OFFICIAL ***2022 Midterms election results thread ***

536,877 Views | 4564 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by TRM
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Question" How do poll pads increase the numbers of "voters" checked in when the polls are closing and no one is being checked in?

This happened in Texas. Watch the videos HERE and HERE
WaltonAg18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Question" How do poll pads increase the numbers of "voters" checked in when the polls are closing and no one is being checked in?

This happened in Texas. Watch the videos HERE and HERE
After a very basic google search, the user manual for Poll Pads shows that they sync up to other devices present, but those two videos conveniently leave off the main display screen showing where the vote tallies are syncing from. You can see the second screen on the first image at the top of the page here:

https://verifiedvoting.org/election-system/knowink-poll-pad/

Is this seriously the best y'all have? "Number go up therefore election stolen"?
No one should have to work to survive. Your right to life should not depend solely on your ability to produce capital.
MOCO9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I thought there was supposed to be hundreds of thousands of votes dropped? What happened to those?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So poll pads are worthless, good to know.
Hungry Ojos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Time to end this thread. Worst case scenario has been realized once again and it's final.
HumpitPuryear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
10thYrSr said:

HumpitPuryear said:

10thYrSr said:

Que Te Gusta Mas said:





Harvesting votes is harvesting votes. Republicans can go into those same apartment buildings and harvest votes. That's why it is harvesting. The people who are being harvested aren't opinionated voters who would otherwise go out and vote. This is just collecting signatures. The right field agents could collect signatures no matter the party.

LOL sure put on your maga hat and go collect ballots in Detroit and Philly.


You think this is about party. It isn't. It is collecting signatures. In Detroit I'd send conservative blacks to harvest the votes

Don't be obtuse. This is about getting signatures. Not politics. The vote harvesters are the engine. Who drives them is dictated by cash

The Democrat machine is in place in those cities. It's taken years to organize. You aren't going to just waltz in and start throwing money around. Your canvassers will be hospitalized.
Aston04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
10thYrSr said:

Charpie said:

The people of PA didn't like Oz, so they voted for the stroke guy


The people of PA loved Oz enough that he won the primary and was placed on the ballot
he had a stroke days before the primary and didn't disclose how bad it was to voters..
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOL. Do people really bother to mark a ballot for people running unopposed?

Charpie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is it?

Everyone who lost did so by buying amplified by the democrats in the primary. They literally were bolstered into position by the dems in the primary because of how unpopular they would be with independents.
Charpie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
John Carter ran unopposed and got 182,704 in the primary..so yes they do
TaxLawAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WaltonAg18 said:

agjacent said:

maroon man said:

Still having a real hard time grasping how most all the "delayed" votes go democrat.
By "delayed" you mean the votes that are getting counted now, ie votes that arrived by mail or were dropped at a ballot box?

You see, republicans have spent the past couple of election cycles vilifying any voting methods that aren't same day, in person voting. Therefore, most of the votes that get cast in the mail or a drop box will be from people who DON'T think it's evil and satanic to vote that way, ie democrats. If you want a more even political distribution from the ballots cast by mail or drop box, then first you have to convince and encourage your voters to vote by mail or drop box.

Does that clarify things for you?
I'm still waiting on the Hawg explanation of how it's at all possible for BOTH NUMBERS to go up AT THE SAME TIME, it just doesn't make any sense and doesn't add up..


Always enjoy posts from this kid who knows absolutely dick and actually thinks democrats are still the "working man's" party.

Hawg is a LOT more accomplished than you.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That and the fact that data in real time shows a pattern that is a statistical anomaly. Flip a coin a hundred times and it comes up heads ninety-nine times, although possible in theory, very rarely happens.

Which is more likely? Edison feeds are being hacked and changed? Or the data going into them is being manipulated in specific locations?

One would think the people running the Edison feeds would at least be a teensy bit curious when an accretive count declines in total votes cast.
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

TexasAggie_97 said:

Somehow the republicans are going to lose seats in the senate.


How so?


Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teslag said:

Dr. Alister MacKenzie said:

Headed for small R control in house, run off for the Senate. Complete gridlock for 2 years, not the worst.


A 20 to 25 seat margin is it small, and that's what it will be


Hmmmm
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Captain Pablo said:

aginlakeway said:

TexasAggie_97 said:

Somehow the republicans are going to lose seats in the senate.


