The climate may be slowly changing but it's not man made. It a natural earthly cyclical event.
"Presidential hopeful, Ron DeSantis"?
6,541 Views |
99 Replies |
Last: 2 yr ago by Maroon Dawn
Except they don't.+ 2 more quotes (click to expand)VitruvianAg said:The right doesn't HATE science!
They just understand it better than left!
HTHNeehau said:Comical. 94 percent of the scientific community agree smoking causes lung cancer. I am sure you and Ron DeSantis would agree. 99 percent of the scientific community agree that man made climate change is real. Ron DeSantis doesn't. Hypocrisy and inconsistency.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/?sh=73372a6f3f9f
+ 3 more quotes (click to expand)Definitely Not A Cop said:
Can you please provide a link to DeSantis saying climate change isn't real?Neehau said:I don't believe DeSantis is serious about it nor do I believe he truly believes it is happening. If he did, he would be all in. HIs state will be the first to disappear due to rising sea levels.
Ah, so that's a narrative you created in your head without evidence. Thanks for admitting that. Ironic that you are calling people hypocrites.
I guess all the rich liberals living in oceanside mansions in South Florida don't truly believe in it either. I mean, since Florida is gonna disappear and all. Same for Obama and his multiple seaside properties. When will Florida be gone? Before or after Guam tips over?+ 3 more quotes (click to expand)Definitely Not A Cop said:
Can you please provide a link to DeSantis saying climate change isn't real?Neehau said:I don't believe DeSantis is serious about it nor do I believe he truly believes it is happening. If he did, he would be all in. HIs state will be the first to disappear due to rising sea levels.
+ 3 more quotes (click to expand)Definitely Not A Cop said:
Can you please provide a link to DeSantis saying climate change isn't real?Neehau said:I don't believe DeSantis is serious about it nor do I believe he truly believes it is happening. If he did, he would be all in. HIs state will be the first to disappear due to rising sea levels.
Nope. That would be all of the mansions right on the beach of liberal kings like Obama. Which is how you know the entire thing is a joke.
Why do lib posters have really odd user names and stupid ideas ??No Spin Ag said:
I heard on a segment on TV where the host was talking about DeSantis sending the immigrants to MV, but what really stood out was when she said that he was a Presidential hopeful.
We all know he's been working his way through all that he's done to make himself the best candidate for the next election, but I don't remember him saying he's running. Did I miss something or is it just so obvious to everyone now that he's going to run that they're going to just speak of him this way going forward?Neehau said:Your quote in your signature is ironic given your posts support of Ron DeSantis. Ron DeSantis pretty much epitomizes the right's hatred of science.
DeSantis and the Dark Ages
The Right hates science ??? No the right hates lefty lies they try to pass off as science.
What a joke !!!+ 3 more quotes (click to expand)Definitely Not A Cop said:
Can you please provide a link to DeSantis saying climate change isn't real?Neehau said:I don't believe DeSantis is serious about it nor do I believe he truly believes it is happening. If he did, he would be all in. HIs state will be the first to disappear due to rising sea levels.
Isn't Obama's new mansion being built on the Florida coast. I guess he's not buying your "science" either.
Watermelon Man said:Sounds like you are trying for a 'member-only society.+ 2 more quotes (click to expand)DrEvazanPhD said:'member when New York said they were a sanctuary city? Pepperidge farm 'members.
'member when DC said they were a sanctuary city? Pepperidge farm 'members.
'member when both DC and New York mayors said their city services were overwhelmed from something like 4000 illegals? Guessing Watermelon Man don't 'member
Last time I checked, there was a statue in the New York Harbor, called Liberty or something. It has inscribed on it:Quote:
GIVE ME YOUR TIRED YOUR POOR
YOUR HUDDLED MASSES YEARNING TO BREATHE FREE
THE WRETCHED REFUSE OF YOUR TEEMING SHORES
SEND THESE, THE HOMELESS, TEMPEST, TOSSED TO ME
I LIFT MY LAMP BESIDE THE GOLDEN DOOR
I'm guessing you might 'member that, but maybe you are wishing you didn't. That statue, those words, and the response from NYC doesn't sound to me like a city that is objecting to people "Yearning to breathe free." The truth is, they are welcoming them.
NYC has a homeless population of over 90,000. You think a few thousand more is going to "overwhelm" them? Not likely. And, the people Abbott is sending aren't your typical homeless. They want to work for a good life. NYC was built by immigrants.
