It's a joke, maybe you just missed it.aggietony2010 said:HTownAg98 said:The government does need to be involved, but only minimally, because they get to tax assets, and need to know what to do with your property when you're dead. Plus, if what you're doing is a common law marriage, and doing this in Texas, you can't just leave each other and say you're not married anymore; you have to file for divorce. I am not an attorney, and I am definitely not your attorney, and take this advice for what it's worth, but this is a very, very bad idea.Yellerjacket said:Exactly. My wife and I don't even have any kind of contract. We just said we are married and that was that. If we ever decide we don't want to be married anymore, we just won't be. No need to get the government involved.biles90 said:
A better question is why do consenting adults have to get government approval to enter into a contractural relationship (marriage)? I don't have to get government approval to enter into a personal services contract or other (real estate, employment, etc...) contracts.
Back to the OP, if gay/lesbian couples want to be married, they should be able to be as miserable as everyone else.
Oh wow you really got him with that original decade old zinger.
Man, I feel sorry for your spouse if that's your view on marriage.
Any Republican that would support protections for gay marriage needs tar and feathers
20,819 Views |
387 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by No Spin Ag
I've got news for you amigo, conservative browns don't like woke gay stuff. That's why they're trending to the right. What they don't care much about is lofty ideas about federalism or why trans people should be able to read in libraries to children.BigRobSA said:Kunkle for Congress TX-34 said:Maybe not now, but in 15-20 years when Hispanics make up the majority of the Republican voting block, it can be a winning platform issue. Lord knows what craziness will be going on then.TheHulkster said:
If you're gonna continue to bark up this particular tree, there's no need to worry about when strong, moral Republicans assume power and what they'll be able to do because there won't be a Republican president elected any time soon running on this.
A platform that includes overturning gay marriage protections will alienate every single Democrat, most swing voters, and even a decent percentage of Republican voters. Don't know how you'll cobble together a winning path starting there.
As has been stated above, this is the slippery slope that has lead us to where we are now... only one way to fix it.
Yeah, us conservative browns don't give a single, group **** about gays marrying.
We could be the straightest, most anti-gay country in existence and be broke as **** because we stupidly didn't worry about the real problems, all fiscal.
Im Gipper said:
Should come as no surprise to anyone, RINO Elise Stefanik voted for gay marriage. Can someone remind us why the hell she was given a leadership position in the party?
She's constantly pushing an illegal amnesty and always votes for gun control, going for the GOP trifecta I assume.
Silian Rail said:I've got news for you amigo, conservative browns don't like woke gay stuff. That's why they're trending to the right. What they don't care much about is lofty ideas about federalism or why trans people should be able to read in libraries to children.BigRobSA said:Kunkle for Congress TX-34 said:Maybe not now, but in 15-20 years when Hispanics make up the majority of the Republican voting block, it can be a winning platform issue. Lord knows what craziness will be going on then.TheHulkster said:
If you're gonna continue to bark up this particular tree, there's no need to worry about when strong, moral Republicans assume power and what they'll be able to do because there won't be a Republican president elected any time soon running on this.
A platform that includes overturning gay marriage protections will alienate every single Democrat, most swing voters, and even a decent percentage of Republican voters. Don't know how you'll cobble together a winning path starting there.
As has been stated above, this is the slippery slope that has lead us to where we are now... only one way to fix it.
Yeah, us conservative browns don't give a single, group **** about gays marrying.
We could be the straightest, most anti-gay country in existence and be broke as **** because we stupidly didn't worry about the real problems, all fiscal.
Yes, please....tell me about conservative browns. </Oprah face>
Ya gotta give this guy credit.
He's either playing the long troll really well, or we are finding out just how off his rocker he actually is.
He's either playing the long troll really well, or we are finding out just how off his rocker he actually is.
BigRobSA said:Kunkle for Congress TX-34 said:Maybe not now, but in 15-20 years when Hispanics make up the majority of the Republican voting block, it can be a winning platform issue. Lord knows what craziness will be going on then.TheHulkster said:
If you're gonna continue to bark up this particular tree, there's no need to worry about when strong, moral Republicans assume power and what they'll be able to do because there won't be a Republican president elected any time soon running on this.
