And the Pope is in on it.BigHitterDaLama said:
One world govt
One world religion
One currency
Bow down to the AntiChrist
And the Pope is in on it.BigHitterDaLama said:
One world govt
One world religion
One currency
Bow down to the AntiChrist
1872walker said:2017. Biden said that Trump was breaking down the norms that hold the liberal world order together. pic.twitter.com/vhovQ44wH2
— Maze (@mazemoore) July 1, 2022
Neehau said:
You are mistaking the meaning of liberal in this context. It means something very different overseas and it means something very different when discussing trade. This is referring to trade liberalism.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/trade-liberalization.aspCSTXAg92 said:Neehau said:
You are mistaking the meaning of liberal in this context. It means something very different overseas and it means something very different when discussing trade. This is referring to trade liberalism.
Show me the text - from overseas or anywhere else - that reflects 'liberal' in the context of trade.
Furthermore, Biden specifically said, '…it's the glue that holds the liberal world order together.'
Attempt to move the goalposts all you want, but what Biden said was very clear. Kinda' like when he said his team has created, "the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics"
gotsand said:
I think he's talking about "Trade Liberalization", which is not the "Liberal World Order".
It's a poor attempt to walk back the statement.
Its what he meant. Trump was directly opposed to trade liberalization and Liberal World Order is a direct reference to trade liberalization.gotsand said:
I think he's talking about "Trade Liberalization", which is not the "Liberal World Order".
It's a poor attempt to walk back the statement.
Neehau said:Its what he meant. Trump was directly opposed to trade liberalization and Liberal World Order is a direct reference to trade liberalization.gotsand said:
I think he's talking about "Trade Liberalization", which is not the "Liberal World Order".
It's a poor attempt to walk back the statement.
Given the time frame, it is probably was what Biden was talking about (Trump's stance on TPP, NAFTA, China tariffs, etc.).CSTXAg92 said:gotsand said:
I think he's talking about "Trade Liberalization", which is not the "Liberal World Order".
It's a poor attempt to walk back the statement.
"Trade Liberalization" was nowhere in the clip of the remark from Biden. "Liberal World Order" was.
Neehau said:Its what he meant. Trump was directly opposed to trade liberalization and Liberal World Order is a direct reference to trade liberalization.gotsand said:
I think he's talking about "Trade Liberalization", which is not the "Liberal World Order".
It's a poor attempt to walk back the statement.
You're 100% correct. That dolt was not talking about trade.CSTXAg92 said:Neehau said:Its what he meant. Trump was directly opposed to trade liberalization and Liberal World Order is a direct reference to trade liberalization.gotsand said:
I think he's talking about "Trade Liberalization", which is not the "Liberal World Order".
It's a poor attempt to walk back the statement.
Having to show this stuff to (presumed) college graduates is disturbing. And, as usual you are dead ass wrong. Here's the full video the clip is taken from. It's approximately at the 38 minute mark. And nowhere is 'trade liberalization' mentioned or even implied. Your arrogance may be clouding your judgement. Take the man at his word. Liberal world order means, liberal. world. order.
Well, of course he is. See the fourth item above.Martin Q. Blank said:And the Pope is in on it.BigHitterDaLama said:
One world govt
One world religion
One currency
Bow down to the AntiChrist
Cinco Ranch Aggie said:
Brian Deese can sit on a ****ing cactus.
Well, can't have the AntiChrist without the False Prophet!Martin Q. Blank said:And the Pope is in on it.BigHitterDaLama said:
One world govt
One world religion
One currency
Bow down to the AntiChrist
SB 43rd STREET OG said:Neehau said:Its what he meant. Trump was directly opposed to trade liberalization and Liberal World Order is a direct reference to trade liberalization.gotsand said:
I think he's talking about "Trade Liberalization", which is not the "Liberal World Order".
It's a poor attempt to walk back the statement.
I f'n love you. Best satire account on the internet.
RebelE Infantry said:
I have some bad news. You've been living in the Liberal World Order all of your life. LWO is synonymous with the post-1945 West.