The right wing nutjobs want to make it sound as if New Yorkers are objecting to them. They aren't. They are objecting to not being notified that Abbott is sending them and just dumping them at the bus station, where there isn't anybody to help them.
How the **** is South Texas suppose to house and care for thousands and thousands of illegals?
These cities want to claim they are sanctuary cities, but freak out when they 5% of the illegals Texas and Arizona do.
Watermelon Man said:Sounds like you are trying for a 'member-only society.+ 3 more quotes (click to expand)
Last time I checked, there was a statue in the New York Harbor, called Liberty or something. It has inscribed on it:+ 1 more quotes (click to expand)
I'm guessing you might 'member that, but maybe you are wishing you didn't. That statue, those words, and the response from NYC doesn't sound to me like a city that is objecting to people "Yearning to breathe free." The truth is, they are welcoming them.
NYC has a homeless population of over 90,000. You think a few thousand more is going to "overwhelm" them? Not likely. And, the people Abbott is sending aren't your typical homeless. They want to work for a good life. NYC was built by immigrants.
The right wing nutjobs want to make it sound as if New Yorkers are objecting to them. They aren't. They are objecting to not being notified that Abbott is sending them and just dumping them at the bus station, where there isn't anybody to help them.Tanya 93 said:
How the **** is South Texas suppose to house and care for thousands and thousands of illegals?
These cities want to claim they are sanctuary cities, but freak out when they 5% of the illegals Texas and Arizona do.
It's funny how the left believes in science until you start talking about x and Y chromosomes.
I bet this derailing troll fully supports Fetterman.
Wrong. It has everything to do with the absolute lack of border control and illegal immigration.No Spin Ag said:
I heard on a segment on TV where the host was talking about DeSantis sending the immigrants to MV, but what really stood out was when she said that he was a Presidential hopeful.
We all know he's been working his way through all that he's done to make himself the best candidate for the next election, but I don't remember him saying he's running. Did I miss something or is it just so obvious to everyone now that he's going to run that they're going to just speak of him this way going forward?Watermelon Man said:Why would a Florida Governor pay for a private plane to take undocumented immigrants from Texas to Massachusetts (and claim credit for it) if it wasn't to get his name in the national media?
The entire stunt had nothing to do with Florida.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Are there really posters here that are not aware of the fact that the Biden administration has been flying illegal aliens to states of his administration's choice, often in the dead of night or hide this fact.
Why in the hell didn't the MSM call Biden's administration the awful names they are calling Republican Governors?
Clue to those posters denouncing this as a stunt, it is because the Democratic Party leadership, leftist progressives and MSM are corrupt, unethical and have absolutely no honor.
Why in the hell didn't the MSM call Biden's administration the awful names they are calling Republican Governors?
Clue to those posters denouncing this as a stunt, it is because the Democratic Party leadership, leftist progressives and MSM are corrupt, unethical and have absolutely no honor.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
richardag said:
Are there really posters here that are not aware of the fact that the Biden administration has been flying illegal aliens to states of his administration's choice, often in the dead of night or hide this fact.
Why in the hell didn't the MSM call Biden's administration the awful names they are calling Republican Governors?
Clue to those posters denouncing this as a stunt, it is because the Democratic Party leadership, leftist progressives and MSM are corrupt, unethical and have absolutely no honor.
For the posters crying on here, it's called selective outrage.
Except you misread or didnt read the article+ 3 more quotes (click to expand)Neehau said:Comical. 94 percent of the scientific community agree smoking causes lung cancer. I am sure you and Ron DeSantis would agree. 99 percent of the scientific community agree that man made climate change is real. Ron DeSantis doesn't. Hypocrisy and inconsistency.B-1 83 said:Except they don't.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/?sh=73372a6f3f9f
Quote:
If you look at the literature, the specific meaning of the 97% claim is: 97 percent of climate scientists agree that there is a global warming trend and that human beings are the main cause--that is, that we are over 50% responsible. The warming is a whopping 0.8 degrees over the past 150 years, a warming that has tapered off to essentially nothing in the last decade and a half.
Actions speak much louder than words. He should be at the forefront of going all electric vehicles, not Gavin Newsom.+ 4 more quotes (click to expand)Neehau said:I don't believe DeSantis is serious about it nor do I believe he truly believes it is happening. If he did, he would be all in. HIs state will be the first to disappear due to rising sea levels.Definitely Not A Cop said:
Ah, so that's a narrative you created in your head without evidence. Thanks for admitting that. Ironic that you are calling people hypocrites.
