I'm not saying she knowingly ate the marijuana laced food, I'm saying that after she had eaten it and was laying in her car worrying about dying she had pretty good reason to know she was just high. A quick Google search of "has anyone ever died from marijuana" would've returned a quick no.

Buck Turgidson said:

---

I thought the only thing pot did to you was make you hungry, placid and Democrat. That's the impression I got from the crowd wanting to legalize it.

---

Ingesting too much of anything is dangerous.

AggieLostinDallas said:

---

CanyonAg77 said:

---

Quote:

---

Slow down. That's not 100% true.

---

Are you ever going to back up this assertion?

(Which you can't)

---

You patience is sad old man.

1. No one is getting fired for failing a drug test if they are victim of a crime.

2. Please list any major drug interactions that occur with THC

---

They will more than likely be suspended until it can be proven they were a victim of a crime, which could take years. The employer will not just take your word for it.

Can* not will.

Cbd can be converted to THC in stomach acid. Depending on product/formulation/delivery method a "CBD" product could have traces of THC in it despite labeling.

What you want of you'd like to engage in CBD consumption with minimal risk of popping hot on drug tests is a nano-encapsulated or nano-emulsified product or topical, and knowing your lab/dealer helps.

I know people that are allergic. This would have killed them.

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

AggieLostinDallas said:

---

CanyonAg77 said:

---

Quote:

---

Slow down. That's not 100% true.

---

Are you ever going to back up this assertion?

(Which you can't)

---

You patience is sad old man.

1. No one is getting fired for failing a drug test if they are victim of a crime.

2. Please list any major drug interactions that occur with THC

---

They will more than likely be suspended until it can be proven they were a victim of a crime, which could take years. The employer will not just take your word for it.

---

No employer with a half a brain HR team is going to punish anyone in anyway for being the victim of a documented crime.

The lawsuit they would lose would be unreal.

AggieLostinDallas said:

---

CanyonAg77 said:

---

Quote:

---

Slow down. That's not 100% true.

---

Are you ever going to back up this assertion?

(Which you can't)

---

You patience is sad old man.

1. No one is getting fired for failing a drug test if they are victim of a crime.

2. Please list any major drug interactions that occur with THC

---

What's sad is someone making a baseless statement, then scurrying away.

Also sad is resorting to a personal attack when your assertion has no substance.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7055953/

Quote:

---

Cannabinoid levels can be increased by other medications
Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol are pharmacologically active cannabinoids in marijuana that are metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4; THC is also metabolized by CYP2C9, a liver enzyme.1 A pharmacokinetic study found that the CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole nearly doubled THC and cannabidiol concentrations,2 and similar interactions could occur with other CYP3A4 inhibitors, including macrolides and verapamil, augmenting the psychoactive effects of THC and dose-related adverse effects of cannabidiol (e.g., somnolence, transaminase elevation).1,2 CYP2C9 inhibitors such as cotrimoxazole, fluoxetine and amiodarone would also be expected to increase THC exposure and psychoactive effects.1

Go to:
Cannabinoids can affect levels of other drugs
Cannabidiol inhibits CYP2C19, increasing levels of the active metabolite of clobazam threefold.1,3 Interactions with other drugs metabolized by CYP2C19 (Appendix 1, available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1503/cmaj.191097/-/DC1) should be anticipated. Very high international normalized ratio levels and bleeding have been reported with combined used of warfarin and marijuana.1 A case reporting a threefold increase in tacrolimus levels following the addition of cannabidiol shows that CYP3A4/5 inhibition can also occur.4

Go to:
Smoking marijuana can increase clearance of some drugs
Smoked marijuana increases the clearance of theophylline 40%.1 Similar findings would be expected for other drugs metabolized by CYP1A2, such as olanzapine. Increased drug clearance occurs with regular marijuana use (> 2 marijuana cigarettes per week); no effect of occasional use has been reported.

Go to:
Additive effects can occur with other drugs
Additive effects can occur when marijuana is combined with sympathomimetics (e.g., tachycardia, hypertension), central nervous system depressants such as alcohol and opioids (e.g., drowsiness, ataxia), and anticholinergics (e.g., tachycardia, confusion).5

Go to:
There are potential "red flag" interactions
Though further research is needed, marijuana may have serious interactions with drugs including warfarin (increased international normalized ratio and risk of bleeding); clobazam (increased risk of benzodiazepine toxicity); central nervous sytem depressants and sympathomimetics (additive effects); and theophylline, clozapine and olanzapine (reduced efficacy). Patients should be advised about possible increased cannabinoid effects with concomitant CYP3A4 and 2C9 inhibitors (Appendix 1).1,5 Alternatives that do not interact with marijuana should be selected when clinically feasible.

