Jeeper79 said:

---

aTm2004 said:

---

Jeeper79 said:

---

Really says something when it's released to Tucker Carlson rather than an actual journalist. You give it to the press if you want to inform the public. You give it to Tucker Carlson if you want to use it as a tool to somehow sway the public.

---

That's rich given what you would consider to be an actual journalist is nothing more than a democrat shill. Who would you suggest they give it to? Chuck Todd? Clinton simp George Snuffleupagus? Norah O'Donnell? Or anybody else at one of the MSM, who has continued to push the "insurrection" fear and treat it like it's another 9/11? Give me a friggin' break. .

You're scared because Tucker's team will begin to call out the facts and crush the narrative the actual "journalists" have lied about for 2 years.

---

Fox News has journalists. Tucker Carlson just isn't one of them.

---

Who will more than likely be helping Tucker. Tucker has reach that your average journalist doesn't, and will open several doors for those within Fox News looking at this.

ArcticPenguin said:

---

Irish 2.0 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

Irish 2.0 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

I imagine to analyze and gut the insurrection narrative that liberals have clung to.

---

It is strange the back the blue crowd was suddenly all good with beating police.

---

Uhhhh…I've never been a back the blue type. Your "beating police" line is complete bull**** and has already been discredited.

ETA:
See my signature below.

---

You should tell the guy who got convicted of beating a police officer with a flag pole, not to worry about serving his prison sentence because his actions were "discredited". While you are at it, you should also let the other 4 police who were beaten that day, along with the family of the one who died. I am sure they would be happy to hear from you.

---

No cop died because of Jan 6. Only one person died; an unarmed female Air Force veteran. Your "media" has been lying to you about this and who knows what else?

Four cops "beaten" doesn't seem like much of an "insurrection".

Jeeper79 said:

---

Really says something when it's released to Tucker Carlson rather than an actual journalist. You give it to the press if you want to inform the public. You give it to Tucker Carlson if you want to use it as a tool to somehow sway the public.

---

That's fair, but you're not operating in a bubble. It has been selectively released and framed for over a year by people every bit as partisan as Carlson. Isn't this just evening that up some?

Edit: Another thought - "the press" has not been asking for it the last two years. By and large, they were fine with what the DNC committee wanted to give them and when. Carlson has actually been asking for it. If they want it now all of the sudden, then why?

Jeeper79 said:

---

Really says something when it's released to Tucker Carlson rather than an actual journalist. You give it to the press if you want to inform the public. You give it to Tucker Carlson if you want to use it as a tool to somehow sway the public.

---

Ohhhh nooooo...can you imagine people using this as a tool to try and sway the public?

TXAGFAN said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Jeeper79 said:

---

Really says something when it's released to Tucker Carlson rather than an actual journalist. You give it to the press if you want to inform the public. You give it to Tucker Carlson if you want to use it as a tool to somehow sway the public.

---

Tell us about all those "actual journalists." Can you name some?

---

You miss the news about Tucker in last week? He's all about views/clicks.

Jeeper is right, if you want to be objective you give to a few real journalists and can even give to a few across spectrum - not talking head types.

---

So NOW we want to be objective.

Funny how that works.

Ciboag96 said:

---

Something I've learned on TexAgs.

When a certain post hits close to a sensitive DNC/Media Matters talking point memo, the lib posters jump on it quick and with similarly worded responses.

That is when you know you've zeroed in on something that matters.

---

Jeeper/TAF/AP suddenly caring about journalism and objectivity.

ArcticPenguin said:

---

Irish 2.0 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

Irish 2.0 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

I imagine to analyze and gut the insurrection narrative that liberals have clung to.

---

It is strange the back the blue crowd was suddenly all good with beating police.

---

Uhhhh…I've never been a back the blue type. Your "beating police" line is complete bull**** and has already been discredited.

ETA:
See my signature below.

---

You should tell the guy who got convicted of beating a police officer with a flag pole, not to worry about serving his prison sentence because his actions were "discredited". While you are at it, you should also let the other 4 police who were beaten that day, along with the family of the one who died. I am sure they would be happy to hear from you.

