I will never buy an electric powered vehicle.

519,709 Views | 7787 Replies | Last: 13 days ago by techno-ag
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

Think how many times Windows has glitched over the years, crashing and causing system reboots. Now imagine that in your EV. That's what GM is literally dealing with right now.
Trump will fix it.
bmks270
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

Think how many times Windows has glitched over the years, crashing and causing system reboots. Now imagine that in your EV. That's what GM is literally dealing with right now.


Modern ICE needs software too. and a lot of sensors. The days of carburetors is long gone.
It's not just EVs that can have a software bug.
Texasclipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

The words "Blazer" and "electric vehicle" shouldn't be together. Of course , the current ICE thing called a "Blazer" is an insult to real Blazers also. Just let the old name die and name the new abominations something else.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texasclipper said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

The words "Blazer" and "electric vehicle" shouldn't be together. Of course , the current ICE thing called a "Blazer" is an insult to real Blazers also. Just let the old name die and name the new abominations something else.
Maybe Elon could buy the name. "Tesla Blazer" sounds appropriate.
Trump will fix it.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bmks270 said:

techno-ag said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

Think how many times Windows has glitched over the years, crashing and causing system reboots. Now imagine that in your EV. That's what GM is literally dealing with right now.


Modern ICE needs software too. and a lot of sensors. The days of carburetors is long gone.
It's not just EVs that can have a software bug.


Yes, but going all in on all of this stuff with zero contingency planning or backup is idiocy. With EVs, that have even more automation than ICE, we are sprinting towards a scenario with no way out of it when SHTF.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

bmks270 said:

techno-ag said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

Think how many times Windows has glitched over the years, crashing and causing system reboots. Now imagine that in your EV. That's what GM is literally dealing with right now.


Modern ICE needs software too. and a lot of sensors. The days of carburetors is long gone.
It's not just EVs that can have a software bug.


Yes, but going all in on all of this stuff with zero contingency planning or backup is idiocy. With EVs, that have even more automation than ICE, we are sprinting towards a scenario with no way out of it when SHTF.
I'm curious what you think is the backup or contingency for new ICE vehicles? They also don't run if their computers fail with only a few limited exceptions of cars that have electronics but not the computers. Like I said earlier, my Vette hasn't run in a few months while we track down a replacement module and that car is 20 years old. It will not turn over and I can't even open the doors expect through the trunk emergency latch release.
Texasclipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

Texasclipper said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

The words "Blazer" and "electric vehicle" shouldn't be together. Of course , the current ICE thing called a "Blazer" is an insult to real Blazers also. Just let the old name die and name the new abominations something else.
Maybe Elon could buy the name. "Tesla Blazer" sounds appropriate.
Nope. A "Blazer" is a 4 wheel or rear wheel drive vehicle powered by a gas or diesel engine, preferably a V8. It has 2 doors. If it has 4 doors, it is called a Tahoe. If it is front wheel or all wheel with a transverse mounted engine, it is not a "Blazer". If it is an EV, it is definitely not a "Blazer".
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

Think how many times Windows has glitched over the years, crashing and causing system reboots. Now imagine that in your EV. That's what GM is literally dealing with right now.
They key is building in volume. If you buy a car towards the end of its design cycle, typically most of the bugs have been worked out and you don't experience issues like this. New or low volume desigs don't get this extended beta test, and the first customers are the guinea pigs.

This is one reason why Tesla has such an advantage over Detroit in EVs. Despite what anyone may think of them, they ARE selling in volume. Detroit can only push out a handful of supposed halo EVs.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texasclipper said:

techno-ag said:

Texasclipper said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

The words "Blazer" and "electric vehicle" shouldn't be together. Of course , the current ICE thing called a "Blazer" is an insult to real Blazers also. Just let the old name die and name the new abominations something else.
Maybe Elon could buy the name. "Tesla Blazer" sounds appropriate.
Nope. A "Blazer" is a 4 wheel or rear wheel drive vehicle powered by a gas or diesel engine, preferably a V8. It has 2 doors. If it has 4 doors, it is called a Tahoe. If it is front wheel or all wheel with a transverse mounted engine, it is not a "Blazer". If it is an EV, it is definitely not a "Blazer".
I thought all Teslas were blazers.
bmks270
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

bmks270 said:

techno-ag said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

Think how many times Windows has glitched over the years, crashing and causing system reboots. Now imagine that in your EV. That's what GM is literally dealing with right now.


Modern ICE needs software too. and a lot of sensors. The days of carburetors is long gone.
It's not just EVs that can have a software bug.


