Silian Rail said:

---

Colorado legalizing psychedelics, multiple states allowing babies to be killed up until the moment of birth, and allowing babies who have survived a botched abortion to be tossed in the medical refuse bin.

I don't believe there was cheating in this election. I believe the libs made it easier for people to vote who otherwise wouldn't have bothered and these people are low information liberals. The problem is America doesn't want what conservatives want. We are a country that wants to use drugs, that wants to kill
babies, and whose sole motivation revolves around watching porn and having immigrants deliver fast food to their door. The problem isn't the message, it's the electorate.

This election isn't about candidates. The right will always lose if it has to run Galahad the Pure while the left can trot out Fetterman and get an easy W. The Virgin Mary may have beat Fetterman by a point or two in Pennsylvania. Think about what that says about Democracy, and about voting.

The only silver lining is that nothing would have changed even if the Reps had an iron clad lock on Congress. Nothing ever changes, things just keep going left at a slightly faster or slower speed depending on who is "in charge".

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

You folks need to decide what party you are. For example, if you're the party of individual freedoms why so uptight about drugs?

I understand perfectly the pro life argument from your side, but there are so many examples of where your party says they are one thing and does another.

---

Silian Rail said:

---

Colorado legalizing psychedelics, multiple states allowing babies to be killed up until the moment of birth, and allowing babies who have survived a botched abortion to be tossed in the medical refuse bin.

I don't believe there was cheating in this election. I believe the libs made it easier for people to vote who otherwise wouldn't have bothered and these people are low information liberals. The problem is America doesn't want what conservatives want. We are a country that wants to use drugs, that wants to kill
babies, and whose sole motivation revolves around watching porn and having immigrants deliver fast food to their door. The problem isn't the message, it's the electorate.

This election isn't about candidates. The right will always lose if it has to run Galahad the Pure while the left can trot out Fetterman and get an easy W. The Virgin Mary may have beat Fetterman by a point or two in Pennsylvania. Think about what that says about Democracy, and about voting.

The only silver lining is that nothing would have changed even if the Reps had an iron clad lock on Congress. Nothing ever changes, things just keep going left at a slightly faster or slower speed depending on who is "in charge".

---

Silian Rail said:

---

Colorado legalizing psychedelics, multiple states allowing babies to be killed up until the moment of birth, and allowing babies who have survived a botched abortion to be tossed in the medical refuse bin.

I don't believe there was cheating in this election. I believe the libs made it easier for people to vote who otherwise wouldn't have bothered and these people are low information liberals. The problem is America doesn't want what conservatives want. We are a country that wants to use drugs, that wants to kill
babies, and whose sole motivation revolves around watching porn and having immigrants deliver fast food to their door. The problem isn't the message, it's the electorate.

This election isn't about candidates. The right will always lose if it has to run Galahad the Pure while the left can trot out Fetterman and get an easy W. The Virgin Mary may have beat Fetterman by a point or two in Pennsylvania. Think about what that says about Democracy, and about voting.

The only silver lining is that nothing would have changed even if the Reps had an iron clad lock on Congress. Nothing ever changes, things just keep going left at a slightly faster or slower speed depending on who is "in charge".

---

TaxLawAg said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

You folks need to decide what party you are. For example, if you're the party of individual freedoms why so uptight about drugs?

I understand perfectly the pro life argument from your side, but there are so many examples of where your party says they are one thing and does another.

---

Now do your party.

---

Sims said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

You folks need to decide what party you are. For example, if you're the party of individual freedoms why so uptight about drugs?

I understand perfectly the pro life argument from your side, but there are so many examples of where your party says they are one thing and does another.

---

It's a great point, honestly.

For me, if there wasn't such a cradle to grave benefit system built into our society, things like this would have much less impact on me personally (or at least my perception of how it impacts me personally).

As things stand, in the face of unprecedented low labor force participation, constant fiscal stimulus, entitlement spending programs outpacing necessary government expenditures, record high crime, dismal education metrics etc., legalizing a bunch of extra drugs just doesn't move the "hey, this is a great idea" needle for me.

Typically, if someone's life choice doesn't harm me or others...then I'm going on with my life. Based on how tied to the hip net tax payers are to everyone else then it almost behooves me to have an opinion on how others live.

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TaxLawAg said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

You folks need to decide what party you are. For example, if you're the party of individual freedoms why so uptight about drugs?

I understand perfectly the pro life argument from your side, but there are so many examples of where your party says they are one thing and does another.

---

Now do your party.

---

They have plenty of flaws, discussed at length by me on this forum.

They aren't the ones losing elections because of their awful messaging and blaming it on cheating, Trump, etc.

---

Silian Rail said:

---

I don't care about many many individual freedoms. Nice try Trojan horse

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Sims said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

You folks need to decide what party you are. For example, if you're the party of individual freedoms why so uptight about drugs?

I understand perfectly the pro life argument from your side, but there are so many examples of where your party says they are one thing and does another.

---

It's a great point, honestly.

