You are mistaking the meaning of liberal in this context. It means something very different overseas and it means something very different when discussing trade. This is referring to trade liberalism.

I don't know why it works, but it works.

"We have to **** people over in order to stay in power. The more we **** people over the more they continue to vote for us."

That's basically what that moron stated.

1872walker said:

---

2017. Biden said that Trump was breaking down the norms that hold the liberal world order together. pic.twitter.com/vhovQ44wH2

— Maze (@mazemoore) July 1, 2022

---

Wow. So as far back as 2017, this liberal world order has been the agenda. Makes what's been going on in the U.S. make much more sense. Also explains why getting rid of trump by any means - even election fraud - is absolutely on the table.

Wake up RINOS and concerned moderates. The America that has given you and your families so much freedom, opportunity, and security is all but doomed if you continue to allow liberals and RINOs to win elections.

Neehau said:

---

You are mistaking the meaning of liberal in this context. It means something very different overseas and it means something very different when discussing trade. This is referring to trade liberalism.

---

Show me the text - from overseas or anywhere else - that reflects 'liberal' in the context of trade.

Furthermore, Biden specifically said, '…it's the glue that holds the liberal world order together.'

Attempt to move the goalposts all you want, but what Biden said was very clear. Kinda' like when he said his team has created, "the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics"

Gives me faith that this last election was totally legit.

I think he's talking about "Trade Liberalization", which is not the "Liberal World Order".

It's a poor attempt to walk back the statement.

CSTXAg92 said:

---

Neehau said:

---

You are mistaking the meaning of liberal in this context. It means something very different overseas and it means something very different when discussing trade. This is referring to trade liberalism.

---

Show me the text - from overseas or anywhere else - that reflects 'liberal' in the context of trade.

Furthermore, Biden specifically said, '…it's the glue that holds the liberal world order together.'

Attempt to move the goalposts all you want, but what Biden said was very clear. Kinda' like when he said his team has created, "the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics"

---

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/trade-liberalization.asp

Having to show this type of stuff to college graduates is disturbing. You should have heard of the term trade liberalization by now.

gotsand said:

---

I think he's talking about "Trade Liberalization", which is not the "Liberal World Order".

It's a poor attempt to walk back the statement.

---

"Trade Liberalization" was nowhere in the clip of the remark from Biden. "Liberal World Order" was.

gotsand said:

---

I think he's talking about "Trade Liberalization", which is not the "Liberal World Order".

It's a poor attempt to walk back the statement.

---

Its what he meant. Trump was directly opposed to trade liberalization and Liberal World Order is a direct reference to trade liberalization.

CSTXAg92 said:

---

gotsand said:

---

I think he's talking about "Trade Liberalization", which is not the "Liberal World Order".

It's a poor attempt to walk back the statement.

---

"Trade Liberalization" was nowhere in the clip of the remark from Biden. "Liberal World Order" was.

---

Given the time frame, it is probably was what Biden was talking about (Trump's stance on TPP, NAFTA, China tariffs, etc.).


More importantly, I do not think the more modern CNN quote was talking about tariffs.

Neehau said:

---

gotsand said:

---

I think he's talking about "Trade Liberalization", which is not the "Liberal World Order".

It's a poor attempt to walk back the statement.

---

Its what he meant. Trump was directly opposed to trade liberalization and Liberal World Order is a direct reference to trade liberalization.

---

Having to show this stuff to (presumed) college graduates is disturbing. And, as usual you are dead ass wrong. Here's the full video the clip is taken from. It's approximately at the 38 minute mark. And nowhere is 'trade liberalization' mentioned or even implied. Your arrogance may be clouding your judgement. Take the man at his word. Liberal world order means, liberal. world. order.

CSTXAg92 said:

---

Neehau said:

---

gotsand said:

---

I think he's talking about "Trade Liberalization", which is not the "Liberal World Order".

It's a poor attempt to walk back the statement.

---

Its what he meant. Trump was directly opposed to trade liberalization and Liberal World Order is a direct reference to trade liberalization.

---

Having to show this stuff to (presumed) college graduates is disturbing. And, as usual you are dead ass wrong. Here's the full video the clip is taken from. It's approximately at the 38 minute mark. And nowhere is 'trade liberalization' mentioned or even implied. Your arrogance may be clouding your judgement. Take the man at his word. Liberal world order means, liberal. world. order.

