I will never buy an electric powered vehicle.

531,395 Views | 7787 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by techno-ag
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another car catches fire parked at home and the family was sleeping. Thankfully they listened to people like Norte and had it parked in the driveway.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/maryland-familys-suv-bursts-flames-they-slept-video-shows-terrified
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

I'm actually shocked the overall likely is that high. The CCP effort to force Americans at literal gunpoint to buy an EV must be very effective
Better Dead Than Red!!!

Amirite?
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm referring to why Ford is cutting back. They are number 2 only because they were second to market with mass manufactured EVs.

Even your own numbers say over 20% are very likely to buy an EV and over 50% are "overall likely", which exceeds the roughly 7% market share for EVs you also provided. That tells me the demand for EVs is strong, just not for legacy auto that doesn't know how to design, build or sell them. That's thanks in no small part to the unions and dealership protections. If you're looking for where big government is hamstringing the auto industry, that's where you should be focusing.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I laugh at the "big three, and everyone but Tesla, just don't know how to do EVs".

They have the brightest engineers on the planet working for them. If they can't do it then it's never going to be done in critical mass (which it won't for a whole host of reasons)
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kansas Kid said:

Another car catches fire parked at home and the family was sleeping. Thankfully they listened to people like Norte and had it parked in the driveway.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/maryland-familys-suv-bursts-flames-they-slept-video-shows-terrified


Devastating for ICE
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

I laugh at the "big three, and everyone but Tesla, just don't know how to do EVs".

They have the brightest engineers on the planet working for them. If they can't do it then it's never going to be done in critical mass (which it won't for a whole host of reasons)


You'd think with their massive resources and experience they'd be able to roll out something competitive. Then you see GM rolling out a $95,000 9100lb electric Silverado…
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Asian autos are making interesting products. I also the Stellantis will be competitive when they get to market. I'd probably have waited and bought the new Ramcharger if it fit my needs (family of 5 with the kids approaching teens years isn't comfy in a two row vehicle).

Ford basically took an F-150 and threw a battery and electric motors in it.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick said:

I laugh at the "big three, and everyone but Tesla, just don't know how to do EVs".

They have the brightest engineers on the planet working for them. If they can't do it then it's never going to be done in critical mass (which it won't for a whole host of reasons)

Historically, when industries get disrupted, the established players fail. See Intel with microchips, Sears in retail, Kodak in film, Nokia in cell phones, Xerox in many industries they should have dominated, etc. The problem is they either try to modify what they have to fit with the new technology or they deny it is a threat. Do I think the Big 3 and major foreign manufacturers totally fail? No bit mostly because I believe there will still be a sizable ICE market but I don't think all of them will have successful EV programs.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

Logos Stick said:

I laugh at the "big three, and everyone but Tesla, just don't know how to do EVs".

They have the brightest engineers on the planet working for them. If they can't do it then it's never going to be done in critical mass (which it won't for a whole host of reasons)


You'd think with their massive resources and experience they'd be able to roll out something competitive. Then you see GM rolling out a $95,000 9100lb electric Silverado…
And Mercedes lost 25% of their income because of their EVs. 25%. Let that sink in for a minute.
Trump will fix it.
jt2hunt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Driving by the Tesla factory in Austin. They keep expanding every time I drive by this place and I don't even know if it's officially open yet.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They have been delivering vehicles from Austin for almost two years now
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

Two posts up is a poll saying that 58% of Americans consider themselves likely to buy an EV.
And it's deceptive statistic. Given the range of EV types.

MHEV - ICE engine with a large voltage battery the provides minimal mpg improvement.

With all sorts of hybrids in between.

BEV - No ICE engine with 100% battery power that probably pollutes the planet more than a 1960's muscle car.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did JD Power include hybrids in their stats? No they did not. It's for fully electric vehicles.

https://www.jdpower.com/sites/default/files/file/2024-05/2024043%20U.S.%20EV%20Consideration.pdf

"The U.S. Electric Vehicle Consideration Study (EVC) is an industry benchmark focusing on gauging fully electric or battery electric vehicle shopper consideration, simply referred to EVs in the study."

