We are not "bothered" by it.
We are laughing at it.
We are laughing at it.
Your comparison is the exact same as the progressive mindset and the constant complaints of "Hollywood whitewashing".Athanasius said:OG UNF said:Athanasius said:
Actors are supposed to play people they aren't.
This bothers me zero. And those of you it does bother, you're position is no better than people complaining that the voice of Simba (an imaginary talking lion) should be voiced by a black person, because talking lions are only… black people, I guess.
Are you also offended they are letting humans play elves?
I do, however, hope they don't ruin it with a glorification of sin. Tolkien would surely disapprove.
What a stupid take, it's silly and unfaithful to the source material to have modern diversity in middle earth.
You aren't reading and addressing my points.
"Silly" is saying only elves should play elves.
"Silly" is saying the melanin in an actor's skin should determine what roles they can play.
If you go down that road, eventually the only capable person of playing a historical figure is that person themself.
"Silly" indeed.
Athanasius said:OG UNF said:Athanasius said:
Actors are supposed to play people they aren't.
This bothers me zero. And those of you it does bother, you're position is no better than people complaining that the voice of Simba (an imaginary talking lion) should be voiced by a black person, because talking lions are only… black people, I guess.
Are you also offended they are letting humans play elves?
I do, however, hope they don't ruin it with a glorification of sin. Tolkien would surely disapprove.
What a stupid take, it's silly and unfaithful to the source material to have modern diversity in middle earth.
You aren't reading and addressing my points.
"Silly" is saying only elves should play elves.
"Silly" is saying the melanin in an actor's skin should determine what roles they can play.
If you go down that road, eventually the only capable person of playing a historical figure is that person themself.
"Silly" indeed.
I don't think that's actually true. There are writings from him where he specifically states that LOTR is not an allegory of them and he wrote much of it before they came along. He did start all of this in WWI though and there is a lot of symbolism out of that war in his books.TChaney said:
Now one other angle to look at this.
I think I remember Sauron and Saruman were representations of Hitler and Stalin.
So if we go with this as a Lord of the Rings prequel it sets up a racial genocide aspect happening where Sauron succeeds in subracial genocide killing off all of the black elves and black dwarves.
I don't think that is the angle being promoted here though, it's simple pandering.
Lately, Hollywood would disagree with you. They cast a black gal to be Ariel of The Little Mermaid. There has been discussion of a black actor portraying both Superman and James Bond (the latter of which would be perfectly fine, but Superman is not black). Thor has no tits, but the comics have lately made Thor a woman. I wouldn't doubt that Hollywood would absolutely cast a black actor to portray Lincoln if given the opportunity, but doubt they'd extend that opportunity to a white actor portraying Othello.Quote:
Skin color absolutely determines which roles an actor can play. Can a white guy play Othello or Frederick Douglass? Can a black guy play Abraham Lincoln or the King of England?
Cinco Ranch Aggie said:Lately, Hollywood would disagree with you. They cast a black gal to be Ariel of The Little Mermaid. There has been discussion of a black actor portraying both Superman and James Bond (the latter of which would be perfectly fine, but Superman is not black). Thor has no tits, but the comics have lately made Thor a woman. I wouldn't doubt that Hollywood would absolutely cast a black actor to portray Lincoln if given the opportunity, but doubt they'd extend that opportunity to a white actor portraying Othello.Quote:
Skin color absolutely determines which roles an actor can play. Can a white guy play Othello or Frederick Douglass? Can a black guy play Abraham Lincoln or the King of England?
To be fair, this isn't a reboot. It takes place hundreds to thousands years before LOTR in the Second Age. It's based on The Silmarillion which is Tolkien's primary love.American Hardwood said:
It is always befuddling to me that their are some addle brained idiots in Hollywood that feel compelled to remake movies that were essentially perfect in their original form. The original LOTR was one of the best executions of a cherished source material ever. How many countless times have we seen Hollywood try this?
Think about what they are really saying here. You as a movie goer see LOTR and think this movie is not good enough not because of anything having to do with the craft of moviemaking, but because there isn't enough color in the skin of the actors. These very same people would be quick to label the creation team as racist because of it. Irony seems to be invisible to people such as this.