A platform that includes overturning gay marriage protections will alienate every single Democrat, most swing voters, and even a decent percentage of Republican voters. Don't know how you'll cobble together a winning path starting there.
As has been stated above, this is the slippery slope that has lead us to where we are now... only one way to fix it.
Yeah, us conservative browns don't give a single, group **** about gays marrying.
We could be the straightest, most anti-gay country in existence and be broke as **** because we stupidly didn't worry about the real problems, all fiscal.
Muh marginal tax rates
BQ2017 said:BigRobSA said:Kunkle for Congress TX-34 said:Maybe not now, but in 15-20 years when Hispanics make up the majority of the Republican voting block, it can be a winning platform issue. Lord knows what craziness will be going on then.TheHulkster said:
If you're gonna continue to bark up this particular tree, there's no need to worry about when strong, moral Republicans assume power and what they'll be able to do because there won't be a Republican president elected any time soon running on this.
A platform that includes overturning gay marriage protections will alienate every single Democrat, most swing voters, and even a decent percentage of Republican voters. Don't know how you'll cobble together a winning path starting there.
As has been stated above, this is the slippery slope that has lead us to where we are now... only one way to fix it.
Yeah, us conservative browns don't give a single, group **** about gays marrying.
We could be the straightest, most anti-gay country in existence and be broke as **** because we stupidly didn't worry about the real problems, all fiscal.
Muh marginal tax rates
More to fiscal health than tax rates. Good Lord. This IS a college-educated board, right?
Once gay marriage is taking care of, what's next OP? Tattoos, or any body modification? Divorce? Plenty of other rules to start codifying.
The OP is a great microcosm of why I'm decidedly a libertarian, and not a republican. Not the only reason of course, but great example.
Still a good amount that don't get the "leave me alone, but let me tell you about your bedroom" hypocrisy, apparently.
Still a good amount that don't get the "leave me alone, but let me tell you about your bedroom" hypocrisy, apparently.
okay, I'll tell you about them. My mom's mother is from Monterrey, my mom's father from McAllen and we have family in Monterrey, Reynosa and also just across the border in McAllen. Many mexicans grew up in Catholic households and are socially conservative while economically ambivalent. They don't really care too much about government interference in the economy so long as they can work, go to church, and provide a safe life for their family. They're fine with strongmen, so long as the strongmen keep the peace and let them do all of the things I mentioned above. They also don't like illegal immigration.BigRobSA said:Silian Rail said:I've got news for you amigo, conservative browns don't like woke gay stuff. That's why they're trending to the right. What they don't care much about is lofty ideas about federalism or why trans people should be able to read in libraries to children.BigRobSA said:Kunkle for Congress TX-34 said:Maybe not now, but in 15-20 years when Hispanics make up the majority of the Republican voting block, it can be a winning platform issue. Lord knows what craziness will be going on then.TheHulkster said:
If you're gonna continue to bark up this particular tree, there's no need to worry about when strong, moral Republicans assume power and what they'll be able to do because there won't be a Republican president elected any time soon running on this.
A platform that includes overturning gay marriage protections will alienate every single Democrat, most swing voters, and even a decent percentage of Republican voters. Don't know how you'll cobble together a winning path starting there.
As has been stated above, this is the slippery slope that has lead us to where we are now... only one way to fix it.
Yeah, us conservative browns don't give a single, group **** about gays marrying.
We could be the straightest, most anti-gay country in existence and be broke as **** because we stupidly didn't worry about the real problems, all fiscal.
Yes, please....tell me about conservative browns. </Oprah face>
What is it about the gay agenda that is being kept in the bedroom? How do I know about it if it's kept in the bedroom?Clown Baby said:
The OP is a great microcosm of why I'm decidedly a libertarian, and not a republican. Not the only reason of course, but great example.
Still a good amount that don't get the "leave me alone, but let me tell you about your bedroom" hypocrisy, apparently.
If any, we need to get the government out of the marriage business. Why is it they require a #*%@ license just to get married?