More than half of Americans are considering buying a fully electric vehicle. When accounting for the people that simply aren't a good use case for EV's, plus the nuts that think it's a communist conspiracy, that's a very strong number for EV adoption.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

Did JD Power include hybrids in their stats? No they did not. It's for fully electric vehicles.

https://www.jdpower.com/sites/default/files/file/2024-05/2024043%20U.S.%20EV%20Consideration.pdf

"The U.S. Electric Vehicle Consideration Study (EVC) is an industry benchmark focusing on gauging fully electric or battery electric vehicle shopper consideration, simply referred to EVs in the study."

More than half of Americans are considering buying a fully electric vehicle. When accounting for the people that simply aren't a good use case for EV's, plus the nuts that think it's a communist conspiracy, that's a very strong number for EV adoption.


Fair enough. At the end of the day the consideration results in low market share. Thanks for the laughs though.

And I don't know how to address your idea any significant number of people consider EVs to be a communist conspiracy.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not sure how those facts got you laughing but ok. I don't have a JD Power study for the conspiracy people but some post on this thread.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not sure if serious.

Hyperbole does exist.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

Did JD Power include hybrids in their stats? No they did not. It's for fully electric vehicles.

https://www.jdpower.com/sites/default/files/file/2024-05/2024043%20U.S.%20EV%20Consideration.pdf

"The U.S. Electric Vehicle Consideration Study (EVC) is an industry benchmark focusing on gauging fully electric or battery electric vehicle shopper consideration, simply referred to EVs in the study."

More than half of Americans are considering buying a fully electric vehicle. When accounting for the people that simply aren't a good use case for EV's, plus the nuts that think it's a communist conspiracy, that's a very strong number for EV adoption.

"Considering" is the key word there. Are they actually going out and buying a $100,000 electric truck and installing a fast charger in their garage? No, they are not. They're just considering it.
Trump will fix it.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well I imagine very few people will buy a $95,000 9,000lb truck. Almost 60% are considering buying an EV, and around 25% are "strongly" considering it. Those are very strong numbers, and it blows up the nonsense spouted here about EV's being rejected.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

Well I imagine very few people will buy a $95,000 9,000lb truck. Almost 60% are considering buying an EV, and around 25% are "strongly" considering it. Those are very strong numbers, and it blows up the nonsense spouted here about EV's being rejected.
Except sales keep falling, across the board.
Trump will fix it.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

Well I imagine very few people will buy a $95,000 9,000lb truck. Almost 60% are considering buying an EV, and around 25% are "strongly" considering it. Those are very strong numbers, and it blows up the nonsense spouted here about EV's being rejected.
When fewer are considering than the year before, and only 7 percent of new vehicle registrations are BEV's, and the leading EV manufacturers are laying off/scaling back product plans…tap dancing about 60% 'thinking about" them really is kind of absurd, imho.

Heck, I'd briefly consider it if I were buying a new car next month, but then dismiss it out of hand for the many reasons I've listed here. But let's face it, eventually the direct-from-CCP EV's will show up (and even Elon has recanted and said he opposes tariffs), and wipe out the domestic/UAW competition. That's been the plan all along.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

GAC06 said:

Well I imagine very few people will buy a $95,000 9,000lb truck. Almost 60% are considering buying an EV, and around 25% are "strongly" considering it. Those are very strong numbers, and it blows up the nonsense spouted here about EV's being rejected.
Except sales keep falling, across the board.


Sales of EV's are still growing in the US, including the most recent quarter despite Tesla's known issue switching production to their new model 3. I'm not going to spend any more time explaining slowed growth versus declining sales, because it clearly didn't work last time.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

techno-ag said:

GAC06 said:

Well I imagine very few people will buy a $95,000 9,000lb truck. Almost 60% are considering buying an EV, and around 25% are "strongly" considering it. Those are very strong numbers, and it blows up the nonsense spouted here about EV's being rejected.
Except sales keep falling, across the board.


Sales of EV's are still growing in the US, including the most recent quarter despite Tesla's known issue switching production to their new model 3. I'm not going to spend any more time explaining slowed growth versus declining sales, because it clearly didn't work last time.


Q1 2024 was a 15% decline against the previous quarter.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
But up year over year
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

techno-ag said:

GAC06 said:

Well I imagine very few people will buy a $95,000 9,000lb truck. Almost 60% are considering buying an EV, and around 25% are "strongly" considering it. Those are very strong numbers, and it blows up the nonsense spouted here about EV's being rejected.
Except sales keep falling, across the board.


