Fightin TX Aggie said:

---

The curriculum should be available to the public.

If any of these concepts are taught, the Aggie community should make its opinions heard. A&M should not embrace regressive racism as a supposed way to promote inclusion.

---

The list reminds me of this...

TXAGFAN said:

---

WHOOP!'91 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Frederick Palowaski said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Good.

---

"I'm going to force you to accept my beliefs or I'm going to call you a bigot"

/txagfan

---

I'm not the one throwing temper tantrum about never giving athletics another dime on a Texas A&M sports board that happens to have a highly divisive politics forum (that is often the antithesis of everything A&M stands for today).

If student athletes, many of which are minorities, and athletics leadership think it's a good idea then good for them. I'm going out on a limb that Department knows more about student athletes than a bunch of complainers who say they're not giving any more money to University.

---

Dividing Aggies based on skin color is the antithesis of everything A&M is supposed to stand for.

---

Where is that in the press release? Acknowledging people for characteristics they have be it race, gender, sexual orientation, etc is not divisive on its face.

---

In 2002? Probably not.

In 2022? Most defiitely.

So freaking easy to exploit the wallets of white liberals.

WHOOP!'91 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

WHOOP!'91 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Frederick Palowaski said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Good.

---

"I'm going to force you to accept my beliefs or I'm going to call you a bigot"

/txagfan

---

I'm not the one throwing temper tantrum about never giving athletics another dime on a Texas A&M sports board that happens to have a highly divisive politics forum (that is often the antithesis of everything A&M stands for today).

If student athletes, many of which are minorities, and athletics leadership think it's a good idea then good for them. I'm going out on a limb that Department knows more about student athletes than a bunch of complainers who say they're not giving any more money to University.

---

Dividing Aggies based on skin color is the antithesis of everything A&M is supposed to stand for.

---

Where is that in the press release? Acknowledging people for characteristics they have be it race, gender, sexual orientation, etc is not divisive on its face.

---

Are we acknowledging or giving preferential treatment?

I would say the Sully protests where our athletes, funded by our donations, called us old white dudes and racists were pretty divisive and pushed from the left and non-whites, unless you call standing in the way of people trying to destroy property divisive.

---

They aren't allowed to have an opinion you disagree with as scholarship athletes? I don't agree with that position at all.

Translation: we will teach the coaches and staff that white = bad, and black = good. Also that gay = good, Christian = Bad.

Be open about about your degeneracy and victimhood. It's not allowed to push traditional values though.

SHUT UP IF YOU DISAGREE YOU BIGOT! THERE IS NO PLACE FOR YOU STRAIGHT WHITE CHRISTIAN BELIEFS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS! REEEEEEEEE

larry culpepper said:

---

I have a feeling neither OP nor anyone angry about this have any idea what this move by the athletic department even means. They just see buzzwords like diversity and flip out and assume all the athletes are going to get lectured about the evils of whiteness or something.

Just being divisive for no reason.

---

I know exactly what it means and bolded the six modules. You'd have to be a complete dumbass to not get it.

"Return on Inclusion" - Hope A&M got the money back guarantee. Nobody at A&M will be the wiser after wasting time on this devisive gibberish.

What I find interesting about this is my own experience.

I'm a white guy. Prior to moving to Hawaii I lived in predominantly white communities/cultures.

But I was raised well.

So when we moved to Hawaii and I worked closely with local families (Polynesians, Micronesians, Melanesians, Japanese, Chinese, Korean, I can go on, but you get the point) would it be surprising that I connected with them? That I developed relationships with people of very diverse backgrounds?

Would it surprise anybody that when I arrived in the islands and began working as a substance abuse counselor, a local co-worker warned, "I wouldn't go there," referring to a very local enclaves, and Hawaiian homesteads, which may be hostile towards haoles, but I was accepted and even invited?

Only my Okinawan, CRT infused supervisor, told me that my explanation for connecting with local families-humility, respect, and love-was white privilege and I should return to the mainland to work with white people.