How so?





We haven't lost any seats in the senate yet. If Walker wins the runoff it is exactly as it was before.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Captain Pablo said:

aginlakeway said:

TexasAggie_97 said:

Somehow the republicans are going to lose seats in the senate.


How so?




Thanks for the bump! I'm glad someone pays attention to what I write.

So how many seats did the republicans lose in the senate?
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

Captain Pablo said:

aginlakeway said:

TexasAggie_97 said:

Somehow the republicans are going to lose seats in the senate.


How so?




Thanks for the bump! I'm glad someone pays attention to what I write.

So how many seats did the republicans lose in the senate?



That makes one person at least
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
AggieUSMC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

Captain Pablo said:

aginlakeway said:

TexasAggie_97 said:

Somehow the republicans are going to lose seats in the senate.


How so?




Thanks for the bump! I'm glad someone pays attention to what I write.

So how many seats did the republicans lose in the senate?

One so far, GA runoff will determine if it stays that way or a net wash. I'm leaning toward the former.
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

Captain Pablo said:

aginlakeway said:

TexasAggie_97 said:

Somehow the republicans are going to lose seats in the senate.


How so?




Thanks for the bump! I'm glad someone pays attention to what I write.

So how many seats did the republicans lose in the senate?



One, for now.

Certainly didn't gain any

We'll see if the GOP gets it back
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Captain Pablo said:

aginlakeway said:

Captain Pablo said:

aginlakeway said:

TexasAggie_97 said:

Somehow the republicans are going to lose seats in the senate.


How so?




Thanks for the bump! I'm glad someone pays attention to what I write.

So how many seats did the republicans lose in the senate?



One, for now.

Certainly didn't gain any

We'll see if the GOP gets it back


OK. So the GOP may not lose any seats then.
AggieUSMC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

Captain Pablo said:

aginlakeway said:

Captain Pablo said:

aginlakeway said:

TexasAggie_97 said:

Somehow the republicans are going to lose seats in the senate.


How so?




Thanks for the bump! I'm glad someone pays attention to what I write.

So how many seats did the republicans lose in the senate?



One, for now.

Certainly didn't gain any

We'll see if the GOP gets it back


OK. So the GOP may not lose any seats then.
Yes, depends on what happens in GA runoff.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Charpie said:

Is it?

Everyone who lost did so by buying amplified by the democrats in the primary. They literally were bolstered into position by the dems in the primary because of how unpopular they would be with independents.
Yes. Because the dems had ****ty candidates that independents should have shunned too. And they supported their candidates with money and GOTV help regardless. Mitch McConnell didn't support the non GOP-e senatorial candidates with money and the party gave them only minimal support for GOTV efforts. And leaders of the party went on news programs talking about how terrible these candidates were. They don't get to completely trash a candidate selected by their own party and refuse to support the candidate, then blame the candidate losing entirely on how bad the candidate was. The argument about how good or bad an individual candidate is should end the day the primary is over. At that point the candidate is selected and the party should support them in the general, period, because we can't afford to keep handing the dems easy wins in what should be competitive races.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/democrat-marie-gluesenkamp-perez-defeats-republican-joe-kent-in-wa-house-race/?amp=1

Washington 3, which has been a deep red republican district for 20 years flipped blue. The Republican was a Trump candidate that primaried the incumbent who was anti-Trump, but was a reliable conservative vote. Great strategy!
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kimberly Yee needs to be the Republican Senate candidate against Sinema. If Republicans want to have a chance at winning the seat that is.

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

The missing ballots from four voting districts in New Jersey were found on Thursday at the Mercer County Board of Elections, where they had been sitting since Election Day.

Ballots were found from three districts in Princeton and one in Robbinsville, which officials earlier said were lost after being shuttled from the voting place to the election board. Paper ballots had to be used after a software glitch rendered the Dominion electronic voting machines unusable.
Quote:

The Robbinsville ballots were counted Thursday and the Princeton ballots on Friday, according to the New Jersey Globe. The missing ballots were predicted to decide several local elections with narrow margins. The ballots from one of the four districts were recorded as having arrived at the Board of Elections office, while records show the office never received ballots from the remaining three.

