Wyoming GOP Primary Poll: Liz Cheney Down 22 Points

6,783 Views | 91 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Squadron7
RGLAG85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AGHouston11 said:

She is terrible- But all the Republicans that gave her the green light to go after Trump are just as bad. They are not out speaking like her everyday but they do like her doing what she is doing!


Cough, cough..... Crenshaw
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

But she thinks she can run for President in 2024.

She will create an exploratory commission to spend the rest of her campaign funds. Whether she actually runs remains to be seen.

I'm not a fan of "registered voter" polls in general, however, they are usually skewed toward the democrat side of things. So this poll is encouraging. I wouldn't put money on it, though.
RGLAG85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
New World Ag said:

Really a shame that a majority of the GOP voting base has bought into the Trump fantasyland. Cheney had the will and fortitude to do what is right while other Republicans backed off because the political ramifications that Cheney is now receiving. It's not the party I grew up with.
Rhino by any other name is premium, you know where that is.
IslanderAg04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Smelling me some cooked Rhino. Learn to code biatch.
IslanderAg04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
New World Ag said:

Really a shame that a majority of the GOP voting base has bought into the Trump fantasyland. Cheney had the will and fortitude to do what is right while other Republicans backed off because the political ramifications that Cheney is now receiving. It's not the party I grew up with.


The party you grew up in was the Democrats door mat.
AgDad121619
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BQ78 said:

She is set, CNN or MSNBC will pay her more than her campaign contributions took in starting in January.
actually read an OpEd that she thinks her stance on Jan 6 will set her up for presidential run. Can't make this **** up

Should have read thread before posting - late to the game with this info
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
New World Ag said:

Really a shame that a majority of the GOP voting base has bought into the Trump fantasyland. Cheney had the will and fortitude to do what is right while other Republicans backed off because the political ramifications that Cheney is now receiving. It's not the party I grew up with.
It has nothing to do with her being anti-Trump per say. If all she ever did was say she didn't like Trump, his policies, etc. most people would disagree with her and that's it. She'd likely still win reelection.

Instead she has turned into a female version of Adam Schiff, totally consumed with Trump Derangement Syndrome, and willing to destroy as many innocent people as possible simply to destroy Donald Trump.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

New World Ag said:

Really a shame that a majority of the GOP voting base has bought into the Trump fantasyland. Cheney had the will and fortitude to do what is right while other Republicans backed off because the political ramifications that Cheney is now receiving. It's not the party I grew up with.
It has nothing to do with her being anti-Trump per say. If all she ever did was say she didn't like Trump, his policies, etc. most people would disagree with her and that's it. She'd likely still win reelection.

Instead she has turned into a female version of Adam Schiff, totally consumed with Trump Derangement Syndrome, and willing to destroy as many innocent people as possible simply to destroy Donald Trump.
This.

She's gone full Schiff4Brains. Makes all kinds of claims about nonexistent "evidence" she's seen or heard.
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BQ78 said:

She is set, CNN or MSNBC will pay her more than her campaign contributions took in starting in January.
Kenan Thompson said so (she appears at 3:38:

zephyr88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

But she thinks she can run for President in 2024.
As a democrat.
AggieMD95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BQ78 said:

She is set, CNN or MSNBC will pay her more than her campaign contributions took in starting in January.


Paid hack
twk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
New World Ag said:

Really a shame that a majority of the GOP voting base has bought into the Trump fantasyland. Cheney had the will and fortitude to do what is right while other Republicans backed off because the political ramifications that Cheney is now receiving. It's not the party I grew up with.
If you think what she's doing on the committee is right, then you have no sense of right and wrong at all. This Stalin-esque show trial is a complete travesty, and anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional. Cheney will get a little bit of justice served to her on primary day, but nothing like she deserves.
Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IslanderAg04 said:

New World Ag said:

Really a shame that a majority of the GOP voting base has bought into the Trump fantasyland. Cheney had the will and fortitude to do what is right while other Republicans backed off because the political ramifications that Cheney is now receiving. It's not the party I grew up with.


The party you grew up in was the Democrats door mat.


They may have been limp wristed and spineless, but they "showed decorum" and "took the high road" as the dems pushed their **** in on the reg. God forbid a Republican actually fight back against the insanity on the left.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That was pretty good. Thanks for posting it.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
New World Ag said:

Really a shame that a majority of the GOP voting base has bought into the Trump fantasyland. Cheney had the will and fortitude to do what is right while other Republicans backed off because the political ramifications that Cheney is now receiving. It's not the party I grew up with.