---

Can we agree to drop the faux emotional histrionics for once and dare to discuss this...dare I say it...honestly and objectively?

Well Schiff4Brains is coming unglued, so the right pigs are sqealing.

Kevin McCarthy turned over Jan 6 videos to right-wing propagandist Tucker Carlson.

A man who spews Kremlin talking points. Suggests Jan 6 was a false flag. And spreads the Big Lie.

Make no mistake: This isn’t about transparency, it’s about fueling dangerous conspiracy theories.

— Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) February 20, 2023

If you're ever on the side of Adam Schiff, it's time to take a pause and reevaluate.

Ignore her. She's a proven liar who makes crap up out of thin air and has done it for years.

If you gave it to NBC they would air someone tea bagging AOCs desk on a loop and lose the rest of the footage.

The fact that he's trying to take the high road after falsifying a transcript is rich.

nortex97 said:

---

etxag02 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

More entertainment. Fox News won the McDougal case by stating Tucker is only an entertainer and not news media held to standards that could make him or Fox News liable for false statements. US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, saying "this 'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.'" Then we have the texts from the Dominion case that shows how he and the other entertainers at Fox News play their audience.

---

Fact check, false. But don't take my word for it, read the opinion.

Quote:

---

After the case was removed from New York state court, Fox News moved to dismiss Ms. McDougal's claim on the grounds that Mr. Carlson's statements were not statements of fact and that she failed adequately to allege actual malice. For the reasons stated herein, Fox News's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. 9/24/2020USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: Case 1:19-cv-11161-MKV Document 39 Filed 09/24/20 Page 1 of 19McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLCDoc. 39Dockets.

---

Actual malice is required by journalists/media toward public persons. Actual malice was required to be shown, and she clearly failed to do so, so the case was dismissed.

Quote:

---

A series of decisions from courts around the country hold that similar accusations of extortion or blackmail, especially as related to political issues, are almost always construed as nonactionable.

---

Despite propaganda/lies from the usual mouthpieces to the contrary, your whole summary of the legal arguments made is wholly untrue/false. I'm gonna just go out and guess you're not a lawyer, but regardless your ability to read/analyze legal decisions/reasoning is exceptionally poor.

---

Except that doesn't speak to the fact the 1) Carlson admitted he was just an entertainer (ala Alex Jones) and 2) There is zero way to read his exposed texts about his feelings of Jan 6 out of context. He thought he election fraud was bogus, was embarrassed by the riots...but also did not want their talking heads to state this but rather toe the line of Trumps claims to keep their supporter numbers up. He's a business man/entertainer. Sure he gets things right sometimes but whether he believes all the claims he makes is obviously suspect. The liberal media obviously obfuscates their stories...but to thing the right doesn't do it is just ridiculous.

BluHorseShu said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

etxag02 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

More entertainment. Fox News won the McDougal case by stating Tucker is only an entertainer and not news media held to standards that could make him or Fox News liable for false statements. US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, saying "this 'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.'" Then we have the texts from the Dominion case that shows how he and the other entertainers at Fox News play their audience.

---

Fact check, false. But don't take my word for it, read the opinion.

Quote:

---

After the case was removed from New York state court, Fox News moved to dismiss Ms. McDougal's claim on the grounds that Mr. Carlson's statements were not statements of fact and that she failed adequately to allege actual malice. For the reasons stated herein, Fox News's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. 9/24/2020USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: Case 1:19-cv-11161-MKV Document 39 Filed 09/24/20 Page 1 of 19McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLCDoc. 39Dockets.

---

Actual malice is required by journalists/media toward public persons. Actual malice was required to be shown, and she clearly failed to do so, so the case was dismissed.

Quote:

---

A series of decisions from courts around the country hold that similar accusations of extortion or blackmail, especially as related to political issues, are almost always construed as nonactionable.