A small number of additional ballots were also found inside voting machines that were opened on Thursday after Superior Court Judge William Anklowitz signed an order allowing the machines to be opened.

Mercer County's superintendent of elections kept his office open on Veterans Day, as well as the weekend, to count ballots.
LINK

New Jersey doing New Jersey things.
WaltonAg18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TaxLawAg said:

WaltonAg18 said:

agjacent said:

maroon man said:

Still having a real hard time grasping how most all the "delayed" votes go democrat.
By "delayed" you mean the votes that are getting counted now, ie votes that arrived by mail or were dropped at a ballot box?

You see, republicans have spent the past couple of election cycles vilifying any voting methods that aren't same day, in person voting. Therefore, most of the votes that get cast in the mail or a drop box will be from people who DON'T think it's evil and satanic to vote that way, ie democrats. If you want a more even political distribution from the ballots cast by mail or drop box, then first you have to convince and encourage your voters to vote by mail or drop box.

Does that clarify things for you?
I'm still waiting on the Hawg explanation of how it's at all possible for BOTH NUMBERS to go up AT THE SAME TIME, it just doesn't make any sense and doesn't add up..


Always enjoy posts from this kid who knows absolutely dick and actually thinks democrats are still the "working man's" party.

Hawg is a LOT more accomplished than you.
Feel free to show me a single, solitary time I've ever voiced anything but contempt for the Democrats, I'll wait.

Accomplished in the field of law and posting about football doesn't make you an expert in cybersecurity. Spending "thousands of hours" staring at rumble videos about how "no actually this one is actually cheating" doesn't make you any more knowledgeable in how wifi networks are secured.

I'm sure the tax law expert has plenty of useful thoughts to bring to the table though, maybe you can tell us how they aren't filing their forms properly.
No one should have to work to survive. Your right to life should not depend solely on your ability to produce capital.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WaltonAg18 said:

TaxLawAg said:

WaltonAg18 said:

agjacent said:

maroon man said:

Still having a real hard time grasping how most all the "delayed" votes go democrat.
By "delayed" you mean the votes that are getting counted now, ie votes that arrived by mail or were dropped at a ballot box?

You see, republicans have spent the past couple of election cycles vilifying any voting methods that aren't same day, in person voting. Therefore, most of the votes that get cast in the mail or a drop box will be from people who DON'T think it's evil and satanic to vote that way, ie democrats. If you want a more even political distribution from the ballots cast by mail or drop box, then first you have to convince and encourage your voters to vote by mail or drop box.

Does that clarify things for you?
I'm still waiting on the Hawg explanation of how it's at all possible for BOTH NUMBERS to go up AT THE SAME TIME, it just doesn't make any sense and doesn't add up..


Always enjoy posts from this kid who knows absolutely dick and actually thinks democrats are still the "working man's" party.

Hawg is a LOT more accomplished than you.
Feel free to show me a single, solitary time I've ever voiced anything but contempt for the Democrats, I'll wait.

Accomplished in the field of law and posting about football doesn't make you an expert in cybersecurity. Spending "thousands of hours" staring at rumble videos about how "no actually this one is actually cheating" doesn't make you any more knowledgeable in how wifi networks are secured.

I'm sure the tax law expert has plenty of useful thoughts to bring to the table though, maybe you can tell us how they aren't filing their forms properly.
You and your three socks that starred that stupidity should be ashamed. But shame is never on the menu, is it.

Prove with actual admissible evidence the election is totally free of issues.

You can't. So you have lost the argument. This is not aout proving a negative, at f***ing all.

It is about proving chain of custody. DO THAT!
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So latest status on House races? Lake?
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
About 90K more votes to be released around 7:30
PlanoAg79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fox has the Republican count of house wins at 212, but I can't tell who the last projected call was. CNN still has the count at211.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
maroon man said:

Still having a real hard time grasping how most all the "delayed" votes go democrat.
"I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this who will count the votes, and how." Joey Stalin
TX04Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oregon district flipped from D to R. So maybe that is it
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PlanoAg79 said:

Fox has the Republican count of house wins at 212, but I can't tell who the last projected call was. CNN still has the count at211.
I think it is OR-5.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


Jesus, these ****ing ******s are still counting? The population of AZ is 7 million...How?
First Page Last Page
Page 112 of 131
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.