I can't believe people, supposedly college educated ones at that, still believe in the "97%" lie.
It has been known as a debunked lie for years, yet still gets repeated by the low-intellect.
Quote:
Unfortunately, in the case of 97% of climate scientists agreeing that human beings are the main cause of warming, the researchers have engaged in egregious misconduct.
One of the main papers behind the 97 percent claim is authored by John Cook, who runs the popular website SkepticalScience.com, a virtual encyclopedia of arguments trying to defend predictions of catastrophic climate change from all challenges.
Here is Cook's summary of his paper: "Cook et al. (2013) found that over 97 percent [of papers he surveyed] endorsed the view that the Earth is warming up and human emissions of greenhouse gases are the main cause."
This is a fairly clear statement97 percent of the papers surveyed endorsed the view that man-made greenhouse gases were the main causemain in common usage meaning more than 50 percent.
But even a quick scan of the paper reveals that this is not the case. Cook is able to demonstrate only that a relative handful endorse "the view that the Earth is warming up and human emissions of greenhouse gases are the main cause." Cook calls this "explicit endorsement with quantification" (quantification meaning 50 percent or more). The problem is, only a small percentage of the papers fall into this category; Cook does not say what percentage, but when the study was publicly challenged by economist David Friedman, one observer calculated that only 1.6 percent explicitly stated that man-made greenhouse gases caused at least 50 percent of global warming.
Where did most of the 97 percent come from, then? Cook had created a category called "explicit endorsement without quantification"that is, papers in which the author, by Cook's admission, did not say whether 1 percent or 50 percent or 100 percent of the warming was caused by man. He had also created a category called "implicit endorsement," for papers that imply (but don't say) that there is some man-made global warming and don't quantify it. In other words, he created two categories that he labeled as endorsing a view that they most certainly didn't.
The 97 percent claim is a deliberate misrepresentation designed to intimidate the publicand numerous scientists whose papers were classified by Cook protested:
"Cook survey included 10 of my 122 eligible papers. 5/10 were rated incorrectly. 4/5 were rated as endorse rather than neutral."
It has been known as a debunked lie for years, yet still gets repeated by the low-intellect.
+ 5 more quotes (click to expand)Definitely Not A Cop said:
Ah, so that's a narrative you created in your head without evidence. Thanks for admitting that. Ironic that you are calling people hypocrites.Neehau said:Actions speak much louder than words. He should be at the forefront of going all electric vehicles, not Gavin Newsom.
Why do we need all electric vehicles?
+ 6 more quotes (click to expand)Neehau said:Actions speak much louder than words. He should be at the forefront of going all electric vehicles, not Gavin Newsom.Rockdoc said:
Why do we need all electric vehicles?
Because Electric Vehicle is one of the liberal merit badges. You know, like speak to a black person in public, break a window with a brick, those things.
You're not a scientist, are you? That "data" would not pass review of any serious researcher. Here, this should send you to the dentist with another poster….Neehau said:Except you misread or didnt read the article+ 4 more quotes (click to expand)B-1 83 said:Except they don't.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/?sh=73372a6f3f9fQuote:
If you look at the literature, the specific meaning of the 97% claim is: 97 percent of climate scientists agree that there is a global warming trend and that human beings are the main cause--that is, that we are over 50% responsible. The warming is a whopping 0.8 degrees over the past 150 years, a warming that has tapered off to essentially nothing in the last decade and a half.
Quote:
Quote:
Unfortunately, in the case of 97% of climate scientists agreeing that human beings are the main cause of warming, the researchers have engaged in egregious misconduct.
One of the main papers behind the 97 percent claim is authored by John Cook, who runs the popular website SkepticalScience.com, a virtual encyclopedia of arguments trying to defend predictions of catastrophic climate change from all challenges.
Here is Cook's summary of his paper: "Cook et al. (2013) found that over 97 percent [of papers he surveyed] endorsed the view that the Earth is warming up and human emissions of greenhouse gases are the main cause."
This is a fairly clear statement97 percent of the papers surveyed endorsed the view that man-made greenhouse gases were the main causemain in common usage meaning more than 50 percent.
But even a quick scan of the paper reveals that this is not the case. Cook is able to demonstrate only that a relative handful endorse "the view that the Earth is warming up and human emissions of greenhouse gases are the main cause." Cook calls this "explicit endorsement with quantification" (quantification meaning 50 percent or more). The problem is, only a small percentage of the papers fall into this category; Cook does not say what percentage, but when the study was publicly challenged by economist David Friedman, one observer calculated that only 1.6 percent explicitly stated that man-made greenhouse gases caused at least 50 percent of global warming.