---

Despite propaganda/lies from the usual mouthpieces to the contrary, your whole summary of the legal arguments made is wholly untrue/false. I'm gonna just go out and guess you're not a lawyer, but regardless your ability to read/analyze legal decisions/reasoning is exceptionally poor.

---

Except that doesn't speak to the fact the 1) Carlson admitted he was just an entertainer (ala Alex Jones) and 2) There is zero way to read his exposed texts about his feelings of Jan 6 out of context. He thought he election fraud was bogus, was embarrassed by the riots...but also did not want their talking heads to state this but rather toe the line of Trumps claims to keep their supporter numbers up. He's a business man/entertainer. Sure he gets things right sometimes but whether he believes all the claims he makes is obviously suspect. The liberal media obviously obfuscates their stories...but to thing the right doesn't do it is just ridiculous.

---

So why is all this protest and outrage reserved for the right? Not a peep from many of you over the last two years about the dog and pony show the J6 committee and their media have put us through (actually a lot of these posters were cheerleading the J6 nonsense) but now it's "OMG Tucker is not objective!". I don't even watch Tucker or Fox News but this is all so silly. The footage will speak for itself.

Ciboag96 said:

---

Something I've learned on TexAgs.

When a certain post hits close to a sensitive DNC/Media Matters talking point memo, the lib posters jump on it quick and with similarly worded responses.

That is when you know you've zeroed in on something that matters.

---

Yeah, and this thread is like watching seagulls flock to scraps. All it takes is one to swoop in and start making noise and before you know it the rest of the group shows up squawking loudly and crapping over everything.

Bearpitbull said:

---

Can you imagine this thread if BLM stormed the cap in the same manner? Hypocrisy set at MAX!

---

BLM prefers to storm the white house.

Beast of Burden said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

etxag02 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

More entertainment. Fox News won the McDougal case by stating Tucker is only an entertainer and not news media held to standards that could make him or Fox News liable for false statements. US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, saying "this 'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.'" Then we have the texts from the Dominion case that shows how he and the other entertainers at Fox News play their audience.

---

Fact check, false. But don't take my word for it, read the opinion.

Quote:

---

After the case was removed from New York state court, Fox News moved to dismiss Ms. McDougal's claim on the grounds that Mr. Carlson's statements were not statements of fact and that she failed adequately to allege actual malice. For the reasons stated herein, Fox News's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. 9/24/2020USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: Case 1:19-cv-11161-MKV Document 39 Filed 09/24/20 Page 1 of 19McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLCDoc. 39Dockets.

---

Actual malice is required by journalists/media toward public persons. Actual malice was required to be shown, and she clearly failed to do so, so the case was dismissed.

Quote:

---

A series of decisions from courts around the country hold that similar accusations of extortion or blackmail, especially as related to political issues, are almost always construed as nonactionable.

---

Despite propaganda/lies from the usual mouthpieces to the contrary, your whole summary of the legal arguments made is wholly untrue/false. I'm gonna just go out and guess you're not a lawyer, but regardless your ability to read/analyze legal decisions/reasoning is exceptionally poor.

---

Except that doesn't speak to the fact the 1) Carlson admitted he was just an entertainer (ala Alex Jones) and 2) There is zero way to read his exposed texts about his feelings of Jan 6 out of context. He thought he election fraud was bogus, was embarrassed by the riots...but also did not want their talking heads to state this but rather toe the line of Trumps claims to keep their supporter numbers up. He's a business man/entertainer. Sure he gets things right sometimes but whether he believes all the claims he makes is obviously suspect. The liberal media obviously obfuscates their stories...but to thing the right doesn't do it is just ridiculous.

---

So why is all this protest and outrage reserved for the right? Not a peep from many of you over the last two years about the dog and pony show the J6 committee and their media have put us through (actually a lot of these posters were cheerleading the J6 nonsense) but now it's "OMG Tucker is not objective!". I don't even watch Tucker or Fox News but this is all so silly. The footage will speak for itself.