For me, if there wasn't such a cradle to grave benefit system built into our society, things like this would have much less impact on me personally (or at least my perception of how it impacts me personally).

As things stand, in the face of unprecedented low labor force participation, constant fiscal stimulus, entitlement spending programs outpacing necessary government expenditures, record high crime, dismal education metrics etc., legalizing a bunch of extra drugs just doesn't move the "hey, this is a great idea" needle for me.

Typically, if someone's life choice doesn't harm me or others...then I'm going on with my life. Based on how tied to the hip net tax payers are to everyone else then it almost behooves me to have an opinion on how others live.

---

So if this is the compelling reason for this viewpoint, why not acknowledge you aren't really about freedom and embrace your nanny state you'd like to be. Forget legalizing weed, let's outlaw alcohol - it leads to all manner of sinful activity and societal issues.

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

You folks need to decide what party you are. For example, if you're the party of individual freedoms why so uptight about drugs?

I understand perfectly the pro life argument from your side, but there are so many examples of where your party says they are one thing and does another.

---

TaxLawAg said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TaxLawAg said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

You folks need to decide what party you are. For example, if you're the party of individual freedoms why so uptight about drugs?

I understand perfectly the pro life argument from your side, but there are so many examples of where your party says they are one thing and does another.

---

Now do your party.

---

They have plenty of flaws, discussed at length by me on this forum.

They aren't the ones losing elections because of their awful messaging and blaming it on cheating, Trump, etc.

---

They are ABSOLUTELY losing elections because of their awful messaging and stupid ****ing policies that don't work. They are ABSOLUTELY blaming Trump for EVERYTHING bad that happens thats actually a result of their dip****tery. No one is surprised you can't connect that.

Face it: you only vote for them because they celebrate your immoral choices. That's it. You need that affirmation because you're insecure about it…which you should be. It's wrong.

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

You folks need to decide what party you are. For example, if you're the party of individual freedoms why so uptight about drugs?

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TaxLawAg said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TaxLawAg said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

You folks need to decide what party you are. For example, if you're the party of individual freedoms why so uptight about drugs?

I understand perfectly the pro life argument from your side, but there are so many examples of where your party says they are one thing and does another.

---

Now do your party.

---

They have plenty of flaws, discussed at length by me on this forum.

They aren't the ones losing elections because of their awful messaging and blaming it on cheating, Trump, etc.

---

They are ABSOLUTELY losing elections because of their awful messaging and stupid ****ing policies that don't work. They are ABSOLUTELY blaming Trump for EVERYTHING bad that happens thats actually a result of their dip****tery. No one is surprised you can't connect that.

Face it: you only vote for them because they celebrate your immoral choices. That's it. You need that affirmation because you're insecure about it…which you should be. It's wrong.

---

This comment from TaxLawAg and his disapproval about my life "choice" has just ruined my whole day. Going to text with the Beto people that texted me 100 times this month for affirmation.

---

Silian Rail said:

---

Freedom was never supposed to exist in a vacuum, this is a ruse by the left to get "conservatives" to go along with their social agenda. Freedom was predicated on the idea that a person should be allowed to do what was "right", not that they had license to do anything physically possible.

Moral relativism entered the equation during the enlightenment with disastrous results.

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TaxLawAg said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TaxLawAg said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

You folks need to decide what party you are. For example, if you're the party of individual freedoms why so uptight about drugs?

I understand perfectly the pro life argument from your side, but there are so many examples of where your party says they are one thing and does another.

---

Now do your party.

---

They have plenty of flaws, discussed at length by me on this forum.

They aren't the ones losing elections because of their awful messaging and blaming it on cheating, Trump, etc.

---

They are ABSOLUTELY losing elections because of their awful messaging and stupid ****ing policies that don't work. They are ABSOLUTELY blaming Trump for EVERYTHING bad that happens thats actually a result of their dip****tery. No one is surprised you can't connect that.

Face it: you only vote for them because they celebrate your immoral choices. That's it. You need that affirmation because you're insecure about it…which you should be. It's wrong.

---

This comment from TaxLawAg and his disapproval about my life "choice" has just ruined my whole day. Going to text with the Beto people that texted me 100 times this month for affirmation.

Just another example of GOP wanting to legislate and restrict people.

---

TaxLawAg said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TaxLawAg said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TaxLawAg said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

You folks need to decide what party you are. For example, if you're the party of individual freedoms why so uptight about drugs?

I understand perfectly the pro life argument from your side, but there are so many examples of where your party says they are one thing and does another.

---

Now do your party.

---

They have plenty of flaws, discussed at length by me on this forum.

They aren't the ones losing elections because of their awful messaging and blaming it on cheating, Trump, etc.

---

They are ABSOLUTELY losing elections because of their awful messaging and stupid ****ing policies that don't work. They are ABSOLUTELY blaming Trump for EVERYTHING bad that happens thats actually a result of their dip****tery. No one is surprised you can't connect that.

Face it: you only vote for them because they celebrate your immoral choices. That's it. You need that affirmation because you're insecure about it…which you should be. It's wrong.

