***Russian - Ukraine War Tactical and Strategic Updates*** [Warning on OP]

7,620,427 Views | 47855 Replies | Last: 58 min ago by B-1 83
ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't understand the smiling in this situation.

aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATX_AG_08 said:


I no kidding thought that guy was dead. Hadn't seen an update on him in forever.
ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not sure he disagrees with you. He looks pretty resigned to that fact in the video.
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane said:

aggie93 said:

JFABNRGR said:

aggie93 said:

FireAg said:

This war seems to be shaping up as follows...

The only way for the Russians to turn the tide at this point appears to be a move away from conventional warfare toward a WMD campaign...

But a WMD campaign, at this point, I think would engage the eastern bloc NATO countries to move troops into Ukraine...which then puts other NATO countries on the verge of WWIII as they move to reinforce and protect the borders of eastern bloc NATO countries in the spirit and in honor of Article 5...

The best outcome for the entire world is one that would have saved the world from WWII given a similar predicament...cut the head off of the leadership of the offending force...

The world needs Putin to be dispatched...
Perhaps but I don't think so. I think this continues as a long, drawn out fight where Russia eventually wins but at tremendous cost to Russia and with Ukraine basically being destroyed. That's sadly in the best interests of NATO at this point because the real danger is when Russia decides to move to the next step and go after one of the Baltics or Poland that are NATO countries. That's when the nuclear risk really kicks in, Russia would be crushed from a conventional perspective so it's either accept defeat or go nuclear. So as much as it is horrible the best thing for us is for this to stay in Ukraine. Russia is not going to quit, they are fully committed.

As for Putin, certainly taking him out may solve this but it also means Russia goes into chaos. There is no one in Russia who can replace him, Putin has destroyed all his opposition internally and there are just very few people even capable of being in charge of such a complex country there. So you are looking at a possible Civil War or failed state or both. In a country with thousands of nukes and a lot of really bad people. Maybe that turns out ok but that could actually end up even more dangerous.

It's really frightening we don't have any adults in charge of our foreign policy right now.
The best interest of NATO is to keep russia in russia. If you give them Ukraine you just put a significant amount of their intermediate and some of their short range weapons in NATO range. Its 500 miles from western border to Dnieper river, if you kick them out completely including Crimea that jumps to 750 miles. Ukraine also has very valuable strategic resources: Black Sea access, Agriculture, O&G, Etc absolutely nuts to give them all this while allowing them to commit genocide on the Ukrainian peoples.

The Risk of Nuclear war already exists. Is the world prepared to let anyone with Nukes steal land and murder people?

Russia is a failed state now. We have to have faith and prepare that a new group of leaders better than putin rises to the occasion. Prepare for future problems now but deal with them as they come about nukes or not.
Of course it would be better if Russia retreated but that isn't going to happen or is very unlikely to happen. Russia is trying to seal itself off from a future attack while it still can, it's in demographic collapse and in 10 years (maybe less) simply won't be capable of doing so. The lack of military age males in Russia is a real problem. So they have gone all in and to retreat means total collapse and soon rather than later. Russians don't look at this the same way we do and they are far more accustomed to a harsh life. I mean it's possible they just "go back to Russia" but extremely unlikely so what we are looking at is the much more likely scenario that they continue to attack Ukraine until the conquer it no matter the cost.

Taking out Putin certainly reshuffles the deck but that seems very unllikely to happen. He has a death grip on power and is still supported by most Russians. Russians like a nationalist and they don't really have an alternative as Putin has made sure of that. He's 70 but in pretty good health. So the only way you are probably taking him out is assassination and that's a really, really dangerous card to play because no one knows who or what will replace him and how they will react if they think NATO is behind taking out Putin.

You need to look a few moves further down the chess board.

Russia has a population in 2022 of 146,000,000 citizens

to think that the Russian Army doesn't have enough potential recruits to seal itself off from future attack is not accurate.
Do the rest of the math though.

Russia has 3 million in their military now. They are a country that has the largest land mass in the world and borders 16 countries and have been invaded 50 times through 9 different paths, of which they control 3, 5 if they get total control of Ukraine. They can't just put everyone in Ukraine.

Of that 145 million they have one of the oldest demographics on Earth. Their population collapsed in the late Soviet period and they are literally trying to make up numbers just to hide their weakness. They also stopped investing in education and have some of the worst alcohol and drug epidemics of anywhere in the world. Of those few who are educated and healthy huge portions have left as they have no opportunity. Russia has a GDP about the size of Florida btw, that was before they just destroyed it. Are there still some 18-30 year old healthy males left to join the military? I mean there are a few but you are also talking about the definition of cannon fodder. Poorly trained and equipped soldiers who don't want to be there and being sent into hostile territory to fight an entrenched and motivated opposition.