---

hph6203 said:

---

I'm not saying she knowingly ate the marijuana laced food, I'm saying that after she had eaten it and was laying in her car worrying about dying she had pretty good reason to know she was just high. A quick Google search of "has anyone ever died from marijuana" would've returned a quick no.

---

Can't argue with that. But it is pretty obvious she was not thinking straight, so it might be a bit much to expect her to calmly Google her symptoms.

AggieLostinDallas said:

---

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

AggieLostinDallas said:

---

CanyonAg77 said:

---

Quote:

---

Slow down. That's not 100% true.

---

Are you ever going to back up this assertion?

(Which you can't)

---

You patience is sad old man.

1. No one is getting fired for failing a drug test if they are victim of a crime.

2. Please list any major drug interactions that occur with THC

---

They will more than likely be suspended until it can be proven they were a victim of a crime, which could take years. The employer will not just take your word for it.

---

No employer with a half a brain HR team is going to punish anyone in anyway for being the victim of a documented crime.

The lawsuit they would lose would be unreal.

---

The two specific examples I stated involved the military and a government contractor. Other possibilities included airline pilots (FAA) and truck drivers (DOT)

If you think that they will act reasonably, give someone due process, or act quickly to clear an innocent, then I have some beach front property in Amarillo to sell you.

It's also obvious you have no clue what it means to have a security clearance.

You can lose a clearance if you get a divorce, have a bankruptcy, or other major life event. You may get it back quickly, but you can still get it yanked.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personnel_Reliability_Program

Quote:

---

The Personnel Reliability Program (PRP) is a United States Department of Defense security, medical and psychological evaluation program, designed to permit only the most trustworthy individuals to have access to nuclear weapons (NPRP), chemical weapons (CPRP), and biological weapons (BPRP).

The program was first instituted for nuclear weapons during the Cold War; it was later extended to the realm of chemical and biological workers. Among its goals are, (Quoting from DOD Directive 5210.42)

The Department of Defense shall support the national security of the United States by maintaining an effective nuclear deterrent while protecting the public health, safety, and environment. For that reason, nuclear-weapons require special consideration because of their policy implications and military importance, their destructive power, and the political consequences of an accident or an unauthorized act. The safety, security, control, and effectiveness of nuclear weapons are of paramount importance to the security of the United States.

Nuclear weapons shall not be subject to loss, theft, sabotage, unauthorized use, unauthorized destruction, unauthorized disablement, jettison, or accidental damage.

Only those personnel who have demonstrated the highest degree of individual reliability for allegiance, trustworthiness, conduct, behavior, and responsibility shall be allowed to perform duties associated with nuclear weapons, and they shall be continuously evaluated for adherence to PRP standards.

The PRP evaluates many aspects of the individual's work life and home life. Any disruption of these, or severe deviation from an established norm would be cause to deny access. The denial might be temporary or permanent. However, the policy does explicitly state,

The denial of eligibility or the revocation of certification for assignment to PRP positions is neither a punitive measure nor the basis for disciplinary action. The failure of an individual to be certified for assignment to PRP duties does not necessarily reflect unfavorably on the individual's suitability for assignment to other duties.

In certain instances officers and enlisted personnel certified under PRP have been punished for information that also disqualifies them from the program. The suspension from, or indeed the permanent removal of an individual from the program in it itself does not represent a punitive measure.

---

AggieLostinDallas said:

---

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

AggieLostinDallas said:

---

CanyonAg77 said:

---

Quote:

---

Slow down. That's not 100% true.

---

Are you ever going to back up this assertion?

(Which you can't)

---

You patience is sad old man.

1. No one is getting fired for failing a drug test if they are victim of a crime.

2. Please list any major drug interactions that occur with THC

---

They will more than likely be suspended until it can be proven they were a victim of a crime, which could take years. The employer will not just take your word for it.

---

No employer with a half a brain HR team is going to punish anyone in anyway for being the victim of a documented crime.

The lawsuit they would lose would be unreal.

