The Fed will be thrilled with this sort of thing as it fights inflation---BIDEN TO PROPOSE 5.2% FEDERAL PAY INCREASE: WASHINGTON POST
— James DePorre (@RevShark) March 8, 2023
The Fed will be thrilled with this sort of thing as it fights inflation---BIDEN TO PROPOSE 5.2% FEDERAL PAY INCREASE: WASHINGTON POST
— James DePorre (@RevShark) March 8, 2023
I agree. But if 10% cut is dead on arrival, 50% would get laughed out of the room. I'd love to just start working in the right direction.CDUB98 said:
10%?
Minimum is 50% needing cut, and in reality, probably could get away with 90%.
So we agree on the problem...DallasAg 94 said:
You people are hysterical.
When has the Fed ever cut jobs.
You can only hope they cut the rate of growth.
Beerosch said:
I'm all for it if they do about a 50% cut in headcount.
bmks270 said:Beerosch said:
I'm all for it if they do about a 50% cut in headcount.
Ever notice that the government NEVER has layoffs?
It only ever expands. It's like an organism, or a cult. It serves its own interest, which is to grow. It does the bare minimum to serve the people but goes to extremes to serve itself.
I do not think is is a gravy train, but it is pretty much a guaranteed job for life. Recession proof, merger and acquisition proof, and other guarantees that the private sector does not enjoy. Trade offs are to be expectedaunuwyn08 said:
Feds made like 3% in raises total between 2010 and 2020. Fed compensation in many geographic areas significantly lags behind private sector comp, and is creating some serious recruitment issues.
Further, fed raises since 2020 have significantly lagged inflation. It's not a gravy train like many make it out to be.
No.AgGrad99 said:
I'm fine with him giving a 5% raise, if he cuts 10% of the federal work force.
The Collective said:
Won't this feed more inflation?
Of course it will. They're not trying to do what is good for America. They are buying votes and destroying the middle class.The Collective said:
Won't this feed more inflation?
This is a perfect example of something being too big and rigid… the government. A smaller more agile government would be able to understand that certain position do not fall correctly in their GS pay scale.aunuwyn08 said:
We can agree that many federal positions are over compensated or benefitted compared to the private sector, but the only tech workers and engineers I can get in my hiring pools are woefully unqualified kids who picked up a certificate while driving Uber Eats.
That's all comp driven. Good applicants ghost me after they get their formal offer letters.
45-70Ag said:The Fed will be thrilled with this sort of thing as it fights inflation---BIDEN TO PROPOSE 5.2% FEDERAL PAY INCREASE: WASHINGTON POST
— James DePorre (@RevShark) March 8, 2023
I ll be sure to tell my Air traffic controller co-workers that. When is your next flight?ABATTBQ87 said:
All govt employees should be paid $15/hr
Minimum wage for minimum work
Oh, they have layoffs...it's just that they get rehired when the Republican led Budget stalemate is overridden...bmks270 said:Beerosch said:
I'm all for it if they do about a 50% cut in headcount.
Ever notice that the government NEVER has layoffs?
It only ever expands. It's like an organism, or a cult. It serves its own interest, which is to grow. It does the bare minimum to serve the people but goes to extremes to serve itself.
Gov Contractors do not get back pay... Critical positions keep working and do not get paid until the resolution is signed. Yes, MOST all non essential employees do get back pay. Every job has its benefits and there are many Gov workers that should be fired, but that is true in many professions.SeMgCo87 said:Oh, they have layoffs...it's just that they get rehired when the Republican led Budget stalemate is overridden...bmks270 said:Beerosch said:
I'm all for it if they do about a 50% cut in headcount.
Ever notice that the government NEVER has layoffs?
It only ever expands. It's like an organism, or a cult. It serves its own interest, which is to grow. It does the bare minimum to serve the people but goes to extremes to serve itself.
Us normies would call it a Furlough with Back-pay, but "Lay-offs" draws much more sympathetic reactions from MSM...