Woke vandals acquire next target: Wizard of Oz

7,328 Views | 84 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Squadron7
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bonfarr said:

What about the midgets? Will they be allowed in the update?
Smeghead4761
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Saltwater Assassin said:

How many times in the original film did the movie address hetero realtionships & or sex?

Zero.

It is a kids movie, WHY DO THEY THINK KIDS NEED TO TALK ABOUT THIS????????

Just let kids be kids.
Well, I mean, Dorothy's aunt and uncle were married, cis-gendered male and female, so there's that. And even that is just implied/assumed, and makes no difference to the story line.
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BadMoonRisin said:

Makes a movie literally no one except for maybe 5% of the population is actually willing to see.

After the movie bombs: "We blame review-bombing, anti-LGBTQ right-winger, white nationalist trolls for the movie not doing well."

Rinse and repeat.
Wait...wait...wait....no way this can bomb. There is a certain poster on this forum that guarantees that their is no mightier economic force than the gay dollar. According to that poster, it makes perfect sense to model your business around attracting the gays at the expense of everyone else. No way this movie can fail with so much gay cash coming in.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lb3 said:

CanyonAg77 said:

lb3 said:

CDUB98 said:

How do you make that thing any more gay?
The Wizard of Oz made Judy Garland an icon for generations of gay men. They literally can't make that movie more gay friendly.

Help the old guy.

Why did Oz make Dorothy a gay icon? Seems I've read that Judy Garland was a friend of the gay community, are they just transferring that to Dorothy?

Maybe I don't have a sufficiently dirty mind to make the connection between gay men and Dorothy.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judy_Garland_as_a_gay_icon
Of course Wikipedia has it. Thanks
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
titan said:

BadMoonRisin said:

Makes a movie literally no one except for maybe 5% of the population is actually willing to see.

After the movie bombs: "We blame review-bombing, anti-LGBTQ right-winger, white nationalist trolls for the movie not doing well."

Rinse and repeat.
Serious question: Could this possibly be money laundering operation or a way it is done? Why would a studio set out to make what is almost certainly a bomb and completely unwanted out of the gate. To the point where few would even bother to go see regardless? It seems an avoidable flushing of money and capital unless that is the purpose.



The plot of The Producers
APHIS AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CDUB98 said:

How do you make that thing any more gay?
Just have the Munchkins have a gay orgy in honor of Dorothy.
FCBlitz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
coconutED said:

Director Promises Homosexuality in 'Wizard of Oz' Remake
Quote:

Kenya Barris, the director of the upcoming Wizard of Oz remake, has promised to inject homosexuality into the classic children's film.

This week, Barris said to far-left Variety, "[W]e're going to turn a mirror on where we're at right now and take disparate characters from the LGBTQ community, from different cultural communities and socioeconomic communities, and tell a story that reflects the world. I think this is the best time to do that."




Why? Just make the monkeys with wings gay and have them spread monkeypox to all of the other characters.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funny side story about the midgets. Savannah River nuclear site was built just after WWII. Part of the plant included large pipelines. They hired a couple of midgets, who had been extras in Oz, to crawl inside the pipes and weld them from the inside.

Photo and article, in case you think I'm making it up.

https://www.postandcourier.com/aikenstandard/entertainment/barnwell-brothers-played-munchkins-in-wizard-of-oz/article_ff9a0025-9788-5121-9f85-b73993b74ea8.html

WestTexasAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

and tell a story that reflects the world.

And what percentage of the world is gay?
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Well within Hollywood it might be fairly high now, who knows?
Post removed:
by user
Artimus Gordon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They might as well go full Mel brooks with this latest version!
DrEvazanPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
C@LAg said:

WestTexasAg said:

Quote:

and tell a story that reflects the world.

And what percentage of the world is gay?
whatever the answer you get, cut it in half.


Based on Hollywood…100% of the world is gay or POC.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annie88 said:

When I was a kid that movie would only come on television once a year. It was a big deal because this was before VCRs or being able to rent movies or even really see them in the theater that much if it was a classic.


Same thing with "Gone With The Wind". Now if a cable channel dares to run it, they only do so with a disclaimer.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Crocker91 said:

Who on earth is stupid enough to invest in that movie? I predict it never gets made--not because people object to the content but rather because there aren't enough morons with real money to back the project.

She Hulk: Attorney At Law is on line 2 for you.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.