listen to 60 Minutes and believe that DeSantis is the devil. Your media hasn't fed you all the garbage yet on DeSantis.

My bet is that you will easily be swayed again. Leopards don't change their spots.
Post removed:
by user
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A vote for Trump in the primary IS a vote for cornpop
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The argument that a vote against President Trump by voting third party is not meaningful in states that are Republican strongholds is another rationalization. It's not the vote itself it is the proclaiming this to be the ethical thing to your relatives, friends, co-workers and on boards such as this. It allows others to follow this advice and only serves to ensure the Democratic Party dominance resulting in the destruction of the rule of law and the Constitution.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's ridiculous. Vote your conscience. If that means you show that the R nominee hasn't earned yor vote (or earned a nonvote), don't let anyone bully you into anything different. No nominee or party owns your vote, otherwise you are just like the left. Make them earn it or we get the same bull **** every time.
Ags77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Phatbob said:

That's ridiculous. Vote your conscience. If that means you show that the R nominee hasn't earned yor vote (or earned a nonvote), don't let anyone bully you into anything different. No nominee or party owns your vote, otherwise you are just like the left. Make them earn it or we get the same bull **** every time.
Ags77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
60 minutes or any other media show hasn't and won't ever cause me to vote or not vote for anyone.

DeSantis 2024
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.