***Russian - Ukraine War Tactical and Strategic Updates*** [Warning on OP]

7,903,266 Views | 48481 Replies | Last: 14 min ago by Ag with kids
docb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.reddit.com/r/UkrainianConflict/comments/11zt95s/ukrainian_pilot_test_a10_thunderbolt_at_the/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=1&utm_term=1

Maybe?
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
docb said:

https://www.reddit.com/r/UkrainianConflict/comments/11zt95s/ukrainian_pilot_test_a10_thunderbolt_at_the/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=1&utm_term=1

Maybe?
That info smells like Clovis, NM.
benchmark
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Milley never ceases to underwhelm me with his personal opinions.

P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't typically like the guy but he is not wrong, for several reasons there are a lot Russians in the east and Crimea. You can militarily kick them out but a lot of the citizens have been there from the 90s or earlier that still consider themselves Russian

The DPR and LPR troops are also examples of not a true military, more like Russian militias in Ukraine
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
P.U.T.U said:

...for several reasons there are a lot Russians in the east and Crimea. You can militarily kick them out but a lot of the citizens have been there from the 90s or earlier since 2014 that still consider themselves Russian

The DPR and LPR troops are also examples of not a true military, more like Russian militias in Ukraine
FIFY
revvie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane said:

anyone else find it ironically hilarious that the most effective Russian commander...

looks like a retired librarian?
Not at all, US military history is full of former teachers and educators making significant battlefield contributions.
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
benchmark said:

Milley never ceases to underwhelm me with his personal opinions.


Drop the bridge into the strait and cut off resupply through Melitopol and there will be no need to kick the Russians out. They will all leave of their own accord.

That or the Russians would need to employ an air/sea lift on a scale 20% greater than Berlin in 1949.
AGS-R-TUFF
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

74OA said:

Today's SITREP. Sevastopol attacked by sea and air.
More detail on the seaborne portion of the attack.

DRONES
This write up confirms what I was thinking…that a swarm of drones would be much harder to defend against. But if true that the Orcs used machine guns to take out the Naval drones, then it definitely implies a lack of sophistication in their defenses.

Imagine if a Naval drone could be made to dive to a specific depth below surface as it approaches the marina (to avoid detection), then resurface at the last minute right before impact. Try hitting something like that with machine guns.
Blackbeard94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A harbor net would keep out submersible drones
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
But it has to be up at all times. Gonna need to open it up for traffic pretty consistently.
Smeghead4761
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not a new problem. It was done during WWII, and probably even during WWI. A tug is stationed at the harbor entrance with the job of opening and closing the net.
AGS-R-TUFF
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A couple of thoughts…

First, do we think the Orcs currently have a harbor net in place? Because if not, submersible drones have potential. Second, if there is a net…what's to stop the drone from gliding over it then submerging or an even more out of the box capability would be to have the drone be able to accelerate and launch out of the water enough to clear the net, then dive.

The fact that the Ukes have shown they can actually reach and threaten the harbor is a big deal. They just need to figure out how to get some creative drone design that can get to the targets.

And what a site that would be if the Ruskies woke up to ships listing or ablaze in the harbor.
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The nets typically have a floating boom on the top so there really isn't a way to glide over the top. Jumping a net would take a ton of power and these drones are optimized for payload size and range. Efficiency (range) means moving slowly and having a relatively long narrow hull shape. Imagine trying to jump a 30ft long jet-ski that has a top speed of 12 mph.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane said:

well this certainly sounds both strange and interesting...

Russian forces have left the town of Nova Kakhovka in the southern Kherson region, the Ukrainian military's General Staff said on Thursday.

"As of 22nd March 2023, all units of the occupying army that had been deployed in the town of Nova Kakhovka in Kherson region, have left the city," the General Staff said in its evening report outlining conditions on the front lines.

The town is located on the east bank of the Dnipro River, where Russian forces redeployed last November after abandoning positions on the west bank in the face of a counter-offensive by Ukrainian troops.

The report said Russian troops had stolen appliances, valuables, clothing and mobile telephones from nearby houses as they departed.
Per Dennis, apparently this wasn't the Russians abandoning the town. There was a misunderstanding about a troop rotation. Start at 9:34:

74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Today's SITREP.

Film of drone boat jumping the harbor's boom defense?
AGS-R-TUFF
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lb3 said:

The nets typically have a floating boom on the top so there really isn't a way to glide over the top. Jumping a net would take a ton of power and these drones are optimized for payload size and range. Efficiency (range) means moving slowly and having a relatively long narrow hull shape. Imagine trying to jump a 30ft long jet-ski that has a top speed of 12 mph.
Understood. Thanks lb3, good points.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Smeghead4761 said:

Not a new problem. It was done during WWII, and probably even during WWI. A tug is stationed at the harbor entrance with the job of opening and closing the net.


Yeah, but it means you're still going to be consistently open. Look at the Italians and Alexandria. They got their submersibles in while the nets were open for traffic.
docb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ABATTBQ11 said:

Smeghead4761 said:

Not a new problem. It was done during WWII, and probably even during WWI. A tug is stationed at the harbor entrance with the job of opening and closing the net.