Yes, but going all in on all of this stuff with zero contingency planning or backup is idiocy. With EVs, that have even more automation than ICE, we are sprinting towards a scenario with no way out of it when SHTF.


It's pretty simple electronics. It's an electric motor with a speed controller. It's a lot less complex than a combustion engine paired to a transmission.
Texasclipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
torrid said:

Texasclipper said:

techno-ag said:

Texasclipper said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

The words "Blazer" and "electric vehicle" shouldn't be together. Of course , the current ICE thing called a "Blazer" is an insult to real Blazers also. Just let the old name die and name the new abominations something else.
Maybe Elon could buy the name. "Tesla Blazer" sounds appropriate.
Nope. A "Blazer" is a 4 wheel or rear wheel drive vehicle powered by a gas or diesel engine, preferably a V8. It has 2 doors. If it has 4 doors, it is called a Tahoe. If it is front wheel or all wheel with a transverse mounted engine, it is not a "Blazer". If it is an EV, it is definitely not a "Blazer".
I thought all Teslas were blazers.
Oh, now i see what you did there! Sorry, I'm slow! LOL! They can be blazers in that regard! But Teslag will say that isn't true! Now we've gone and triggered a bat signal.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bmks270 said:

YouBet said:

bmks270 said:

techno-ag said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

Think how many times Windows has glitched over the years, crashing and causing system reboots. Now imagine that in your EV. That's what GM is literally dealing with right now.


Modern ICE needs software too. and a lot of sensors. The days of carburetors is long gone.
It's not just EVs that can have a software bug.


Yes, but going all in on all of this stuff with zero contingency planning or backup is idiocy. With EVs, that have even more automation than ICE, we are sprinting towards a scenario with no way out of it when SHTF.


It's pretty simple electronics. It's an electric motor with a speed controller. It's a lot less complex than a combustion engine paired to a transmission.


Apparently not for the Blazer.

Look, I realize ICE vehicles have computers as well. My point is that we just keep going down a path that leaves no room for error and there is zero contingency planning being done. And with EV/green it's as if we are willfully ignoring reality and by god we are just going to do this regardless of capabilities and consequences.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
torrid said:

Texasclipper said:

techno-ag said:

Texasclipper said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

The words "Blazer" and "electric vehicle" shouldn't be together. Of course , the current ICE thing called a "Blazer" is an insult to real Blazers also. Just let the old name die and name the new abominations something else.
Maybe Elon could buy the name. "Tesla Blazer" sounds appropriate.
Nope. A "Blazer" is a 4 wheel or rear wheel drive vehicle powered by a gas or diesel engine, preferably a V8. It has 2 doors. If it has 4 doors, it is called a Tahoe. If it is front wheel or all wheel with a transverse mounted engine, it is not a "Blazer". If it is an EV, it is definitely not a "Blazer".
I thought all Teslas were blazers.
You would think that based on a couple posters on this board.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bmks270 said:

YouBet said:

bmks270 said:

techno-ag said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

Think how many times Windows has glitched over the years, crashing and causing system reboots. Now imagine that in your EV. That's what GM is literally dealing with right now.


Modern ICE needs software too. and a lot of sensors. The days of carburetors is long gone.
It's not just EVs that can have a software bug.


Yes, but going all in on all of this stuff with zero contingency planning or backup is idiocy. With EVs, that have even more automation than ICE, we are sprinting towards a scenario with no way out of it when SHTF.


It's pretty simple electronics. It's an electric motor with a speed controller. It's a lot less complex than a combustion engine paired to a transmission.
I would think with the batteries and charging to manage, the electronics overall are more complex on an EV than a gas car. Plus they throw every bit of technology bell-and-whistle on that they can.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

bmks270 said:

YouBet said:

bmks270 said:

techno-ag said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

Think how many times Windows has glitched over the years, crashing and causing system reboots. Now imagine that in your EV. That's what GM is literally dealing with right now.


Modern ICE needs software too. and a lot of sensors. The days of carburetors is long gone.
It's not just EVs that can have a software bug.


Yes, but going all in on all of this stuff with zero contingency planning or backup is idiocy. With EVs, that have even more automation than ICE, we are sprinting towards a scenario with no way out of it when SHTF.


It's pretty simple electronics. It's an electric motor with a speed controller. It's a lot less complex than a combustion engine paired to a transmission.


Apparently not for the Blazer.

