Why would it get locked? Serious question
Roe out, question is who leaked???
103,402 Views |
1094 Replies |
Last: 2 yr ago by Agthatbuilds
For those who may think "the Right" is over-reacting, @scotusblog leans left, but more importantly is "the" place former S.Ct. Clerks gather. And this is how they put it! https://t.co/ul4JPeNELn
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) May 3, 2022
So is there a liberal insurrection happening at scotus?
zoneag said:BallerStaf2003 said:
Wow. Wild times all around.
Handmaids tale vs. The crazy crazy left.
Where do normal people fit anymore?
Most states will likely fall somewhere in the middle. I think the hysteria will fade once people understand what Roe being overturned actually means.
I agree. Roe being struck down doesn't mean abortion is outlawed. Some states will, most states wont.
Hopefully, enough libs will be so upset that they decide to leave Red states and move back to their Blue hellholes, taking their ****ty politics with themzoneag said:BallerStaf2003 said:
Wow. Wild times all around.
Handmaids tale vs. The crazy crazy left.
Where do normal people fit anymore?
Most states will likely fall somewhere in the middle. I think the hysteria will fade once people understand what Roe being overturned actually means.
BallerStaf2003 said:
Wow. Wild times all around.
Handmaids tale vs. The crazy crazy left.
Where do normal people fit anymore?
OHHHH NOOOOO WE DONT GET TO MURDER CHILDREN AFTER HAVING UNPROTECTED SEX. THIS IS TOTALLY A DYSTOPIA!!!
That's already happening. I heard it on kut from a family with a trans kid moving to another state
Scotusblog has always had a large majority of liberal commentators/analysts, but they also do a good job of being fair and neutral.will25u said:For those who may think "the Right" is over-reacting, @scotusblog leans left, but more importantly is "the" place former S.Ct. Clerks gather. And this is how they put it! https://t.co/ul4JPeNELn
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) May 3, 2022
We'll see if that continues to hold up.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
I was about to ask when the insurrection begins and it looks like it already has!Premium said:
So is there a liberal insurrection happening at scotus?
Maybe the MSM will downgrade it to a mostly peaceful riot?
SupaManu said:RebelE Infantry said:ChemAg15 said:
I hate emotionally charged issues that distract from the more pressing issues facing the country. This is the perfect distraction the dems need to energize their base right before the midterms. The timing is too convenient.
There is literally no more pressing issue than infants being murdered day in and day out to the tune of a million or more every single year. None whatsoever.
I think abortion is disgusting but now won't most of these millions Be a burden on tax payers?
And?
This is going to be a major battleground in Kansas this summer….
https://valuethemboth.com/the-amendment/
https://valuethemboth.com/the-amendment/
fun fact: Jane ROE (Norma McCorvey) regretted being the plaintiff in the case and felt she was a pawn. was anti-abortion later in life.VaultingChemist said:
It seems ironic that just a few months after Sarah Weddington's death, the Supreme Court is ready to overturn her landmark victory in Roe vs Wade.
Pastel hat color cat ladies, assemble!
lol we live in a banana republic
And then said she didn't, she just "changed" her opinion because people paid her.Carnwellag2 said:fun fact: Jane ROE (Norma McCorvey) regretted being the plaintiff in the case and felt she was a pawn. was anti-abortion later in life.VaultingChemist said:
It seems ironic that just a few months after Sarah Weddington's death, the Supreme Court is ready to overturn her landmark victory in Roe vs Wade.
She was a grifter at best.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Hahaha you idiot libs. Can't define what a woman is but want to protect women's right. Have fun morons
DTP02 said:SupaManu said:RebelE Infantry said:ChemAg15 said:
I hate emotionally charged issues that distract from the more pressing issues facing the country. This is the perfect distraction the dems need to energize their base right before the midterms. The timing is too convenient.
There is literally no more pressing issue than infants being murdered day in and day out to the tune of a million or more every single year. None whatsoever.
I think abortion is disgusting but now won't most of these millions Be a burden on tax payers?
And?
And? Why should i be forced to keep paying for other peoples poor choices.
How so? This is what democracy looks like, or something like that
Are you a biologist? If not sit down and shut up
Surely a leak like this, if at the direction of a SC justice for the purpose of undermining the decision, would lead to major sanctions against said SC justice.
God Bless those Justices who vote to overturn this.
What an incredible day.
What an incredible day.
CrottyKid said:
Surely a leak like this, if at the direction of a SC justice for the purpose of undermining the decision, would lead to major sanctions against said SC justice.
I can only imagine the tears from one of the justices on the left getting perma'd from the court over this. Please make it so!
BallerStaf2003 said:
Wow. Wild times all around.