Sorry but Russia is completely screwed from a conventional perspective and things are going to get worse not better for them. They have nukes and a lot of them, that is really the only threat they have that makes a difference at this point.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
SPF250
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From the Department of It's Never Going to Happen Department:

The 1994 Budapest Memorandum was the agreement whereby if Ukraine gave up its nukes, the US, UK and (yeah right) Russia would guarantee their security. Since, clearly, no one is holding up their respective ends of that agreement, let's just unwind the agreement. King's X, go back to square one and give Ukraine their nukes back. Let them take care of their own security.

Putin would really shat his pants, but so would the rest of the world.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATX_AG_08 said:




Brave guys. If they get captured by the Russians they probably will not make it to any POW cage.

I don't think the Russians have agreed to follow the Geneva Conventions for what they term "volunteers and mercenaries"
Ag In Ok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What if they call it what it is, a war? If they are admitted into the Uke army, regardless of their origin, they are protected?
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A joke from Moscow: "According to Putin, the special military operation is really a conflict between Russia and NATO about world dominance. What's the situation now? Russia has lost 15,000 troops, 6 generals, 500 tanks, 3 ships, 100 planes and 1,000 trucks. NATO hasn't even arrived yet."
Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MeatDr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That first video is clipped from this tweet from the guy actually involved.

Edited to add this tweet as well.
MeatDr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MeatDr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MeatDr said:

That first video is clipped from this tweet from the guy actually involved.

Edited to add this tweet as well.

Just going thru his timeline:











PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG




ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They're all in. Looks like the Ukrainians are going to just have to kill them all.
ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Like several of us have been saying, Russia is a dying country and a land grab is the only thing they can do to survive. But they had a paper target army and forgot that fighting an insurgency defending their own land is not easy. Now, like several other empires, are bringing themselves down quicker than any outside force could have.

Sometimes you wonder if the leaders have ever picked up a history book

SPF250
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Medinsky's reference of Russia's existence being at risk is troubling. Setting the stage for the "existential threat" predicate for using nukes.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Looking through the American's feed above, it looks like we may be getting probably company sized units of US volunteers over there in action now.
You do not have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SPF250 said:

Medinsky's reference of Russia's existence being at risk is troubling. Setting the stage for the "existential threat" predicate for using nukes.
Russia, or the Soviet Union, has been saying the West is an existential threat since 1917. That is a tenet of Marxism, Leninism, Communism, Maoism, blah, blah, blah.

Workers of the World Unite! Was the slogan for a reason. Capitalism works better for the people living under it than communism does. Unless it is worldwide, it will always fail, eventually.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SPF250 said:

Medinsky's reference of Russia's existence being at risk is troubling. Setting the stage for the "existential threat" predicate for using nukes.

Much like the nuclear 'bug out' test flights - I believe the existential threat talk is for the West.

If you believe that Putin is still a rational actor then as long as NATO makes him believe that WMDs are a red line then we will be fine.

And it sounds like any use of a tactical nuke will bring NATO into the fight.
MeatDr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
At least some things are being kept quiet...
MeatDr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Robk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MeatDr said:

At least some things are being kept quiet...



In one of Zelensky comments yesterday or the day before he thanked the US for materials. Mentioned that there was help given that he could no go into details about. Sounds similiar.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MeatDr said:


Holy crap! Who is directing this PR? I mean that is genius for a country under siege.
Matt Hooper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quick compliment to all well informed posts and people with real world military knowledge.

Great input. Better than any "news" channel.
Hooper Drives the Boat
Jetpilot86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From a post above.

Basic training Uke style. Kill Russians all day. Learn how to kill Russians after the evening meal of steak and dumplings.
VitruvianAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

MeatDr said:


Holy crap! Who is directing this PR? I mean that is genius for a country under siege.


Question is; how'd they get the database?
Jetpilot86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anonymous perhaps?
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting things on https://liveuamap.com/ today. Earlier today, there were reports of heavy battles near the border of the Mykolaiv and Kherson regions, and it looked like the Ukrainians were making some gains. Now, it almost looks like Russia repelled those and may have gained back some

The battles can be found on this time stamp:

https://liveuamap.com/en/time/24.03.2022

As of right now, those are gone. I can't seem to find a link to the exact map as it stands without it updating whenever anyone goes to the site, but they're gone.

Interestingly, though, Ukraine liberated Malynivka Village in the Zaporizhia Oblast. This is about 2.5 hours Northwest (~100 miles according to Google Maps) from Mariupol.

https://liveuamap.com/en/2022/24-march-ukrainian-army-cleared-malynivka-village-in-zaporizhiye
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
VitruvianAg said:

aggiehawg said:

MeatDr said:


Holy crap! Who is directing this PR? I mean that is genius for a country under siege.


Question is; how'd they get the database?
You know how. The Russians have been doing that in a surveilance state for years.
VitruvianAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Of course, but surely the Russians don't let just anyone have access to their database.

Well, unless they are just plain stupid, they do seem to fight that way, if what we're seeing here is not just what we would like to believe.
First Page Last Page
Page 384 of 1368
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.