Look, I realize ICE vehicles have computers as well. My point is that we just keep going down a path that leaves no room for error and there is zero contingency planning being done. And with EV/green it's as if we are willfully ignoring reality and by god we are just going to do this regardless of capabilities and consequences.
I still don't see why you make it about EVs when as you admit, virtually all cars are being made with similar technology. What do you see in EVs that is different than ICE vehicles when it comes to computer controls because if the computer goes out in the ICE or an EV, they both are giant paper weights?
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kansas Kid said:

YouBet said:

bmks270 said:

YouBet said:

bmks270 said:

techno-ag said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

Think how many times Windows has glitched over the years, crashing and causing system reboots. Now imagine that in your EV. That's what GM is literally dealing with right now.


Modern ICE needs software too. and a lot of sensors. The days of carburetors is long gone.
It's not just EVs that can have a software bug.


Yes, but going all in on all of this stuff with zero contingency planning or backup is idiocy. With EVs, that have even more automation than ICE, we are sprinting towards a scenario with no way out of it when SHTF.


It's pretty simple electronics. It's an electric motor with a speed controller. It's a lot less complex than a combustion engine paired to a transmission.


Apparently not for the Blazer.

Look, I realize ICE vehicles have computers as well. My point is that we just keep going down a path that leaves no room for error and there is zero contingency planning being done. And with EV/green it's as if we are willfully ignoring reality and by god we are just going to do this regardless of capabilities and consequences.
I still don't see why you make it about EVs when as you admit, virtually all cars are being made with similar technology. What do you see in EVs that is different than ICE vehicles when it comes to computer controls because if the computer goes out in the ICE or an EV, they both are giant paper weights?


Because how it's being done is not taking into account what is actually needed to support it. If the market was driving these changes, then more power to it. But it's not....government mandates are. So we are accelerating dependency on technology that has no backup. The entire green movement is one big politically plan with zero thought to practicality.

If are doing the same with ICE then that is dumb as well.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texasclipper said:

techno-ag said:

Texasclipper said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

The words "Blazer" and "electric vehicle" shouldn't be together. Of course , the current ICE thing called a "Blazer" is an insult to real Blazers also. Just let the old name die and name the new abominations something else.
Maybe Elon could buy the name. "Tesla Blazer" sounds appropriate.
Nope. A "Blazer" is a 4 wheel or rear wheel drive vehicle powered by a gas or diesel engine, preferably a V8. It has 2 doors. If it has 4 doors, it is called a Tahoe. If it is front wheel or all wheel with a transverse mounted engine, it is not a "Blazer". If it is an EV, it is definitely not a "Blazer".
This is a "Tesla Blazer," for reference.


Trump will fix it.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Kansas Kid said:

YouBet said:

bmks270 said:

YouBet said:

bmks270 said:

techno-ag said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

Think how many times Windows has glitched over the years, crashing and causing system reboots. Now imagine that in your EV. That's what GM is literally dealing with right now.


Modern ICE needs software too. and a lot of sensors. The days of carburetors is long gone.
It's not just EVs that can have a software bug.


Yes, but going all in on all of this stuff with zero contingency planning or backup is idiocy. With EVs, that have even more automation than ICE, we are sprinting towards a scenario with no way out of it when SHTF.


It's pretty simple electronics. It's an electric motor with a speed controller. It's a lot less complex than a combustion engine paired to a transmission.


Apparently not for the Blazer.

Look, I realize ICE vehicles have computers as well. My point is that we just keep going down a path that leaves no room for error and there is zero contingency planning being done. And with EV/green it's as if we are willfully ignoring reality and by god we are just going to do this regardless of capabilities and consequences.
I still don't see why you make it about EVs when as you admit, virtually all cars are being made with similar technology. What do you see in EVs that is different than ICE vehicles when it comes to computer controls because if the computer goes out in the ICE or an EV, they both are giant paper weights?


Because how it's being done is not taking into account what is actually needed to support it. If the market was driving these changes, then more power to it. But it's not....government mandates are. So we are accelerating dependency on technology that has no backup. The entire green movement is one big politically plan with zero thought to practicality.

If are doing the same with ICE then that is dumb as well.

The governments aren't mandating the electronic controls and they are already starting to be rolled back such as in Connecticut. Again, hatred of the mandates which is justified shows up as irrational arguments against EVs in general.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kansas Kid said:

YouBet said:

Kansas Kid said:

YouBet said:

bmks270 said:

YouBet said:

bmks270 said:

techno-ag said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

Think how many times Windows has glitched over the years, crashing and causing system reboots. Now imagine that in your EV. That's what GM is literally dealing with right now.


Modern ICE needs software too. and a lot of sensors. The days of carburetors is long gone.
It's not just EVs that can have a software bug.