Handmaids tale vs. The crazy crazy left.
Where do normal people fit anymore?
Normal people don't support killing babies.
Geez Fox News not preempting gutfield
SupaManu said:DTP02 said:SupaManu said:RebelE Infantry said:ChemAg15 said:
I hate emotionally charged issues that distract from the more pressing issues facing the country. This is the perfect distraction the dems need to energize their base right before the midterms. The timing is too convenient.
There is literally no more pressing issue than infants being murdered day in and day out to the tune of a million or more every single year. None whatsoever.
I think abortion is disgusting but now won't most of these millions Be a burden on tax payers?
And?
And? Why should i be forced to keep paying for other peoples poor choices.
If your argument isn't "we should just kill them instead," then what is your point?
The life of millions of innocents is worth whatever the negatives are. If you disagree, then I guess abortion really isn't all that disgusting after all.
📺 NEW VIDEO
— MeidasTouch.com (@MeidasTouch) May 3, 2022
Republicans have taken away your right to choose. Now take away their right to govern. #GOPHandmaidsTale pic.twitter.com/uHZVjH5Qfh
The propaganda machine is in overdrive.
So?Dan Scott said:
Geez Fox News not preempting gutfield
Nothing else to report on except the people outside the Court pitching a fit.
Turn to CNN or MSDNC if you need to see that.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
yeah that's weakDan Scott said:
Geez Fox News not preempting gutfield
Aggie Jurist said:
If this is true, one of the liberal justices has violated a sacred canon and leaked this in an effort to pressure someone to change their vote - like Roberts did in NFIB v. Sebelius.
Could also be a clerk. Either way, the list of people with access is probably small enough for a toddler to count.
What is the actual case that is being reviewed here where toe vs. wade can be overturned? I don't understand at all
Honestly this is the reprieve the democrats wanted. They have something for them to throw at their base instead of the disaster of the past year and a half. However this is the right decision Roe v Wade is a travesty.
These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.-Thomas Paine
Let us not forget that this is the way stuff like this should work. If not clearly enumerated in the Constitution it should go back to the states to decide. If the commies in California want to have abortion for everyone at any time so be it, if the good folks from Oklahoma want to ban it outright so be it. That is the way this country is supposed to work. A win for the framers if this holds up.
Today, unfortunately, many Americans have good reason to fear that they will be victimized if they are unable to protect themselves. And today, no less than in 1791, the Second Amendment guarantees their right to do so. - Justice Samuel Alito 2022
It's impossible to have a rational discussion with a leftist about Roe or Casey. I'm no constitutional scholar by any means but Roe was clearly a HUGE overreach by the federal government.
If you want abortions, live in a state where the STATE LEGISLATURE CODIFIES ABORTION. It never should have been a mandate from the federal government. Not to mention Roe itself pulls a "constitutional right" out of thin air.
I remember studying for the Bar and going through the con law section. Generally speaking, there are three main "tests" for viewing a proposed law in a constitutional lens.
But then like off to the side they had to have this tiny bubble talking about the Roe "undue burden" test. That always made me chuckle.
If you want abortions, live in a state where the STATE LEGISLATURE CODIFIES ABORTION. It never should have been a mandate from the federal government. Not to mention Roe itself pulls a "constitutional right" out of thin air.
I remember studying for the Bar and going through the con law section. Generally speaking, there are three main "tests" for viewing a proposed law in a constitutional lens.
But then like off to the side they had to have this tiny bubble talking about the Roe "undue burden" test. That always made me chuckle.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
sure - if you believe what is written in the LA TIMES and Washington POST. Who both claimed she gave a "death bed" confession.Rapier108 said:And then said she didn't, she just "changed" her opinion because people paid her.Carnwellag2 said:fun fact: Jane ROE (Norma McCorvey) regretted being the plaintiff in the case and felt she was a pawn. was anti-abortion later in life.VaultingChemist said:
It seems ironic that just a few months after Sarah Weddington's death, the Supreme Court is ready to overturn her landmark victory in Roe vs Wade.
She was a grifter at best.
Come on - those rags ever lie before to push a narrative?
With musical accompaniment! pic.twitter.com/X4CbJkfIyR
— Nate Hochman (@njhochman) May 3, 2022
Featured Stories
See All
47:40
16h ago
8.0k
Myopic Aggies focused on task at hand with South Carolina up next
by Olin Buchanan
19:09
33m ago
941
9:13
21h ago
1.6k
Players to Watch: No. 10 Texas A&M at South Carolina
by Olin Buchanan
suburban cowboy
SIAP: Texas A&M Baseball lands commitment from top Catcher
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
50
bmc13
Mark Stoops complaining Kentucky playing too many night games.
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
40