Would it surprise anyone that when I arrived in California and was working with incarcerated, gang-entrenched, black and Mexican young men, that a black youth who, upon first seeing me, threw up his arms exclaiming, "Oh, we got a white doc!" would go on to prefer working with me than my black female colleagues who were from the same neighborhood? One black youth gave me a hug, the likes of which I have only experienced from family members.

A Hawaiian colleague and dear friend said to me early in my career when I thought myself of such a different background and too removed from the local experience to be of any service, "Yes, it may be good to have someone from the same culture working with them, but what you bring is a different perspective."

Aggie_Brad said:

---

"Return on Inclusion" - Hope A&M got the money back guarantee. Nobody at A&M will be the wiser after wasting time on this devisive commie gibberish.

---

FIFY

TXAGFAN said:

---

WHOOP!'91 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

WHOOP!'91 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Frederick Palowaski said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Good.

---

"I'm going to force you to accept my beliefs or I'm going to call you a bigot"

/txagfan

---

I'm not the one throwing temper tantrum about never giving athletics another dime on a Texas A&M sports board that happens to have a highly divisive politics forum (that is often the antithesis of everything A&M stands for today).

If student athletes, many of which are minorities, and athletics leadership think it's a good idea then good for them. I'm going out on a limb that Department knows more about student athletes than a bunch of complainers who say they're not giving any more money to University.

---

Dividing Aggies based on skin color is the antithesis of everything A&M is supposed to stand for.

---

Where is that in the press release? Acknowledging people for characteristics they have be it race, gender, sexual orientation, etc is not divisive on its face.

---

Are we acknowledging or giving preferential treatment?

I would say the Sully protests where our athletes, funded by our donations, called us old white dudes and racists were pretty divisive and pushed from the left and non-whites, unless you call standing in the way of people trying to destroy property divisive.

---

They aren't allowed to have an opinion you disagree with as scholarship athletes? I don't agree with that position at all.

---

They can have an opinion, but they can't threaten to destroy property, call racist names and threaten violence. That should be especially true of those who are paying for your scholarship, but that would mean they actually appreciate it. That is obviously not the case. No respect for Aggies, no respect for elders, no respect for A&M or its traditions.

"Micronesians"!?


How'd you even see them?

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Translation: we will teach the coaches and staff that white = bad, and black = good. Also that gay = good, Christian = Bad.

Be open about about you degeneracy and victimhood. It's not allowed to push traditional values though.

SHUT UP IF YOU DISAGREE YOU BIGOT! THERE IS NO PLACE FOR YOU STRAIGHT WHITE CHRISTIAN BELIEFS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS! REEEEEEEEE

---

I'm praying for all these straight white Christian males as they fight to overcome the intense oppression they have faced for generations in College Station, Texas.

Honk Honk!

WHOOP!'91 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

WHOOP!'91 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

WHOOP!'91 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Frederick Palowaski said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Good.

---

"I'm going to force you to accept my beliefs or I'm going to call you a bigot"

/txagfan

---

I'm not the one throwing temper tantrum about never giving athletics another dime on a Texas A&M sports board that happens to have a highly divisive politics forum (that is often the antithesis of everything A&M stands for today).

If student athletes, many of which are minorities, and athletics leadership think it's a good idea then good for them. I'm going out on a limb that Department knows more about student athletes than a bunch of complainers who say they're not giving any more money to University.

---

Dividing Aggies based on skin color is the antithesis of everything A&M is supposed to stand for.

---

Where is that in the press release? Acknowledging people for characteristics they have be it race, gender, sexual orientation, etc is not divisive on its face.

---

Are we acknowledging or giving preferential treatment?

I would say the Sully protests where our athletes, funded by our donations, called us old white dudes and racists were pretty divisive and pushed from the left and non-whites, unless you call standing in the way of people trying to destroy property divisive.

---

They aren't allowed to have an opinion you disagree with as scholarship athletes? I don't agree with that position at all.

---

They can have an opinion, but they can't threaten to destroy property, call racist names and threaten violence. That should be especially true of those who are paying for your scholarship, but that would mean they actually appreciate it. That is obviously not the case. No respect for Aggies, no respect for elders, no respect for A&M or its traditions.

---

The post I replied to referenced words (and hurting your feelings). Allegations about property damage and violence are not the same thing. You moved the goalposts and fwiw I don't think that's what happened re: incremental accusations you added.

