BTW, if you want to get in on this willful vandalism and violation of the Democrat's precious norms you can get your own stickers here.
(No affiliation with seller)
(No affiliation with seller)
I did that
26,877 Views |
291 Replies |
Last: 2 yr ago by Valtrex11
BlueAg2003 said:Quote:
Don't need anyone to "have my back", if you agree with me sometimes can just say that. Not a real popular position around here.
My bad. Sorry I wrote about having your back. Was trying to show solidarity as another LGBT member of this board.
Almost like you should support someone based on the content of their ideas, not based on some perceived shared victimhood. Not to mention, the underlying philosophies of the LG and the BT are completely at odds with each other, so there's no reason they should just blindly support each other.
Sorry didn't see you posting during the BLM riots last summer.TXAGFAN said:
Vandalism is so cool
I don't blindly support him. I have supported him on issues in which we share an experience. Clearly I don't "blindly" support him because I just told him how I disagree with his use of the term vandalism for silly stickers.
Always the victimhood commentary around here. Name one expansion of your fundamental rights as a presumably straight (probably white) guy in your lifetime and get back to me on that. Victim? No. Second class citizen? Maybe.Kvetch said:BlueAg2003 said:Quote:
Don't need anyone to "have my back", if you agree with me sometimes can just say that. Not a real popular position around here.
My bad. Sorry I wrote about having your back. Was trying to show solidarity as another LGBT member of this board.
Almost like you should support someone based on the content of their ideas, not based on some perceived shared victimhood. Not to mention, the underlying philosophies of the LG and the BT are completely at odds with each other, so there's no reason they should just blindly support each other.
TXAGFAN said:Always the victimhood commentary around here. Name one expansion of your fundamental rights as a presumably straight (probably white) guy in your lifetime and get back to me on that. Victim? No. Second class citizen? Maybe.Kvetch said:BlueAg2003 said:Quote:
Don't need anyone to "have my back", if you agree with me sometimes can just say that. Not a real popular position around here.
My bad. Sorry I wrote about having your back. Was trying to show solidarity as another LGBT member of this board.
Almost like you should support someone based on the content of their ideas, not based on some perceived shared victimhood. Not to mention, the underlying philosophies of the LG and the BT are completely at odds with each other, so there's no reason they should just blindly support each other.
First, define fundamental rights.
Also, the victimhood commentary is pretty appropriate.
Where do you sell at? All I can find is sets that have one sticker of each for like $6 a set.Racer X said:Thanks! There are sooo many people selling the I Did That stickers so I wanted to up the game a little. I created and sold my first BidenPelosiKamala set in September, now it's practically all I sell. It's a good side hustle... and it makes me smile.Quote:
Back to the stickers: the three together are hilarious, but the one about that dunce Kamala is the best…she's an empty pant suit and sucks! (Not to mention the nice double entendre)
Most married people I know would put their marriage (family) in their Top 3 priorities in life alongside duty to country and god (religion). Recognition of your family by the govt seems pretty fundamental to me. If you disagree would love your reasoning.Kvetch said:TXAGFAN said:Always the victimhood commentary around here. Name one expansion of your fundamental rights as a presumably straight (probably white) guy in your lifetime and get back to me on that. Victim? No. Second class citizen? Maybe.Kvetch said:BlueAg2003 said:Quote:
Don't need anyone to "have my back", if you agree with me sometimes can just say that. Not a real popular position around here.
My bad. Sorry I wrote about having your back. Was trying to show solidarity as another LGBT member of this board.
Almost like you should support someone based on the content of their ideas, not based on some perceived shared victimhood. Not to mention, the underlying philosophies of the LG and the BT are completely at odds with each other, so there's no reason they should just blindly support each other.
First, define fundamental rights.
Oh man I've got to get a case of those stickers. I'll use half to put on every gas pump I use and the other half will be Christmas gifts. Win win (except for Biden's damage)
TXAGFAN said:Most married people I know would put their marriage (family) in their Top 3 priorities in life alongside duty to country and god (religion). Recognition of your family by the govt seems pretty fundamental to me. If you disagree would love your reasoning.Kvetch said:TXAGFAN said:Always the victimhood commentary around here. Name one expansion of your fundamental rights as a presumably straight (probably white) guy in your lifetime and get back to me on that. Victim? No. Second class citizen? Maybe.Kvetch said:BlueAg2003 said:Quote:
Don't need anyone to "have my back", if you agree with me sometimes can just say that. Not a real popular position around here.
My bad. Sorry I wrote about having your back. Was trying to show solidarity as another LGBT member of this board.
Almost like you should support someone based on the content of their ideas, not based on some perceived shared victimhood. Not to mention, the underlying philosophies of the LG and the BT are completely at odds with each other, so there's no reason they should just blindly support each other.
First, define fundamental rights.
I don't care what seems fundamental to you. What does the constitution say? Rights aren't derived based upon your feelings.
