D-Fens said:

---

boboguitar said:

---

The fact that he keeps saying they planted evidence tells me whatever they found is absolutely big. If that's his best defense, he's squirming.

---

Who said that? Link?

---

Trump did. It's literally right up the page.

D-Fens said:

---

boboguitar said:

---

The fact that he keeps saying they planted evidence tells me whatever they found is absolutely big. If that's his best defense, he's squirming.

---

Who said that? Link?

---

LINK

boboguitar said:

---

The fact that he keeps saying they planted evidence tells me whatever they found is absolutely big. If that's his best defense, he's squirming.

---

Oh no, the FBI would never falsify anything ever, right? Never ever. Please.

it will always be hilarious that mainline institutions would rather burn their credibility to the ground rather than have a bureaucrat resign in disgrace and lose their pension

CM Trump Voter said:

---

Now...how do we do this?

1. Got him?

2. It was planted!!!

3. Anonymous sources!!

4. He declassified dem!!!!!!!

5, I don't care!!! I love trump.

---

You forgot,

6. OK. Now do Hillary (which, of course, was totally not a political witch hunt)

boboguitar said:

---

The fact that he keeps saying they planted evidence tells me whatever they found is absolutely big. If that's his best defense, he's squirming.

---

That's really your conclusion? Like every statement from Trump is calculated and strategic?

lead said:

---

boboguitar said:

---

The fact that he keeps saying they planted evidence tells me whatever they found is absolutely big. If that's his best defense, he's squirming.

---

That's really your conclusion? Like every statement from Trump is calculated and strategic?

---

Well, when he claimed the dossier was a hoax, turned out he was right and the handwringers were wrong. Which way will this play out?

boboguitar said:

---

The fact that he keeps saying they planted evidence tells me whatever they found is absolutely big. If that's his best defense, he's squirming.

---

Yep. Because he's always been wrong about this stuff. And he doesn't know anything.

No doubt you're right this time.

BMX Bandit said:

---

Why would Trump want nuclear documents?

---

.

Who TF cares? Unless they were currently classified and he was disseminating them, it does not matter.

El_Zorro said:

---

BMX Bandit said:

---

Why would Trump want nuclear documents?

---

.

Who TF cares? Unless they were currently classified and he was disseminating them, it does not matter.

---

Sorry, but what you think matters very little on this. You all need to understand that he is being prosecuted by a leftist DOJ, investigated by a leftist FBI and will be tried before a DC jury of his "peers".

boboguitar said:

---

The fact that he keeps saying they planted evidence tells me whatever they found is absolutely big. If that's his best defense, he's squirming.

---

You're right. That reminded me of his claims of election fraud in both 2016 and 2020. Both times, he made those claims prior to the election. In both cases, no evidence of significant fraud was presented, although in the 2020 election, there was plenty of fraudulent evidence manufactured (although none of it was suitable to be used).

Also, you guys seem to be assuming the WAPO article was about US nuclear weapons. That claim is not in the article.

will25u said:

---

---

Holy **** is this real?? He's actually saying the FBI planted evidence?? lolol wow

agjacent said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

Holy **** is this real?? He's actually saying the FBI planted evidence?? lolol wow

---

The only thing worth a LOL is you thinking the FBI would not do it.

Watermelon Man said:

---

boboguitar said:

---

The fact that he keeps saying they planted evidence tells me whatever they found is absolutely big. If that's his best defense, he's squirming.

---

You're right. That reminded me of his claims of election fraud in both 2016 and 2020. Both times, he made those claims prior to the election. In both cases, no evidence of significant fraud was presented, although in the 2020 election, there was plenty of fraudulent evidence manufactured (although none of it was suitable to be used).

Also, you guys seem to be assuming the WAPO article was about US nuclear weapons. That claim is not in the article.

---

So what? Did he have the missing soviet suitcase nukes with a map on the wall with corresponding US cities circled for the same number of nukes in his possession?

If so, man that does seem serious.

That would probably justify the FBI raid.

agjacent said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

Holy **** is this real?? He's actually saying the FBI planted evidence?? lolol wow

---

Uhh, no. He's saying that the FBI made his attorneys stay outside and not be able to observe while they "searched" the house.

In other words, they specifically created an environment where they COULD plant evidence, which in normal circumstances would be very unusual and circumspect. Under what circumstances, if your search is above board, would you be concerned to have the "suspect's" attorneys present while you searched?