Yes, but going all in on all of this stuff with zero contingency planning or backup is idiocy. With EVs, that have even more automation than ICE, we are sprinting towards a scenario with no way out of it when SHTF.


It's pretty simple electronics. It's an electric motor with a speed controller. It's a lot less complex than a combustion engine paired to a transmission.


Apparently not for the Blazer.

Look, I realize ICE vehicles have computers as well. My point is that we just keep going down a path that leaves no room for error and there is zero contingency planning being done. And with EV/green it's as if we are willfully ignoring reality and by god we are just going to do this regardless of capabilities and consequences.
I still don't see why you make it about EVs when as you admit, virtually all cars are being made with similar technology. What do you see in EVs that is different than ICE vehicles when it comes to computer controls because if the computer goes out in the ICE or an EV, they both are giant paper weights?


Because how it's being done is not taking into account what is actually needed to support it. If the market was driving these changes, then more power to it. But it's not....government mandates are. So we are accelerating dependency on technology that has no backup. The entire green movement is one big politically plan with zero thought to practicality.

If are doing the same with ICE then that is dumb as well.

The governments aren't mandating the electronic controls and they are already starting to be rolled back such as in Connecticut. Again, hatred of the mandates which is justified shows up as irrational arguments against EVs in general.


It's not irrational at all. I'm talking about CAFE standards that are forcing us down the EV path, prematurely, and along with that comes all the new and additional software that comes with it. If all the new gadgetry and software is mutually exclusive from being EV then I guess I'll shut up but that's not how it's communicated or portrayed.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not sure if serious.
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

Sub freezing temps have hit DFW tonight and I took the Tesla to the grocery store a bit ago. Left with 80% charge and came back with 68%.

Devastating. Seriously regretting this purchase now and will probably have to change my username again.
don't worry, we will all still know the back stabbing, vaccine pushing fraudster that you are.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And taste of European women.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Kansas Kid said:

YouBet said:

Kansas Kid said:

YouBet said:

bmks270 said:

YouBet said:

bmks270 said:

techno-ag said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

Think how many times Windows has glitched over the years, crashing and causing system reboots. Now imagine that in your EV. That's what GM is literally dealing with right now.


Modern ICE needs software too. and a lot of sensors. The days of carburetors is long gone.
It's not just EVs that can have a software bug.


Yes, but going all in on all of this stuff with zero contingency planning or backup is idiocy. With EVs, that have even more automation than ICE, we are sprinting towards a scenario with no way out of it when SHTF.


It's pretty simple electronics. It's an electric motor with a speed controller. It's a lot less complex than a combustion engine paired to a transmission.


Apparently not for the Blazer.

Look, I realize ICE vehicles have computers as well. My point is that we just keep going down a path that leaves no room for error and there is zero contingency planning being done. And with EV/green it's as if we are willfully ignoring reality and by god we are just going to do this regardless of capabilities and consequences.
I still don't see why you make it about EVs when as you admit, virtually all cars are being made with similar technology. What do you see in EVs that is different than ICE vehicles when it comes to computer controls because if the computer goes out in the ICE or an EV, they both are giant paper weights?


Because how it's being done is not taking into account what is actually needed to support it. If the market was driving these changes, then more power to it. But it's not....government mandates are. So we are accelerating dependency on technology that has no backup. The entire green movement is one big politically plan with zero thought to practicality.

If are doing the same with ICE then that is dumb as well.

The governments aren't mandating the electronic controls and they are already starting to be rolled back such as in Connecticut. Again, hatred of the mandates which is justified shows up as irrational arguments against EVs in general.


It's not irrational at all. I'm talking about CAFE standards that are forcing us down the EV path, prematurely, and along with that comes all the new and additional software that comes with it. If all the new gadgetry and software is mutually exclusive from being EV then I guess I'll shut up but that's not how it's communicated or portrayed.

I think it depends on what new gadgetry you are taking about. Computer modules to improve fuel economy and performance has been around since before 2000. People like getting quicker acceleration and better fuel economy so they pay less at the pump. Even more advanced fuel management systems are in modern airplanes where there are no cafe standards.

If you are referring to all the new gadgets around driver assists, better entertainment systems, being able to use an app to find your car, remote start it, etc those have nothing to do with CAFE standards. Instead, many people like the modern convenience of a connected car and driver assists for lane following, radar controlled cruise control, etc.