Where did most of the 97 percent come from, then? Cook had created a category called "explicit endorsement without quantification"that is, papers in which the author, by Cook's admission, did not say whether 1 percent or 50 percent or 100 percent of the warming was caused by man. He had also created a category called "implicit endorsement," for papers that imply (but don't say) that there is some man-made global warming and don't quantify it. In other words, he created two categories that he labeled as endorsing a view that they most certainly didn't.
The 97 percent claim is a deliberate misrepresentation designed to intimidate the publicand numerous scientists whose papers were classified by Cook protested:
"Cook survey included 10 of my 122 eligible papers. 5/10 were rated incorrectly. 4/5 were rated as endorse rather than neutral."Quote:
The comment about climate change is incorrect. Merely repeating a lie ad infinitum does not make it true.+ 2 more quotes (click to expand)VitruvianAg said:The right doesn't HATE science!
They just understand it better than left!
HTHNeehau said:Comical. 94 percent of the scientific community agree smoking causes lung cancer. I am sure you and Ron DeSantis would agree. 99 percent of the scientific community agree that man made climate change is real. Ron DeSantis doesn't. Hypocrisy and inconsistency.
+ 5 more quotes (click to expand)Definitely Not A Cop said:
Ah, so that's a narrative you created in your head without evidence. Thanks for admitting that. Ironic that you are calling people hypocrites.Neehau said:Actions speak much louder than words. He should be at the forefront of going all electric vehicles, not Gavin Newsom.
Correct. Actions speak louder than words. And the actions by the left and Hollywood elites (buying multiple beachside mansions, jetting all over the world in private jets etc) definitely say that they don't think this is real.
Define "scientific community." If your definition has anything to do with a group that signed one letter, you are a moron, an enabler and proponent of propaganda, or, most likely, both.+ 2 more quotes (click to expand)VitruvianAg said:The right doesn't HATE science!
They just understand it better than left!
HTHNeehau said:Comical. 94 percent of the scientific community agree smoking causes lung cancer. I am sure you and Ron DeSantis would agree. 99 percent of the scientific community agree that man made climate change is real. Ron DeSantis doesn't. Hypocrisy and inconsistency.
+ 5 more quotes (click to expand)Definitely Not A Cop said:
Ah, so that's a narrative you created in your head without evidence. Thanks for admitting that. Ironic that you are calling people hypocrites.Neehau said:Actions speak much louder than words. He should be at the forefront of going all electric vehicles, not Gavin Newsom.
So anyone who is not advocating for all electric vehicles doesn't believe in global warming? Or is that just another narrative you are making up?
+ 6 more quotes (click to expand)Neehau said:Actions speak much louder than words. He should be at the forefront of going all electric vehicles, not Gavin Newsom.Rockdoc said:
Why do we need all electric vehicles?
So that we can burn more coal. Oh, and have tons of batteries that will need to be disposed of down the road.
Concerning the bolded sentence, you haven't seen the *****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD***** have you? Of course, you're correct, but that thread has over 20,000 responses, most of them repeating lies on the theory that if they're repeated enough, they will come true.+ 3 more quotes (click to expand)Neehau said:Comical. 94 percent of the scientific community agree smoking causes lung cancer. I am sure you and Ron DeSantis would agree. 99 percent of the scientific community agree that man made climate change is real. Ron DeSantis doesn't. Hypocrisy and inconsistency.Ag with kids said:The comment about climate change is incorrect. Merely repeating a lie ad infinitum does not make it true.
I notice you didn't refute my statement...you just moved the goalposts.+ 4 more quotes (click to expand)Ag with kids said:The comment about climate change is incorrect. Merely repeating a lie ad infinitum does not make it true.Watermelon Man said:Concerning the bolded sentence, you haven't seen the *****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD***** have you? Of course, you're correct, but that thread has over 20,000 responses, most of them repeating lies on the theory that if they're repeated enough, they will come true.
Jmiller said:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/gop-senate-candidate-herschel-walker-says-evolution-cant-be-real-because-apes-exist
Thank God the Left is here to tell us what The Science REALLY says:
Featured Stories
See All
61:57
2h ago
2.0k
Cashius Howell named SEC's Defensive Lineman of the Week
by Richard Zane
9:20
1h ago
333
