More docs in Joe's Garage..

20,723 Views | 261 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by WHOOP!'91
Tom Doniphon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Though they had nothing to do with trump or declassified docs, McConnell's words to Reid - "You'll regret this, and you may regret this a lot sooner than you think," - seem even more poignant now.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fasthorse05 said:

In fairness, those *******s classify waaaay to much crap anyway.

Now, if it's SCIF material, fine, but watching those SOB's in the Russiagate/FISA issues classify docs JUST to cover up incompetence was/is infuriating. So in lieu of so much information we don't have, especially regarding Trump's FBI fiasco, it may be possible for us to agree on this. Although, I seriously doubt any of our confiscatory brethren give a damn, as the ONLY goal isn't accuracy but myopia to make Republicans look bad, being evil and all. Hell, I doubt they have ever seen some of the crap the intel agencies choose to classify.




What they were does matter.


I find it ironic the first thing they mentioned was they were related to Ukraine and Iran. That's seems a tad but troubling.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MsDoubleD81 said:

Quoting Peter Doocy!


He's not wrong!
fixer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What is amazing isn't that absolutely nothing of any consequence will occur to anyone related to this.

What actually is amazing is that people will still vote Democrat in 2024.
BQ78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They get one and then they get debriefed all in the same session.
DamnGood86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Could someone post the FBI photos of Biden's classified documents spread out on hood of his Corvette?
You may not be a moron, but some people think you are.
Houstonag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My garage looks better than that. I guess I should have never sold that Corvette.
BaitShack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's a new one "They" are saying that this is proof of what a hard worker Biden is. Demonstrating that he works from home.
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fixer said:

What is amazing isn't that absolutely nothing of any consequence will occur to anyone related to this.

What actually is amazing is that people will still vote Democrat in 2024.
To be fair -- half the GOP acts like Democrats and are not much, if at all, better.

With 'friends' like Dan Crenshaw, why fight AOC?
Jock 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Loren Visser said:

Whistle Pig said:

ChiefKiefton said:

Nothing will happen to Biden.


He had and maintained a security clearance since 2008. Trump lost his clearance. Also didn't lie to the FBI precipitating a search warrant.


Prez can declassify whatever he wants. VP cannot. Trump didn't break the law and Biden did. You know that but you don't care.


Exactly this. Also please share with the class when trump "lost" his clearance and, how and who exactly, rescinds the president's (who maintains ultimate OCA) security clearance.

WP is a clown show
jja79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Penn Biden Center didn't open until 2018 so the documents were removed from the WH and placed somewhere else before being moved to this location. Who had them and where all have they been?
japantiger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Kathy Chung, who was Biden's executive assistant while he was vice president and helped pack up his vice presidential office in January 2017, is among those who have been interviewed, according to the sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the ongoing inquiry. Chung currently serves as deputy director of protocol for Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin.

One of the sources said that those who were asked to be interviewed by law enforcement officials complied "quickly."
"The people who were boxing [up the vice presidential office] had no idea that there was anything in there that shouldn't leave the White House," the source said. "There was no decision made to take certain documents that should have been presidential records or classified."
The sources did not know if all interviews of the aides were complete.
The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment about Chung and the other aides being interviewed.
LINK

Talking points are out.
If your a Democrat, ignorance is an excuse
“It was miraculous. It was almost no trick at all, he saw, to turn vice into virtue and slander into truth, impotence into abstinence, arrogance into humility, plunder into philanthropy, thievery into honor, blasphemy into wisdom, brutality into patriotism, and sadism into justice. Anybody could do it; it required no brains at all. It merely required no character.”
Joseph Heller, Catch 22
AggiePops
How long do you want to ignore this user?
XXXVII said:

Impeach the MFer.
You can sure get on his case for being a DF, but being a DF is not an impeachable offense.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Talking points are out to use the Hillary defense and claim that if you didn't INTEND to violate the law, then it's okay to violate the law
MsDoubleD81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This whole thing amuses me and I think back on the document I signed every year that I understood and abided by XYZ Corp's Record Retention Guidelines. Only time anybody took it seriously was in preparation for the audits every 3 years.
Tom Doniphon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1872walker said:



Monthly Rent: $49,910

Nothing nefarious here... nothing at all. Who wouldn't "rent" their home to a son / daughter for $50k a month.
FJB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tom Doniphon said:

1872walker said:



Monthly Rent: $49,910

Nothing nefarious here... nothing at all. Who wouldn't "rent" their home to a son / daughter for $50k a month.
But was that rental income reported?
Who is John Galt?