TXAGFAN said:Always the victimhood commentary around here. Name one expansion of your fundamental rights as a presumably straight (probably white) guy in your lifetime and get back to me on that. Victim? No. Second class citizen? Maybe.Kvetch said:BlueAg2003 said:Quote:
Don't need anyone to "have my back", if you agree with me sometimes can just say that. Not a real popular position around here.
My bad. Sorry I wrote about having your back. Was trying to show solidarity as another LGBT member of this board.
Almost like you should support someone based on the content of their ideas, not based on some perceived shared victimhood. Not to mention, the underlying philosophies of the LG and the BT are completely at odds with each other, so there's no reason they should just blindly support each other.
What are you even trying to argue?
There's not a more persecuted racial group in America today than the white male.
TXAGFAN said:Most married people I know would put their marriage (family) in their Top 3 priorities in life alongside duty to country and god (religion). Recognition of your family by the govt seems pretty fundamental to me. If you disagree would love your reasoning.Kvetch said:TXAGFAN said:Always the victimhood commentary around here. Name one expansion of your fundamental rights as a presumably straight (probably white) guy in your lifetime and get back to me on that. Victim? No. Second class citizen? Maybe.Kvetch said:BlueAg2003 said:Quote:
Don't need anyone to "have my back", if you agree with me sometimes can just say that. Not a real popular position around here.
My bad. Sorry I wrote about having your back. Was trying to show solidarity as another LGBT member of this board.
Almost like you should support someone based on the content of their ideas, not based on some perceived shared victimhood. Not to mention, the underlying philosophies of the LG and the BT are completely at odds with each other, so there's no reason they should just blindly support each other.
First, define fundamental rights.
Yet you support a political party that designs every policy remove around destroying the family unit and making all children property of the state.
Slap fight
BlueSmoke said:Me and Muy got most of Frisco covered. The rest of you - step up your game.....Muy said:
Just ordered 2 packs of 100 stickers, shipping today via Amazon.
Want me to take West Frisco, Broseph?
Muy said:BlueSmoke said:Me and Muy got most of Frisco covered. The rest of you - step up your game.....Muy said:
Just ordered 2 packs of 100 stickers, shipping today via Amazon.
Want me to take West Frisco, Broseph?
I want a piece. You want to give me Little Elm? They probably won't remove them over there.
"Huge problem?" Really? Huge?bonfarr said:Philip J Fry said:
I work for a major fuel retailer and those stickers are a huge problem. I feel bad for the employees that have to go out and scrape and clean them off the pumps every day.
quit voting for idiots like Joe F Biden and you wont get stickers like this... I hope yall get 1000 stickers a day or F that, maybe 10,000 a day, until people like your company step up and say something nothing will fix what is happening.. so maybe 20,000 a day will work?bonfarr said:Philip J Fry said:
I work for a major fuel retailer and those stickers are a huge problem. I feel bad for the employees that have to go out and scrape and clean them off the pumps every day.
agdoc2001 said:
My oldest has been vandalizing his school binder with Pokemon stickers this week. Don't despair, guys, I spanked him and cancelled Christmas. Lesson learned.
He got off light. I put my kids in solitary for a month for vandalizing my coffee table and plantation shutters. That'll learn em.
Also almost every gas station i have been to in the last decade has key pad numbers and other buttons that are completely unable to be read due to wear from use. Surely they will all be rebranded from their major chain status any day now. Aaaaaaaany day.
I don't think that scraping a tiny sticker off of a gas pump is that bad of a chore I am an hourly worker at a convenience store especially when I am tasked with cleaning toilets and dealing with all types of unsavory characters at odd hours. Try again.
Unfortunately for your company those stickers are going to be the least of their problems with Joe and his ilk in charge. Wait til he shuts down a couple more pipelines and enacts legislation banning the sale of internal combustion engines (hello California).
They are taking the hit on their "brand points" from the major supply companies. They will probably be closing their doors any day now. Nevermind the fact that convenience store margins only rival that of furniture stores.Sea Speed said:
Also almost every gas station i have been to in the last decade has key pad numbers and other buttons that are completely unable to be read due to wear from use. Surely they will all be rebranded from their major chain status any day now. Aaaaaaaany day.
Staff doesn't like me linking so search DoingMyOwnStuff on Etsy.Quote:Where do you sell at? All I can find is sets that have one sticker of each for like $6 a set.Quote:Racer X said:Quote:
Quote:
Back to the stickers: the three together are hilarious, but the one about that dunce Kamala is the best…she's an empty pant suit and sucks! (Not to mention the nice double entendre)
Thanks! There are sooo many people selling the I Did That stickers so I wanted to up the game a little. I created and sold my first BidenPelosiKamala set in September, now it's practically all I sell. It's a good side hustle... and it makes me smile.
Doingmyownstuff
FIFYRapier108 said:
It is amazing how such an effective sticker can trigger people so much.
BlueSmoke said:FIFYRapier108 said:
It is amazing how such an effective sticker can trigger people so much.
The truth hurts.
