Story here: https://t.co/CWKF9E9A4o

— ALX 🇺🇸 (@alx) February 20, 2023

For what?
A documentary?

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

I imagine to analyze and gut the insurrection narrative that liberals have clung to.

Irish 2.0 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

I imagine to analyze and gut the insurrection narrative that liberals have clung to.

---

That's also more than enough material to last well into the next election cycle.

Irish 2.0 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

I imagine to analyze and gut the insurrection narrative that liberals have clung to.

---

It is strange the back the blue crowd was suddenly all good with beating police.

TxTarpon said:

---

Irish 2.0 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

I imagine to analyze and gut the insurrection narrative that liberals have clung to.

---

It is strange the back the blue crowd was suddenly all good with beating police.

---

Uhhhh…I've never been a back the blue type. Your "beating police" line is complete bull**** and has already been discredited.

ETA:
See my signature below.

TxTarpon said:

---

Irish 2.0 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

I imagine to analyze and gut the insurrection narrative that liberals have clung to.

---

It is strange the back the blue crowd was suddenly all good with beating police.

---

Is this about the beating police gave to the person they hauled to another area to all start beating on them ? The one that nobody knows who was involved or getting beat …….

First thing Tucker will do is see if he can find anything to embarrass Lindsay Graham. I aint crazy about him but Tucker goes after him like a jilted lover...

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

To bring to light that which the bastion of democracy (dims) wish to censor to fit their narrative. Nothing new here really

Have to admit I'm of two minds on this one. Full transparency doesn't mean an exclusive deal with Tucker Carlson to me. Nor do I trust Tucker not to have it behind a paywall to restrict distribution.

aggiehawg said:

---

Have to admit I'm of two minds on this one. Full transparency doesn't mean an exclusive deal with Tucker Carlson to me. Nor do I trust Tucker not to have it behind a paywall to restrict distribution.

---

I suspect Tucker received it first, but it will go out to many more. You know that outlets will put in FOIAs if they don't get it too

Only liberals are allowed to cook up slanted stories

Quote:

---

Carlson's team having access to this footage will definitely allow for counter-arguments to be made, however, it's unclear that his team has exclusive access.

We will likely see footage released from Carlson and his team over the course of the next few weeks and you shouldn't be surprised if an entire special is created on the side that will air on Fox Nation.

It is currently unclear if McCarthy will release the footage to the general public after Carlson's team is done with it. One thing is for sure. The Democrats will be going into a full-on crisis mode, and like a cornered beast it's going to lash out as Carlson begins airing footage that casts the Democrat Party's narratives surrounding the event into question.

---

LINK

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

More entertainment. Fox News won the McDougal case by stating Tucker is only an entertainer and not news media held to standards that could make him or Fox News liable for false statements. US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, saying "this 'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.'" Then we have the texts from the Dominion case that shows how he and the other entertainers at Fox News play their audience.

Quote:

---

More entertainment. Fox News won the McDougal case by stating Tucker is only an entertainer and not news media held to standards that could make him or Fox News liable for false statements. US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, saying "this 'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.'" Then we have the texts from the Dominion case that shows how he and the other entertainers at Fox News play their audience.

---

Dems got 18 months and a farcical committee to carefully craft a narrative, eliminate any dissenting opinions and blame Trump and MAGA. It was an f'ing joke. It seems politicians sitting on committees aren't held liable for false statements either.

Why doesn't he release it to the American people?

H2Ag said:

---

First thing Tucker will do is see if he can find anything to embarrass Lindsay Graham. I aint crazy about him but Tucker goes after him like a jilted lover...

---

Lindsey Graham is a total fraud.

No Spin Ag said:

---

Irish 2.0 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

I imagine to analyze and gut the insurrection narrative that liberals have clung to.

---

That's also more than enough material to last well into the next election cycle.

---

It's gonna be tough for you to watch your favorite insurrection hoax house of cards finally fall


Try to stay positive… You & the other cornpop voters had a good run beating that fake drum

etxag02 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

More entertainment. Fox News won the McDougal case by stating Tucker is only an entertainer and not news media held to standards that could make him or Fox News liable for false statements. US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, saying "this 'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.'" Then we have the texts from the Dominion case that shows how he and the other entertainers at Fox News play their audience.

