fightingfarmer09 said:

---

TexasRebel said:

---

You talk about GS like development stopped 10 years ago.

---

That was the state of the market in 2016-2017 when the merger took place. I saw the Blue River demo back in like 2014. GS was a joke then.

I was working with both technologies at the time.

I'm sure a lot changed since then as they blended the technologies.

---

I also may have been ahead of the curve on GS tech.

So if AI is supposed to replace 300 million low skill routine type jobs, has any politician addressed what are the millions of illegals that are being continuously let in going to do for work?

Who needs to work with UBI?

Elvis lives.

We living in pre-Bladerunner times.

Quote:

---

The FTC has signaled increased regulatory oversight of AI before. In 2021, the agency warned companies against using biased algorithms.

The FTC wants to get detailed information on how OpenAI vets information used in training for its models and how it prevents false claims from being shown to ChatGPT users.

---

Sounds like the FTC wants to be the decider of what information can be used to train LLMs.

Which is essentially the question of whether it's against the law for a machine to publish false information.

If it's illegal for a machine to publish false information, is is also illegal for a human to publish false information?

Who is the decider of the truthiness of information?

Just asking.

Stat Monitor Repairman said:

---

We living in pre-Bladerunner times.

---

Actually Amazon is planning to deploy 1,000,000 AI fueled autonomous humanoid robots globally to deliver packages to you directly. Think of taking elevators, climbing through ditches, up stairs, over hills, up driveways, etc. They will determine the best way to get to you. And I'm sure the Federal Government will in NO WAY use them for anything nefarious.

Ciboag96 said:

---

Stat Monitor Repairman said:

---

We living in pre-Bladerunner times.

---

Actually Amazon is planning to deploy 1,000,000 AI fueled autonomous humanoid robots globally to deliver packages to you directly. Think of taking elevators, climbing through ditches, up stairs, over hills, up driveways, etc. They will determine the best way to get to you. And I'm sure the Federal Government will in NO WAY use them for anything nefarious.

---

Will they work together?

If I trap a rolling one by luring it onto a moated platform, will a flying one come rescue it?

So catalytic converter theives gonna switch to stealing Amazon delivery robots?

10-years from now we'll see that unlawfully tampering or interfering with a robot during the course of duty will be a federal offense.

It won't be a crime against property like vandalism. They'll find some way to carve out a more serious charge of messing with a robot.

It's a federal crime to interfere with a postal worker. They'll make it a federal crime to mess with Bezos bots.

The bot might even upload 4K video of you tampering with it before it gets destroyed. The judicial process will be truncated and people sent to jail.

In the future it will be a more serious crime to tamper with a bot, than it will be to assault or kill another human.

10-years from now we'll be in a live action episode of the Black Mirror episode Metalhead.

If the robot causes the bridge across the moat to collapse who is to blame?

Stat Monitor Repairman said:

---

10-years from now we'll see that unlawfully tampering or interfering with a robot during the course of duty will be a federal offense.

It won't be a crime against property like vandalism. They'll find some way to carve out a more serious charge of messing with a robot.

It's a federal crime to interfere with a postal worker. They'll make it a federal crime to mess with Bezos bots.

The bot might even upload 4K video of you tampering with it before it gets destroyed. The judicial process will be truncated and people sent to jail.

In the future it will be a more serious crime to tamper with a bot, than it will be to assault or kill another human.

10-years from now we'll be in a live action episode of the Black Mirror episode Metalhead.

---

But what about when robots hurt each other?

"Professional"

Agreed on this.

Wont be surprised to see trading halted over the next year, and they'll point to this as the cause.

'It's not the printing of $11 trillion dollars that caused a financial meltdown ... its the AI bots.'

Quote:

---

A federal judge on Friday upheld a finding from the U.S. Copyright Office that a piece of art created by AI is not open to protection.

Copyright law has "never stretched so far" to "protect works generated by new forms of technology operating absent any guiding human hand," U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell found.

The opinion stressed, "Human authorship is a bedrock requirement."

Copyright law wasn't designed to reach nonhuman actors, Howell said.

---

i wonder how disney feels about microsoft building a bing app that generates ai pics of mickey mouse hijacking a plane on 9/11 pic.twitter.com/Y61Ag19J3D

— 𖤐 Sage 𖤐 🏳️‍⚧️ (@Transgenderista) October 5, 2023

Quote:

---

it seems that Image Creator's guardrails have intensified, honing in on terrorism-implying language and other potentially problematic keywords.

---

"guardrails" is the key word here.

We'll see more of this concept.

Ai tools available to the masses, but with guardrails in place.

That's pretty eye opening.

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

Stat Monitor Repairman said:

---

Lol at people calling for a moratorium on all this.

Cats out of the bag.

Like putting on a condom after you've already ****ed.

---

Yup. It would be about as successful as trying to stop the internet. Our lives could be drastically easier in the next ten years.

There's gonna be a need to discuss UBI at some point. AI will be taking away a significant amount of our jobs.

---

The internet is just a fad.

This is also what the Hollywood writers are mad about. They don't want their IP being used to train AI.

IP created by AI cannot be copyrighted. That's what it is as far as I understand it.

But it's a real mess. How do you prevent somebody from training their AI with your data?

And how are you gonna prove that they did it?

We might see companies licensing entire bodies of work to train AI.

We see these competing versions of AI software.

The one that breaks away from the others will figure out a way to license content and create a workable regime for licensing content to train AI.

That might be where we are headed.

Auto-generated AI content blocker will be the new virus blocker.

AI generated content is proliferating the internet.

Content is being generated in response to your search query using generic domains and auto-generated content.

In other words it's generating clickbait on demand and the search engines are serving even more clickbait to sift through until you find what you are looking for with a legitimate source.

Often times you get a few lines to paragraphs deep before it's clear that the content is nonsense.

All the artist that create mages for blogs and article leaders have been decimated by ai.

In the future ai will approach making all human minds useless. So that will affect about 50% of the population- cause 50% is already useless

AI not really working out like we had hoped.

Krogers AI self-checkout accused me of stealing a pomegranate but I fought them sons of *****es and won.

Self-checkout machine shuts down with the message 'help is on the way!'

Self checkout lady waddles over and scans her badge.

Screen shows a looped video on the screen of my hand putting a pomegranate in the bag with a digitized green box surrounding the pomegranate.

Like something you'd see on an NFL goal line replay and we had to stand there and review the tape with the Kroger lady then go back to the receipt and discover that I got charged for it.

Meanwhile, while the attendant was distracted with my $1.50 pomegranate, a bunch of other people at the self checkout used that opportunity to steal a bunch of other stuff so it all worked out in the end.

I saw someone scan a bunch of groceries at a self checkout and then just walk out without paying.

🔮 There will not be an ‘AI winter’ in 2024-2027. The rate of change will continue to accelerate. It will impact all. The ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’ will be with those that own their own AI and apply it to all aspects of their lives. The ‘have nots’ will be relegated to a cloud AI.

— Brian Roemmele (@BrianRoemmele) December 26, 2023

Unauthorized AI rendered celebrity ads are flooding the internet as of late.

Law and business struggling to get a handle on this.

I love the idea of NY Times or really any other publisher protecting their work that AI is trained on. There are inherent biases already, so better that people are creating awareness around that.