These people are freaking out because the LWO that conquered Europe in 1945 is falling apart. Russia invading Ukraine and triggering the insane suicidal response by the west has pretty much ensured its demise.
Side note- the Hitler comment is dumb. He was conquered by the LWO.
Waffledynamics said:
This is an instance in which y'all are overreacting. Recall that "liberal" globally does not mean the same thing it does in the United States. He is correct that, compared to countries like Russia, China, Iran, North Kora, etc, the West is much more liberalized in a classical sense. A better, more accurate term for him to say would be a "Western" world order. I question how that would appear to those not in the North Atlantic, though.
I am absolutely no fan of organizations like the WEF. I just think this is cut deliberately to enrage some people.
I was just thinking that except we are on the other side of the pancake.The Chicken Ranch said:
Makes you wonder why they are suddenly no longer whispering their intentions anymore?
We are living in 1930's Germany, I'm afraid.
That live and let live is what the conservative parties and politicians did in the final few years of the Weimar RepublicQuote:
Remember the sanctimonious "COEXIST" bumper stickers? Those were total BS.
I and most of you dont subscribe to most liberal points of view; however we tolerate them and live and let live.
They have zero intent to let you exist in their leftist eutopian totalitarian world. They want to delete you and those like you from existence. That's the cold hard truth of it and the culture / political war we are in right now.
"World order" or "international order" essentially means the predominate way states or other international actors interact with each other. There was an international order before the liberal world order and there will be one if/whenever the liberal world order falls.agent-maroon said:Right. So why is Deese using the term if he's an American that has lived here all of his life? Or is he sending a message to some non-American audience?Quote:
Recall that "liberal" globally does not mean the same thing it does in the United States.
Liberal or conservative, any kind of "world order" is a hard no from me.
"Economic liberalization encompasses the processes, including government policies, that promote free trade, deregulation, elimination of subsidies, price controls and rationing systems, and, often, the downsizing or privatization of public services" (Much more at: https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/rwss/docs/2010/chapter6.pdf)CSTXAg92 said:Neehau said:
You are mistaking the meaning of liberal in this context. It means something very different overseas and it means something very different when discussing trade. This is referring to trade liberalism.
Show me the text - from overseas or anywhere else - that reflects 'liberal' in the context of trade.
Furthermore, Biden specifically said, '…it's the glue that holds the liberal world order together.'
Attempt to move the goalposts all you want, but what Biden said was very clear. Kinda' like when he said his team has created, "the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics"
Quote:
US families should suffer high gas prices to protect 'the liberal world order', Biden's economic advisor Brian Deese says when asked what he would say to Americans who can't afford $4.85 a gallonBy MORGAN PHILLIPS, POLITICS REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
- 'What do you say to those families that say, 'listen, we can't afford to pay $4.85 a gallon for months, if not years?' the advisor was asked
- 'This is about the future of the Liberal World Order and we have to stand firm,' he replied
- 'You have a president and an administration that is going to do everything in its power to blunt those price increases and bring those prices down,' he added
- Republicans said Deese's comments prove the administration is out of touch
- Biden said on Thursday that drivers should be expected to pay 'premium' for gas prices for 'as long as it takes'
- The U.S. cut off all Russian gas after Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine, and the European Union followed suit, driving up gas and energy prices the world over
- After breaching $5 a gallon for the first time ever, gas prices have fallen back to an average of $4.84 as of Friday
PUBLISHED: 10:19 EDT, 1 July 2022 | UPDATED: 14:46 EDT, 1 July 2022
Personally, I hope gas goes to $20 / gal.AnScAggie said:
My take is a horrible one, let the people that voted for this **** suffer. Seriously, I hope they feel the pain.
One is actually the cause of the other. Whatever you think of his personality, the fact is President Trump unleashed the American potential and was rapidly eroding the Media-Democrat plantation state they hold the black vote on with their gaslighting. Opportunities for all increased as seldom before.Prosperdick said:
Frightening that in less than two years we went from Make America Great Again to the Liberal World Order.