Roe out, question is who leaked???

103,477 Views | 1094 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Agthatbuilds
DTP02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lb3 said:

The Court must release the opinion tomorrow lest they allow the leak to undermine the court.


It's probably still weeks away from being finalized.
G. hirsutum Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anyone good at reading voting records? Found this one

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/29/us/politics/biden-abortion-rights.html
AggieUSMC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

As I said earlier, Jain is the most likely suspect.
That's pretty scant circumstantial evidence. It doesn't really prove anything.
Proc92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So, it's up to state legislatures to do what their citizens want via legislative process. Does anyone think abortion will be banned entirely in any state? Won't blue states allow them like now or even more so? Won't red states allow them, just limited somewhat? What is the crisis?
StandUpforAmerica
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big Al 1992 said:

What karma it would be if the clerk that leaked it did so with (allegedly) Sotomayer's knowledge or consent - forcing her to resign or be impeached.
She can't be forced to resign, and no way there would be enough votes to remove her from the Court.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
AggieUSMC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Quote:

lb3 said:
The Court must release the opinion tomorrow lest they allow the leak to undermine the court.


It's probably still weeks away from being finalized.
Agree but they do need to immediately release a statement about this.
AgResearch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We have the "midterm fear issue" that Dems are going to run on for the next 6 months.

Guess they're going to shelve race wars for this election and go with murdering babies healthcare.
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieUSMC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Quote:

Big Al 1992 said:
What karma it would be if the clerk that leaked it did so with (allegedly) Sotomayer's knowledge or consent - forcing her to resign or be impeached.
She can't be forced to resign, and no way there would be enough votes to remove her from the Court.
Not so sure about that since there is still at least 2 1/2 years of Democrat control of the White House.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Proc92 said:

So, it's up to state legislatures to do what their citizens want via legislative process. Does anyone think abortion will be banned entirely in any state? Won't blue states allow them like now or even more so? Won't red states allow them, just limited somewhat? What is the crisis?


Each state will do what they want. Cali and New York and the like will allow abortion up to post birth. Oklahoma and Mississippi will ban it altogether. Texas will probably keep what it has and determine a date by which one must get an abortion.

Organizations will pop up paying for people from red states to go to blue states. Businesses will pay for it. These things are already happening
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieUSMC said:

Quote:

Quote:

Big Al 1992 said:
What karma it would be if the clerk that leaked it did so with (allegedly) Sotomayer's knowledge or consent - forcing her to resign or be impeached.
She can't be forced to resign, and no way there would be enough votes to remove her from the Court.
Not so sure about that since there is still at least 2 1/2 years of Democrat control of the White House.
Would depend on who controls the Senate in 2023.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
DTP02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
C@LAg said:

Also, This is a GIFT to the Dems.

It will energize their base and the media like NOTHING else, not even Trump running.

Will readily be used to distract attention away from ALL of Joe's economic, politic and international failures.


It's a bigger gift to humanity, so forget politics on this one.
CyclingAg82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MouthBQ98 said:

Why does the left want to kill their own reinforcements?
They don't care, bringing in reinforcements over the river......
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texaggie7nine said:

RebelE Infantry said:

Texaggie7nine said:

My Name Is Judge said:

I really don't care if idiots want to kill their own offspring

But the lib tears from this will be able to feed entire countries in Africa

Great day if true



Right. But question is, did Reps just shoot their wad for this when they were gaining so much political capital for midterms? This could keep a lot of R votes home and D votes that don't usually show up, to show up.


What good is political capital if you're not willing to trade it to stop the wholesale slaughter of infants?
Yeah, I don't really care about the issue that much. Lot more poor kids and trouble kids if it was banned.

I want to save political capital for things that will actually make the country better. Ending federal dept of Education. Fed Reserve. Fed income tax.
Sickening. You should spend some time contemplating what's important in LIFE.
AggieUSMC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

+ 1 more quotes (click to expand)
Quote:
She can't be forced to resign, and no way there would be enough votes to remove her from the Court.
AggieUSMC said:
Not so sure about that since there is still at least 2 1/2 years of Democrat control of the White House.
Would depend on who controls the Senate in 2023.
There will still be enough RINOs in the Senate to put a nominee over the top.
AgFormerlyInIrving
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If I'm a conservative Justice, I'm getting an official food taster stat.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VaultingChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It seems ironic that just a few months after Sarah Weddington's death, the Supreme Court is ready to overturn her landmark victory in Roe vs Wade.
rgag12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
StandUpforAmerica said:

Hmmmm...




This, nothing has happened yet technically. The ruling is so far away. Politico has been coordinating with the Dems on how best to use this for their advantage for some time now I imagine.

For some reason they've calculated now is the best time to drop this
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sotomayor's clerk most likely leaked it. There is no trust in the SCOTUS any longer.

Hold on to your butts folks. Stuff is gonna get real.

As for now, in Texas..... .YOU WILL NO LONGER BE ABLE TO MURDER UNBORN CHILDREN.

Glory to God! God Bless Texas!
--

"The Kingdom is for HE that can TAKE IT!" - Alexander
AgResearch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgResearch said:

We have the "midterm fear issue" that Dems are going to run on for the next 6 months.

Guess they're going to shelve race wars for this election and go with murdering babies healthcare.
"Time to expand the Court" could be the other running line for Dems....despite how unpopular.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?


**language warning
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If it is 5-4 like some people think, that means Roberts is in the minority and Thomas would be the senior justice in the majority.

I would be shocked if he didn't write the decision himself.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
RebelE Infantry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTm2004 said:

Morons.




Lmao I wish the right was half as awesome as they make us out to be
The flames of the Imperium burn brightly in the hearts of men repulsed by degenerate modernity. Souls aflame with love of goodness, truth, beauty, justice, and order.
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agthatbuilds said:




This needs to happen at minimum and SHOULD be a bipartisan issue.

Our nation is built around some very stout bedrock ideals and tenets. The smallest crack or ***** and things can snowball out of control very, very fast. This is one of those things.

I am glad this may be overturned. Just as much as I am shocked and furious over this kind of leak. Almost on a personal level. Mainly because I know what kind of weight this action just caused.

Whoever did it will be found out I am sure and I sincerely hope they are burned and shunned by absolutely everyone. Fingers crossed at least.
3 Toed Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agthatbuilds said:


Oh good, bring in the FBI to investigate another liberal crime.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captain Positivity said:

I think the idea that legal abortion resulted in lower crime might've had some legs at one point, but the welfare state culture is encouraging poor people to have more kids anyway.

There is more and better evidence that the elimination of leaded gasoline is responsible for the drop in crime.
Marcus Brutus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agthatbuilds said:



**language warning



How did any of those fat psychotic ugly sacks of goo get a man to sleep with them?

I'm not even joking.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah, we both know it won't be a bipartisan investigation.
Ukraine Gas Expert
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
China Joe is liar, always has been. He's a disgusting piece of garbage who flips and flops for votes and has destroyed America for decades.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/joe-biden-roe-v-wade-quote/

FJB, Let's go Brandon.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
3 Toed Pete said:

Agthatbuilds said:


Oh good, bring in the FBI to investigate another liberal crime.
The Supreme Court has its own police force. They also have the full assistance of the US Marshals.

Would not be a surprise if the USMS is the lead agency in charge of investigating.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
P.H. Dexippus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The comments on the SCOTUSblog post are unreal. Re-enforces that such a significant portion of my profession is filled with leftist activists in their own ideological echo chamber.
Marcus Brutus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agthatbuilds said:







The FBI is a corrupt joke. They will not bring a Lib to justice for doing this!

We need a 3rd party investigation.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.