HTH.

agjacent said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

Holy **** is this real?? He's actually saying the FBI planted evidence?? lolol wow

---

No, he said it's possible they could. Your comprehension is lacking. Are you familiar with the FBI's track record with Trump?

agjacent said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

Holy **** is this real?? He's actually saying the FBI planted evidence?? lolol wow

---

If the FBI can lie(Clinesmith) and get away with it.
If the FBI can lie on FISA warrants and get away with it.

What makes you think they wouldn't do this as well to get Trump?

I'm not saying they did plant stuff, but the FBI clearly doesn't like Trump and will do whatever it can to get him.

He went right past "I did nothing wrong" and landed on "they could have planted it". Wow. Y'all know in your heart of hearts what that means. You just don't want to admit it to yourselves.

agjacent said:

---

He went right past "I did nothing wrong" and landed on "they could have planted it". Wow. Y'all know in your heart of hearts what that means. You just don't want to admit it to yourselves.

---

Not for me. There are no records that would warrant them raiding Trump simply for possessing them. None.

will25u said:

---

agjacent said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

Holy **** is this real?? He's actually saying the FBI planted evidence?? lolol wow

---

If the FBI can lie(Clinesmith) and get away with it.
If the FBI can lie on FISA warrants and get away with it.

What makes you think they wouldn't do this as well to get Trump?

I'm not saying they did plant stuff, but the FBI clearly doesn't like Trump and will do whatever it can to get him.

---

Exactly.

Keep in mind, Trump was IMPEACHED he first time for DARING to have a conversation regarding his suspicion of illegal activity by a potential future opponent and requesting it be investigated.

Now, the AG of the sitting president that was originally under suspicion has personally authorized an unprecedented search of a potential future opponent, and to the left, it's totally above board. The mental gymnastics required to ignore this hypocricy is astounding.

Watermelon Man said:

---

boboguitar said:

---

The fact that he keeps saying they planted evidence tells me whatever they found is absolutely big. If that's his best defense, he's squirming.

---

You're right. That reminded me of his claims of election fraud in both 2016 and 2020. Both times, he made those claims prior to the election. In both cases, no evidence of significant fraud was presented, although in the 2020 election, there was plenty of fraudulent evidence manufactured (although none of it was suitable to be used).

Also, you guys seem to be assuming the WAPO article was about US nuclear weapons. That claim is not in the article.

---

What we need is fewer rons, not mo

Questioning whether FBI could or would plant something is VERY different than claiming the FBI planted something.

We saw the same backlash when Trump accused FBI of illegally spying on him. Then we found out the FBI actually did illegally spy on him. Well, if you consider doctoring emails to con a FISA judge "illegal". ..which liberals consider business as usual.

El_Zorro said:

---

agjacent said:

---

He went right past "I did nothing wrong" and landed on "they could have planted it". Wow. Y'all know in your heart of hearts what that means. You just don't want to admit it to yourselves.

---

Not for me. There are no records that would warrant them raiding Trump simply for possessing them. None.

---

Oh?

Who posted this?

Quote:

---

So what? Did he have the missing soviet suitcase nukes with a map on the wall with corresponding US cities circled for the same number of nukes in his possession?

If so, man that does seem serious.

That would probably justify the FBI raid.

---

agjacent said:

---

He went right past "I did nothing wrong" and landed on "they could have planted it". Wow. Y'all know in your heart of hearts what that means. You just don't want to admit it to yourselves.

---

I can't believe that you continue to fall for the same lies over and over again. I guess when NPCs minds are programmed with the conclusion of "got him" they simply forget how the previous lies they bought hook, line, and sinker blew up in their faces. And remember, this guy was all over this board believing Russia collusion and that Kavanaugh is a rapist. Go ahead and break out your clown nose again, you'll need it soon.

agjacent said:

---

He went right past "I did nothing wrong" and landed on "they could have planted it". Wow. Y'all know in your heart of hearts what that means. You just don't want to admit it to yourselves.

---

Yep. He has wised up. He has learned you skip defense and go straight to offense. If you knew the country's deepest classified secrets on FBI, were impeached twice, and had the Feds after you for 6 years, you might understand. But instead you have a personal hatred for him and all your logic is rooted in that.

Whatever the media tells you is a "big deal" you will beelive is a big deal, because in your heart of hearts you want it to be a big deal.

Watermelon Man said:

---

El_Zorro said:

---

agjacent said:

---

He went right past "I did nothing wrong" and landed on "they could have planted it". Wow. Y'all know in your heart of hearts what that means. You just don't want to admit it to yourselves.

