Ag87H2O said:aggie93 said:
I just don't know how you can reason with folks like this, it's just such a disconnect. It's kind of like how Trump was posting the White House Old Folks Home video about Biden and Trump folks think it is just so awesome as they can't wait to vote for Trump who will be older than Biden if he serves out his term.
I don't really even get mad at it anymore, I've just accepted the lunacy as being part of it. It's pointless to even argue as it is always somehow different because Trump.I was talking with a coworker a few moments ago who is a fellow Bama fan and a Trump supporter. He said:
— Right Wing Dad (@RightWingDad) January 12, 2024
"I'm sad about Saban retiring but he is 72. That's pretty old to be coaching. Someone younger will come in and do a great job. I'm sure of it because they will most likely…
"I'm sad about Saban retiring but he is 72. That's pretty old to be coaching. Someone younger will come in and do a great job. I'm sure of it because they will most likely have been taught by Saban."
I didn't reply to him because all I could think was "So 72 is too old to coach football but 78 isn't too old to run the country?!"
I bet there are a ton of Trump supporters out there that were thinking the same thing yesterday after Saban's announcement. Such a great point, but it's lost on folks blinded by the desire for some payback.
It's sad that personality and vendettas count more to voters than conservative policy and effective leadership.
This comes to mind
My question is why does anyone bother giving Loomer credibility by clicking on her crap to begin with?Captn_Ag05 said:My question is why isn't Loomer in a loony bin somewhereaggiehawg said:
Question: What is HAARP and is it effective or just some research study? (which is what I thought it was.)
FireAg said:My question is why does anyone bother giving Loomer credibility by clicking on her crap to begin with?Captn_Ag05 said:My question is why isn't Loomer in a loony bin somewhereaggiehawg said:
Question: What is HAARP and is it effective or just some research study? (which is what I thought it was.)
AggieVictor10 said:
Loomer is a fed plant psyop.
There are lots of nutjobs who do and say stupid stuff. The difference with Loomer is she is close to Trump and he calls her out and complements her regularly as well as spending time with her. Trump gives her credibility and is responsible for her large following and reach (and the money that comes from it). Folks like Tim Pool amplify her as well and have her as a regular on his show and she and Roger Stone (who is one of Trump's oldest allies) have even joked about her having his love child quite literally.FireAg said:My question is why does anyone bother giving Loomer credibility by clicking on her crap to begin with?Captn_Ag05 said:My question is why isn't Loomer in a loony bin somewhereaggiehawg said:
Question: What is HAARP and is it effective or just some research study? (which is what I thought it was.)
shack009 said:AggieVictor10 said:
Loomer is a fed plant psyop.
No she isn't. She has been very well known by those most online for the last decade plus. She ran for congress in Florida I think in 2018. She sent illegals to Nancy Pelosi's house like 7-8 years ago. She has just completely given herself to Trump.
That's what I was thinking, that she was a Dem?TRM said:shack009 said:AggieVictor10 said:
Loomer is a fed plant psyop.
No she isn't. She has been very well known by those most online for the last decade plus. She ran for congress in Florida I think in 2018. She sent illegals to Nancy Pelosi's house like 7-8 years ago. She has just completely given herself to Trump.
She was a Hillary supporter too.
trump too dumb to figure this out?AggieVictor10 said:
Loomer is a fed plant psyop.
She's definitely been on the right since I have been aware of her, she is just completely unprincipled. Not sure what the story is with supporting Hillary. Loomer ran for congress as a Republican in 2020.aggiehawg said:That's what I was thinking, that she was a Dem?TRM said:shack009 said:AggieVictor10 said:
Loomer is a fed plant psyop.
No she isn't. She has been very well known by those most online for the last decade plus. She ran for congress in Florida I think in 2018. She sent illegals to Nancy Pelosi's house like 7-8 years ago. She has just completely given herself to Trump.
She was a Hillary supporter too.
FireAg said:My question is why does anyone bother giving Loomer credibility by clicking on her crap to begin with?Captn_Ag05 said:My question is why isn't Loomer in a loony bin somewhereaggiehawg said:
Question: What is HAARP and is it effective or just some research study? (which is what I thought it was.)
I'm with you. She hadn't gone completely nuts yet. She did make a big scene at the Caesar play where they cut the head off of a fake Trump, but that was after Trump had been elected.aggiehawg said:
I don't remember her being on the radar for Trump in 2016, although Trump also had his share of wacky women back then. Katrina Piersol (sp?) comes to mind.
She's only 30 so was just getting started in '16. She used to work with O'Keefe at PV and he still likes her but she took some of the undercover stuff to the extreme. Chick is definitely nuts. She loves to scream and be outrageous and has zero compulsion with lying. Pretty much a sociopath.aggiehawg said:
I don't remember her being on the radar for Trump in 2016, although Trump also had his share of wacky women back then. Katrina Piersol (sp?) comes to mind.
Hedging his bets, which is unfortunate.Dan Scott said:
Rand is a never Nikki. I was hoping for a little more
BMX Bandit said:trump too dumb to figure this out?AggieVictor10 said:
Loomer is a fed plant psyop.