---

You're 100% correct. That dolt was not talking about trade.

He was fearmongering the possibility of Trump starting a war (funny given where we are today).

When someone tells you who they are, believe them.

**** that *****

Wolverines!

Martin Q. Blank said:

---

BigHitterDaLama said:

---

One world govt
One world religion
One currency
Bow down to the AntiChrist

---

And the Pope is in on it.

---

Well, of course he is. See the fourth item above.

Sincerely,
Martin Luther

come and take it, ***** libs

Cinco Ranch Aggie said:

---

Brian Deese can sit on a ****ing cactus.

---

You can suck on Deese nuts!!!

Martin Q. Blank said:

---

BigHitterDaLama said:

---

One world govt
One world religion
One currency
Bow down to the AntiChrist

---

And the Pope is in on it.

---

Well, can't have the AntiChrist without the False Prophet!

SB 43rd STREET OG said:

---

Neehau said:

---

gotsand said:

---

I think he's talking about "Trade Liberalization", which is not the "Liberal World Order".

It's a poor attempt to walk back the statement.

---

Its what he meant. Trump was directly opposed to trade liberalization and Liberal World Order is a direct reference to trade liberalization.

---

I f'n love you. Best satire account on the internet.

---

Conservatives: Biden is going to do X.

CMs: Nuh uh no he's not!

Conservatives: Here are several clips of him and others in his administration saying it. Right from the horses mouth.

CMs: That's not what he meant. Read this random wiki entry.

Remember the sanctimonious "COEXIST" bumper stickers? Those were total BS.

I and most of you dont subscribe to most liberal points of view; however we tolerate them and live and let live.

They have zero intent to let you exist in their leftist eutopian totalitarian world. They want to delete you and those like you from existence. That's the cold hard truth of it and the culture / political war we are in right now.

RebelE Infantry said:

---

I have some bad news. You've been living in the Liberal World Order all of your life. LWO is synonymous with the post-1945 West.

These people are freaking out because the LWO that conquered Europe in 1945 is falling apart. Russia invading Ukraine and triggering the insane suicidal response by the west has pretty much ensured its demise.


Side note- the Hitler comment is dumb. He was conquered by the LWO.

---

The hyperventilating over this quote is ludicrous.

https://warroom.armywarcollege.edu/articles/liberal-world-order/

Having said that - my concern is language today isn't rooted in Truth, rather it is entirely subjective. If a man is a woman, the liberal world order could be the new name covering an old beast. I have little trust in the US government let alone the guy being interviewed.

Waffledynamics said:

---

This is an instance in which y'all are overreacting. Recall that "liberal" globally does not mean the same thing it does in the United States. He is correct that, compared to countries like Russia, China, Iran, North Kora, etc, the West is much more liberalized in a classical sense. A better, more accurate term for him to say would be a "Western" world order. I question how that would appear to those not in the North Atlantic, though.

I am absolutely no fan of organizations like the WEF. I just think this is cut deliberately to enrage some people.

---

No they want to remake the western world in the imagine of the tyrannical govt a of China, Russia and N. Korea.

Their verisimilitude of Liberalism is not classical Liberterian Liberalism but a control economy socialist liberalism

His statement was a "dog whistle" to leftists the world over to push harder for the "transformation."

This statement should be in EVERY Republican's campaign PSA for November. This is the agenda. They are telling you what they are doing.

The Chicken Ranch said:

---

Makes you wonder why they are suddenly no longer whispering their intentions anymore?

We are living in 1930's Germany, I'm afraid.

---

I was just thinking that except we are on the other side of the pancake.

Quote:

---

Remember the sanctimonious "COEXIST" bumper stickers? Those were total BS.

I and most of you dont subscribe to most liberal points of view; however we tolerate them and live and let live.

They have zero intent to let you exist in their leftist eutopian totalitarian world. They want to delete you and those like you from existence. That's the cold hard truth of it and the culture / political war we are in right now.

---

That live and let live is what the conservative parties and politicians did in the final few years of the Weimar Republic

agent-maroon said:

---

Quote:

---

Recall that "liberal" globally does not mean the same thing it does in the United States.

---

Right. So why is Deese using the term if he's an American that has lived here all of his life? Or is he sending a message to some non-American audience?

Liberal or conservative, any kind of "world order" is a hard no from me.