---

I am on the right...and I still believe the Jan 6 was a bunch of idiots who received the justice they deserved. But that has nothing to do with Tuckers credibility. I absolutely believe they should release it to the entire public

Jeeper79 said:

---

Really says something when it's released to Tucker Carlson rather than an actual journalist. You give it to the press if you want to inform the public. You give it to Tucker Carlson if you want to use it as a tool to somehow sway the public.

---

By "Journalists" you mean DNC propagandists that are only going to use it as a tool to somehow sway the public. Much like the entirety of the Jan 6th committee. You're just pissed that someone got the actual evidence that might release it to the public to allow people to decide for themselves instead of viewing it through the filter of progressive propaganda.

The hypocrisy of leftist intellectual dishonesty is truly amazing. You guys have no shame at all!

BluHorseShu said:

---

Beast of Burden said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

etxag02 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

More entertainment. Fox News won the McDougal case by stating Tucker is only an entertainer and not news media held to standards that could make him or Fox News liable for false statements. US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, saying "this 'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.'" Then we have the texts from the Dominion case that shows how he and the other entertainers at Fox News play their audience.

---

Fact check, false. But don't take my word for it, read the opinion.

Quote:

---

After the case was removed from New York state court, Fox News moved to dismiss Ms. McDougal's claim on the grounds that Mr. Carlson's statements were not statements of fact and that she failed adequately to allege actual malice. For the reasons stated herein, Fox News's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. 9/24/2020USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: Case 1:19-cv-11161-MKV Document 39 Filed 09/24/20 Page 1 of 19McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLCDoc. 39Dockets.

---

Actual malice is required by journalists/media toward public persons. Actual malice was required to be shown, and she clearly failed to do so, so the case was dismissed.

Quote:

---

A series of decisions from courts around the country hold that similar accusations of extortion or blackmail, especially as related to political issues, are almost always construed as nonactionable.

---

Despite propaganda/lies from the usual mouthpieces to the contrary, your whole summary of the legal arguments made is wholly untrue/false. I'm gonna just go out and guess you're not a lawyer, but regardless your ability to read/analyze legal decisions/reasoning is exceptionally poor.

---

Except that doesn't speak to the fact the 1) Carlson admitted he was just an entertainer (ala Alex Jones) and 2) There is zero way to read his exposed texts about his feelings of Jan 6 out of context. He thought he election fraud was bogus, was embarrassed by the riots...but also did not want their talking heads to state this but rather toe the line of Trumps claims to keep their supporter numbers up. He's a business man/entertainer. Sure he gets things right sometimes but whether he believes all the claims he makes is obviously suspect. The liberal media obviously obfuscates their stories...but to thing the right doesn't do it is just ridiculous.

---

So why is all this protest and outrage reserved for the right? Not a peep from many of you over the last two years about the dog and pony show the J6 committee and their media have put us through (actually a lot of these posters were cheerleading the J6 nonsense) but now it's "OMG Tucker is not objective!". I don't even watch Tucker or Fox News but this is all so silly. The footage will speak for itself.

---

I am on the right...and I still believe the Jan 6 was a bunch of idiots who received the justice they deserved. But that has nothing to do with Tuckers credibility. I absolutely believe they should release it to the entire public

---

I think we need as much information as we can get before we can say "they got what they deserved". I assume that sentiment extends to Ashley Babbitt, and couldn't disagree more. And what about the people who have been held 2 years without a trial? Their Constitutional rights are not being granted them. And how about people who were let in through open doors and waved in by capitol police, took some selfies, walked around a bit and left without breaking anything?

TxTarpon said:

---

Irish 2.0 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

I imagine to analyze and gut the insurrection narrative that liberals have clung to.

---

It is strange the back the blue crowd was suddenly all good with beating police.

---

You are wrong, completely wrong. Conservatives and Republicans condemn the violence and destruction of property during the Jan. 6th altercations. What they condemn is the unwarranted and possibly illegal detention of some arrested for extended periods. What they condemn is the reactions from the Democratic Party leadership comparing this to Pearl Harbor, 9-11 and other truly horrific attacks on the United States. The Democratic Party leadership is unethical, amoral and has no honor.