---

Prove you were a victim of a crime.

aggrad02 said:

---

Goose06 said:

---

They probably got the idea from Snowfall. Recent episode from Snowfall had the food at a wedding laced with LSD.

---

I thought the same thing at first, but this happened a month before the episode.

---

Or the movie stir crazy.

I am trying to figure out if any of you operate in the real world.

AggieLostinDallas said:

---

I am trying to figure out if any of you operate in the real world.

---

Same.

David Happymountain said:

---

Yikes

---

She's got a distinct Cro-Magnon presence.

they should have had a special wedding cake and made everyone aware of it.

IndividualFreedom said:

---

they should have had a special wedding cake and made everyone aware of it.

---

That would have been the adult/responsible thing to do.

Bodycam video is wild.

AggieLostinDallas said:

---

IndividualFreedom said:

---

they should have had a special wedding cake and made everyone aware of it.

---

That would have been the adult/responsible thing to do.

---

The adult/responsible thing would no drugs at a wedding.

Watching that video, that witch just grins like the Cheshire Cat when the LEO asks about drugs.

What a despicable human being.

CanyonAg77 said:

---

AggieLostinDallas said:

---

IndividualFreedom said:

---

they should have had a special wedding cake and made everyone aware of it.

---

That would have been the adult/responsible thing to do.

---

The adult/responsible thing would no drugs at a wedding.

---

What about alcohol at a wedding?

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

Ernest Tucker said:

---

annie88 said:

---

The tampering charge alone carries a maximum punishment of up to 30 years in prison.

---

That's the price you pay for high crimes and misdemeanors

---

This is basically assault with a deadly weapon and attempted murder given the fact that many people there had medical issues that should not be mixed with weed.

The Bride and the caterer along with anyone who knew and helped are going to prison for a long time.

---

Not to mention how many people drove there and might try to drive home. This is BAD. What a psycho.

Stat Monitor Repairman said:

---

Bodycam video is wild.

---

The bride is baked

nortex97 said:

---

Florida man. Shocker.

---

That post can not be starred enough.

AggieLostinDallas said:

---

CanyonAg77 said:

---

AggieLostinDallas said:

---

IndividualFreedom said:

---

they should have had a special wedding cake and made everyone aware of it.

---

That would have been the adult/responsible thing to do.

---

The adult/responsible thing would no drugs at a wedding.

---

What about alcohol at a wedding?

---

Pretty sure most weddings do not serve Everclear Trash Can punch
If you get a cocktail at a wedding you are making an informed decision about the amount of the drug you are ingesting

IndividualFreedom said:

---

they should have had a special wedding cake and made everyone aware of it.

---

Is marijuana even legal in FL ?
if it is not acknowledging that it had been added to the cake would be admission of a crime. The bride and the caterer probably thought about telling people or putting it in optional portion of the meal. They had to know they were breaking a law so best not to broadcast laws are being broken

Sq 17 said:

---

AggieLostinDallas said:

---

CanyonAg77 said:

---

AggieLostinDallas said:

---

IndividualFreedom said:

---

they should have had a special wedding cake and made everyone aware of it.

---

That would have been the adult/responsible thing to do.

---

The adult/responsible thing would no drugs at a wedding.

---

What about alcohol at a wedding?

---

Pretty sure most weddings do not serve Everclear Trash Can punch
If you get a cocktail at a wedding you are making an informed decision about the amount of the drug you are ingesting

---

That's not what I asked. I asked if it was ok to serve alcohol to consenting adults? Same with serving a edible of it's known to be an an edible? This has become very common in states where THC is legal.

Nothing excuses what she did but consent is consent, regardless of the substance.

I continue to find it amazing that we continue to buy a government supported lie that somehow alcohol is better for people than THC.

recreational Cannabis still not legal in FL so consent is a problem

If lizard people are real, she's definitely one of them.

AggieLostinDallas said:

---

Same with serving a edible of it's known to be an an edible? This has become very common in states where THC is legal.

---

No it's not.

Aggie_Boomin 21 said:

---

AggieLostinDallas said:

---

Same with serving a edible of it's known to be an an edible? This has become very common in states where THC is legal.

---

No it's not.

---

Why not?

I don't know. I'm not saying it's wrong to go that route, but it's not "very common" to by any means.

Gotcha. I have lately seen weddings in CA, CO and IL that have an edibles table.