Bob Michel? Is that you?
Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

But she thinks she can run for President in 2024.
She might sink in as the Dem VP nom maybe? The Kneepads experiment is over. The Dems are already having a hard time finding a candidate.
IslanderAg04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Iowaggie said:

BQ78 said:

She is set, CNN or MSNBC will pay her more than her campaign contributions took in starting in January.
Kenan Thompson said so (she appears at 3:38:




I could see her dumb ass on the view. Those wenches love her.
AgDad121619
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Line Ate Member said:

aggiehawg said:

But she thinks she can run for President in 2024.
She might sink in as the Dem VP nom maybe? The Kneepads experiment is over. The Dems are already having a hard time finding a candidate.
she is just a useful tool right now - if you think the dems really value her, you aren't paying attention to their tactics
The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
twk said:

New World Ag said:

Really a shame that a majority of the GOP voting base has bought into the Trump fantasyland. Cheney had the will and fortitude to do what is right while other Republicans backed off because the political ramifications that Cheney is now receiving. It's not the party I grew up with.
If you think what she's doing on the committee is right, then you have no sense of right and wrong at all. This Stalin-esque show trial is a complete travesty, and anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional. Cheney will get a little bit of justice served to her on primary day, but nothing like she deserves.
There were widespread calls for bipartisan investigations immediately after 1/6, but most Republicans backed off after getting pressured by Trump and his supporters. It's no trial, it's a congressional investigation where the vast majority of the testimony is coming from members of Trump's administration. If you haven't seen any testimony that makes your hair stand on end, that's on you...but like many posters in this forum, you haven't paid any attention to the hearings, so why would I expect you to have learned anything from them?
plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
AggieHammer2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

She seems like the type of politician that, even after getting kicked out of office, just won't go away.
Just say the voting was rigged and never go away. That seems to work.
The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Squadron7 said:

New World Ag said:

Really a shame that a majority of the GOP voting base has bought into the Trump fantasyland. Cheney had the will and fortitude to do what is right while other Republicans backed off because the political ramifications that Cheney is now receiving. It's not the party I grew up with.

Bob Michel? Is that you?
Bob Michel was a good man.
plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
BQ78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nobody is paying attention except for you and Keith.
twk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
New World Ag said:

twk said:

New World Ag said:

Really a shame that a majority of the GOP voting base has bought into the Trump fantasyland. Cheney had the will and fortitude to do what is right while other Republicans backed off because the political ramifications that Cheney is now receiving. It's not the party I grew up with.
If you think what she's doing on the committee is right, then you have no sense of right and wrong at all. This Stalin-esque show trial is a complete travesty, and anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional. Cheney will get a little bit of justice served to her on primary day, but nothing like she deserves.
There were widespread calls for bipartisan investigations immediately after 1/6, but most Republicans backed off after getting pressured by Trump and his supporters. It's no trial, it's a congressional investigation where the vast majority of the testimony is coming from members of Trump's administration. If you haven't seen any testimony that makes your hair stand on end, that's on you...but like many posters in this forum, you haven't paid any attention to the hearings, so why would I expect you to have learned anything from them?
You don't learn anything from a show-trial where no one is challenging the evidence. That's what Pelosi wanted, so she vetoed McCarthy's choices for the Republican members of the committee, an unprecedented move in the history of the House. It is a complete sham of hearsay testimony from biased witnesses that is never challenged because that's the way Pelosi wanted it. I read summaries of what happens in the committee, and every alleged bombshell that they come up with ends up being full of holes. This is only convincing the gullible or the folks who are so convinced that Trump is guilty of every evil deed imaginable: which of those describes you?

If they really wanted to investigate January 6, you'd start with finding out why Pelosi rejected Trump's offer of the National Guard; why the Capitol Hill police were so unprepared; why the police let protesters in; what paid informants were among the mob that entered the building; etc, none of which will be touched upon in this dog and pony show.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrats have been complaining for months that no one except the normal democrat mouth breathers even care about Jan 6 hearings, but they have nothing else to talk about.
PCC_80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

It's no trial, it's a congressional investigation where the vast majority of the testimony is coming from members of Trump's administration. If you haven't seen any testimony that makes your hair stand on end, that's on you...but like many posters in this forum, you haven't paid any attention to the hearings, so why would I expect you to have learned anything from them?
A very very one sided Congressional Committee. Nancy Pelosi selected every member of the committee even the Republicans which is unheard of. No rebuttal witnesses that will defend Trump have or will be called.

Lots of things are completely off limits for questions including why Nancy Pelosi turned down the National Guard protection or why doors were opened and protestors waved in. Thousands of Hours of video is not available for review.

Most of the witnesses had an ax to grind against Trump or were without a job and were probably promised one in exchange for testifying against Trump. Several of them were completely debunked within hours of testifying. The whole thing is choreographed and stage managed to make Trump and all Republicans look like terrible people.