Matthew 7:5
You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye.
The Dirty Sock said:
Where are the muslim orcs?
I tried reading it and gave up after about 30 pages or so.Cinco Ranch Aggie said:I've heard that it is a tough read to get started, which is probably why it has been sitting on my bookshelf since I bought it way back around the time the first Hobbit movie came out.OG UNF said:
Read it. It's really freaking awesome. But it literally stars at creation and mythology of the gods, so takes some time to heat up.
Ideally played by Leslie Jones or Tiffany HadishQuote:
The hero has to be a sassy black woman who proves she doesn't need help from a man
His name is Toby you racist piece of sht!The Dirty Sock said:
Roots. Kunta Kinte played by Tom Cruise
FIFY. My Tolkein nerdiness would not let this go uncorrected.OG UNF said:OnlyForNow said:
She's a dwarf
It's true you don't see many dwarf women. And in fact, they are so alike in voice and appearance, that they are often mistaken for dwarf men.
And this in turn has given rise to the belief that there are no dwarf women, and that dwarves grow out of stonejust spring out of holes in the ground!
BQ78 said:
Thomas Jefferson is shocked by your statement.
Cultural appropriation bruhblacksox said:It's a fictional story, not a documentary. Changing up books when brought to the big screen is more the rule than the exception. I can't imagine why this upsets anyone.OG UNF said:Athanasius said:
Actors are supposed to play people they aren't.
This bothers me zero. And those of you it does bother, you're position is no better than people complaining that the voice of Simba (an imaginary talking lion) should be voiced by a black person, because talking lions are only… black people, I guess.
Are you also offended they are letting humans play elves?
I do, however, hope they don't ruin it with a glorification of sin. Tolkien would surely disapprove.
What a stupid take, it's silly and unfaithful to the source material to have modern diversity in middle earth.
An L of an Ag said:FIFY. My Tolkein nerdiness would not let this go uncorrected.OG UNF said:OnlyForNow said:
She's a dwarf
It's true you don't see many dwarf women. And in fact, they are so alike in voice and appearance, that they are often mistaken for dwarf men.
And this in turn has given rise to the belief that there are no dwarf women, and that dwarves grow out of stonejust spring out of holes in the ground!
blacksox said:It's a fictional story, not a documentary. Changing up books when brought to the big screen is more the rule than the exception. I can't imagine why this upsets anyone.OG UNF said:Athanasius said:
Actors are supposed to play people they aren't.
This bothers me zero. And those of you it does bother, you're position is no better than people complaining that the voice of Simba (an imaginary talking lion) should be voiced by a black person, because talking lions are only… black people, I guess.
Are you also offended they are letting humans play elves?
I do, however, hope they don't ruin it with a glorification of sin. Tolkien would surely disapprove.
What a stupid take, it's silly and unfaithful to the source material to have modern diversity in middle earth.
Athanasius said:OG UNF said:Athanasius said:
Actors are supposed to play people they aren't.
This bothers me zero. And those of you it does bother, you're position is no better than people complaining that the voice of Simba (an imaginary talking lion) should be voiced by a black person, because talking lions are only… black people, I guess.
Are you also offended they are letting humans play elves?
I do, however, hope they don't ruin it with a glorification of sin. Tolkien would surely disapprove.
What a stupid take, it's silly and unfaithful to the source material to have modern diversity in middle earth.
You aren't reading and addressing my points.
"Silly" is saying only elves should play elves.
"Silly" is saying the melanin in an actor's skin should determine what roles they can play.
If you go down that road, eventually the only capable person of playing a historical figure is that person themself.
"Silly" indeed.
tk111 said:
They did it in the witcher and it didn't really bother me except that they still managed to make it make as little sense as possible, which seems to be the goal. Odd in a story where there a multiple large extremely racist factions and the writers do things like send a black Fringilla to the Nilfguardians (full blown Nazis essentially) and expect us believe that racism in this imaginary world extends to literally anything you can think of except skin color.
One Louder said:BQ78 said:
Thomas Jefferson is shocked by your statement.
As is Anne Boleyn...