Owlagdad said:
Is there a warrant out on chalk boy?
That dudes gone silent, maybe higher ups told him his crap is putting a target on them.
Not the policy that matters to me and actually impacts people directly, you're speaking in hyperboles re: democrats (all tens of millions of them?) trying to destroy their own family unit.AG 2000' said:TXAGFAN said:Most married people I know would put their marriage (family) in their Top 3 priorities in life alongside duty to country and god (religion). Recognition of your family by the govt seems pretty fundamental to me. If you disagree would love your reasoning.Kvetch said:TXAGFAN said:Always the victimhood commentary around here. Name one expansion of your fundamental rights as a presumably straight (probably white) guy in your lifetime and get back to me on that. Victim? No. Second class citizen? Maybe.Kvetch said:BlueAg2003 said:Quote:
Don't need anyone to "have my back", if you agree with me sometimes can just say that. Not a real popular position around here.
My bad. Sorry I wrote about having your back. Was trying to show solidarity as another LGBT member of this board.
Almost like you should support someone based on the content of their ideas, not based on some perceived shared victimhood. Not to mention, the underlying philosophies of the LG and the BT are completely at odds with each other, so there's no reason they should just blindly support each other.
First, define fundamental rights.
Yet you support a political party that designs every policy remove around destroying the family unit and making all children property of the state.
Don't worry bonfarr and txagfan, they are easily removable. No need to worry!
Thanks. Those are perfect!
This is hilariously tragic. Your entire position is so incredibly flawed. Everything you said can be VERY easily picked apart. My favorite part was you *****ing about flags...I guess you forgot about the whole "not my president," schtick that went on for 4 entire years. You really should reconsider posting further.TXAGFAN said:Not the policy that matters to me and actually impacts people directly, you're speaking in hyperboles re: democrats (all tens of millions of them?) trying to destroy their own family unit.AG 2000' said:TXAGFAN said:Most married people I know would put their marriage (family) in their Top 3 priorities in life alongside duty to country and god (religion). Recognition of your family by the govt seems pretty fundamental to me. If you disagree would love your reasoning.Kvetch said:TXAGFAN said:Always the victimhood commentary around here. Name one expansion of your fundamental rights as a presumably straight (probably white) guy in your lifetime and get back to me on that. Victim? No. Second class citizen? Maybe.Kvetch said:BlueAg2003 said:Quote:
Don't need anyone to "have my back", if you agree with me sometimes can just say that. Not a real popular position around here.
My bad. Sorry I wrote about having your back. Was trying to show solidarity as another LGBT member of this board.
Almost like you should support someone based on the content of their ideas, not based on some perceived shared victimhood. Not to mention, the underlying philosophies of the LG and the BT are completely at odds with each other, so there's no reason they should just blindly support each other.
First, define fundamental rights.
Yet you support a political party that designs every policy remove around destroying the family unit and making all children property of the state.
BUT its vandalism guys!!!! Bahaa, wonder what its like being a liberal ***** and get triggered everyday?
TexAgBackNTex said:This is hilariously tragic. Your entire position is so incredibly flawed. Everything you said can be VERY easily picked apart. My favorite part was you *****ing about flags...I guess you forgot about the whole "not my president," schtick that went on for 4 entire years. You really should reconsider posting further.TXAGFAN said:Not the policy that matters to me and actually impacts people directly, you're speaking in hyperboles re: democrats (all tens of millions of them?) trying to destroy their own family unit.AG 2000' said:TXAGFAN said:Most married people I know would put their marriage (family) in their Top 3 priorities in life alongside duty to country and god (religion). Recognition of your family by the govt seems pretty fundamental to me. If you disagree would love your reasoning.Kvetch said:TXAGFAN said:Always the victimhood commentary around here. Name one expansion of your fundamental rights as a presumably straight (probably white) guy in your lifetime and get back to me on that. Victim? No. Second class citizen? Maybe.Kvetch said:BlueAg2003 said:Quote:
Don't need anyone to "have my back", if you agree with me sometimes can just say that. Not a real popular position around here.
My bad. Sorry I wrote about having your back. Was trying to show solidarity as another LGBT member of this board.
Almost like you should support someone based on the content of their ideas, not based on some perceived shared victimhood. Not to mention, the underlying philosophies of the LG and the BT are completely at odds with each other, so there's no reason they should just blindly support each other.
First, define fundamental rights.
Yet you support a political party that designs every policy remove around destroying the family unit and making all children property of the state.
That comment was honestly not even worth responding to. It was so logically flawed.
Featured Stories
See All
Elko: RB Moss out for remainder of 2024 season due to injury
by Olin Buchanan
Brauny's Best: Highlighting top high school performances from Week 10
by Ryan Brauninger
No. 13 Texas A&M shocked by UCF in season-opening upset, 64-61
by Luke Evangelist
11:14
1h ago
472
5 Thoughts: UCF 64, No. 13 Texas A&M 61
by Luke Evangelist