Sales of EV's are still growing in the US, including the most recent quarter despite Tesla's known issue switching production to their new model 3. I'm not going to spend any more time explaining slowed growth versus declining sales, because it clearly didn't work last time.
Yup. Evidently nobody believes you. When EV sales are down across the board, when Mercedes lost 25% and Tesla had a losing quarter, nobody buys your schtick that everything is hunky dory.

Honestly, sales go up and down in every sector. I don't get why you guys refuse to acknowledge that EV sales are just not going gangbusters. Does it hurt your ego or something? It's ok to face the facts.

Quote:

Kelley Blue Book's data shows that while people still bought nearly 270,000 new EVs, they made up a smaller chunk of overall car sales compared to last year. This slowdown was expected somewhat, especially since the growth rate of EVs had been crazy high in recent years.


https://www.topspeed.com/biggest-ev-automakers-sales-decline/
Trump will fix it.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

But up year over year


By 2.6%, in part because of price cuts. You 're choosing not to see what is obvious to everyone else.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PlaneCrashGuy said:

GAC06 said:

But up year over year


By 2.6%, in part because of price cuts. You choosing not to see what is obvious to everyone else.
Don't forget to break out the hybrid vs. BEV numbers too. Hybrids are up bigly.
Trump will fix it.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PlaneCrashGuy said:

GAC06 said:

But up year over year


By 2.6%, in part because of price cuts. You 're choosing not to see what is obvious to everyone else.


That growth has slowed? Yes that's it. That "sales are falling"? No, that's false.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

GAC06 said:

techno-ag said:

GAC06 said:

Well I imagine very few people will buy a $95,000 9,000lb truck. Almost 60% are considering buying an EV, and around 25% are "strongly" considering it. Those are very strong numbers, and it blows up the nonsense spouted here about EV's being rejected.
Except sales keep falling, across the board.


Sales of EV's are still growing in the US, including the most recent quarter despite Tesla's known issue switching production to their new model 3. I'm not going to spend any more time explaining slowed growth versus declining sales, because it clearly didn't work last time.
Yup. Evidently nobody believes you. When EV sales are down across the board, when Mercedes lost 25% and Tesla had a losing quarter, nobody buys your schtick that everything is hunky dory.

Honestly, sales go up and down in every sector. I don't get why you guys refuse to acknowledge that EV sales are just not going gangbusters. Does it hurt your ego or something? It's ok to face the facts.

Quote:

Kelley Blue Book's data shows that while people still bought nearly 270,000 new EVs, they made up a smaller chunk of overall car sales compared to last year. This slowdown was expected somewhat, especially since the growth rate of EVs had been crazy high in recent years.


https://www.topspeed.com/biggest-ev-automakers-sales-decline/



Then there's no need to continually lie about EV sales
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

GAC06 said:

But up year over year


By 2.6%, in part because of price cuts. You 're choosing not to see what is obvious to everyone else.


That growth has slowed? Yes that's it. That "sales are falling"? No, that's false.



Sales fell by 15% in Q1 2024 when measured against the most recent data (previous quarter)
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
But still up year over year, which means growth.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yup. Sales are down. Growth is down.
Trump will fix it.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

But still up year over year, which means growth.


OK. Sales are falling when using recent data. Sales growth is falling when using last years data.

This comes back to the thread about Tesla owners living in an echo chamber, of course you focus on the positive while ignoring whats actually going on.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

But still up year over year, which means growth.


They will never get it.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PlaneCrashGuy said:

GAC06 said:

But still up year over year, which means growth.


OK. Sales are falling when using recent data. Sales growth is falling when using last years data.

This comes back to the thread about Tesla owners living in an echo chamber, of course you focus on the positive while ignoring whats actually going on.
It's just silliness to debate. The truth is the layoffs/product scale backs etc. reflect that this niche product will wind up topping off even with the mandates and subsidies somewhere around 10 or 20 percent of the market. Heck, sedans sell a lot and Ford/GM etc. basically gave up on them similarly as 'just not worth it' any longer due to the relative decline in market share. If China does ship over more of their cheap EV's maybe it will get to 30 percent, I dunno. Most people who look into these obviously don't like/decide to spend their money on them.
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Isn't Q4 typically the highest sales quarter for auto in general?
First Page Last Page
Page 171 of 223
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.