Diversity is just a code word for fewer heterosexual white people. You can probably add in Asians as well because they aren't included with the woke mob due to them being successful in education.

larry culpepper said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Translation: we will teach the coaches and staff that white = bad, and black = good. Also that gay = good, Christian = Bad.

Be open about about you degeneracy and victimhood. It's not allowed to push traditional values though.

SHUT UP IF YOU DISAGREE YOU BIGOT! THERE IS NO PLACE FOR YOU STRAIGHT WHITE CHRISTIAN BELIEFS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS! REEEEEEEEE

---

I'm praying for all these straight white Christian males as they fight to overcome the intense oppression they have faced for generations in College Station, Texas.

---

Heavy is the head that wears the crown.

BigRobSA said:

---

"Micronesians"!?


How'd you even see them?

---

Ross Bjork please resign your position that you only got because of your race and privilege. We need a proud latina woman to run our athletic program or a black trans female.

Marvin_Zindler said:

---

Looks like there is a lot of $$$$$$ to be made in grifting.

https://www.nevincaple.com/

---

Black NY Lesbian who played basketball at a school no one has ever heard of with a degree in marketing...

Now she is an expert in race relations and how a kid from Luling, Texas should feel about a black team mate?

I hope they promptly address all those microaggression losses against our men's basketball team this year.

TXAGFAN said:

---

WHOOP!'91 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

WHOOP!'91 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

WHOOP!'91 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Frederick Palowaski said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Good.

---

"I'm going to force you to accept my beliefs or I'm going to call you a bigot"

/txagfan

---

I'm not the one throwing temper tantrum about never giving athletics another dime on a Texas A&M sports board that happens to have a highly divisive politics forum (that is often the antithesis of everything A&M stands for today).

If student athletes, many of which are minorities, and athletics leadership think it's a good idea then good for them. I'm going out on a limb that Department knows more about student athletes than a bunch of complainers who say they're not giving any more money to University.

---

Dividing Aggies based on skin color is the antithesis of everything A&M is supposed to stand for.

---

Where is that in the press release? Acknowledging people for characteristics they have be it race, gender, sexual orientation, etc is not divisive on its face.

---

Are we acknowledging or giving preferential treatment?

I would say the Sully protests where our athletes, funded by our donations, called us old white dudes and racists were pretty divisive and pushed from the left and non-whites, unless you call standing in the way of people trying to destroy property divisive.

---

They aren't allowed to have an opinion you disagree with as scholarship athletes? I don't agree with that position at all.

---

They can have an opinion, but they can't threaten to destroy property, call racist names and threaten violence. That should be especially true of those who are paying for your scholarship, but that would mean they actually appreciate it. That is obviously not the case. No respect for Aggies, no respect for elders, no respect for A&M or its traditions.

---

The post I replied to referenced words (and hurting your feelings). Allegations about property damage and violence are not the same thing. You moved the goalposts and fwiw I don't think that's what happened re: incremental accusations you added.

---

Let me make sure I understand your position before I nuke it into Bolivian. Your position is that an athlete didn't offer to stab a former student? Your position isn't that Sully supporters weren't called racists?

Goes?

PatriotAg02 said:

---

As long as we win. Win at all costs!

---

Woke is not a winning strategy- fairness never won anything. Wokeness/socialism is mediocrity at best. UT has gone that way and now TAMU. Time for Tech to dominate not just BB, baseball, and track but football too. Hopefully this contagion spreads throughout the SEC. If so, its days as a premier conference are numbered.

TxTarpon said:

---

Quote:

---

Does this mean fat girls will be running track now?

---

Fat track and field athletes: Not just for shot put anymore!

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Frederick Palowaski said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Good.

---

"I'm going to force you to accept my beliefs or I'm going to call you a bigot"

/txagfan

---

I'm not the one throwing temper tantrum about never giving athletics another dime on a Texas A&M sports board that happens to have a highly divisive politics forum (that is often the antithesis of everything A&M stands for today).