Without a doubt, the EV focused companies like Tesla and Lucid are leaning more into this technology but it is because they started with a blank slate and assume their buyers want new gadgets. The holy grail is fully autonomous vehicles and many companies including non car companies are spending money in this area and there are zero mandates around this. If anyone perfects it, you can be assured it will be quickly adopted into the majority of new ICE and EV cars.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

Sub freezing temps have hit DFW tonight and I took the Tesla to the grocery store a bit ago. Left with 80% charge and came back with 68%.

Devastating. Seriously regretting this purchase now and will probably have to change my username again.


I kind of want to get a pool going on F16 to see who can correctly pick the next topic you are going to autistically glom onto and go all-in on with a username.

Was thinking pellet grills vs gas grills. You could be TraegarAg or something like that and we could have pages of threads on the Outdoors board with you fighting everyone about the superiority of electric driven grills.

Or metal roofs vs shingle roofs. Roo***. You would obviously argue for metal roofs.

Or pick one of the more esoteric Constitutional Amendments and then constantly post and argue about it. 20thAmendmentAg. You could go all in on random **** about why Jan 20 is better than any other date.
Aggie Apotheosis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Drove from South Austin to Georgetown and back in my Tesla today. Saw several people standing outside getting gas in the cold. Felt sorry for them.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quite the view from your ivory tower?
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Apotheosis said:

Drove from South Austin to Georgetown and back in my Tesla today. Saw several people standing outside getting gas in the cold. Felt sorry for them.
I feel sorry for the people stuck in line waiting to charge at a station they drove 45 minutes out of their way to get to, then spend another 50 minutes charging, all while burning energy keeping their car warm and losing range because of the weather.
Trump will fix it.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anything but shake shingle roofs. I will never have one of those again.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

Texasclipper said:

techno-ag said:

Texasclipper said:

YouBet said:

GM has halted sales of the Blazer EV because of software issues. They are bricking. So awesome we are moving to vehicles that now require software to even turn on.

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/chevy-blazer-troubles-add-to-gms-ev-growing-pains-8f7e5c64?st=ojwdwe250j9ygfn&reflink=article_copyURL_share


Quote:

GM instructed Chevrolet dealers late last month to stop selling the Blazer, while it sought to address certain software-quality issues that have frustrated buyers and auto reviewers alike. The company hasn't given a time frame for when it might have a fix and continues to build them at its plant in Mexico, a spokesman said.

The words "Blazer" and "electric vehicle" shouldn't be together. Of course , the current ICE thing called a "Blazer" is an insult to real Blazers also. Just let the old name die and name the new abominations something else.
Maybe Elon could buy the name. "Tesla Blazer" sounds appropriate.
Nope. A "Blazer" is a 4 wheel or rear wheel drive vehicle powered by a gas or diesel engine, preferably a V8. It has 2 doors. If it has 4 doors, it is called a Tahoe. If it is front wheel or all wheel with a transverse mounted engine, it is not a "Blazer". If it is an EV, it is definitely not a "Blazer".
This is a "Tesla Blazer," for reference.





HAHA beat me to it!
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Range Rovers are also Blazers. A diesel one of those caused this fire.

PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kansas Kid said:

Range Rovers are also Blazers. A diesel one of those caused this fire.




Another derail.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PlaneCrashGuy said:

Kansas Kid said:

Range Rovers are also Blazers. A diesel one of those caused this fire.




Another derail.

Says the guy that quickly posted about the Denton car lot during Christmas that caught fire. I think we all know why you didn't followup on what caused it. So you can post about ICE fires but no one else?

I should go look up who posted first about the above fire. I know it was one of the anti EV people because of a jump to conclusions that only an EV could burn down a parking garage.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kansas Kid said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

Kansas Kid said:

Range Rovers are also Blazers. A diesel one of those caused this fire.




Another derail.

Says the guy that quickly posted about the Denton car lot during Christmas that caught fire. I think we all know why you didn't followup on what caused it. So you can post about ICE fires but no one else?

I should go look up who posted first about the above fire. I know it was one of the anti EV people because of a jump to conclusions that only an EV could burn down a parking garage.


I bet you're fun at parties. I was online when the Denton story popped up.
Texasclipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kansas Kid said:

Range Rovers are also Blazers. A diesel one of those caused this fire.


At least that Range Rover fire is relatively easy to put out, as opposed to lithium battery fires that burn no matter what you pour on it. But yeah, act like they are the same.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That didn't make any difference in that fire. It burned down a lot of the structure and the vehicles inside it.

The issue is it is much easier to get gasoline and diesel to catch fire so once they are near a fire, it is a lot easier for it to spread to other vehicles near each other. Li ion fires need to be under flame longer to get the coolant to vaporize.
First Page Last Page
Page 108 of 223
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.