Pornography would be after divorce.WaltonAg18 said:
Once gay marriage is taking care of, what's next OP? Tattoos, or any body modification? Divorce? Plenty of other rules to start codifying.
Quote:
This issue is about so much more than consenting adults
No, it's not.
I'm not sure why you're conflating gay marriage with trans issues, but gay marriage is absolutely exclusively an issue between two consenting adults.
To be clear, any church (or any private org for that matter) should never be forced to conduct ceremonies or recognize gay marriage. That's not the question however.
I'm fairly sure if they took porn off the internet, there'd only be one website left, and it'd be called "Bring back the porn"!Silian Rail said:Pornography would be after divorce.WaltonAg18 said:
Once gay marriage is taking care of, what's next OP? Tattoos, or any body modification? Divorce? Plenty of other rules to start codifying.
Silian Rail said:What is it about the gay agenda that is being kept in the bedroom? How do I know about it if it's kept in the bedroom?Clown Baby said:
The OP is a great microcosm of why I'm decidedly a libertarian, and not a republican. Not the only reason of course, but great example.
Still a good amount that don't get the "leave me alone, but let me tell you about your bedroom" hypocrisy, apparently.
To the extent it leaves the bedroom (I'm not even sure what you mean by that), I would probably be fighting right along with you. Children shouldn't be encouraged to be any sexuality at school, that is bewtween themselves and their family. As a good example, I support Disantis' law that aims to cut down on that *****
I am strictly talking about the institution of gay marriage.
WaltonAg18 said:
Once gay marriage is taking care of, what's next OP? Tattoos, or any body modification? Divorce? Plenty of other rules to start codifying.
In a perfect world we would get rid of most if not all substantive due process.
Quien es mas brown? Mi primo BigRobSA or the sonso OP?
In a theocratic fascist society you wouldn't even be able to have your username...since it's an obscenity...BQ2017 said:WaltonAg18 said:
Once gay marriage is taking care of, what's next OP? Tattoos, or any body modification? Divorce? Plenty of other rules to start codifying.
In a perfect world we would get rid of most if not all substantive due process.
I always knew they should've smoked y'all more. Leaving at lunch time from every Load I went to, without fail. Maybe you'd've built more character.
Silian Rail said:Pornography would be after divorce.WaltonAg18 said:
Once gay marriage is taking care of, what's next OP? Tattoos, or any body modification? Divorce? Plenty of other rules to start codifying.
That's a good point. Pornography is disgusting, degenerate, and unvirtuous. This is coming from a former porn addict.
WaltonAg18 said:I'm fairly sure if they took porn off the internet, there'd only be one website left, and it'd be called "Bring back the porn"!Silian Rail said:Pornography would be after divorce.WaltonAg18 said:
Once gay marriage is taking care of, what's next OP? Tattoos, or any body modification? Divorce? Plenty of other rules to start codifying.
Walton loads, aka spank bank.
96% chance that the OP is a Walton sock.
Not that the F16Reich isn't a thing, but this is a bit too over the top for even for the six of them.
Not that the F16Reich isn't a thing, but this is a bit too over the top for even for the six of them.
This board would have known what to do with you between 2001 and 2012ish for trashing George W Bush:Quote:
If you're holding up George W. Bush as the standard bearer for conservatism, I don't know what to with you
- Question your patriotism
- Question when you are leaving Texas for CA or MA
- Question why you liked seeing dead Americans on 9/11/2001
- Suggest you do something to your body that cannot be posted here
Don't put this on me, y'all need to claim your own. This is your base!MiniShrike said:
96% chance that the OP is a Walton sock.
Not that the F16Reich isn't a thing, but this is a bit too over the top for even for the six of them.
Protestant or Catholic?BQ2017 said:
I agree with OP. I am also unironically a theocratic fascist.