---

Why are you so obsessed with Tucker Carlson?

It's like you had that quote memorized. It's weird and kind of creepy.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

H2Ag said:

---

First thing Tucker will do is see if he can find anything to embarrass Lindsay Graham. I aint crazy about him but Tucker goes after him like a jilted lover...

---

Lindsey Graham is a total fraud.

---

Which persona?

I hope this turns into a more investigative piece about agent provocateurs embedded in the crowd than just trying to craft a right-sided narrative. I don't need superficial right-winger mind pron, I want to see some real investigation into who was involved in the ACTUAL instigation of violent acts.

I really want to see the video of the Capital Police unlocking the doors and welcoming in the protestors.

Arresting and Prosecuting people for walking in through an opened door while being welcomed by the officers inside is disgusting and probably entrapment. Anyone that does not think that is dirty is the real danger to democracy.

Franklin Comes Alive! said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Irish 2.0 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

I imagine to analyze and gut the insurrection narrative that liberals have clung to.

---

That's also more than enough material to last well into the next election cycle.

---

It's gonna be tough for you to watch your favorite insurrection hoax house of cards finally fall


Try to stay positive… You & the other cornpop voters had a good run beating that fake drum

---

Why would I watch it? I already got all I needed from it when it happened in real time. Besides, it's not like this is going to get anyone out of jail or bring someone back from the dead.

This will end up being as effective at changing things as anything else Congress does after the fact, which is typically nothing.

I mean, yes, it'll get clicks, ratings, and likes, but after that, not much. But at least the right can finally have their turn with the information.

etxag02 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

More entertainment. Fox News won the McDougal case by stating Tucker is only an entertainer and not news media held to standards that could make him or Fox News liable for false statements. US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, saying "this 'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.'" Then we have the texts from the Dominion case that shows how he and the other entertainers at Fox News play their audience.

---

So you are buttsore that this one guy is held to the same standard as all of the MSM outlets?

I'm sure the Kraken is in there somewhere!

etxag02 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

More entertainment. Fox News won the McDougal case by stating Tucker is only an entertainer and not news media held to standards that could make him or Fox News liable for false statements. US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, saying "this 'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.'" Then we have the texts from the Dominion case that shows how he and the other entertainers at Fox News play their audience.

---

Does this mean we shouldn't believe our lying eyes when we see capitol police waving people into the building through open doors, or just that any commentary we hear should be processed for truth?

No Spin Ag said:

---

Franklin Comes Alive! said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Irish 2.0 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

I imagine to analyze and gut the insurrection narrative that liberals have clung to.

---

That's also more than enough material to last well into the next election cycle.

---

It's gonna be tough for you to watch your favorite insurrection hoax house of cards finally fall


Try to stay positive… You & the other cornpop voters had a good run beating that fake drum

---

Why would I watch it? I already got all I needed from it when it happened in real time. Besides, it's not like this is going to get anyone out of jail or bring someone back from the dead.

This will end up being as effective at changing things as anything else Congress does after the fact, which is typically nothing.

I mean, yes, it'll get clicks, ratings, and likes, but after that, not much. But at least the right can finally have their turn with the information.

---

You don't want any context to what you think you know? Why would you avoid more information?

It could get someone out of jail, but no, it won't bring Ashley Babbitt - the only person who died from the huge insurrection - back from the dead.

"No Spin" Ag continues to own the worst handle on the site.

Sort of follows the way Elon let out the Twitter files. Except here the govt official not a private citizen is determining who gets the info first.

Agree with you. Glad its out but above board level playing field would be better, particularly on such a divisive issue.

fka ftc said:

---

Sort of follows the way Elon let out the Twitter files. Except here the govt official not a private citizen is determining who gets the info first.

Agree with you. Glad its out but above board level playing field would be better, particularly on such a divisive issue.