---

Not for me. There are no records that would warrant them raiding Trump simply for possessing them. None.

---

Oh?

Who posted this?

Quote:

---

So what? Did he have the missing soviet suitcase nukes with a map on the wall with corresponding US cities circled for the same number of nukes in his possession?

If so, man that does seem serious.

That would probably justify the FBI raid.

---

---

And that would be more than simple possession of records. He would have also had soviet suitcase nukes genius.

Can you read? Did you attend college?

agjacent said:

---

He went right past "I did nothing wrong" and landed on "they could have planted it". Wow. Y'all know in your heart of hearts what that means. You just don't want to admit it to yourselves.

---

You use the term "y'all" a lot. And you seem to know a lot about what is in the hearts of strangers. And what others do and don't want to admit to themselves.

How do you know so much about total strangers?

This is WAPO putting down cover fire for the enemy of this nation. If the good guys used the tactics of the enemy of this nation, we would delete the OP's post and issue a perma ban.

agjacent said:

---

Oh, my.

---

So you believe everything that is reported? If it is biased towards your views?

Got it.

agjacent said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

Holy **** is this real?? He's actually saying the FBI planted evidence?? lolol wow

---

And you do not believe anything that is biased against your side.

At least you are transparent.

IndividualFreedom said:

---

This is WAPO putting down cover fire for the enemy of this nation. If the good guys used the tactics of the enemy of this nation, we would delete the OP's post and issue a perma ban.

---

Good grief guys. This is a major political story. That's why I posted it. I have not taken a position on it's veracity or if it is even meaningful one way or another, but I am very interested in this political story and its implications for the nations direction. Don't shoot me for being the messenger.

Malibu2 said:

---

IndividualFreedom said:

---

This is WAPO putting down cover fire for the enemy of this nation. If the good guys used the tactics of the enemy of this nation, we would delete the OP's post and issue a perma ban.

---

Good grief guys. This is a major political story. That's why I posted it. I have not taken a position on it's veracity or if it is even meaningful one way or another, but I am very interested in this political story and its implications for the nations direction. Don't shoot me for being the messenger.

---

Is it? Really!?

We've been inundated with all of the previous "major political stories" as a form of "got eeeem!" by idiots in the media and elsewhere. This is so obviously more weaponization of the fed govt that it's laughably sad that anyone pays it even a modicum of give a ****.

BMX Bandit said:

---

Why would Trump want nuclear documents?

---

(R)easons!

BigRobSA said:

---

Malibu2 said:

---

IndividualFreedom said:

---

This is WAPO putting down cover fire for the enemy of this nation. If the good guys used the tactics of the enemy of this nation, we would delete the OP's post and issue a perma ban.

---

Good grief guys. This is a major political story. That's why I posted it. I have not taken a position on it's veracity or if it is even meaningful one way or another, but I am very interested in this political story and its implications for the nations direction. Don't shoot me for being the messenger.

---

Is it? Really!?

We've been inundated with all of the previous "major political stories" as a form of "got eeeem!" by idiots in the media and elsewhere. This is so obviously more weaponization of the fed govt that it's laughably sad that anyone pays it even a modicum of give a ****.

---

Yes, it is. If this story is made up bull**** that in and of itself is a major story. Someone's credibility is 100% at stake here. And there won't be any ability to hedge afterwards either.

Malibu2 said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Malibu2 said:

---

IndividualFreedom said:

---

This is WAPO putting down cover fire for the enemy of this nation. If the good guys used the tactics of the enemy of this nation, we would delete the OP's post and issue a perma ban.

---

Good grief guys. This is a major political story. That's why I posted it. I have not taken a position on it's veracity or if it is even meaningful one way or another, but I am very interested in this political story and its implications for the nations direction. Don't shoot me for being the messenger.

---

Is it? Really!?

We've been inundated with all of the previous "major political stories" as a form of "got eeeem!" by idiots in the media and elsewhere. This is so obviously more weaponization of the fed govt that it's laughably sad that anyone pays it even a modicum of give a ****.

---

Yes, it is. If this story is made up bull**** that in and of itself is a major story. Someone's credibility is 100% at stake here. And there won't be any ability to hedge afterwards either.

---

No ability to hedge?!

Sure. LOL And dragons are real, as is Nessy .

When it is proven to be what it obviously is.....a nothingburger....nothing will happen and it will be memory holed and morons will still spout it like truth in their other made up reasons why "Orange Man bad!".