You are being completely disingenuous with your statement. The Democratic Party Leadership conflated the events. There is evidence that the FBI had informants within the crowd agitating and several ANTIFA members involved.

Conservatives back the blue and are smart enough to be able to distinguish the difference in the situations.

Thank you for the post and presenting the facts.

It is depressing that the Democratic Party leadership and MSM gets away with complete lies and that people repeat these lies continuously even after shown to be false

BluHorseShu said:

---

Beast of Burden said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

etxag02 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

More entertainment. Fox News won the McDougal case by stating Tucker is only an entertainer and not news media held to standards that could make him or Fox News liable for false statements. US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, saying "this 'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.'" Then we have the texts from the Dominion case that shows how he and the other entertainers at Fox News play their audience.

---

Fact check, false. But don't take my word for it, read the opinion.

Quote:

---

After the case was removed from New York state court, Fox News moved to dismiss Ms. McDougal's claim on the grounds that Mr. Carlson's statements were not statements of fact and that she failed adequately to allege actual malice. For the reasons stated herein, Fox News's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. 9/24/2020USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: Case 1:19-cv-11161-MKV Document 39 Filed 09/24/20 Page 1 of 19McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLCDoc. 39Dockets.

---

Actual malice is required by journalists/media toward public persons. Actual malice was required to be shown, and she clearly failed to do so, so the case was dismissed.

Quote:

---

A series of decisions from courts around the country hold that similar accusations of extortion or blackmail, especially as related to political issues, are almost always construed as nonactionable.

---

Despite propaganda/lies from the usual mouthpieces to the contrary, your whole summary of the legal arguments made is wholly untrue/false. I'm gonna just go out and guess you're not a lawyer, but regardless your ability to read/analyze legal decisions/reasoning is exceptionally poor.

---

Except that doesn't speak to the fact the 1) Carlson admitted he was just an entertainer (ala Alex Jones) and 2) There is zero way to read his exposed texts about his feelings of Jan 6 out of context. He thought he election fraud was bogus, was embarrassed by the riots...but also did not want their talking heads to state this but rather toe the line of Trumps claims to keep their supporter numbers up. He's a business man/entertainer. Sure he gets things right sometimes but whether he believes all the claims he makes is obviously suspect. The liberal media obviously obfuscates their stories...but to thing the right doesn't do it is just ridiculous.

---

So why is all this protest and outrage reserved for the right? Not a peep from many of you over the last two years about the dog and pony show the J6 committee and their media have put us through (actually a lot of these posters were cheerleading the J6 nonsense) but now it's "OMG Tucker is not objective!". I don't even watch Tucker or Fox News but this is all so silly. The footage will speak for itself.

---

I am on the right...and I still believe the Jan 6 was a bunch of idiots who received the justice they deserved. But that has nothing to do with Tuckers credibility. I absolutely believe they should release it to the entire public

---

I don't know you so I will take you at your word but I've never gotten the impression you are conservative based on your posts.

The fact that you claim "a bunch of idiots who received the justice they deserved" without any regard to their due process while having their constitutional rights trampled reinforces my opinion on your actual and true political stance.

TXAGFAN said:

---

Bearpitbull said:

---

Can you imagine this thread if BLM stormed the cap in the same manner? Hypocrisy set at MAX!

---

Well…they didn't.

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kavanaugh-protesters-arrested-at-capitol-after-thousands-march-on-supreme-court

• By Thursday afternoon, Capitol Police began arresting hundreds of protesters inside the Hart Senate Office Building who raised their fists and loudly started chanting "Kavanaugh has got to go." Arrests were made after protesters began sitting down in the building's atrium, refusing to cooperate with law enforcement.
  
  In all, some 302 protesters were arrested and charged with unlawfully demonstrating in Senate office buildings Thursday, police said.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/protests-build-capitol-hill-ahead-brett-kavanaugh-vote-n917351

• U.S. Capitol Police said a total of 164 people were arrested during the protests for "crowding, obstructing, or incommoding."