Conservatism does mean small govt. Liberal authoritarianism cloaked in Christianity and reactionary policy doesn't make it not liberalism
icrymyselftosleep said:If you have a Eurocentric and Christian worldview, you're probably not wrong. However, there is much more in the world that is not European and ChristianKunkle for Congress TX-34 said:Yeah, but they were shunned and not (literally) paraded around. It is the process of normalizing...icrymyselftosleep said:Pedophiles and trans kids existed long before Obergefell v. HodgesBAP Enthusiast said:93MarineHorn said:
100% disagree. Primarily because I'm pro-liberty and gays getting married doesn't impact my life at all. Secondarily, fighting gay marriage is a political LOSER! That wasn't the case 15 years ago when every major Dem candidate was against it. But times have changed dramatically. DO NOT give the Dems a lifeline here.
Gay marriage to pedos and transexual kids in under 10 years. Yeah it sure didn't have any affect upon your life.
I dont want to be in any country that isn't
Clown Baby said:Quote:
This issue is about so much more than consenting adults
No, it's not.
I'm not sure why you're conflating gay marriage with trans issues, but gay marriage is absolutely exclusively an issue between two consenting adults.
To be clear, any church (or any private org for that matter) should never be forced to conduct ceremonies or recognize gay marriage. That's not the question however.
Yes. It is.
7 years ago we magically found a right to gay marriage in the Constitution, and now we're looking at you like you have a dick growing out of your head if you AREN'T in favor of castrating little boys. The slippery slope is real. Now twist yourself into a pretzel trying to argue otherwise, for me.
No surprise thereTxAgPreacher said:I dont want to be in any country that isn'ticrymyselftosleep said:If you have a Eurocentric and Christian worldview, you're probably not wrong. However, there is much more in the world that is not European and ChristianKunkle for Congress TX-34 said:Yeah, but they were shunned and not (literally) paraded around. It is the process of normalizing...icrymyselftosleep said:Pedophiles and trans kids existed long before Obergefell v. HodgesBAP Enthusiast said:93MarineHorn said:
100% disagree. Primarily because I'm pro-liberty and gays getting married doesn't impact my life at all. Secondarily, fighting gay marriage is a political LOSER! That wasn't the case 15 years ago when every major Dem candidate was against it. But times have changed dramatically. DO NOT give the Dems a lifeline here.
Gay marriage to pedos and transexual kids in under 10 years. Yeah it sure didn't have any affect upon your life.
The Holy Mother must just weep for you and your hateful congregation. I pray she manages to get through that skull and show you how to love as Jesus did.TxAgPreacher said:icrymyselftosleep said:If you have a Eurocentric and Christian worldview, you're probably not wrong. However, there is much more in the world that is not European and ChristianKunkle for Congress TX-34 said:Yeah, but they were shunned and not (literally) paraded around. It is the process of normalizing...icrymyselftosleep said:Pedophiles and trans kids existed long before Obergefell v. HodgesBAP Enthusiast said:93MarineHorn said:
100% disagree. Primarily because I'm pro-liberty and gays getting married doesn't impact my life at all. Secondarily, fighting gay marriage is a political LOSER! That wasn't the case 15 years ago when every major Dem candidate was against it. But times have changed dramatically. DO NOT give the Dems a lifeline here.
Gay marriage to pedos and transexual kids in under 10 years. Yeah it sure didn't have any affect upon your life.
I dont want to be in any country that isn't
I'm a libertarian (small l)/ Catholic (Practicing) / Jew (Mom). So according to the altReich literally everything is my fault.WaltonAg18 said:Don't put this on me, y'all need to claim your own. This is your base!MiniShrike said:
96% chance that the OP is a Walton sock.
Not that the F16Reich isn't a thing, but this is a bit too over the top for even for the six of them.
But if you're being honest, and I don't believe you are, the 3 or 4 theocrats are being roundly crushed on this thread. So no, it's not "Our base."
Now go pretend to be arrested somewhere.
Featured Stories
See All
5:30
11h ago
4.3k
Baseball Thoughts: Gauntlet is about to ramp up
by Ryan Brauninger
Sims earns SEC Pitcher of the Week for Friday's gem
by Richard Zane
5:35
13h ago
2.7k
5:51
12h ago
2.8k
J.D. PicKell remains high on Texas A&M under Mike Elko
by David Nuño