---

This comment from TaxLawAg and his disapproval about my life "choice" has just ruined my whole day. Going to text with the Beto people that texted me 100 times this month for affirmation.

---

You've said it yourself. Did you forget?

It's a choice, just like I choose not to bang my Secretary, even if I wanted to.

---

ArmchairCowboy said:

---

I agree for the most part but I think my mind has changed on psychedelics

Listen to Marcus and Amber Capone on the Jocko podcast and tell me you want our veterans to have to go to Mexico to receive this treatment. By their account, this has been life saving for many veterans suffering from PTSD and self medicating addictions.

---

rocky the dog said:

---

---

Rapier108 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

You folks need to decide what party you are. For example, if you're the party of individual freedoms why so uptight about drugs?

I understand perfectly the pro life argument from your side, but there are so many examples of where your party says they are one thing and does another.

---

Your party would legalize turning boys into girls and girls into boys at age 2, removing age of consent laws, legalizing every other perversion that academia could come up with, allowing not only abortion, but infanticide (just about there already), euthanasia for any reason, even if the person doesn't want to die, but family or doctors decide it is the "right thing to do."

Your party would also remove the right to own any firearm, would eliminate freedom of speech using the claim of "hate speech" for anything they don't like, and then imprison anyone who dared to utter non-approved speech. The #1 target would be anything religious which goes against the alphabet soup crowd.

So don't go lecturing us about individual freedom. Your party is the antithesis of individual freedom.

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

You folks need to decide what party you are. For example, if you're the party of individual freedoms why so uptight about drugs?

I understand perfectly the pro life argument from your side, but there are so many examples of where your party says they are one thing and does another.

---

Your party would legalize turning boys into girls and girls into boys at age 2, removing age of consent laws, legalizing every other perversion that academia could come up with, allowing not only abortion, but infanticide (just about there already), euthanasia for any reason, even if the person doesn't want to die, but family or doctors decide it is the "right thing to do."

Your party would also remove the right to own any firearm, would eliminate freedom of speech using the claim of "hate speech" for anything they don't like, and then imprison anyone who dared to utter non-approved speech. The #1 target would be anything religious which goes against the alphabet soup crowd.

So don't go lecturing us about individual freedom. Your party is the antithesis of individual freedom.

---

Wow, don't think I've seen anyone campaigning on all that. Congrats though, I know that's the GOP propaganda talking points. You bought in to all those. Baa baa.

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TaxLawAg said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TaxLawAg said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TaxLawAg said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

You folks need to decide what party you are. For example, if you're the party of individual freedoms why so uptight about drugs?

I understand perfectly the pro life argument from your side, but there are so many examples of where your party says they are one thing and does another.

---

Now do your party.

---

They have plenty of flaws, discussed at length by me on this forum.

They aren't the ones losing elections because of their awful messaging and blaming it on cheating, Trump, etc.

---

They are ABSOLUTELY losing elections because of their awful messaging and stupid ****ing policies that don't work. They are ABSOLUTELY blaming Trump for EVERYTHING bad that happens thats actually a result of their dip****tery. No one is surprised you can't connect that.

Face it: you only vote for them because they celebrate your immoral choices. That's it. You need that affirmation because you're insecure about it…which you should be. It's wrong.

---

This comment from TaxLawAg and his disapproval about my life "choice" has just ruined my whole day. Going to text with the Beto people that texted me 100 times this month for affirmation.

---

You've said it yourself. Did you forget?

It's a choice, just like I choose not to bang my Secretary, even if I wanted to.

---

Start a new thread if you want to talk about this, it's an obsession.

You just don't like that I'm right about republicans on this issue. They are the party of freedoms, as long as they fit in their narrow view.

---

Adverse Event said:

---

Silian Rail said:

---

Colorado legalizing psychedelics, multiple states allowing babies to be killed up until the moment of birth, and allowing babies who have survived a botched abortion to be tossed in the medical refuse bin.

I don't believe there was cheating in this election. I believe the libs made it easier for people to vote who otherwise wouldn't have bothered and these people are low information liberals. The problem is America doesn't want what conservatives want. We are a country that wants to use drugs, that wants to kill
babies, and whose sole motivation revolves around watching porn and having immigrants deliver fast food to their door. The problem isn't the message, it's the electorate.

This election isn't about candidates. The right will always lose if it has to run Galahad the Pure while the left can trot out Fetterman and get an easy W. The Virgin Mary may have beat Fetterman by a point or two in Pennsylvania. Think about what that says about Democracy, and about voting.

The only silver lining is that nothing would have changed even if the Reps had an iron clad lock on Congress. Nothing ever changes, things just keep going left at a slightly faster or slower speed depending on who is "in charge".

---

And that's just the Electorate!

Let's dive deep into what our spiritual leaders have offered up to follow behind...

Oh wait, thats a Lotta children diddling.

Maybe its not the electorate, or our leaders, but the actual game being played that needs to change. The game is corrupting all of its participants and ever faster than before.

---