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/kavanaugh-protests-escalate-120-arrested-capitol-hill/story?id=58048599

• Kavanaugh protests escalate, over 120 arrested on Capitol Hill
  Protests on Capitol Hill and around the country escalated on Monday
  ByCheyenne Haslett
  September 24, 2018, 6:04 PM

More general violence not necessarily @ the Capitol
The Democratic Party is often violent, divisive and hypocritical; if it doesn't change, Trump will be back | COMMENTARY By Ronald P. Boone For The Baltimore Sun Nov 20, 2020 at 5:00 am
some quotes from the article

• Ignoring the Constitution. When Trump won, leftists rampaged the streets, randomly destroyinginnocent citizens' property. Democrats began impeachment immediately. They touted eliminating the Electoral College and packing the Supreme Court and Senate. If leftists resort to violence whenever unhappy with electoral results, and if the Democratic Party alters timeworn American institutions to guarantee its own political supremacy, citizens who respect peace and democracy will resist.
  Being divisive, elitist, and hypocritical. The right didn't elect Donald Trump, the left did. Hillary Clinton called millions of voters "deplorables." Democrats everywhere cheered her statement. Conservatives were callously called Trumpies. Some were intimidated in the workplace, even fired. Moderates perceive such leftist tactics as threatening, humiliating, and arrogant toward those with differing viewpoints, leaving them resentful of the party and its agenda.
  Being partisan in the press. Did CNN dedicate the same coverage to the Obama administration's treatment of families at the Mexican border that it did to the Trump administration for the same behaviors? The scope of challenges to questionable policies shouldn't be determined by political party. Many don't seek the news for political preferences of editors and columnists. We desire nonpartisan analysis of events. Single perspective news outlets limit the perspective of citizens and foster intolerant outlooks.

Beast of Burden said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

Beast of Burden said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

etxag02 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

More entertainment. Fox News won the McDougal case by stating Tucker is only an entertainer and not news media held to standards that could make him or Fox News liable for false statements. US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, saying "this 'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.'" Then we have the texts from the Dominion case that shows how he and the other entertainers at Fox News play their audience.

---

Fact check, false. But don't take my word for it, read the opinion.

Quote:

---

After the case was removed from New York state court, Fox News moved to dismiss Ms. McDougal's claim on the grounds that Mr. Carlson's statements were not statements of fact and that she failed adequately to allege actual malice. For the reasons stated herein, Fox News's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. 9/24/2020USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: Case 1:19-cv-11161-MKV Document 39 Filed 09/24/20 Page 1 of 19McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLCDoc. 39Dockets.

---

Actual malice is required by journalists/media toward public persons. Actual malice was required to be shown, and she clearly failed to do so, so the case was dismissed.

Quote:

---

A series of decisions from courts around the country hold that similar accusations of extortion or blackmail, especially as related to political issues, are almost always construed as nonactionable.

---

Despite propaganda/lies from the usual mouthpieces to the contrary, your whole summary of the legal arguments made is wholly untrue/false. I'm gonna just go out and guess you're not a lawyer, but regardless your ability to read/analyze legal decisions/reasoning is exceptionally poor.

---

Except that doesn't speak to the fact the 1) Carlson admitted he was just an entertainer (ala Alex Jones) and 2) There is zero way to read his exposed texts about his feelings of Jan 6 out of context. He thought he election fraud was bogus, was embarrassed by the riots...but also did not want their talking heads to state this but rather toe the line of Trumps claims to keep their supporter numbers up. He's a business man/entertainer. Sure he gets things right sometimes but whether he believes all the claims he makes is obviously suspect. The liberal media obviously obfuscates their stories...but to thing the right doesn't do it is just ridiculous.

---

So why is all this protest and outrage reserved for the right? Not a peep from many of you over the last two years about the dog and pony show the J6 committee and their media have put us through (actually a lot of these posters were cheerleading the J6 nonsense) but now it's "OMG Tucker is not objective!". I don't even watch Tucker or Fox News but this is all so silly. The footage will speak for itself.