---

"World order" or "international order" essentially means the predominate way states or other international actors interact with each other. There was an international order before the liberal world order and there will be one if/whenever the liberal world order falls.

CSTXAg92 said:

---

Neehau said:

---

You are mistaking the meaning of liberal in this context. It means something very different overseas and it means something very different when discussing trade. This is referring to trade liberalism.

---

Show me the text - from overseas or anywhere else - that reflects 'liberal' in the context of trade.

Furthermore, Biden specifically said, '…it's the glue that holds the liberal world order together.'

Attempt to move the goalposts all you want, but what Biden said was very clear. Kinda' like when he said his team has created, "the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics"

---

"Economic liberalization encompasses the processes, including government policies, that promote free trade, deregulation, elimination of subsidies, price controls and rationing systems, and, often, the downsizing or privatization of public services" (Much more at: https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/rwss/docs/2010/chapter6.pdf)

Some of the push back here is pretty hilarious considering how unpopular price controls, public services, regulation, subsidies and so many things the liberal economics has pushed back against...


"Trade liberalization" specifically refers to the idea of free trade and the removal of barriers to trade. No doubt that's more controversial here.

The Transgender and Abortion Party and its members are enemies of America.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10973371/Brian-Deese-says-Americans-stand-firm-paying-record-high-gas-prices.html

Quote:

---

US families should suffer high gas prices to protect 'the liberal world order', Biden's economic advisor Brian Deese says when asked what he would say to Americans who can't afford $4.85 a gallon

• 'What do you say to those families that say, 'listen, we can't afford to pay $4.85 a gallon for months, if not years?' the advisor was asked
• 'This is about the future of the Liberal World Order and we have to stand firm,' he replied
• 'You have a president and an administration that is going to do everything in its power to blunt those price increases and bring those prices down,' he added
• Republicans said Deese's comments prove the administration is out of touch
• Biden said on Thursday that drivers should be expected to pay 'premium' for gas prices for 'as long as it takes'
• The U.S. cut off all Russian gas after Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine, and the European Union followed suit, driving up gas and energy prices the world over
• After breaching $5 a gallon for the first time ever, gas prices have fallen back to an average of $4.84 as of Friday

By MORGAN PHILLIPS, POLITICS REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 10:19 EDT, 1 July 2022 | UPDATED: 14:46 EDT, 1 July 2022

---

AnScAggie said:

---

My take is a horrible one, let the people that voted for this **** suffer. Seriously, I hope they feel the pain.

---

Personally, I hope gas goes to $20 / gal.

Prosperdick said:

---

Frightening that in less than two years we went from Make America Great Again to the Liberal World Order.

---

One is actually the cause of the other. Whatever you think of his personality, the fact is President Trump unleashed the American potential and was rapidly eroding the Media-Democrat plantation state they hold the black vote on with their gaslighting. Opportunities for all increased as seldom before.

So the socialist bent clique (that have utterly outed themselves beyond dispute) set up an election cycle and coverage designed to remove him. I don't know how much I believe the actual voting was changed or created to throw the election, but there is NO DOUBT that the coverage and lawless changes of voting procedures prior to Nov 4 were designed to throw it to Biden.

Its a measure of how worthless our education system is that anyone could even briefly believe that a man basically running on grievance riots and arson and an intention to impose socialism and top down govt control won an election running on that, with little more than a campaign from backyards and a few warehouses. Coverage was so selective that all the Biden crimes were concealed, and all the Trump errors magnified. This ludicrous censorship and deletion of any contrary view continued after the election. Trump's own considerable flaws of presentation and situation awareness just made that easy for them. They would have had a harder time defrauding DeSantis with that kind of reporting (such as Wallace sandbagging Sept 29th debate) but they would have done it to him to. It was the America First trajectory they could not tolerate.

In every sense it was a staged election. Which is not to say it was fake, but simply the powers that be were not going to allow another outcome. Having so forcibly displaced him, they immediately imposed their anti-American agenda. It doesn't even qualify as a Euro-trash socialist agenda, because some of Europe's social restrictions and limits are not as Left. This is indeed the "Liberal Left World Order agenda and secular religion, and national media figures are major priests of it. The National Democratic Party is not even American anymore. Its some kind of European amalgam, but doesn't even have some of the better traits of say, France.