Welloiledmachine04 said:
How could she get in the school? But zero cops??
Sadly this is true...I had a shocking conversation with a retired Supervising Border Patrol agent of 27 years. i went into the conversation expecting him to bash the police for doing nothing. He instead, supported their decision for doing nothing. His thought process was they don't get paid enough to go into a scene where they will knowingly take heavy fire, he went on to say that before all the Defund The Police narratives he had a different attitude.BrazosDog02 said:Welloiledmachine04 said:
How could she get in the school? But zero cops??
Because she had a child inside, the cops had their children at home.
there is a huge difference between putting your life on the line when you have a child in danger vs. putting your life on the line because you need a paycheck.
I've said it before, but the fact is that MOST cops are not suited for the jobs they signed up for. Most of them will never unholster their weapon outside of range day. Police officers, Home Depot Employees, Whataburger cashiers....all have people that are just punching a clock.
Rocky Rider said:
Can someone summarize? tiktok is blocked on work systems
Rocky Rider said:
Can someone summarize? tiktok is blocked on work systems
Sort of...they were following a "Barricaded Suspect" protocol instead of an "Active Shooter" protocol. Barricaded Suspect protocol says stand back and wait for the breach team, Active Shooter protocol says stop active shooter immediately and by any means. It was not a barricaded suspect protocol as you could hear gunfire.Funky Winkerbean said:
Is it policy preventing these cops from being more active/involved?
After BLM's assassination of 5 police officers in Dallas, the defund the police movement, and what happened to Chauvin, I won't blame cops for not wanting to put themselves at risk for an ungrateful public.Bronco6G said:Sadly this is true...I had a shocking conversation with a retired Supervising Border Patrol agent of 27 years. i went into the conversation expecting him to bash the police for doing nothing. He instead, supported their decision for doing nothing. His thought process was they don't get paid enough to go into a scene where they will knowingly take heavy fire, he went on to say that before all the Defund The Police narratives he had a different attitude.BrazosDog02 said:Welloiledmachine04 said:
How could she get in the school? But zero cops??
Because she had a child inside, the cops had their children at home.
there is a huge difference between putting your life on the line when you have a child in danger vs. putting your life on the line because you need a paycheck.
I've said it before, but the fact is that MOST cops are not suited for the jobs they signed up for. Most of them will never unholster their weapon outside of range day. Police officers, Home Depot Employees, Whataburger cashiers....all have people that are just punching a clock.
Maybe they should quit. If they're representing something to people that they have no intention of fulfilling, then they're guilty of more than just being self-serving.lb3 said:
After BLM's assassination of 5 police officers in Dallas, the defund the police movement, and what happened to Chauvin, I won't blame cops for not wanting to put themselves at risk for an ungrateful public.
If you want security you must be willing to provide it yourself.
we know from video footage that cops went into the school shortly after the shooter. So they were there, just not exactly where her second son's classroom was located.Red Red Wine said:
I think she meant there were no cops in the school when she went in.
Obviously some cops came in to GET HER OUT. But, apparently, they were too tied up with her to bother going after the shooter????
I disagree. Cops may have went in after the shooter, but then they seem to have disappeared. Why weren't they in there doing what she was doing?agracer said:we know from video footage that cops went into the school shortly after the shooter. So they were there, just not exactly where her second son's classroom was located.Red Red Wine said:
I think she meant there were no cops in the school when she went in.
Obviously some cops came in to GET HER OUT. But, apparently, they were too tied up with her to bother going after the shooter????
Either way, it's a gotcha viral video from CBS trying to push a narrative. The media was all in on defund the police so why would they not publish this story and not question the woman at all? Oh, it makes the Uvalde police look bad (which they appear to be doing all on there own anyway).
Exactly. I don't fault the mom, but if she had the classroom door open, why not direct all the kids to the nearest exit.jpb1999 said:I disagree. Cops may have went in after the shooter, but then they seem to have disappeared. Why weren't they in there doing what she was doing?agracer said:we know from video footage that cops went into the school shortly after the shooter. So they were there, just not exactly where her second son's classroom was located.Red Red Wine said:
I think she meant there were no cops in the school when she went in.
Obviously some cops came in to GET HER OUT. But, apparently, they were too tied up with her to bother going after the shooter????
Either way, it's a gotcha viral video from CBS trying to push a narrative. The media was all in on defund the police so why would they not publish this story and not question the woman at all? Oh, it makes the Uvalde police look bad (which they appear to be doing all on there own anyway).