Yeah, but it means you're still going to be consistently open. Look at the Italians and Alexandria. They got their submersibles in while the nets were open for traffic.
I would think with the help from us the drones could just loiter in the area and go in when we see the nets open like when a ship is leaving or going in?
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
docb said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

Smeghead4761 said:

Not a new problem. It was done during WWII, and probably even during WWI. A tug is stationed at the harbor entrance with the job of opening and closing the net.


Yeah, but it means you're still going to be consistently open. Look at the Italians and Alexandria. They got their submersibles in while the nets were open for traffic.
I would think with the help from us the drones could just loiter in the area and go in when we see the nets open like when a ship is leaving or going in?
These naval drones are carrying large warheads and move slowly. That means you can't park them 10 miles away and wait for the tug to open the harbor. They would be observed, even at night, if parked a few hundred meters from the nets waiting for a ship to enter or exit.

A submersible naval drone wouldn't be observed but would consume a lot of power loitering near the nets. The reasoning is that the submersible version would need to maintain some small positive buoyancy in order to not have to build in complex ballast tanks, pneumatics, and control systems. It would then use its forward motion to provide the downward force on its bow planes to dive and remain submerged.

Works well when on the move but stop moving and it would float back to the surface and be visible again. Loitering near the nets for a few hours would consume a lot of power trying to stay submerged and would reduce the range of the drones which is likely already stretched to its limit.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nasty little close-in fight.

Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why no fire for effect? Are the tubes spread out so far apart?
Jetpilot86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Look forward to seeing some analysis of this from the mil types here....
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think with drone spotting and correction, both sides are trying to preserve ammunition where they can, and minimize counter battery threat.
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wagner PMC killed 9 Chinese in a mine in the CAR.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/witnesses-accuse-russias-wagner-group-of-killing-9-chinese-miners-in-central-african-republic

If Putin is worrying about Prizoghin getting too political, this could be the pretext he could use to feed him to Russia's Chinese puppet masters.
Post removed:
by user
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jetpilot86 said:

Look forward to seeing some analysis of this from the mil types here....
Not much to say really I think. This to me just screams lack of training and small unit leadership. As nasty as a thing it is, assaulting an enemy held trench is literally infantry 101 and they committed the gravest error you could ever do. They allowed themselves to pinned by pretty weak small arms fire in the open. This war has a hallmark of accurate artillery fire and the Russians failed to maintain a good pace of advance. And then most died and were wounded without taking the objective anyways.

There was a flanking attempt and good on the Russians for that I guess but the plan simply took too long to develop, probably simply through bad execution, and those first couple of arty blasts stopped that flanking maneuver flat.

This is fantastic footage of what not having violence of action and proper small unit training can do to an attacking force. Taking a trench sucks and you are probably going to die anyways but at least up the chances of taking the damned thing first and save the next group of grunts from worrying about it. Proper fire and maneuver from a well trained squad would have had some of the Russians at least on top of the Ukes in short order. Which is about the best you can ask for in those situations.

JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jetpilot86 said:

Look forward to seeing some analysis of this from the mil types here....
Thank God for Fire Support. The Ukes in the trench owe the spotter and the arty crew a cold beer for sure.

Danger close with a couple of air bursts is like DANGER CLOSE!

Russians had a decent plan on their attack it was just executed poorly. Small team on the right and larger one in the front. Typically one acts as supporting fire to keep the defenders heads down and from returning fire while the other group assaults through. Needs to be coordinate lift and shift of fire based off of precordinated signal. Smoke, whistle flare, etc. The larger force had several RPG/AT4 types weapons but it looks like they only got one shot off.

That one direct hit changed the momentum completely wounding on my count 7 which appeared to be about half the force.

My question is HOW did they get so close? Fire mission should have been called in long time ago.

To the other question yes Ukes and now orcs mostly using 1-2 tubes only to avoid counter battery etc.
Jetpilot86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks. I was trying to figure out what was supposed to happen, the plan, vs the s***show that occurred. Appreciate the explanation.
Jetpilot86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks. I knew it ended bad for the Orcs, but I had no idea what it was supposed to look like when it started...
revvie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jetpilot86 said:

Thanks. I knew it ended bad for the Orcs, but I had no idea what it was supposed to look like when it started...
I remember that in WWI and WWII that geophones were used to locate artillery locations. Are they still employed for general location to send drones for more precise coordinates.
Jetpilot86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
revvie said:

Jetpilot86 said:

Thanks. I knew it ended bad for the Orcs, but I had no idea what it was supposed to look like when it started...
I remember that in WWI and WWII that geophones were used to locate artillery locations. Are they still employed for general location to send drones for more precise coordinates.
Within the last 20 pages or so it has been mentioned that the Orcs have Audio Artillery locating devices as well as radar, but the radar ones are vulnerable to anti-radar attacks. IIRC
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?


chickencoupe16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rossticus said:

Damn. Brits escorting their drones over the Black Sea now.


The Rivet Joint is a manned aircraft. An adaptation of the KC-135 tanker.
First Page Last Page
Page 1036 of 1386
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.