---

I am on the right...and I still believe the Jan 6 was a bunch of idiots who received the justice they deserved. But that has nothing to do with Tuckers credibility. I absolutely believe they should release it to the entire public

---

I don't know you so I will take you at your word but I've never gotten the impression you are conservative based on your posts.

The fact that you claim "a bunch of idiots who received the justice they deserved" without any regard to their due process while having their constitutional rights trampled reinforces my opinion on your actual and true political stance.

---

This user somehow gets staff to delete my posts every single time I mention that their posting style and history on here are very clearly far left of center.

Kavanaugh protests





Jan 6





Same manner?

Jeeper79 said:

---

Really says something when it's released to Tucker Carlson rather than an actual journalist. You give it to the press if you want to inform the public. You give it to Tucker Carlson if you want to use it as a tool to somehow sway the public.

---

There are no journalists. The entire American media is comprised of nothing but self aggrandizing hacks.

Pictures for one, gifs for the other.

lol

Let's see some GIFs from the summer of love. Liberals are violent and extraordinarily hypocritical.

aggieforester05 said:

---

Let's see some GIFs from the summer of love. Liberals are violent and extraordinarily hypocritical.

---

Didn't you know they were mostly peaceful?! The media said so over and over! It was mostly peaceful!



That police station set on fire? Mostly peaceful.

The left are pissed because they know that a lot of the stuff they've been clinging to for the last 2 years is about to be debunked. And the "conspiracy theorists" are about to be proven right for like the 10,000th time. They can't really claim this was comparable to 9/11 and Pearl Harbor when video is going to show people dancing around after having been let in by Capitol Police.

Bingo.

Leftists love them some surveillance state, but hate sharing information about what they see.

pretty obvious what's going on here, the Party needs its chief propagandist to comb through 41,000 hours of footage to compile some 2 minute clips of mostly peaceful protesters singing kumbaya on the capitol steps on 1/6/21 for the next election cycle

Ciboag96 said:

---

Something I've learned on TexAgs.

When a certain post hits close to a sensitive DNC/Media Matters talking point memo, the lib posters jump on it quick and with similarly worded responses.

That is when you know you've zeroed in on something that matters.

---

I wouldn't have an issue if these same posters would actually take the time to educate themselves instead of reading, or listening, to self-serving BS.

The fact AP still believes a cop died and it was attributable to the J6 protestors is obscene. It's been two full years, and he doesn't know (or uses it to refute other TA posters) the cop died of natural causes means he's either listening to the wrong crap (likely, since maybe 10% of the media covered it accurately), or reads articles of writers writing for a purpose, not enlightenment.

Now, do BLM, Antifa, about 10 attorneys and elected Reps for Republicans who had their phones taken at gun point, Russiagate, etc..

Then I might consider the reply to be of value.

Old McDonald said:

---

pretty obvious what's going on here, the Party needs its chief propagandist to comb through 41,000 hours of footage to compile some 2 minute clips of mostly peaceful protesters singing kumbaya on the capitol steps on 1/6/21 for the next election cycle

---

I mean that would be better than the left having their propagandists lie to us and tell us that protests are "mostly peaceful" while buildings are being set on fire in the background of that camera shot.

Ciboag96 said:

---

Something I've learned on TexAgs.

When a certain post hits close to a sensitive DNC/Media Matters talking point memo, the lib posters jump on it quick and with similarly worded responses.

That is when you know you've zeroed in on something that matters.

---

One of the weirdest things I've ever seen in this regard was when Trump/Ukraine stuff came out in 2019, I saw posts here, TigerDroppings, Reddit, and Twitter all had people that immediately said that the Ukrainian prosecutor that Biden went after was well known to be corrupt. By leftists of course.

I would imagine the amount of people that could name a Ukrainian prosecutor before that day on TexAgs/TigerDroppings to be 0.