titan said:
snowdog90,
It certainly can't be doubted you are at least right about what the govt has metastasized into as of this date, whatever may or may not have occured in the 1960's with the alphabets. Having reviewed the scenarios, while none particularly compelling with the Pentagon, can you at least say which one you think rings true. To understand your position.
All anomalies are not created equal. Some are easier to explain than others, some really give pause. The Engineering Damage survey not getting to inspect the site till Oct 4 when somewhat cleared (you have cited a similar issue at the NY site) is more disturbing than the nature of wreckage left behind from an extraordinary impact. Etc.
If nothing else, what most doubting about Pentagon, which scenario lean to?
Ok, titan, here goes...
As for the Pentagon, I don't think a plane hit the Pentagon. I think a missile did. I base this on a few things.
1. Witnesses reported smelling cordite, which is much different than smelling jet fuel.
2. The plane did things that that plane is not supposed to be able to do - 500+ knots at sea level, crazy banking turn, knocks over light poles with no consequence or damage or flight deviation.
3. Survivor in Pentagon escapes with child through the hole made by the "plane". She sees no evidence of any plane, no bodies, no luggage, nothing, she just walks out through the hole.
4. Where is the plane? Where are the wings? There is a picture that is evidently well-hidden now that shows a large round hole in the Pentagon, before the wall collapsed. There's no wing damage visible and no wing debris. I saw this years ago and can't find it now. It might be in one of the longer documentaries like Loose Change, but I've seen it. The damage is not conducive to a plane impact.
5. If the plane hit as we're told, the massive engines would have scraped the ground before impacting the wall. There are no gouge marks from the engines, there are no big engine holes in the wall, and no engines. The engines are almost indestructible and yet there's no evidence they were there at all in the first picture taken of the damage.
As for my overall thoughts on the anomalies, there are just so many. On 911 overall, what swayed me the most was Tower 7, as I've said before, and as you have agreed looks very fishy. Once I believed we had been lied to about tower 7, I went deep into the rabbit hole and disbelieved all of it.
Titan, I'm gonna post a link. This is just another one of those anomalies. I've posted this before, and it looks pretty obvious to me what happens, and...
Well, it just doesn't make any sense at all.
So, you being of open mind, please watch this little 3 minute video from 911 and give me your explanation of what happens, if you can.
I've posted it before and gotten some ridiculous answers, but I'm very curious what you think.
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/dustification-north-tower-spire-turns-to-dust/