This whole series of hearings is nothing but a Democrat Get out the vote campaign that is paid for with our tax dollars. It is disgraceful and a disgusting abuse of our money for purely political purposes.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
New World Ag said:

Squadron7 said:

New World Ag said:

Really a shame that a majority of the GOP voting base has bought into the Trump fantasyland. Cheney had the will and fortitude to do what is right while other Republicans backed off because the political ramifications that Cheney is now receiving. It's not the party I grew up with.

Bob Michel? Is that you?
Bob Michel was a good man.


Almost certainly. But it took an imperfect man like Gingrich to shed 45 years of being in the minority.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
New World Ag said:


you haven't paid any attention to the hearings
I think we've isolated the problem.

There are multiple polls out there that contrast biggest issues to actual voters v. biggest issues to main stream media, coastal establishment types, and DC insiders.

The list of stuff that is a big issue to coastal elites, the main stream media and DC insiders is stuff like January 6, roe v. wade, prolonging covid nonsense, and gun control.

Then there's the real world. The stuff we're concerned about is $5/gallon gas, the fact that my weekly grocery bill has doubled, inflation run amok, the economy teetering on the brink armageddon, and oh, lets not forget, due to the gross incompetence and negligence of the current administration, we stranded Americans citizens and billions in military equipment in Afghanistan and their current foreign policy positions have lead us to the brink of WWIII.

We aren't paying attention because (1) we have bigger problems and (2) its a sham. As to (2) if it wasn't a sham, they'd be working out in the open and the public would have complete access to all data (cough cough cameras) and the "republicans" on the committee wouldn't have been hand-picked by Nancy Pelosi.

or to put it more succinctly:

spider96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Darth Randy said:

Well obviously this means that she has to run for president. Because she's definitely got a shot right? Wouldn't have anything to do with grifting for campaign donations or anything like that.
She'll fill the Kasich role in 2024. Someone for the fake republicans to rally around. Kinzinger, Kasich, Crenshaw, Lincoln Project and the rest of the Rino's.
spider96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
New World Ag said:

Really a shame that a majority of the GOP voting base has bought into the Trump fantasyland. Cheney had the will and fortitude to do what is right while other Republicans backed off because the political ramifications that Cheney is now receiving. It's not the party I grew up with.
Did you type that with a straight face? You almost had me thinking you were serious.
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
New World Ag said:

Really a shame that a majority of the GOP voting base has bought into the Trump fantasyland. Cheney had the will and fortitude to do what is right while other Republicans backed off because the political ramifications that Cheney is now receiving. It's not the party I grew up with.
We are going to have the choice between morons with moronic foreign, domestic, immigration and energy policy and ALL HAIL Trumpistan.

Oh well. All Hail Trump!
spider96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Welcome aboard!
96AgGrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TxTarpon said:

She is going to go down faster than (censored)

Well, you know.

Why would "Kamala" be censored?
Ags4DaWin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
New World Ag said:

twk said:

New World Ag said:

Really a shame that a majority of the GOP voting base has bought into the Trump fantasyland. Cheney had the will and fortitude to do what is right while other Republicans backed off because the political ramifications that Cheney is now receiving. It's not the party I grew up with.
If you think what she's doing on the committee is right, then you have no sense of right and wrong at all. This Stalin-esque show trial is a complete travesty, and anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional. Cheney will get a little bit of justice served to her on primary day, but nothing like she deserves.
There were widespread calls for bipartisan investigations immediately after 1/6, but most Republicans backed off after getting pressured by Trump and his supporters. It's no trial, it's a congressional investigation where the vast majority of the testimony is coming from members of Trump's administration. If you haven't seen any testimony that makes your hair stand on end, that's on you...but like many posters in this forum, you haven't paid any attention to the hearings, so why would I expect you to have learned anything from them?


An investigation run by a single political party where the GOP had no input on who got put on the committee in which testifying individuals who have a vested interest in ingratiating themselves to the current administration claim to have heard someone else say incriminating things only to have those claims be debunked by those who were "quoted".

Sounds totally legit.

I think we should totally trust it to be nonpartisan. It is most definitely not be a political witchhunt like the Russian lie which also originated in the establishment GOP. It s origins are totally different in that the Russian lie was something that someone heard from someone else and was reported in the papers and needed investigating because of the reports in the papers which actually were manufactured political newsplants designed to spur an investigation and smear a sitting president.

Yeah.....this doesn't sound at all similar to THAT.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

There were widespread calls for bipartisan investigations immediately after 1/6, but most Republicans backed off after getting pressured by Trump and his supporters. It's no trial, it's a congressional investigation where the vast majority of the testimony is coming from members of Trump's administration. If you haven't seen any testimony that makes your hair stand on end, that's on you...but like many posters in this forum, you haven't paid any attention to the hearings, so why would I expect you to have learned anything from them?
And that would likely have happened except Pelosi wanted another impeachment instead.
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hate to see it
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.