2026
pacecar02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
old Hank "Guam" Johnson got a take

Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pacecar02 said:

old Hank "Guam" Johnson got a take




**** that guy is stupid.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tom Doniphon said:

1872walker said:



Monthly Rent: $49,910

Nothing nefarious here... nothing at all. Who wouldn't "rent" their home to a son / daughter for $50k a month.
Ted Kennedy always charged othe Kennedy's for stays at Hyannisport.

But still looks like money laundering to me.
Tom Doniphon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That sum***** is dumber than a bucket of hair.
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgDad121619
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

So Biden has been keeping classified documents in his GARAGE for AT LEAST 6 years. Who knows how many people went through or had access to his UNSECURED garage in the past 6 years. But that is A-OK to Whistle Pig and others.

It's pretty comical at this point to see the Democrats jump through hoops to make it look/sound better when they were just months ago getting on to Trump about the SAME DAMN stuff.

HAHAHAhahahAHAHAhahaAHa.

Keep on keepin' on Dems.
obviously you have forgot that Trump had nucular documents in his safe. The world was in danger of death - planet of the apes type of death
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here we go…. Like clockwork.

Bryanisbest
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TikkaShooter said:

Great. Now in 2024 the American people will get to choose between two insufferable idiots with shady AF secure doc practices. How fun.



Good, you have assumed either DeSantis does not run or loses to Trump if he does. Trump will then beat Biden again. Whether it is stolen from Trump again remains to be seen.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's been hours. Do we have a couple of our posters already looking for new user names?
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did they point out how there is absolutely no possible way that possession of SCIF only top secret documents outside of a secure facility is not a crime, unless you are the president at the time they were removed, or have the authorization documentation from the president himself allowing that to have been done for each document? I wonder…
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Its just (D)ifferent
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tom Doniphon said:

That sum***** is dumber than a bucket of hair.

Still smarter than the voters that keep reelecting him.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
President Biden's condemnation of President Trump's purported mishandling of classified documents in a "60 Minutes" interview last year will live on as his version of Hillary Clinton's "What difference, at this point, does it make" statement regarding the 2012 Benghazi terror attacks, critics said Thursday
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

Did they point out how there is absolutely no possible way that possession of SCIF only top secret documents outside of a secure facility is not a crime, unless you are the president at the time they were removed, or have the authorization documentation from the president himself allowing that to have been done for each document? I wonder…


As it turns out, that very key point is being desperately ignored by most leftists right now
1872walker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tom Doniphon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DAYYYYUM....
RGLAG85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMCane said:

Andrew99 said:

The establishment controls the mainstream media and the DOJ. Nothing gets reported or investigated without the blessing of the ruling class.

The media will report whatever the narrative is, regardless of the truth. They are reporting on this because it advances the goals of the establishment, whatever they may be. This is not being reported to expose anything, it's to push a narrative. No one in the ruling class has anything to fear from the media or the DOJ unless they step out of line.

This does make Biden look bad but it is not being pushed for journalistic integrity, there is a reason for it.

My guess is they want Biden to gracefully resign for health reasons but he does not want to give up power. So they are firing a little shot across the bow. If he decides to announce that he's been suffering from a condition like Alzheimer's and can no longer perform the duties of President, the media will glorify him with puff pieces praising him for his patriotic service to this country. No further mention will be made of these classified documents. If he defies the establishment then they move to more aggressive means of persuasion and threaten impeachment or prison time for him or possibly family members (Hunter).

Either way, Kamala will replace him and the media will spend the next two years trying to make her likeable and respected (tough challenge there). They are not worried about actual votes, but they need her 2024 victory to be plausible. Unless she is a complete disgrace, they'll just have her avoid campaign appearances and they will drag her across the finish line. That's what they did for Biden and what they thought they could do for Clinton. If she is too unlikable even after all of the gas lighting, they'll find another option.

It's all a show.

the only reason that strategy worked for the left was because of Covid and Trump.

put up DeSantis- then it's going to be a GOP victory.
You're in for a real disappointment, ok SC?
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Holy hell.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.