---

Ironic considering you have a temper tantrum a few times a week every time you get triggered.

larry culpepper said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Translation: we will teach the coaches and staff that white = bad, and black = good. Also that gay = good, Christian = Bad.

Be open about about you degeneracy and victimhood. It's not allowed to push traditional values though.

SHUT UP IF YOU DISAGREE YOU BIGOT! THERE IS NO PLACE FOR YOU STRAIGHT WHITE CHRISTIAN BELIEFS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS! REEEEEEEEE

---

I'm praying for all these straight white Christian males as they fight to overcome the intense oppression they have faced for generations in College Station, Texas.

---

We dont need your prayers or anything you have to offer. But thanks anyway.

rocky the dog said:

---

Does this mean fat girls will be running track now?

---

If you make a fat girl run a lot, will she become thin?

larry culpepper said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Translation: we will teach the coaches and staff that white = bad, and black = good. Also that gay = good, Christian = Bad.

Be open about about you degeneracy and victimhood. It's not allowed to push traditional values though.

SHUT UP IF YOU DISAGREE YOU BIGOT! THERE IS NO PLACE FOR YOU STRAIGHT WHITE CHRISTIAN BELIEFS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS! REEEEEEEEE

---

I'm praying for all these straight white Christian males as they fight to overcome the intense oppression they have faced for generations in College Station, Texas.

---

And here comes Larry with her typical idiotic drive by post. She kept getting her d*** kicked in so she started with the drive by posts. Too funny.

Frederick Palowaski said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Frederick Palowaski said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Good.

---

"I'm going to force you to accept my beliefs or I'm going to call you a bigot"

/txagfan

---

I'm not the one throwing temper tantrum about never giving athletics another dime on a Texas A&M sports board that happens to have a highly divisive politics forum (that is often the antithesis of everything A&M stands for today).

---

Ironic considering you have a temper tantrum a few times a week every time you get triggered.

---

I wouldn't call them a temper tantrum. That being said, I don't see equivalent between a university athletics dept program you disagree with and the posts that I find most objectionable here that gays support pedophilia. Big stretch.

Bobaloo said:

---

So freaking easy to exploit the wallets of white liberals.

---

Now that is unethical. We should never exploit the mentally ill or chronically depressed.

TXAGFAN said:

---

WHOOP!'91 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Frederick Palowaski said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Good.

---

"I'm going to force you to accept my beliefs or I'm going to call you a bigot"

/txagfan

---

I'm not the one throwing temper tantrum about never giving athletics another dime on a Texas A&M sports board that happens to have a highly divisive politics forum (that is often the antithesis of everything A&M stands for today).

If student athletes, many of which are minorities, and athletics leadership think it's a good idea then good for them. I'm going out on a limb that Department knows more about student athletes than a bunch of complainers who say they're not giving any more money to University.

---

Dividing Aggies based on skin color is the antithesis of everything A&M is supposed to stand for.

---

Where is that in the press release? Acknowledging people for characteristics they have be it race, gender, sexual orientation, etc is not divisive on its face.

---

Of course it is. Because they won't acknowledge (celebrate) everyone.

JFABNRGR said:

---

Take them all on a field trip to Ukraine. Thats all the education and experience needed for inclusion, equality, whatever the **** you want to call it.

---

Better yet, and far cheaper and less dangerous, bring all of the so-called underprivileged student athletes to Mexico or any other Latin American country and see how they are treated there, and let them see what real racism looks like.

Well everyone else is being a racist, I guess that makes it ok

larry culpepper said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Translation: we will teach the coaches and staff that white = bad, and black = good. Also that gay = good, Christian = Bad.

Be open about about you degeneracy and victimhood. It's not allowed to push traditional values though.

SHUT UP IF YOU DISAGREE YOU BIGOT! THERE IS NO PLACE FOR YOU STRAIGHT WHITE CHRISTIAN BELIEFS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS! REEEEEEEEE

---

I'm praying for all these straight white Christian males as they fight to overcome the intense oppression they have faced for generations in College Station, Texas.

---

Have you ever posted without using a straw man?

Serious question.

Investiving in divisive ideological indoctrination to try to obtain protection from a possible woke persecution in the future practically invites it to be an ongoing threat.