GAC06 said:
No one said the risk of fires from flooded vehicles doesn't exist. We are dunking on you for saying this stupid comment:
"Imagine getting stuck in flood waters while trying to evacuate. EVs will never completely replace ICE, IMO, for this and other reasons."
Then you just started making **** up about a foot of water being impassable for EV's. You should stop while you're behind but you won't. Never change indeed.
Well well well. Let's examine your lies and mischaracterizations, very typical for this account.
Quote:
No one said the risk of fires from flooded vehicles doesn't exist.
On the contrary, this statement has been made repeatedly in this thread. Several arguments about how vulnerable Teslas are to hurricane flood damages have been recorded the last time a big one hit Florida.
Quote:
We are dunking on you for saying this stupid comment:
"Stupid" is an uninformed opinion of the comment at best and an ad hominem at worst. The comment in question remains factual.
Quote:
Then you just started making up about a foot of water being impassable for EV's.
I've already listed one of dozens of recent articles showing that flood waters are detrimental to EVs. The fact that you have created a strawman out of the 12 inches part of my statement shows that, once again, gac06 is just wrong.
But do keep on. I think these exchanges make you feel better about yourself in some weird way.
Trump will fix it.