you need an assistant when robbing a restaurant. haven't these kids seen pulp fiction?
tysker said:
you need an assistant when robbing a restaurant. haven't these kids seen pulp fiction?
Like "really bro...I'm only half way through my migas".CanyonAg77 said:
The expression on the face of the guy at the same booth as the shooter....
wbt5845 said:
Ignore my post - I didn't see this one.
Yes, I think. He is pointing the "gun" at another customer when he is shot.
BadMoonRisin said:
He also looks to be aiming the weapon in the direction of the gentlemen in the corner with his hands raised...or that's what it looks like from the still. Cant tell without the rest of the footage.
Also, the fact that they even mention "he didnt even have a REAL gun!". What a lame excuse. The people didnt know that.
Same vibe as "it was just a prank, bro".
Sad thing in this litigious society: can't let a wounded perp live. Dead men don't file a civil case and make lie to a jury about what really happened.CanyonAg77 said:
So there is now a news report up on the link in the OP. It says that the good guy shot the robber "multiple times", and shows the video below
Couple of bullet holes in the door. Gives me the idea that the first shot (where the surveillance video is halted) did not take the bad guy out, and that there were several more rounds required to end the perceived threat.
Cromagnum said:
Robber could have squeezed off a round or two himself as he was getting hit too.
CanyonAg77 said:Cromagnum said:
Robber could have squeezed off a round or two himself as he was getting hit too.
Uhhhh, not likely
CanyonAg77 said:Cromagnum said:
Robber could have squeezed off a round or two himself as he was getting hit too.
Uhhhh, not likely
V8Aggie said:
No bueno if shot in the back leaving. If his back was turned but pointing gun at others then yes good shoot.
Either way if I'm on the jury he's getting a standing ovation from me.
I've wondered about that before.CanyonAg77 said:
Here's a question for the Internet lawyers.
If you're that shooter, are you legally required to hang around and talk to the cops?
I can think of a lot of reasons, both legal and illegal that the shooter wants to avoid the cops.
not a legal requirement, for cops or non cops.IndividualFreedom said:
"I heard him say he was going to kill me and I feared for my life"
Big Al 1992 said:
Robber comes in pointing what turns out to be toy gun at customers, turns his back and customer shoots him in the back dead. Perfect case of stupid games/stupid prizes but will hero get charged or is this legit?
https://www.khou.com/article/news/crime/taqueria-robbery-shooting-houston/285-5dceec19-9c07-444c-b211-4c584738e0fa
Sid Farkas said:
The Good Samaritan "dragged" the suspect after he shot him then redistributed the stolen money back to the customers.
Indeed a righteous kill, but what kind of a person doesn't render aid to the suspect he just shot?
Stick up artist meets Texas justice pic.twitter.com/rXJN6yJiDq
— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) January 7, 2023
aggietony2010 said:
Full video, with audio.Stick up artist meets Texas justice pic.twitter.com/rXJN6yJiDq
— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) January 7, 2023
He might have some legal issues with his very last shot. He puts a final bullet in the perp after securing the fake firearm. All the others are easily justified legally.