Inevitably he will dump her just like he did Dilley. Problem is for her and Dilley is they have nowhere to go but to stay Trump supporters even if they get shut out.AggieVictor10 said:BMX Bandit said:trump too dumb to figure this out?AggieVictor10 said:
Loomer is a fed plant psyop.
LOL - She boosts his ego which is all trump and his minions care about.
16 degrees and heavy snow didn’t stop Iowans from showing up to hear @RonDeSantis this morning! Commitment💪💪 pic.twitter.com/qU1q4IQbKJ
— Gabby Wiggins (@GabbyWiggins2) January 12, 2024
she's only 30?!?! she looks at least 40...aggie93 said:She's only 30 so was just getting started in '16. She used to work with O'Keefe at PV and he still likes her but she took some of the undercover stuff to the extreme. Chick is definitely nuts. She loves to scream and be outrageous and has zero compulsion with lying. Pretty much a sociopath.aggiehawg said:
I don't remember her being on the radar for Trump in 2016, although Trump also had his share of wacky women back then. Katrina Piersol (sp?) comes to mind.
aggie93 said:Inevitably he will dump her just like he did Dilley. Problem is for her and Dilley is they have nowhere to go but to stay Trump supporters even if they get shut out.AggieVictor10 said:BMX Bandit said:trump too dumb to figure this out?AggieVictor10 said:
Loomer is a fed plant psyop.
LOL - She boosts his ego which is all trump and his minions care about.
As a reminder though a few weeks back Don Jr said she should be Trump's Press Secretary after he is elected. It's all about the trolling and Clown Show.
Want to know how old Trump and Biden are..?
— Florida Dad (@FloridadadD) January 12, 2024
..
Both Don Jr. and Hunter are older than DeSantis.
LMCane said:
the ultimate irony would be Trump who is going to win "by 30, 40 and 50 points" literally what he claimed a month ago...
now with a blizzard Trump will be able to lie once again and claim he would have won 90% to 10% if not for snow.16 degrees and heavy snow didn’t stop Iowans from showing up to hear @RonDeSantis this morning! Commitment💪💪 pic.twitter.com/qU1q4IQbKJ
— Gabby Wiggins (@GabbyWiggins2) January 12, 2024
Well you can tell Nikki hasn't then since she went virtual for her events. I'm sure it has nothing to do with the Debate performance.BigRobSA said:LMCane said:
the ultimate irony would be Trump who is going to win "by 30, 40 and 50 points" literally what he claimed a month ago...
now with a blizzard Trump will be able to lie once again and claim he would have won 90% to 10% if not for snow.16 degrees and heavy snow didn’t stop Iowans from showing up to hear @RonDeSantis this morning! Commitment💪💪 pic.twitter.com/qU1q4IQbKJ
— Gabby Wiggins (@GabbyWiggins2) January 12, 2024
People that haven't ever lived in the plains states don't realize "16 and snowy" is "a day that ends in Y" in those states at this time of the year. Not really anything special.
If true this is actually quite good news for Biden rather than being a problem for him. If it hasn't sunk in yet that Trump is the likely nominee that makes polls right now (which show him losing) much less meaningful. https://t.co/Azt11wMhY2
— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) January 12, 2024
Yep, most voters don't want Biden.aggie93 said:
One more reason why any polls on the General are meaningless even if they were accurate.If true this is actually quite good news for Biden rather than being a problem for him. If it hasn't sunk in yet that Trump is the likely nominee that makes polls right now (which show him losing) much less meaningful. https://t.co/Azt11wMhY2
— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) January 12, 2024
The official release of my new single "Never Back Down" Ron DeSantis is not just Florida's Governor; he is America's Governor & he inspired me to write & record a song as a message to all those who put power & party above country. I owe it... DOWN!https://t.co/Xg5LZRAYG2
— Billy Dean (@billydean) January 12, 2024
Casey
Not a record low. Democrats will turn out in mass to vote against Trump.CREAg87 said:
It will be interesting to see what the final turnout looks like in that scenario- we'd likely go from a record high year in 2020 to a record low.
Dems will yes, but I am thinking disaffected Republicans and independents could stay home or simply leave President blank.Rapier108 said:Not a record low. Democrats will turn out in mass to vote against Trump.CREAg87 said:
It will be interesting to see what the final turnout looks like in that scenario- we'd likely go from a record high year in 2020 to a record low.
No one turns out Democrat voters more than Trump does.
What it would do is depress Republican turnout, giving the Democrats absolute and total control of the government forever.
More importantly the Dems have already got the mechanisms in place with AI, Mail In, Ballot Harvesting, and micro campaigns targeting voters to assure they will get their folks out. The only question is if Republicans will and if they can convert Independents.Rapier108 said:Not a record low. Democrats will turn out in mass to vote against Trump.CREAg87 said:
It will be interesting to see what the final turnout looks like in that scenario- we'd likely go from a record high year in 2020 to a record low.
No one turns out Democrat voters more than Trump does.
What it would do is depress Republican turnout, giving the Democrats absolute and total control of the government forever.
DeSantis says conservative media carries water for Trump: "He's got basically a Praetorian Guard of the Conservative media. Fox News, the websites, all this stuff. They just don't hold him accountable because they're worried about losing viewers." pic.twitter.com/SOwj8qvJcM
— TheBlaze (@theblaze) January 12, 2024