---

Agree. I've been back and forth on McCarthy but this causes me more concern about his true intentions here.

etxag02 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

More entertainment. Fox News won the McDougal case by stating Tucker is only an entertainer and not news media held to standards that could make him or Fox News liable for false statements. US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, saying "this 'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.'" Then we have the texts from the Dominion case that shows how he and the other entertainers at Fox News play their audience.

---

Fact check, false. But don't take my word for it, read the opinion.

Quote:

---

After the case was removed from New York state court, Fox News moved to dismiss Ms. McDougal's claim on the grounds that Mr. Carlson's statements were not statements of fact and that she failed adequately to allege actual malice. For the reasons stated herein, Fox News's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. 9/24/2020USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: Case 1:19-cv-11161-MKV Document 39 Filed 09/24/20 Page 1 of 19McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLCDoc. 39Dockets.

---

Actual malice is required by journalists/media toward public persons. Actual malice was required to be shown, and she clearly failed to do so, so the case was dismissed.

Quote:

---

A series of decisions from courts around the country hold that similar accusations of extortion or blackmail, especially as related to political issues, are almost always construed as nonactionable.

---

Despite propaganda/lies from the usual mouthpieces to the contrary, your whole summary of the legal arguments made is wholly untrue/false. I'm gonna just go out and guess you're not a lawyer, but regardless your ability to read/analyze legal decisions/reasoning is exceptionally poor.

No Spin Ag said:

---

Franklin Comes Alive! said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Irish 2.0 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

I imagine to analyze and gut the insurrection narrative that liberals have clung to.

---

That's also more than enough material to last well into the next election cycle.

---

It's gonna be tough for you to watch your favorite insurrection hoax house of cards finally fall


Try to stay positive… You & the other cornpop voters had a good run beating that fake drum

---

Why would I watch it? I already got all I needed from it when it happened in real time. Besides, it's not like this is going to get anyone out of jail or bring someone back from the dead.

This will end up being as effective at changing things as anything else Congress does after the fact, which is typically nothing.

I mean, yes, it'll get clicks, ratings, and likes, but after that, not much. But at least the right can finally have their turn with the information.

---

"I already got properly instructed by the carefully crafted MSM narrative and have no desire to see anything contrary to my programmed worldview, so that I can justify voting for Biden again in '24"

etxag02 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

More entertainment. Fox News won the McDougal case by stating Tucker is only an entertainer and not news media held to standards that could make him or Fox News liable for false statements. US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, saying "this 'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.'" Then we have the texts from the Dominion case that shows how he and the other entertainers at Fox News play their audience.

---

41,000 hours of "film". The event lasted say 12 hours, right? 41,000 / 12 = 3,417 cameras?

Is that even possible?

I suppose a lot of it could be on people's cell fones, right? I mean there can't be that many security cameras even in and around the capitol.

Can there?

zoneag said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Franklin Comes Alive! said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Irish 2.0 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

For what?
A documentary?

---

I imagine to analyze and gut the insurrection narrative that liberals have clung to.

---

That's also more than enough material to last well into the next election cycle.

---

It's gonna be tough for you to watch your favorite insurrection hoax house of cards finally fall


Try to stay positive… You & the other cornpop voters had a good run beating that fake drum

---

Why would I watch it? I already got all I needed from it when it happened in real time. Besides, it's not like this is going to get anyone out of jail or bring someone back from the dead.

This will end up being as effective at changing things as anything else Congress does after the fact, which is typically nothing.

I mean, yes, it'll get clicks, ratings, and likes, but after that, not much. But at least the right can finally have their turn with the information.

---

"I already got properly instructed by the carefully crafted MSM narrative and have no desire to see anything contrary to my programmed worldview, so that I can justify voting for Biden again in '24"

---

Actually Desantis has my vote in '24.

Wearer of the Ring said:

---

41,000 hours of "film". The event lasted say 12 hours, right? 41,000 / 12 = 3,417 cameras?

Is that even possible?

I suppose a lot of it could be on people's cell fones, right? I mean there can't be that many security cameras even in and around the capitol.

Can there?

---

The entire Capitol Complex is huge with multiple levels and tunnels. Yes, I could see that many.